1. In vivo Effectiveness of Laser Fluorescence Compared to Visual Inspection and Radiography for the Detection of Occlusal Caries in Primary Teeth
- Author
-
Célia Regina Martins Delgado Rodrigues, Rachel de Oliveira Rocha, Thiago Machado Ardenghi, Luciana Butini Oliveira, and Ana Lídia Ciamponi
- Subjects
Molar ,Radiography ,Laser fluorescence ,Dentistry ,Dental Caries ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,Fluorescence ,In vivo ,Dentin ,medicine ,Humans ,Tooth, Deciduous ,Child ,Dental Enamel ,Radiography, Bitewing ,Tooth Demineralization ,General Dentistry ,Observer Variation ,Enamel paint ,business.industry ,Lasers ,Reproducibility of Results ,Gold standard (test) ,Visual inspection ,stomatognathic diseases ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Photography, Dental ,visual_art ,visual_art.visual_art_medium ,business - Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vivo effectiveness of laser fluorescence compared to visual inspection and radiography for the detection of occlusal caries in primary teeth. Fifty sites from 30 molars in 29 patients were selected and evaluated under standardized conditions by 2 previously trained examiners according to the 3 diagnostic methods. Histological examination served as gold standard after exfoliation or extraction. Values obtained for sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 0.60, 0.90 and 0.73 for laser fluorescence, 0.82, 0.85 and 0.84 for visual inspection and 0.62, 0.73 and 0.67 for radiography, respectively. Considering only dentinal caries, values were 0.73, 0.95 and 0.90 for laser fluorescence, 0.61, 1.00 and 0.90 for visual inspection and 0.96, 0.81 and 0.85 for radiography, respectively. We conclude that for the detection of occlusal caries in primary molars laser fluorescence presents a similar accuracy when compared to visual inspection and radiography, although visual inspection showed better values for sensitivities for both enamel and dentin lesions.
- Published
- 2003
- Full Text
- View/download PDF