Search

To assess the usefulness of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for the hepatic arterial injury related to percutaneous transhepatic portal intervention (PTPI). Fifty-four patients, 32 males and 22 females with a median age of 68 years (range 43–82 years), underwent PTPI. The procedures consisted of 33 percutaneous transhepatic portal vein embolizations, 19 percutaneous transhepatic variceal embolizations, and 2 percutaneous transhepatic portal venous stent placements. Two patients with gastric varices underwent percutaneous transhepatic variceal embolization twice because of recurrence. Therefore, the total number of procedures was 56. Among them, hepatic arterial injury occurred in 6 PTPIs in 5 patients, and TAE was performed. We assessed technical success, complications related to TAE, and clinical outcome. Technical success was defined as the disappearance of findings due to hepatic arterial injury on digital subtraction angiography. As hepatic arterial injuries, 4 extravasations and 2 arterioportal shunts developed. All TAEs were performed successfully. The technical success rate was 100 %. Complication of TAE occurred in 5 of 6 TAEs; 3 were focal liver infarction, not requiring further treatment, and 2 were biloma that required percutaneous drainage. Five TAEs in 4 patients were performed immediately after the PTPI, and these 4 patients were alive. However, one TAE was performed 10 h later, and the patient died due to multiple organ failure 2 months later although TAE was successful. TAE is a useful treatment for hepatic arterial injury related to PTPI. However, it should be performed at an early stage.

The aim of this study is to analyze the technical and clinical success rates and safety of transarterial fiducial marker placement for image-guided proton therapy for malignant liver tumors. Fifty-five patients underwent this procedure as an interventional treatment. Five patients had 2 tumors, and 4 tumors required 2 markers each, so the total number of procedures was 64. The 60 tumors consisted of 46 hepatocellular carcinomas and 14 liver metastases. Five-mm-long straight microcoils of 0.018 inches in diameter were used as fiducial markers and placed in appropriate positions for each tumor. We assessed the technical and clinical success rates of transarterial fiducial marker placement, as well as the complications associated with it. Technical success was defined as the successful delivery and placement of the fiducial coil, and clinical success was defined as the completion of proton therapy. All 64 fiducial coils were successfully installed, so the technical success rate was 100 % (64/64). Fifty-four patients underwent proton therapy without coil migration. In one patient, proton therapy was not performed because of obstructive jaundice due to bile duct invasion by hepatocellular carcinoma. Thus, the clinical success rate was 98 % (54/55). Slight bleeding was observed in one case, but it was stopped immediately and then observed. None of the patients developed hepatic infarctions due to fiducial marker migration. Transarterial fiducial marker placement appears to be a useful and safe procedure for proton therapy for malignant liver tumors.