Search

Simple Summary: Trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE) can effectively treat patients with locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, TARE is not widely used in clinical practice due to the lack of consensus on how to select the best candidates for this therapy. Therefore, it is crucial to find predictive biomarkers or clinical parameters that can differentiate the patients who will respond well to TARE and improve their outcomes. Low skeletal muscle mass (LSMM) is one of the factors that affects the prognosis of HCC patients and has been extensively studied in relation to different treatments. We used a semi-automated program that has been validated and proven to be reliable for assessing LSMM. In this study, we aimed to identify prognostic factors, including pre-treatment LSMM, for survival outcomes in patients with HCC undergoing TARE. Trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE) is a form of radiation therapy performed for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) via selective intra-arterial injection of Yttrium-90-loaded microspheres. This was a multi-center retrospective study of consecutive patients with HCC who underwent TARE between July 2009 and May 2019. Using pre-treatment computed tomography imaging, the total cross-sectional area (cm2) of the abdominal skeletal muscle at the third lumbar vertebra was measured. The skeletal muscle index (SMI) was calculated by normalizing the muscle area to patient height. In total, 347 patients (median age, 65 years; 284 male) were included in the study. A total of 108 (31.1%) patients had portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT), and 126 (36.3%) were classified as LSMM. The median overall survival (OS) was 28.1 months (95% CI, 24.8–35.7), and median progression-free survival was 8.0 months (95% CI, 6.4–9.4). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that LSMM (hazard ratio [HR], 1.36; 95% CI, 1.00–1.85, p = 0.05), PVTT (HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.33–2.49, p < 0.01), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) (≥200 ng/mL) (HR 1.41; 95% CI, 1.04–1.92, p = 0.03), and albumin–bilirubin grade (2–3) (HR 1.74; 95% CI, 1.24–2.43, p < 0.01) were independently associated with poor OS. TARE provided favorable long-term outcomes for patients with advanced HCC. Pre-treatment LSMM independently associated with survival, suggesting its utility as a surrogate biomarker for identifying TARE candidates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This multicenter cohort study is the first to compare the clinical outcomes between the Atezolizumab-plus-bevacizumab (Ate/Bev) and transarterial-chemoembolization-plus-radiotherapy (TACE + RT) therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) who had no metastasis. Through detailed analyses, our study revealed that the Ate/Bev treatment provided superior one-year survival compared to the TACE + RT treatment. The superior outcome of the Ate/Bev therapy was constantly observed in patients with an extensive HCC burden. Meanwhile, patients with unilobar disease demonstrated comparable outcomes between the two treatment groups. Finally, in the propensity score-matching analysis, both one-year survival and progression-free survival rates were higher in the Ate/Bev treatment group. These results suggest that Ate/Bev treatment should be considered as the primary treatment option for HCC patients with PVTT. With respect to TACE + RT, this could also be considered as an alternative treatment option alongside Ate/Bev therapy in patients with unilobar intrahepatic HCC. This study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes of atezolizumab-plus-bevacizumab (Ate/Bev) therapy with those of transarterial chemoembolization plus radiotherapy (TACE + RT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) and without metastasis. Between June 2016 and October 2022, we consecutively enrolled 855 HCC patients with PVTT. After excluding 758 patients, 97 patients (n = 37 in the Ate/Bev group; n = 60 in the TACE + RT group) were analyzed. The two groups showed no significant differences in baseline characteristics and had similar objective response and disease control rates. However, the Ate/Bev group showed a significantly higher one-year survival rate (p = 0.041) compared to the TACE + RT group, which was constantly displayed in patients with extensive HCC burden. Meanwhile, the clinical outcomes were comparable between the two groups in patients with unilobar intrahepatic HCC. In Cox-regression analysis, Ate/Bev treatment emerged as a significant factor for better one-year survival (p = 0.049). Finally, in propensity-score matching, the Ate/Bev group demonstrated a better one-year survival (p = 0.02) and PFS (p = 0.01) than the TACE + RT group. In conclusion, Ate/Bev treatment demonstrated superior clinical outcomes compared to TACE + RT treatment in HCC patients with PVTT. Meanwhile, in patients with unilobar intrahepatic HCC, TACE + RT could also be considered as an alternative treatment option alongside Ate/Bev therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]