1. Head-to-Head Comparison: P-POSSUM and ACS-NSQIP ® in Predicting Perioperative Risk in Robotic Surgery for Gynaecological Cancers.
- Author
-
Sevinyan, Lusine, Asaalaarchchi, Hasanthi, Tailor, Anil, Williams, Peter, Evans, Matthew, Hodnett, Darragh, Arakkal, Darshana, Prabhu, Pradeep, Flint, Melanie S., and Madhuri, Thumuluru Kavitha
- Subjects
- *
PREDICTIVE tests , *SURGICAL robots , *RISK assessment , *RESEARCH funding , *PREDICTION models , *RECEIVER operating characteristic curves , *VEINS , *LOGISTIC regression analysis , *DECISION making , *PREOPERATIVE care , *RETROSPECTIVE studies , *TERTIARY care , *DESCRIPTIVE statistics , *SURGICAL complications , *FEMALE reproductive organ tumors , *DISEASES , *CONVALESCENCE , *MEDICAL records , *ACQUISITION of data , *THROMBOEMBOLISM , *QUALITY assurance , *DATA analysis software , *RELIABILITY (Personality trait) , *HEALTH care teams , *SENSITIVITY & specificity (Statistics) , *EVALUATION , *DISEASE risk factors ,RESEARCH evaluation - Abstract
Simple Summary: Estimating the risk of postoperative complications is important for shared decision-making with the patient. This also helps multidisciplinary teams to plan preoperative management and postoperative care and predict duration of recovery. In this retrospective pilot study, we aim to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the P-POSSUM and ACS-NSQIP surgical risk calculators in predicting postoperative complications in gynaecological–oncological (GO) robotic surgery (RS). We were able to demonstrate that the ACS-NSQIP risk tool showed 90% accuracy in prediction of five major complications and mortality. Purpose: In this retrospective pilot study, we aim to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the P-POSSUM and ACS-NSQIP surgical risk calculators in predicting postoperative complications in gynaecological–oncological (GO) robotic surgery (RS). Methods: Retrospective data collection undertaken through a dedicated GO database and patient notes at a tertiary referral cancer centre. Following data lock with the actual post-op event/complication, the risk calculators were used to measure predictive scores for each patient. Baseline analysis of 153 patients, based on statistician advice, was undertaken to evaluate P-POSSUM and ACS-NSQIP validity and relevance in GO patients undergoing RS performed. Results: P-POSSUM reports on mortality and morbidity only; ACS-NSQIP reports some individual complications as well. ACS-NSQIP risk prediction was most accurate for venous thromboembolism (VTE) (area under the curve (AUC)-0.793) and pneumonia (AUC-0.657) and it showed 90% accuracy in prediction of five major complications (Brier score 0.01). Morbidity was much better predicted by ACS-NSQIP than by P-POSSUM (AUC-0.608 vs. AUC-0.551) with the same result in mortality prediction (Brier score 0.0000). Moreover, a statistically significant overestimation of morbidity has been shown by the P-POSSUM calculator (p = 0.018). Conclusions: Despite the limitations of this pilot study, the ACS-NSQIP risk calculator appears to be a better predictor of major complications and mortality, making it suitable for use by GO surgeons as an informed consent tool. Larger data collection and analyses are ongoing to validate this further. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF