Search

Simple Summary: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a highly precise, non-invasive, and image-guided form of hypofractionated radiotherapy aimed at well-defined small targets. It is characterized by superior conformity of dose distribution, steep dose drop-off gradients, and short overall treatment time, which allow effective protection of surrounding normal tissue from high radiation doses, potentially resulting in lower toxicity and a more potent biological effect. Currently, SBRT is an established curative therapy for certain cancers and some benign tumors, as well as a valuable palliative option. There is limited experience with SBRT for de novo mucosal carcinoma of the head and neck. A systematic review of the literature and subsequent analysis of 124 patients from five studies treated between 2012 and 2020 confirmed that SBRT is an effective and relatively safe treatment for small tumor targets in de novo mucosal carcinoma of the head and neck. Standardization of SBRT practice and well-designed prospective clinical trials are highly needed. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is characterized by a high dose per fraction, well-defined small targets, superior dose conformity, and a steep off-target dose gradient. A literature search was conducted to examine the experience with SBRT as a curative treatment for newly diagnosed mucosal carcinoma of the head and neck (MCHN). Four retrospective case series and one prospective phase I clinical trial published between 2012 and 2020 described 124 patients. SBRT was mainly performed in older patients with different tumor sites. The median size of the planning target volumes ranged from 5.3 to 41 cm3. Different approaches were used to create margins. In two studies, limited elective nodal irradiation was performed. The equivalent doses used were 60–83.33 Gy delivered in five fractions. Considerable heterogeneity was observed in the radiation dose specification. The incidence of grade ≥3 late toxicity was 0–8.3%, with local and regional control ranging from 73% to 100%. Improved or stable quality of life after SBRT was reported in two studies. Curative-intent SBRT for de novo MCHN appears to be an effective and relatively safe treatment for small tumor targets, preferably without concomitant elective tissue irradiation. Standardization of SBRT practice and well-designed prospective clinical trials are needed to better define the role of SBRT in this setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: All patients suspected of having head and neck paragangliomas (HNPGLs) undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) of the head and neck area as the standard imaging according to the Dutch guidelines. However, a relatively new imaging modality, [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT, has shown promising results in the detection of HNPGLs. In this pilot study, we aimed to compare the results of this new modality with the standard imaging. We compared both techniques in 25 patients at the University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands. Twenty-eight percent of the patients had different outcomes between both modalities. In all cases, additional HNPGLs were identified using the [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT, suggesting the need for further prospective research to validate this finding. If confirmed, this modality could potentially be implemented as the standard of care for HNPGL detection in germline variant carriers. The Dutch guideline for patients suspected of head and neck paragangliomas (HNPGLs) recommends magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or computed tomography (CT) of the head and neck area. Additionally, it suggests considering additional nuclear imaging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT compared to MRI in patients with suspected HNPGLs and carriers of genetic variations. Methods: In this single-center pilot study, retrospective data were obtained from consecutive patients between 2016 and 2023. Both MRI and [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT were performed within 12 months. The primary outcome was the location of HNPGLs. Results: A total of 25 consecutive patients were included, and 7 patients (28.0%, p = 0.5) showed differences between the imaging modalities, of whom 5 patients had unexpected localizations with additional uptake by somatostatin receptors (SSTR) on the [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT. Conclusions: The authors recommend performing baseline imaging with [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT (if available) in variant carriers and using MRI/CT for follow-up according to the regional protocol, thereby shifting the gold standard for baseline imaging from MRI/CT to [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Nasal vestibule cancer is considered to be a rare form of cancer. There are several different staging systems in place for categorizing these tumors, which can result in inconsistencies and unreliable data due to variations in registration. The "Rome" classification is the most recent addition. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of this new staging system and to compare it to the UICC/AJCC system. One hundred and forty-nine patients with a squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal vestibule were included. There was a significant association between an increased disease stage as staged per the Rome classification and decreased survival. This association persisted when correcting for various covariates (i.e., age at the time of diagnosis, sex, the presence of lymph node metastases, and treatment modality) in multivariable analysis. The Rome classification appears to be capable of adequately categorizing and stratifying patients for different outcome measures. Nevertheless, additional research with a larger number of patients is required before any definitive conclusions can be drawn. Squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal vestibule is considered a rare malignancy that differs from other sinonasal malignancies in many respects. Four staging systems currently exist for this disease, the most recent addition being the "Rome" classification. This study assesses the use of this new classification and its prognostic value regarding various outcome measures. A retrospective multicenter cohort study of patients with a primary squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal vestibule who were treated in three tertiary head and neck oncology referral centers was conducted. A total of 149 patients were included. The median follow-up duration was 27 months. Five-year locoregional control (LRC), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS) were 81.6%, 90.1, and 62.5% respectively. A statistically significant association was observed between the Rome classification and all survival outcomes in both univariable and multivariable analyses. Moreover, it appeared to perform better than the Union for International Cancer Control TNM classification for tumors of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. The new Rome classification can be used effectively and is associated with LRC, DSS, and OS. However, it requires further validation in a larger (prospective) study population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Cancer of the nasal vestibule is thought to be rare. Multiple staging systems exist for the staging of these tumors, which can lead to variability and, therefore, the poor reliability of data. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate these staging systems. One hundred and forty-eight patients with carcinoma of the nasal vestibule were included and re-staged per the available staging systems. Stage distribution varied widely between the four evaluated staging systems. The classification per Bussu et al. had the most balanced allocation of patients amongst the stages. The widespread adoption of a single system and the introduction of a designated topography code for this disease could lead to greater uniformity in data reporting and an improved understanding of the incidence and disease outcome. Further analysis of survival data is needed to assess which classification system is the best suited for nasal vestibule carcinoma. Squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal vestibule is reported to account for less than one percent of all head and neck malignancies. It lacks a designated WHO ICD-O topography code, and multiple systems are available for the staging of this disease, which results in unwanted variability and the subsequent poor reliability of data. The aim of this study was to evaluate the currently available staging systems for cancer of the nasal vestibule, including the recently introduced classification by Bussu et al., which built on Wang's original concept but with clearer anatomical cutoffs. Different staging systems for cancer of the nasal vestibule (UICC nasal cavity, UICC skin cancer of the head and neck, Wang and Bussu et al.) were evaluated via a retrospective analysis of 148 patients. The staging system, per Bussu et al., had the most balanced allocation of patients among the stages. When using the Wang classification as a reference, stage migration occurred less frequently with the Bussu classification. The widespread adoption of a single staging system, as well as the introduction of a designated topography code for cancer of the nasal vestibule, could lead to more uniformity in data reporting and improve an understanding of the incidence and disease outcome. The newly proposed carcinoma of the nasal vestibule classification by Bussu et al. has the potential to improve the staging and allocation among stages. Further analysis of survival data is needed to assess which classification system is best suited for nasal vestibule carcinoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]