Search

Simple Summary: New forms of cancer treatment are needed to target resistant cancers or reduce severe side effects associated with some treatments. Cold Atmospheric Plasma (CAP) has demonstrated promising anti-cancer effects in several types of cancer, not only by direct application onto cancer cells, but also by indirect treatment using activation of liquids, such as water. Although the exact mechanism of action and underlying signaling pathways are yet to be discovered, CAP has the potential to be combined with traditional therapies, such as chemotherapy. This study investigates a new approach for treating brain cancer by combining a conventional cancer drug with plasma-activated water, which is produced by exposing water to plasma. The reactive chemical species in these solutions may help to kill the cancer cells and reduce the amount of drug that is needed. Not only were the combined treatments able to interfere with cell metabolism and increase cell death, but they also reduced the long-term cell proliferation. This study provides evidence that indirect CAP-derived approaches could be used in combination with chemotherapeutics for prospective treatment of brain cancer. The increase in cancer diagnoses and cancer deaths, severe side effects of existing treatments and resistance to traditional treatments have generated a need for new anticancer treatments. Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common, malignant and aggressive brain cancer. Despite many innovations regarding GBM treatment, the final outcome is still very poor, making it necessary to develop new therapeutic approaches. Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) as well as plasma-activated liquids (PAL) are being studied as new possible approaches against cancer. The anticancer activity of PAL such as "plasma-activated water" (PAW) is dependent on the reactive chemical compounds present in the solution. Possible combinatory effects with conventional therapies, such as chemotherapeutics, may expand the potential of PAL for cancer treatment. We aim to explore the therapeutic properties of a combination of PAW and topotecan (TPT), an antineoplastic agent with major cytotoxic effects during the S phase of the cell cycle, on a GBM cancer cell line (U-251mg). Combined treatments with PAW and TPT showed a reduction in the metabolic activity and cell mass, an increase in apoptotic cell death and a reduction in the long-term survival. Single applications of PAW+TPT treatments showed a cytotoxic effect in the short term and an antiproliferative effect in the long term, warranting future exploration of combining PAW with chemotherapeutic agents as new therapeutic approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Uveal Melanoma (UM) is a rare and malignant intraocular tumor with dismal prognosis. Despite efficient control of the primary tumor by radiation or surgery, up to 50% of patients subsequently develop metastases, mainly in the liver. The treatment of UM metastases is challenging and the patient survival is very poor. Today, most of the tested treatments including inhibitors of protein kinase C (PKC), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) or immune checkpoint blockade have been largely ineffective in patients with metastatic UM. Given that single-agent targeted therapies often activate compensatory mechanisms, combination strategies are relevant to evaluate in UM in preclinical and clinical settings. Our study confirms the previously described synergy of the dual inhibition of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and MEK, and identifies a novel combination of drugs (FAK and PKC inhibitors) as a promising strategy for therapeutic intervention in metastatic UM. Uveal Melanoma (UM) is a rare and malignant intraocular tumor with dismal prognosis. Even if radiation or surgery permit an efficient control of the primary tumor, up to 50% of patients subsequently develop metastases, mainly in the liver. The treatment of UM metastases is challenging and the patient survival is very poor. The most recurrent event in UM is the activation of Gαq signaling induced by mutations in GNAQ/11. These mutations activate downstream effectors including protein kinase C (PKC) and mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK). Clinical trials with inhibitors of these targets have not demonstrated a survival benefit for patients with UM metastasis. Recently, it has been shown that GNAQ promotes YAP activation through the focal adhesion kinase (FAK). Pharmacological inhibition of MEK and FAK showed remarkable synergistic growth-inhibitory effects in UM both in vitro and in vivo. In this study, we have evaluated the synergy of the FAK inhibitor with a series of inhibitors targeting recognized UM deregulated pathways in a panel of cell lines. The combined inhibition of FAK and MEK or PKC had highly synergistic effects by reducing cell viability and inducing apoptosis. Furthermore, we demonstrated that these combinations exert a remarkable in vivo activity in UM patient-derived xenografts. Our study confirms the previously described synergy of the dual inhibition of FAK and MEK and identifies a novel combination of drugs (FAK and PKC inhibitors) as a promising strategy for therapeutic intervention in metastatic UM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) is a type of blood cancer that is currently well-managed with drugs that target cancer-causing proteins. However, a significant proportion of CML patients do not respond to those drug treatments or relapse when they stop those drugs because the cancer cells in those patients stop relying on that protein and instead develop a new way to survive. Therefore, new treatment strategies may be necessary for those patients. In this review, we discuss those additional survival pathways and outline combination treatment strategies to increase responses and clinical outcomes, improving the lives of CML patients. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionised the management of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), with the disease now having a five-year survival rate over 80%. The primary focus in the treatment of CML has been on improving the specificity and potency of TKIs to inhibit the activation of the BCR:ABL1 kinase and/or overcoming resistance driven by mutations in the BCR:ABL1 oncogene. However, this approach may be limited in a significant proportion of patients who develop TKI resistance despite the effective inhibition of BCR:ABL1. These patients may require novel therapeutic strategies that target both BCR:ABL1-dependent and BCR:ABL1-independent mechanisms of resistance. The combination treatment strategies that target alternative survival signalling, which may contribute towards BCR:ABL1-independent resistance, could be a successful strategy for eradicating residual leukaemic cells and consequently increasing the response rate in CML patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]