Search

• Three different leaf litters mulches were applied on compacted soils of skid trails. • The effect of mulches on runoff, sediment, and water holding capacity were studied. • The water holding capacity was higher in beech litter than hornbeam and maple. • Runoff and sediment yield significantly decreased as leaf litter rate increased. The surface of the mineral soil is covered by the forest floor forming water absorbent layers. This is how the forest floor plays an important role in soil and water conservation. The aim of this study was to individualize three leaf litters (beech, hornbeam, and maple) applied at three density rates (6, 12, and 18 Mg ha−1) to assess their soil protection capacities. A total of nine treatments were conducted (i.e., beech6, beech12, beech18, hornbeam6, hornbeam12, hornbeam18, maple6, maple12, maple18) on skid-compacted soils in the Hyrcanian forests of northern Iran to evaluate effects at reducing runoff and sediment yield, and to determine the oven-dry weights and water holding capacity of litters. A total of nine runoff plots with dimensions of 1 × 2 m were established on the skid trails during the study period from September to December 2017 in a field experiment under natural rainfall. At the study period, 29 events with a total of 752.2 mm rainfall were measured in the open space area, that 26% of the rainfall was intercepted by canopy cover. Regardless of leaf litter species, the runoff and sediment yield significantly decreased as the leaf litter rate increased. The average runoff in litter plots of beech, hornbeam, and maple was 102.71, 94.25, and 116.87 mm, whereas the average sediment yield was 27.07, 22.33, and 36.73 g m−2 for the study period, respectively. The mean water holding capacity of beech, hornbeam, and maple litter plots amounted to 84.1, 59.16, and 25.81 mm for the study period, respectively. Our study shows that the different species of leaf litter have a diverse range of hydrological functions and litter water holding capacities, which reduced runoff and sediment yield. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Some forest areas of northern Iran are characterized by extreme water repellency. • An adapted version of SWAP4 model used to compute soil water fluxes and runoff. • Water repellency decreases water infiltration and increases runoff generation. • Water repellency reduces evaporation from the soil surface. Water repellent or non-wetting soils show poor water infiltration, which leads to an increased runoff in both natural and agricultural setting. Some forest areas of northern Iran are characterized by extreme water repellency, which makes their soil hydrological response highly complex. A field experiment was carried out to study the effect of water repellency on water movement and runoff in coarse-textured soil covered in Pinus teada in northwestern Iran. An adapted version of the popular agrohydrological model SWAP (Soil, Water, Atmosphere and Plant) has been used to evaluate the modelling of soil water flow and runoff generation. Water repellency was accounted for by multiplying the soil water content and the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of soil with the F factor. This factor is equal to the volumetric fraction of soil occupied by preferential flow paths. Twenty-seven rainfall experiments were carried out under artificial rainfall using soils with various wettability levels and various rainfall intensities (14 mm/h, 27 mm/h and 34 mm/h). The result show that during the summer and early autumn (May to October) the soil became extreme repellent and runoff was formed when the soils were dry (θ < 2 %) and the rain intensity was more than 27 mm/h. Also, we investigated the role of the repellent layer on evaporation losses. The results of laboratory and simulation data confirm that water repellency reduces evaporation from the soil surface. Comparing modelling results with field data shows that an assumption of uniform flow in water repellent soil leads to an overestimation of soil water content and an underestimation of runoff. After incorporating water repellency in SWAP with the mobile–immobile concept, the agreement between measured and model simulation data considerably improved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]