Search

Introduction The antihistaminic antazoline ( ANT) was reported to be highly effective and safe for rapid conversion of atrial fibrillation ( AF). We therefore analyzed underlying mechanisms in an experimental whole-heart model. Methods and Results Isolated and retrogradely perfused rabbit hearts underwent a standardized protocol employing atrial burst pacing-induced AF in five of 20 hearts under baseline conditions (seven episodes). Thereafter, a combination of acetylcholine and isoproterenol was employed to enhance AF occurrence. Two monophasic action potential recordings on the left- and two on the right atrial epicardium showed a decrease in atrial action potential duration ( aAPD, −25 msec, P<.05) and atrial effective refractory period ( aERP; −52 msec, P<.01) after infusion of acetylcholine (1 μmol/L) and isoproterenol (1 μmol/L). This led to induction of AF in 14 of 20 hearts (145 episodes). Simultaneous infusion of ANT (20 μmol/L) led to a complete suppression of AF in all inducible hearts. Treatment with ANT also led to a significant increase in aAPD (+41 msec, P<.01) and aERP (+74 msec, P<.05), leading to a marked increase in atrial postrepolarization refractoriness ( aPRR, +33 msec, P<.01). Results were compared to 13 rabbits treated with flecainide. Flecainide induced a significant increase in aPRR and resulted in induction of AF in seven of 13 hearts (51 episodes) while 11 of 13 hearts were inducible with acetylcholine and isoproterenol (93 episodes). Conclusion Administration of ANT was highly effective in suppressing AF. The antiarrhythmic effect could be explained by a significant increase in postrepolarization refractoriness as a result of a more marked increase in aERP as compared with aAPD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Introduction: Options for a pharmacological cardioversion (CV) of short‐duration atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with a stable coronary artery disease (CAD) are limited to amiodarone or vernakalant. Antazoline has been reported to achieve high rates of AF conversion to sinus rhythm, but data on its effectiveness and, more importantly, safety in stable CAD patients, have been sparse. Aims: To assess the effectiveness and safety of antazoline‐based therapy in patients with a stable CAD undergoing pharmacological CV of short‐duration AF in the emergency department (ED). Results: A retrospective case‐control study. We conducted an analysis of medical records of patients with a stable CAD undergoing CV of short duration (≤48 hours) AF in the ED using intravenous antazoline. The main endpoints of the study were successful cardioversion of AF and hospitalization due to the adverse effects (AE) of the treatment. Between 2008 and 2012, out of 548 CVs, antazoline was administered 334 times: 138 in CAD and 196 in the control group. Patients in the CAD group were older and had more comorbidities than controls; 65 patients had had a history of myocardial infarction (MI). In CAD group, the effectiveness was higher (82.6% vs 63.8%, RB: 1.30 [95% CI: 1.14‐1.48], P = 0.0002) and the hospitalization rate due to AE was similar (1.4% vs 4.1%, RR: 0.36 [95% CI: 0.08‐1.65], P = 0.2054) to the control group. Among patients with CAD, a history of MI did not influence the effectiveness or safety of the CV (P = 0.2252 and P = 1.0000, respectively). Conclusions: In selected patients with a stable CAD, even with a history of MI, antazoline‐based CV of short‐duration AF may be an effective and safe therapeutic option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]