Search

The authors would like to make a correction to their published paper [...]

Most meningiomas are slow growing tumors arising from the arachnoid cap cells and can be cured by surgical resection or radiation therapy in selected cases. However, recurrent and aggressive cases are also quite common and challenging to treat due to no established treatment alternatives. Assessment of the risk of recurrence is therefore of utmost importance and several prognostic clinical and molecular markers have been established. Additionally, the identification of invasive growth of meningioma cells into CNS tissue was demonstrated to lead to a higher risk of recurrence and was therefore integrated into the WHO classification of CNS tumors. However, the evidence for its prognostic impact has been questioned in subsequent studies and its exclusion from the next WHO classification proposed. We were recently able to show the prognostic impact of CNS invasion in a large comprehensive retrospective meningioma cohort including other established prognostic factors. In this review we discuss the growing experiences that have been gained on this matter, with a focus on the currently nonuniform histopathological assessment, imaging characteristics and intraoperative sampling as well as the overall outlook on the future role of this potential prognostic factor.

Simple Summary Meningiomas are benign tumors of the meninges and represent the most common primary brain tumor. Most tumors can be cured by surgical excision or stabilized by radiation therapy. However, recurrent cases are difficult to treat and alternatives to surgery and radiation are lacking. Therefore, a reliable prognostic marker is important for early identification of patients at risk. The presence of infiltrative growth of meningioma cells into central nervous system tissue has been identified as a negative prognostic factor and was therefore included in the latest WHO classification for CNS tumors. Since then, the clinical impact of CNS invasion has been questioned by different retrospective studies and its removal from the WHO classification has been suggested. There may be several reasons for the emergence of conflicting results on this matter, which are discussed in this review together with the potential and future perspectives of the role of CNS invasion in meningiomas. Abstract Most meningiomas are slow growing tumors arising from the arachnoid cap cells and can be cured by surgical resection or radiation therapy in selected cases. However, recurrent and aggressive cases are also quite common and challenging to treat due to no established treatment alternatives. Assessment of the risk of recurrence is therefore of utmost importance and several prognostic clinical and molecular markers have been established. Additionally, the identification of invasive growth of meningioma cells into CNS tissue was demonstrated to lead to a higher risk of recurrence and was therefore integrated into the WHO classification of CNS tumors. However, the evidence for its prognostic impact has been questioned in subsequent studies and its exclusion from the next WHO classification proposed. We were recently able to show the prognostic impact of CNS invasion in a large comprehensive retrospective meningioma cohort including other established prognostic factors. In this review we discuss the growing experiences that have been gained on this matter, with a focus on the currently nonuniform histopathological assessment, imaging characteristics and intraoperative sampling as well as the overall outlook on the future role of this potential prognostic factor.

Simple Summary Brain invasion has been integrated into the new WHO classification of meningiomas to improve the prognostic assessment regarding tumor recurrence. However, its role has been questioned. One of the reasons is that for complete histopathological assessment, tissue sampling of the complete brain–tumor interface is necessary, but not always surgically and technically feasible. Therefore, the additional intraoperative assessment of CNS invasion may be of value for a more precise assessment of this tumor characteristic. We therefore studied the prognostic impact of the histopathological and intraoperative assessment of CNS invasion regarding radiographic tumor recurrence and found that both factors by themselves do not reach a prognostic significance. However, if both factors are combined, CNS invasion is an independent negative prognostic factor. Our findings show the prognostic potential of a thorough assessment and underline the need for a standardization and documentation of meningioma tissue sampling for the optimal recurrence risk assessment. Abstract The detection of the infiltrative growth of meningiomas into CNS tissue has been integrated into the WHO classification as a stand-alone marker for atypical meningioma. However, its prognostic impact has been questioned. Infiltrative growth can also be detected intraoperatively. The prognostic impact of the intraoperative detection of the central nervous system tissue invasion of meningiomas was analyzed and compared to the histopathological assessment. The clinical data of 1517 cases with follow-up data regarding radiographic recurrence was collected. Histopathology and operative reports were reviewed and invasive growth was seen during resection in 23.7% (n = 345) while histopathology detected it in 4.8% (n = 73). The histopathological and intraoperative assessments were compatible in 63%. The prognostic impact of histopathological and intraoperative assessment was significant in the univariate but not in the multivariate analysis. Both methods of assessment combined reached statistical significance in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.0409). A score including all independent prognostic factors divided the cohort into three prognostic subgroups with a risk of recurrence of 33.8, 64.7 and 88.5%, respectively. The intraoperative detection of the infiltrative growth of primary meningiomas into the central nervous system tissue can complement the histopathological assessment of CNS invasion. The combined assessment is an independent prognostic factor regarding tumor recurrence and allows a risk-adapted tumor stratification.