Search

Aim: To compare the long-term outcomes of patients implanted with Absorb bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) with optimal versus suboptimal technique., Methods and Results: All patients who received an Absorb between March 2012 and January 2016 were selected from 19 Italian centers databases to assess the impact of an optimal implantation technique (CIAO criteria) on long-term device-oriented composite end-point (DOCE) - including cardiac death (CD), target-vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI) and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR) - on its single components and on scaffold thrombosis (ScT). CIAO criteria consist of predilation (balloon/vessel ratio 1:1), correct sizing (BRS/proximal reference vessel diameter -RVD- ratio 0.8-1.2) and high-pressure postdilation with non-compliant (NC) balloon (≥20 atm for balloon/BRS ratio 1:1 or ≥16 atm for a 0.25-0.5 mm oversized balloon). Among the 1.434 patients analyzed, 464 (32.4%) fulfilled all CIAO criteria for every BRS implanted (CIAO 3 group), while 970 (67.6%) did not in at least one of the received BRS (CIAO 0-1-2 group). At 31.0 (interquartile range -IQR- 24.8-38.5) months follow-up, CIAO criteria did not impact on DOCE (8.2% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.92), ID-TLR (6.9% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.72) or ScT (1.9% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.80) in the overall population. At multivariate analysis overall BRS length (p = 0.001), severely calcified lesions (p = 0.03) and absence of CIAO criteria (CIAO 0, p = 0.005) were independent predictors of DOCE in long-term follow-up., Conclusion: Our data suggest that strict application of an optimal Absorb implantation technique doesn't improve long-term DOCE or ScT but may mitigate the worse outcome of patients with calcific lesions., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest B.C., A.S.P. and F.R. report being member of the advisory board of Abbott Vascular and speakers' honoraria from Abbott Vascular; E.C., M.D.C. and F.V. reports speakers' honoraria from Abbott Vascular. The other authors have no conflict of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Our study sought to compare the 12-month clinical outcome of patients treated with paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCB) vs. sirolimus-coated balloons (SCB) during coronary angioplasty., Background: Drug-coated balloons represent an established therapeutic tool for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). A comparison between PCB and SCB is still lacking., Methods: We performed an indirect comparison between two cohorts of patients previously included into two investigator-driven registries with clinical primary endpoints, 494 treated with the Elutax SV PCB (AR Baltic, Lithuania) from the DCB RISE registry, and 596 treated with the Magic Touch SCB (Concept Medical, India) from the EASTBOURNE registry. The primary endpoint was the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 12-month clinical follow-up., Results: After propensity score matching, a total of 580 patients were well matched for baseline clinical and procedural characteristics and were analyzed. At 12 months there was no significant difference between the matched DCB RISE and EASTBOURNE cohorts in terms of the primary endpoint MACE (10.3% DCB RISE vs. 10.7% EASTBOURNE, p = 0.892). No significant difference was observed also regarding the rate of TLR (7.9% DCB RISE vs. 8.3% EASTBOURNE; p = 0.879, respectively). By multivariate analysis, insulin-dependent diabetes was the only predictor of MACE., Conclusions: In the SIRPAC study, the first indirect comparison between paclitaxel-coated and sirolimus coated balloons, no significant difference in clinical endpoints were found at 12-month follow-up. Randomized studies are necessary to confirm these findings., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Authors have no competing interest for this manuscript and no relationship with industry., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Optimal treatment of renal artery "in-stent restenosis" (ISR) is still debated; drug eluting stents (DES), drug coated balloons (DCB) and scoring balloons have all been used, with mixed long term results. The shockwave lithotripsy for the treatment of heavily calcified atherosclerotic plaques has proven to be an effective tool and preliminary data support its use in case of underexpanded stents. Here we present the case of a 60 year old male with a known significant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis and refractory hypertension who already underwent bilateral renal angioplasty with bare metal stents (BMS) in 2011 and angioplasty with DCB in 2012 for right renal artery ISR. In May 2020 he presented with worsening hypertension and CT scan showed total occlusion of the right with critical ISR of the left renal artery. Because of the high calcium burden he underwent balloon lithotripsy for plaque modification and subsequent renal angioplasty with sirolimus and paclitaxel DCB, with a good angiographic result. This is the first case of recurrent renal ISR successfully treated with Shockwave IVL and double-drug DCB therapy., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The aim of the Nanoluté registry was to observe the clinical performance of a novel sirolimus coated balloon (SCB) (Concept Medical Research Private Limited, India) for the treatment of coronary de-novo and restenotic lesions., Methods: All patients treated with SCB between July 2012 and September 2015 were enrolled at Indian centres and clinically followed for 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post-procedure. Primary endpoints were procedural success and device-oriented adverse cardiac events (DOCE) at 12 months. DOCE were defined as a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and target vessel-myocardial infarction., Results: A total of 394 SCB were used in 332 patients to treat 356 lesions. In-stent restenosis and small coronary vessel disease occurred in 46% and 43% of the patients respectively. Mean balloon length and diameter (average ± SD) were 21.83 ± 6.70 mm and 2.69 ± 0.45 mm respectively. All patients with 1 year follow-up were included. Overall DOCE rate was 4.2% (n = 14) which included death 0.3% (n = 1), TLR 3.6% (n = 12) and myocardial infarction 0.3% (n = 1)., Conclusion: The Nanoluté prospective registry, is the first clinical evidence of the safety and feasibility of this type of SCB, both in patients with in-stent restenosis or de novo lesions., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In the recent years percutaneous treatment of the left main stem (LM) has gained a precise role as a result of consistent scientific evidence vs. coronary artery bypass. A self-apposing stent offers an improved adaptation to the vessel wall, especially in case of tapered vessels; aim of this study was to investigate the role of a novel self-apposing, sirolimus-eluting stent (Stentys, France) for the treatment of LM coronary artery disease., Methods and Results: MATISSE is a retrospective, multicenter registry, which enrolled 151 patients treated with the device at 17 international centers. Primary study endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite endpoint of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and target-vessel myocardial infarction, at 9months clinical follow-up. Secondary endpoints included procedural success, the single determinants of MACE and stent thrombosis. Lesions were located in distal LM bifurcation in 84% of the patients. Procedural success was achieved in 150 patients. The average follow-up length was 348±52days. MACE occurred in 14 (9.3%) patients with 2 (1.3%) cardiac deaths. TLR occurred in 8 patients (5.3%). There were 2 cases of definite stent thrombosis, 1 acute and 1 very late., Conclusions: A self-apposing stent, when used for LM PCI in a real world, high risk population, showed good immediate procedural results with low rates of adverse events at mid-term follow-up., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Percutaneous treatment of the unprotected left main trunk (ULM), defined as a vessel without patent bypass graft either to the left circumflex (LCX) or left anterior descending (LAD) artery, has gained a precise role thanks to recent scientific evidence. Although new generation drug-eluting stents have already proven to be safer, there is still a consistent risk of restenosis and late adverse events. The optimal management of a ULM restenosis is still debated. Here we aim at presenting a review of the available data in literature and show our choice for treating it., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Drug-coated balloons (DCB) are being used for in-stent restenosis treatment and there is some preliminary experience in other coronary settings, including small vessels and side branches. Scoring balloons (SB) are a useful tool for the preparation of fibro-calcific lesions. Because of the controlled micro-dissections that SB induce, it has been hypothesized that they may have a role in helping paclitaxel deliverability inside the vessel wall. The AngioSculpt®X (Spectranetics) is a novel paclitaxel-coated SB with encouraging preliminary data for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. We here describe our first experience treating two de novo coronary lesions with angiographic follow up., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purposes: Drug-coated balloons (DCB) currently represent an alternative to drug-eluting stents (DES) for the treatment of in-stent restenosis and they are also variably used for small coronary vessel and bifurcation lesion management. All DCB variably elute paclitaxel as an anti-proliferative drug. The first sirolimus coated balloon (SCB) received the CE mark in 2016, but its clinical performance has not been shown yet., Methods and Results: FASICO in an all-comer registry of the first consecutive patients with at least one lesion treated with SCB between March and July 2016 at the first European centre that used this device. All patients were prospectively enrolled in a dedicated database. Primary endpoint was procedural success; co-primary endpoint was the rate of major adverse cardiac events at short-term follow-up. The 32 patients (34 lesions) enrolled had at least 6-month clinical follow up available. Forty-five percent had diabetes and indication to PCI was ISR in 47% of the cases. Lesions were always pre-dilated and device deployment was successful in all the cases. Procedural success was achieved in 100% of patients. We observed 3 cases of TLR at follow-up., Conclusions: SCB shows high immediate technical performance and adequate short-term efficacy and safety. The ongoing EASTBOURNE registry will shed light on mid-and long-term performance of this device in an adequately powered population., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of drug-coated balloons (DCB) for the management of bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) restenosis., Methods and Results: In a series of 25 BVS restenosis discovered during systematic angiographic follow up of 246 consecutive BVS implantations at our institution, DCB was used as a primary therapeutic tool in 9 patients and 3 different types of DCB were used. Follow-up coronary angiography at 12months after DCB treatment was performed to all the patients. Among the 9 patients treated with DCB, angiographic follow up revealed failure in two patients that experienced type III restenosis (both of them treated with the same type of DCB). Both patients were treated with drug eluting stent implantation., Conclusions: In this case series of consecutive patients with BVS restenosis, the use of certain types of DCB is safe and effective in order to maintain vessel patency at mid-term follow up. Despite the small sample size and the study limitations, DCB can provide therefore an alternative treatment option in this setting, avoiding the implantation of further metallic stents in a patient where a different strategy was initially planned., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Due to the inherent limitations of current generation BVSs, complex coronary artery disease often contains BVS unsuitable segments. Our aim was to assess the feasibility of a hybrid approach using bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVSs) and drug-eluting stents (DESs) for the treatment of complex coronary artery lesions not suitable for a scaffolding only approach., Methods: A retrospective multicenter cohort analysis was performed on patients with complex de novo or in-stent restenosis lesions treated with a hybrid BVS (Absorb BVS, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA) and DES strategy. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF) defined as a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction (MI) and target lesion revascularization (TLR)., Results: A total of 98 patients (105 lesions) were treated with the hybrid strategy. Isolated long lesions in which either proximal or distal reference vessel diameters were not suitable for BVS were an indication in 36.2% (n=38) of cases. In contrast, 28% (n=29) of lesions treated with the hybrid strategy were bifurcations in which the side branch was predominantly treated with DES (n=28). DES bailout after BVS implantation was an indication in 21.9% (n=23 lesions). The rates of type B2/C and long lesions (>28mm) were 95.2% and 74.3% respectively. The mean total BVS and DES lengths implanted were 37.5±24.1mm and 25.0±14.7mm respectively. The rate of TLF in the overall cohort of patients (median follow-up 405days [interquartile range 189-658]) was 11.4% at 1-year. This was primarily driven by TLR (9.5%), with rates of cardiac death and target vessel MI of 2.1% and 1.4% respectively. No cases of definite or probable BVS/DES thrombosis occurred., Conclusion: In conclusion, the use of a hybrid BVS/DES strategy was feasible and associated with acceptable outcomes at 1-year, considering the length and complexity of lesions treated. Further, larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm our findings., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)