Search

Simple Summary Epithelial ovarian cancer is one of the most lethal cancers in women and is typically diagnosed at an advanced-stage. Historically, primary tumor reductive surgery was attempted followed by postoperative chemotherapy in most patients diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer. However, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval tumor reductive surgery is an alternative approach for patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer where primary tumor reductive surgery is not feasible. Here, we review proposed models that can assist in selecting patients who would benefit most from neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. Abstract Epithelial ovarian cancer remains a leading cause of death amongst all gynecologic cancers despite advances in surgical and medical therapy. Historically, patients with ovarian cancer underwent primary tumor reductive surgery followed by postoperative chemotherapy; however, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval tumor reductive surgery has gradually become an alternative approach for patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer for whom primary tumor reductive surgery is not feasible. Decision-making about the use of these approaches has not been uniform. Hence, it is essential to identify patients who can benefit most from neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval tumor reductive surgery. Several prospective and retrospective studies have proposed potential models to guide upfront decision-making for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. In this review, we summarize important decision-making models that can improve patient selection for personalized treatment. Models based on clinical factors (clinical parameters, radiology studies and laparoscopy scoring) and molecular markers (circulating and tumor-based) are useful, but laparoscopic staging is among the most informative diagnostic methods for upfront decision-making in patients medically fit for surgery. Further research is needed to explore more reliable models to determine personalized treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Background: The impact of chemotherapy response score (CRS) on prognosis has varied among studies. We addressed the prognostic significance of CRS and the prognostic value of previously undescribed histologic features using a cohort of 245 patients. Methods: Retrospective study in patients with advanced extrauterine high-grade serous carcinomas treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval tumor reductive surgery from 1990 to 2018 in our hospital. Gynecologic pathologists assessed tumor CRS and other histologic features. Clinical information was collected, and multivariate analyses were conducted. Results: A modified 2 tier CRS (CRS 1/2 versus CRS 3) was significantly associated, independent of scoring site (omental versus adnexal), with overall survival (OS) (omentum, p = 0.018, adnexa, p = 0.042, entire cohort, p = 0.002) and progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.021, p = 0.035, and p = 0.001, respectively). On multivariate survival analysis, 2 tier CRS, oncocytic change, inflammation, and desmoplasia were significant for OS (p = 0.034, p = 0.020, p = 0.007, and p = 0.010, respectively). Likewise, 2 tier CRS, inflammation, and desmoplasia were significant for PFS (p = 0.012, p = 0.003, p = 0.011, respectively). Conclusions: The modified 2 tier CRS was significantly associated with survival, independent of scoring site. Additional histologic features including oncocytic change, inflammation, and desmoplasia can also predict patient outcomes.