Search

Simple Summary: Basal Cell Carcinoma is the most prevalent cancer in the white population, with a 30% lifetime risk for individuals with fair skin. The main treatment goal is to completely remove the tumor while preserving function and appearance. Surgery is usually the preferred method due to its high success rates and the ability to verify that the entire tumor has been excised. However, topical and intralesional immunotherapy, although traditionally secondary to surgery, have demonstrated effectiveness and good cosmetic outcomes. These non-surgical treatments are valuable alternatives for patients who cannot undergo surgery. The objectives of this review are to summarize the current state of topical and intralesional immunotherapy treatments for BCC and to evaluate their potential as effective alternatives for certain patient populations. Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC) is the most common type of cancer among the white population. Individuals with fair skin have an average lifetime risk of around 30% for developing BCC, and there is a noticeable upward trend in its incidence rate. The principal treatment objectives for BCC involve achieving the total excision of the tumor while maximizing the preservation of function and cosmesis. Surgery is considered the treatment of choice for BCC for two main reasons: it allows for the highest cure rates and facilitates histological control of resection margins. However, in the subgroup of patients with low-risk recurrence or medical contraindications for surgery, new non-surgical treatment alternatives can provide an excellent oncological and cosmetic outcome. An evident and justified instance of these local therapies occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic, a period when surgical interventions carried out in hospital settings were not a viable option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common cancer and a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. However, HCC can be effectively treated in selected cases, with liver transplantation representing one of the limited options for potential cure. Unfortunately, many patients are ineligible for liver transplantation either due to an advanced tumor at initial diagnosis or due to disease progression while awaiting liver transplantation. Our review discusses the role of systemic therapies as a bridging treatment to liver transplantation, thereby enabling more HCC patients to undergo potentially curative liver transplantation. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths. Classically, liver transplantation (LT) can be curative for HCC tumors within the Milan criteria. Bridging strategies to reduce the dropouts from LT waiting lists and/or to downstage patients who are beyond the Milan criteria are widely utilized. We conducted a literature-based review to evaluate the role of systemic therapies as a bridging treatment to liver transplantation (LT) in HCC patients. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) can be used as a systemic bridging therapy to LT in patients with contraindications for locoregional liver-directed therapies. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment can be utilized either as a monotherapy or as a combination therapy with bevacizumab or TKIs prior to LT. Acute rejection after liver transplantation is a concern in the context of ICI treatment. Thus, a safe ICI washout period before LT and cautious post-LT immunosuppression strategies are required to reduce post-LT rejections and to optimize clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, prospective clinical trials are needed to establish definitive conclusions about the utility of systemic therapy as a bridging modality prior to LT in HCC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Scientists are studying proteins like kinesin spindle protein and Aurora B, crucial for cell division and potential targets in cancer treatment. Drugs aimed at these proteins show promise in lab tests for killing cancer cells, but in clinical trials alone, they are not always effective, possibly due to varied cancer cell responses. To enhance their efficacy, researchers are exploring combinations with other cell-killing drugs. Our study focused on Navitoclax, an inducer of cancer cell death, tested alongside Ispinesib and Barasertib, targeting kinesin spindle protein and Aurora B, respectively. Together, these drugs induced significant cancer cell death, mainly through apoptosis. Moreover, imaging techniques revealing their combined effects suggest that combining these drugs could be a potent cancer treatment strategy, warranting further investigation in clinical trials. Many proteins regulating mitosis have emerged as targets for cancer therapy, including the kinesin spindle protein (KSP) and Aurora kinase B (AurB). KSP is crucial for proper spindle pole separation during mitosis, while AurB plays roles in chromosome segregation and cytokinesis. Agents targeting KSP and AurB selectively affect dividing cells and have shown significant activity in vitro. However, these drugs, despite advancing to clinical trials, often yield unsatisfactory outcomes as monotherapy, likely due to variable responses driven by cyclin B degradation and apoptosis signal accumulation networks. Accumulated data suggest that combining emerging antimitotics with various cytostatic drugs can enhance tumor-killing effects compared to monotherapy. Here, we investigated the impact of inhibiting anti-apoptotic signals with the BH3-mimetic Navitoclax in oral cancer cells treated with the selective KSP inhibitor, Ispinesib, or AurB inhibitor, Barasertib, aiming to potentiate cell death. The combination of BH3-mimetics with both KSP and AurB inhibitors synergistically induced substantial cell death, primarily through apoptosis. A mechanistic analysis underlying this synergistic activity, undertaken by live-cell imaging, is presented. Our data underscore the importance of combining BH3-mimetics with antimitotics in clinical trials to maximize their effectiveness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Among the different types of breast cancers, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has a poor prognosis and is the most difficult type to treat by monotherapy due to the absence of common targeting receptors. In our review, we focused on the current advanced combination therapies, which include immunotherapy and chemotherapy, immunotherapy and gene therapy, and nanotechnology-based combination therapies for TNBC treatment. Additionally, we discussed the therapeutic outcomes of in vivo studies and clinical trials of the combination therapies. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), lacking specific receptors found in other breast cancer subtypes, poses significant treatment challenges due to limited therapeutic options. Therefore, it is necessary to develop novel treatment approaches for TNBC. In the last few decades, many attempts have been reported for alternative tools for TNBC treatment: immunotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, combination therapy, and nanotechnology-based therapy. Among them, combination therapy and nanotechnology-based therapy show the most promise for TNBC treatment. This review outlines recent advancements in these areas, highlighting the efficacy of combination therapy (immunotherapy paired with chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or radiotherapy) in both preclinical and clinical stages and nanotechnology-based therapies utilizing various nanoparticles loaded with anticancer agents, nucleic acids, immunotherapeutics, or CRISPRs in preclinical stages for TNBC treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Targeted agents, such as Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors and BCL-2 inhibitors, have transformed the treatment landscape for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL). While these therapies offer a more precise approach compared to traditional chemotherapy, they also bring a spectrum of adverse events that can impact patient health and treatment efficacy. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the management strategies for these AEs, encompassing cardiac complications, Tumor Lysis Syndrome, bleeding risks, and other organ-specific challenges. Our goal is to equip healthcare professionals with the knowledge to effectively manage these adverse events, enhancing patient safety and optimizing therapeutic outcomes. The insights from this review will contribute to better clinical decision-making and patient care in CLL treatment, highlighting the significance of personalized management in the era of targeted therapy. The treatment landscape for CLL has undergone a profound transformation with the advent of targeted agents (TAs) like Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors (BTKis) and BCL-2 inhibitors (BCL-2is). These agents target crucial cellular pathways in CLL, offering superior efficacy over traditional chemo-immunotherapy, which has led to improved progression-free and overall survival rates. This advancement promises enhanced disease control and potentially normal life expectancy for many patients. However, the journey is not without challenges, as these TAs are associated with a range of adverse events (AEs) that can impact treatment efficacy and patient quality of life. This review focuses on detailing the various AEs related to TA management in CLL, evaluating their frequency and clinical impact. The aim is to present a comprehensive guide to the effective management of these AEs, ensuring optimal tolerability and efficacy of TAs. By reviewing the existing literature and consolidating findings, we provide insights into AE management, which is crucial for maximizing patient outcomes in CLL therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The evaluation of therapeutic approaches over a decade at a tertiary cancer center in Germany was undertaken due to the frequent and critical discussions surrounding the selection of chemotherapy regimens and the incorporation of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in the management of limited disease small cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC). We found significant differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between patients treated with carboplatin and etoposide (CP) and those treated with cisplatin and etoposide (EP), with EP showing better outcomes. Concomitant chemotherapy was also associated with improved PFS and OS. Notably, PCI was found to significantly improve OS and showed a trend towards improved PFS. Female patients had better OS, and the type of chemotherapy and PCI remained independent predictors of survival. This research provides valuable insights into treatment patterns, outcomes, and survival predictors for LD-SCLC, emphasizing the importance of personalized treatment approaches and the potential benefits of PCI. However, the study's retrospective nature and sample-size limitations should be considered, highlighting the need for further prospective studies in this field. In this study, we investigated the outcomes and factors influencing treatment efficacy in 93 patients with limited disease small cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC), with a median age of 64 years. We focused on the impact of chemotherapy regimens, prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI), and patient-related variables. The median follow-up for OS was 17.3 months. We observed a statistically significant difference in PFS between LD-SCLC patients treated with cisplatin and etoposide (EP) and those treated with carboplatin and etoposide (CP) (PFS: EP 13.63 months vs. CP 6.54 months, p < 0.01). Patients treated with EP had better overall survival (OS) than CP-treated patients (OS: EP 26.9 months vs. CP 16.16 months, p < 0.01). Concomitant chemotherapy was associated with improved PFS (p = 0.003) and OS (p = 0.002). Patients receiving PCI showed superior OS (p = 0.05) and a trend towards improved PFS (p = 0.057). Female gender was associated with better OS (p = 0.025). Most patients had an ECOG performance status of 0 (71%). This real-world study underscores the importance of multidisciplinary LD-SCLC management, emphasizing the roles of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and PCI. These findings inform personalized treatment strategies and emphasize the need for prospective trials to validate these results and optimize LD-SCLC treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Discussed here is a review of the changing landscape in the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) regarding the emergence and use of targeted therapy. Targeted therapy is the use of small molecules designed to interrupt specific mechanisms within the cancer cell to exert anti-tumor efficacy. Targeting such mechanisms relies upon our understanding of what makes a cancer cell malignant. MCL is a difficult-to-treat lymphoid cancer that relies heavily upon constitutive intracellular signaling, promoting its growth and survival. The mainstay of MCL treatment has been to treat it with cytotoxic chemotherapy; however, targeted therapies have allowed for improved treatment outcomes and continue to change the way we manage this disease. This review aims to describe what targeted therapies are being utilized in MCL treatment and their mechanisms of action, safety, and efficacy, as well as future directions for their use in MCL treatment. Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare, heterogeneous B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The standard front-line treatment utilizes chemotherapy, often followed by consolidation with an autologous hematopoietic cell transplant; however, in most patients, the lymphoma will recur and require subsequent treatments. Additionally, mantle cell lymphoma primarily affects older patients and is frequently chemotherapy-resistant, which has further fostered the necessity for new, chemotherapy-free treatment options. In the past decade, targeted therapies in mantle cell lymphoma have been practice-changing as the treatment paradigm shifts further away from relying primarily on cytotoxic agents. Here, we will review the pathophysiology of mantle cell lymphoma and discuss the emergence of targeted, chemotherapy-free treatments aimed at disrupting the abnormal biology driving its lymphomagenesis. Treatments targeting the constitutive activation of NF-kB, Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase signaling, and anti-apoptosis will be the primary focus as we discuss their clinical data and toxicities. Our review will also focus primarily on the emergence and use of targeted therapies in the relapsed/refractory setting but will also discuss the emergence of their use in front-line therapy and in combination with other agents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Melanoma patients with high neutrophil counts often show impaired clinical response and poor prognosis, indicating that neutrophils can support melanoma progression. The precise mechanism responsible for this correlation, especially in the context of targeted therapy, still requires clarification. We show that peripheral blood neutrophils of patients with advanced melanoma are characterized by lower CD16 surface expression compared to healthy donors, which has been reported to be associated with tumor promotion. We provide evidence that melanoma cells under dual-targeted therapy can be protected in vitro by neutrophils from both patients and healthy donors. In addition, this protective effect is dependent on cell–cell contact, as well as on culture conditions, and is observed under nonadherence. Unraveling the mechanism, the interference with the protease activity of neutrophils reduced protection. Understanding the complex interaction of neutrophils and melanoma cells might aid in discovering methods to prevent the tumor-promoting effects by neutrophils in patients. Elevated levels of peripheral blood and tumor tissue neutrophils are associated with poorer clinical response and therapy resistance in melanoma. The underlying mechanism and the role of neutrophils in targeted therapy is still not fully understood. Serum samples of patients with advanced melanoma were collected and neutrophil-associated serum markers were measured and correlated with response to targeted therapy. Blood neutrophils from healthy donors and patients with advanced melanoma were isolated, and their phenotypes, as well as their in vitro functions, were compared. In vitro functional tests were conducted through nonadherent cocultures with melanoma cells. Protection of melanoma cell lines by neutrophils was assessed under MAPK inhibition. Blood neutrophils from advanced melanoma patients exhibited lower CD16 expression compared to healthy donors. In vitro, both healthy-donor- and patient-derived neutrophils prevented melanoma cell apoptosis upon dual MAPK inhibition. The effect depended on cell–cell contact and melanoma cell susceptibility to treatment. Interference with protease activity of neutrophils prevented melanoma cell protection during treatment in cocultures. The negative correlation between neutrophils and melanoma outcomes seems to be linked to a protumoral function of neutrophils. In vitro, neutrophils exert a direct protective effect on melanoma cells during dual MAPK inhibition. This study further hints at a crucial role of neutrophil-related protease activity in protection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of the targeted cancer medication CDK4/6 inhibitors, in patients with breast cancer. These medicaments have been used for nearly a decade, but how well they work can vary greatly from one patient to another. By examining the experiences of 86 patients over a period from November 2016 to May 2020, we aimed to understand what factors might predict better or worse outcomes for patients. We discovered that certain characteristics, like the level of the progesterone receptor in the tumor and whether the cancer had spread to multiple locations or the liver, played a significant role in how long patients benefited from treatment without progression. The study also found that management characteristics during treatment could significantly affect patient outcomes. These insights are crucial for developing personalized management strategies that could lead to better outcomes for people with breast cancer. Background: The quest to comprehend the real-world efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDKis) in breast cancer continues, as patient responses vary significantly. Methods: This single-center retrospective study evaluated CDKi use outside the trial condition from November 2016 to May 2020. Progression-free survival (PFS), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), short-term and prolonged treatment benefit (≥4 and ≥10 months), as well as prognostic and predictive markers were assessed with Kaplan–Meier and multivariate regression analyses. Results: Out of 86 identified patients, 58 (67.4%) had treatment failure of which 40 (46.5%) were due to progression. Median PFS and TTF were 12 and 8.5 months, respectively. A total of 57 (66.3%) and 42 (48.8%) patients experienced short-term and prolonged treatment benefit. Independent, significant predictors for PFS were progesterone receptor expression (HR: 0.88), multiple metastatic sites (HR: 2.56), and hepatic metastasis (HR: 2.01). Significant predictors for TTF were PR expression (HR: 0.86), multiple sites (HR: 3.29), adverse events (HR: 2.35), and diabetes (HR: 2.88). Aside from tumor biology and adverse events, treatment modifications like pausing and switching of CDKi were predictive for short-term (OR: 6.73) and prolonged (OR: 14.27) therapeutic benefit, respectively. Conclusions: These findings emphasize the importance of tailored treatment strategies, highlighting the role of PR expression, metastatic burden, and therapeutic adjustments in optimizing patient outcomes in real-world breast cancer management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Although women 70 years of age and older represent a large percentage of newly diagnosed breast cancer cases, older individuals are drastically underrepresented in clinical trials. Most women diagnosed with breast cancer at 70 years of age and older present with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer. Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor-based therapy has become the standard of care for metastatic HR+ breast cancer. This study reports that metastatic breast cancer patients ≥70 years of age receiving CDK4/6 inhibitor-based treatment, particularly when combined with an aromatase inhibitor, experience prolonged progression-free survival but display no such prolongation in overall survival and report more frequent adverse effects to treatment. The reported findings can aid in the development of optimized treatments based on age and help older patients weigh treatment options. The largest portion of breast cancer patients diagnosed after 70 years of age present with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer subtypes. Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor treatment, in conjunction with endocrine therapy, has become standard-of-care for metastatic HR+ breast cancer. In total, 320 patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving CDK4/6 inhibitor combined with fulvestrant or an aromatase inhibitor were enrolled in an ongoing observational study or were included in an IRB-approved retrospective study. All patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitor-based therapy that were ≥70 years of age (n = 111) displayed prolonged progression-free survival (27.6 months) as compared to patients <70 years of age (n = 209, 21.1 months, HR = 1.38, p < 0.05). Specifically, patients receiving a CDK4/6 inhibitor with an aromatase inhibitor who were ≥70 years of age (n = 79) displayed exceptionally prolonged progression-free survival (46.0 months) as compared to patients receiving the same treatment who were <70 years of age (n = 161, 21.8 months, HR = 1.71, p < 0.01). However, patients ≥70 years of age also experienced more frequent adverse responses to CDK4/6 inhibitor-based treatment leading to dose reduction, hold, or discontinuation than the younger cohort (69% and 53%, respectively). Treatment strategies that may decrease toxicity without affecting efficacy (such as dose titration) are worth further exploration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Neuroblastoma (NB) presents with two patterns of disease: with or without metastasis. Both types of disease presentation include tumors with high-risk (HR) features. The management of HR-NB includes chemotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy, and anti-GD2 immunotherapy. Anti-GD2 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have significantly improved the outcome of HR-NB patients but they are mostly effective against disease affecting the bone and/or bone marrow (known as the osteomedullary compartment), and less so against soft tissue disease. The question arises as to whether anti-GD2 immunotherapy might benefit HR-NB patients with disease compounded by only soft tissue. In this retrospective review, we found that achieving first complete remission with chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy does not prevent the risk of relapse. However, adding anti-GD2 mAbs once the patient has achieved complete remission significantly decreases the chances of relapse by 80%. Our study provides further support to indicate anti-GD2 mAbs in all cases with HR-NB. Neuroblastoma presents with two patterns of disease: locoregional or systemic. The poor prognostic risk factors of locoregional neuroblastoma (LR-NB) include age, MYCN or MDM2-CDK4 amplification, 11q, histology, diploidy with ALK or TERT mutations, and ATRX aberrations. Anti-GD2 immunotherapy has significantly improved the outcome of high-risk (HR) NB and is mostly effective against osteomedullary minimal residual disease (MRD), but less so against soft tissue disease. The question is whether adding anti-GD2 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) benefits patients with HR-NB compounded by only soft tissue. We reviewed 31 patients treated at SJD for HR-NB with no osteomedullary involvement at diagnosis. All tumors had molecular genetic features of HR-NB. The outcome after first-line treatment showed 25 (80.6%) patients achieving CR. Thirteen patients remain in continued CR, median follow-up 3.9 years. We analyzed whether adding anti-GD2 immunotherapy to first-line treatment had any prognostic significance. The EFS analysis using Cox models showed a HR of 0.20, p = 0.0054, and an 80% decrease in the risk of relapse in patients treated with anti-GD2 immunotherapy in the first line. Neither EFS nor OS were significantly different by CR status after first-line treatment. In conclusion, adding treatment with anti-GD2 mAbs at the stage of MRD helps prevent relapse that unequivocally portends poor survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Sacituzumab govitecan is an antibody–drug conjugate that has been approved for the treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer and, recently, also for metastatic hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer. Although patients with metastatic breast cancer frequently need palliative radiotherapy, none of the published prospective trials studied the combination of radiotherapy and Sacituzumab govitecan. We conducted a multi-center retrospective cohort study to assess the efficacy and safety of Sacituzumab govitecan and palliative radiotherapy. We did not find signs of increased toxicity, and response rates were favorable despite extensive prior treatment. More research is necessary to determine the optimal integration of novel systemic agents and radiotherapy in the palliative setting. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a new treatment option for patients with metastatic triple-negative and hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. This antibody–drug conjugate is currently approved as monotherapy. Palliative radiotherapy is frequently used to treat symptomatic metastases locally. Concurrent use of SG and irradiation was excluded in clinical trials of SG, and there are currently limited published data. We report here a systematic review, as well as a retrospective multi-center study of 17 patients with triple-negative breast cancer who received concurrent SG and radiotherapy. In these patients, concurrent use was found to be efficient, safe and well tolerated. There were no apparent differences in moderate or severe acute toxicity according to the timing of SG administration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: In this randomized phase II trial, which included 117 older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving LV5FU2 regimen with or without aflibercept, the primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). The clinical hypotheses expected a PFS rate at 6 months of over 40% (60% expected). It was 54.7% in both arms (90% CI 42.5–66.5 in both). Given the 6-month PFS, the study can be considered positive. However, the toxicity of aflibercept in this elderly population was high (grade ≥ 3 toxicity in 82% of patients versus 58.2% with LV5FU2 alone), and continuation of the trial into phase III is not envisaged. Fluropyrimidine monotherapy is an option for some patients with inoperable metastatic colorectal cancer. Unlike bevacizumab, the addition of aflibercept, an antibody acting as an anti-angiogenic agent, has never been evaluated in this context. The aim of the study was to determine whether aflibercept could increase the efficacy of fluoropyrimidine monotherapy without increasing toxicity. This multicenter phase II non-comparative trial evaluated the addition of aflibercept to infusional 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (LV5FU2 regimen) as first-line treatment in patients unfit to receive doublet cytotoxic chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). The clinical hypotheses expected a PFS rate at 6 months of over 40% (60% expected). A total of 117 patients, with a median age of 81 years, were included: 59 in arm A (LV5FU2-aflibercept) and 58 in arm B (LV5FU2 alone). Six-month PFS was 54.7% in both arms (90% CI 42.5–66.5 in both). Median overall survival was 21.8 months (arm A) and 25.1 months (arm B). Overall toxicity was more common in arm A: grade ≥ 3 toxicity in 82% versus 58.2%. Given the 6-month PFS, the study can be considered positive. However, the toxicity of aflibercept in this population was high, and continuation of the trial into phase III is not envisaged. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The prevalence of second neoplasms among patients with hairy cell leukemia (HCL) treated with cladribine is not negligible. Immunosuppression, high rate of cure, and aging may have a role in the pathogenesis of second cancers after HCL. We aimed to compare the risk of cancer between patients with HCL treated with cladribine and the general population. Concern has emerged about the prevalence of second cancers among patients with hairy cell leukemia (HCL) treated with purine analogs. We investigated 513 patients with HCL treated with cladribine over the last 30 years at 18 Italian centers and calculated their standardized incidence ratios (SIRs). We identified 24 patients with a second cancer diagnosed at a median time from treatment with cladribine of 59.9 months (range: 9.2–169.7 months). All patients with solid neoplasms presented with a limited-stage disease, except four cases of locally advanced cancer; multiple myeloma patients had a smoldering disease, while lymphoma patients had stage Ie and stage IV diseases. Response to therapy was complete in 19 cases; 1 patient is still receiving treatment for a relapsing bladder disease, while 2 patients progressed during treatment and died. These two patients died from unrelated causes: one from infection and one due to surgery complications. The median OS from HCL was 98.5 months (range: 38.4–409.2 months), while the median OS from second cancer was 27.6 months (range: 1–117.8 months). The SIR was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.54–1.30) for males and 1.13 (95% CI: 0.36–2.73) for females: no statistically significant differences were highlighted. We were not able to demonstrate an excess of second cancer or a significant association with the specific studied neoplasm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Drugs that target Aurora A kinase as a treatment for cancer can lead to activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway and ultimately resistance to treatment. We evaluated the preliminary efficacy of the addition of an inhibitor of this pathway (TORC1/2 inhibitor sapanisertib) to Aurora A kinase inhibitor alisertib in patients with advanced solid cancers, including a group with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Select patients experienced prolonged stabilization of their cancers when treated with this combination therapy, including two with pancreatic cancer. To explore potential differences in response to this therapy, changes in the tumor tissues and immune system were evaluated, as were changes in imaging that can evaluate tumor activity. The genetic make-up of the tumor as well as spread of cancer to the liver may contribute in this setting. Background: This study further evaluated the safety and efficacy of the combination of alisertib and sapanisertib in an expansion cohort of patients, including a subset of patients with refractory pancreatic adenocarcinoma, with further evaluation of the pharmacodynamic characteristics of combination therapy. Methods: Twenty patients with refractory solid tumors and 11 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma were treated at the recommended phase 2 dose of alisertib and sapanisertib. Adverse events and disease response were assessed. Patients in the expansion cohort were treated with a 7-day lead-in of either alisertib or sapanisertib prior to combination therapy, with tumor tissue biopsy and serial functional imaging performed for correlative analysis. Results: Toxicity across treatment groups was overall similar to prior studies. One partial response to treatment was observed in a patient with ER positive breast cancer, and a patient with pancreatic cancer experienced prolonged stable disease. In an additional cohort of pancreatic cancer patients, treatment response was modest. Correlative analysis revealed variability in markers of apoptosis and immune cell infiltrate according to lead-in therapy and response. Conclusions: Dual targeting of Aurora A kinase and mTOR resulted in marginal clinical benefit in a population of patients with refractory solid tumors, including pancreatic adenocarcinoma, though individual patients experienced significant response to therapy. Correlatives indicate apoptotic response and tumor immune cell infiltrate may affect clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Bladder cancer is a common disease in urological patients. The approach to treatment depends on the severity of the tumor; in this article, we focus on tumors that do not invade the muscle layer of the bladder. Those tumors are resected during an endoscopic procedure (TURBT), but often reoccur. Treating bladder cancer with drugs instead of surgical removal of the bladder (radical cystectomy) is paramount for patients quality of life and overall well-being. The aim of this paper is to review methods of conservative treatment of tumors unresponsive to the typical treatment of choice (BCG instillations). Bladder cancer is the 10th most popular cancer in the world, and non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is diagnosed in ~80% of all cases. Treatments for NMIBC include transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) and intravesical instillations of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG). Treatment of BCG-unresponsive tumors is scarce and usually leads to Radical Cystectomy. In this paper, we review recent advancements in conservative treatment of BCG-unresponsive tumors. The main focus of the paper is FDA-approved medications: Pembrolizumab and Nadofaragene Firadenovec (Adstiladrin). Other, less researched therapeutic possibilities are also included, namely: N-803 immunotherapy, TAR-200 and TAR-210 intravesical delivery systems and combined Cabazitaxel, Gemcitabine and Cisplatin chemotherapy. Conservative treatment and delaying radical cystectomy would greatly benefit patients' quality of life; it is undoubtedly the future of BCG-unresponsive NMIBC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Head and neck cancer is the seventh most common cancer and most cases of head and neck cancer are squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) such as anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) have been developed. The aim of our study was to evaluate the antitumor effect of adenoviral vector carrying B7-1 (AdB7) in a murine SCC model in order to further explore the potential of the B7-1 gene in immunotherapy for head and neck cancers. Results indicated that tumor size was significantly reduced in the mice treated with both AdB7 and anti-mouse PD-1 antibody. Additionally, treatment resulted in significantly increased cell densities of total immune cells and Ki-67+ CD8+ T cells and decreased the number of regulatory T cells. Our findings indicate that adenovirus-mediated B7-1 gene expression may enhance the antitumor effect of antiPD1 against SCC. Background: The goal of this study was to evaluate the antitumor immune effects of B7-1 gene expression in addition to immune checkpoint inhibitor against squamous cell carcinoma. Methods: A murine SCC cell line, KLN205, was infected with adenoviral vector carrying B7-1 (AdB7). Infected cells were injected subcutaneously in the flanks of DBA/2 mice. Three weeks after implantation, anti-mouse PD-1 antibody (antiPD1) was intraperitonially administrated twice a week for a total of six times. Results: CD80 was significantly overexpressed in the AdB7-infected tumors. IFN-gamma in the T cells in the spleen was significantly increased and tumor size was significantly reduced in the mice treated with both AdB7 and antiPD1. Targeted tumors treated with both AdB7 and antiPD1 exhibited significantly increased cell densities of total immune cells as well as Ki-67+ CD8+ T cells and decreased regulatory T cells. Conclusions: These results suggest that the B7-1 gene transfer may enhance the antitumor effect of anti-PD1 antibody against SCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable disease affecting predominantly elderly people (>65 years of age). Despite improvement in the 10-year survival rate for MM patients due to the advent of medications, including immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) (such as pomalidomide and lenalidomide) and proteasome inhibitors, coupled with autologous stem cell transplant, more effective and safe therapies are still needed. Bromodomain-containing protein 9 (BRD9) has been shown to be important for the survival of MM cells. We discovered that drugs that block the function of BRD9 increase the effectiveness of IMiDs and can override resistance to these medications. Our findings suggest that the combined use of IMiDs and drugs that target BRD9 could potentially improve clinical outcomes for MM patients. Progress in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) has resulted in improvement in the survival rate. However, there is still a need for more efficacious and tolerated therapies. We and others have shown that bromodomain-containing protein 9 (BRD9), a member of the non-canonical SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex, plays a role in MM cell survival, and targeting BRD9 selectively blocks MM cell proliferation and synergizes with IMiDs. We found that synergy in vitro is associated with the downregulation of MYC and Ikaros proteins, including IKZF3, and overexpression of IKZF3 or MYC could partially reverse synergy. RNA-seq analysis revealed synergy to be associated with the suppression of pathways associated with MYC and E2F target genes and pathways, including cell cycle, cell division, and DNA replication. Stimulated pathways included cell adhesion and immune and inflammatory response. Importantly, combining IMiD treatment and BRD9 targeting, which leads to the downregulation of MYC protein and upregulation of CRBN protein, was able to override IMiD resistance of cells exposed to iberdomide in long-term culture. Taken together, our results support the notion that combination therapy based on agents targeting BRD9 and IKZF3, two established dependencies in MM, represents a promising novel therapeutic strategy for MM and IMiD-resistant disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Modern ovarian cancer treatment has not substantially improved outcomes, and superior therapeutic strategies are needed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of artesunate and navitoclax drug combination in ovarian cancer. We determined the combination of these two drugs was extraordinarily effective in multiple models of ovarian cancer, in vitro, inhibiting cancer cell proliferation more than expected based on single-agent activities. Unfortunately, we were unable to validate these findings using a mouse model of metastatic ovarian cancer. These data provide valuable information regarding the potential utility and challenges associated with the artesunate/navitoclax drug combination for ovarian cancer therapy. Artesunate belongs to a class of medications derived from the sweet wormwood plant (Artemisia annua) known as artemisinins. Artesunate has traditionally been used as a frontline treatment for severe malaria but has also demonstrated antineoplastic activity against various malignancies, including ovarian cancer. Data suggest that artesunate exacerbates cellular oxidative stress, triggering apoptosis. In the current study, we investigated the ability of navitoclax, an inhibitor of the antiapoptotic Bcl-2 protein family, to enhance artesunate efficacy in ovarian cancer cells. Artesunate and navitoclax both demonstrated antiproliferative effects on 2D and 3D ovarian cancer cell models as single agents. Upon combination of navitoclax with artesunate, antineoplastic drug synergy was also observed in each of the 2D cell lines and ovarian tumor organoid models tested. Further investigation of this drug combination using intraperitoneal CAOV3 xenograft models in BALB/scid mice showed that the artesunate/navitoclax doublet was superior to single-agent artesunate and vehicle control treatment. However, it did not outperform single-agent navitoclax. With optimization, this drug combination could provide a new therapeutic option for ovarian cancer and warrants further preclinical investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: In the current study, we have collected real-world population data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry of patients who underwent perioperative anthracyclin triplets or FLOT. Our study showed no significant overall survival improvement for FLOT-treated patients compared to anthracyclin triplets, despite more staging laparoscopies in the first group. However, FLOT patients demonstrated higher rates of neoadjuvant therapy completion, proceeding to adjuvant therapy, and increased pathological complete response rates. Even though survival difference failed to reach statistical significance, we believe that our findings hold significance as they mirror the outcomes observed in clinical practice, outside the controlled environment of a clinical trial. Background: The FLOT4-AIO trial (2019) showed improved survival with perioperative fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) compared to anthracyclin triplets in gastric cancer treatment. It is unclear whether these results extend to real-world scenarios in the Netherlands. This study aimed to compare outcomes of perioperative FLOT to anthracyclin triplets in a real-world Dutch gastric cancer population. Methods: Patients diagnosed with resectable (cT2-4a/cTxN0-3/NxM0) gastric or gastro-esophageal junction carcinoma between 2015–2021 who received neoadjuvant FLOT or anthracyclin triplets were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), analyzed through multivariable Cox regression. Secondary outcomes included pathological complete response (pCR), neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycle completion, surgical resection rates, and adjuvant therapy. Results: Adjusted OS showed no significant survival benefit (HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.77–1.01, p = 0.07), even though the median OS was numerically improved by 8 months with FLOT compared to anthracyclin triplets (48.1 vs. 39.9 months, p = 0.16). FLOT patients were more likely to undergo diagnostic staging laparoscopies (74.2% vs. 44.1%, p < 0.001), had higher rates of completing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.09–1.68, p = 0.007), receiving adjuvant therapy (OR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.08–1.66, p = 0.08), and achieving pCR (OR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.05–2.20, p = 0.03). No significant differences were observed in (radical) resection rates. Conclusion(s): Real-world data showed no significant OS improvement for FLOT-treated patients compared to anthracyclin triplets, despite more staging laparoscopies. However, FLOT patients demonstrated higher rates of neoadjuvant therapy completion, proceeding to adjuvant therapy, and increased pCR rates. Therefore, we recommend the continued use of neoadjuvant FLOT therapy in the current clinical setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This study investigates the therapeutic potential of imiquimod (IMQ), a synthetic toll-like receptor 7 agonist, for treating cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Given the risks associated with conventional surgical treatments, IMQ non-invasive application makes it an attractive alternative. This study specifically explores the correlation between IMQ treatment and the expression levels of immune checkpoint molecules PD-1, PD-L1, and sHLA-G in cervical lesions. The results suggest that baseline sHLA-G levels may predict treatment outcomes, while PD-L1 expression before treatment correlates with success. Understanding these immunomodulatory effects sheds light on IMQ potential as a conservative treatment for high-risk cervical lesions. (1) Background: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is a precancerous condition linked to human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, often necessitating surgical interventions carrying the risk of subsequent preterm births. This study explores the potential of imiquimod (IMQ), as a non-invasive alternative treatment. The focus is on understanding IMQ impact on immune checkpoint molecules, particularly PD-1, PD-L1, and sHLA-G, which play pivotal roles in shaping immune responses and cancer progression. (2) Methods: Forty-three patients diagnosed with a high-risk squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL, p16-positive) self-applied 5% IMQ encapsulated in sachets containing 250 g of cream into the vaginal cavity three times a week for 16 weeks. The impact of IMQ therapy on cervical lesion regression was assessed through immunohistochemistry (IHC), examining changes in sHLA-G, PD-L1, and PD-1 levels. The antiviral activity of IMQ was evaluated through HPV-E7 immunofluorescence. Ethical considerations were adhered to, and the research methods were based on a previously approved clinical trial (clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT04859361). (3) Results: IMQ treatment demonstrated efficacy, leading to lesion regression. sHLA-G levels in CIN before starting IMQ application were associated with unsuccessful treatment (p = 0.0036). IMQ did not significantly alter the expression of PD-1. We observed a decrease in PD-L1 levels in those who were successfully treated (p = 0.0509) and a reduction in HPV burden. (4) Conclusions: IMQ exhibits promise as a non-invasive treatment for CIN, emphasising its potential to modulate the immune microenvironment. Baseline sHLA-G levels emerge as potential predictors of treatment response. Understanding the nuanced dynamics of immune checkpoints sheds light on IMQ mechanism of action. Further exploration is warranted to decipher the intricate mechanisms underlying IMQ treatment in the context of cervical lesions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is a prevalent form of cancer globally. Despite advancements in diagnosing and treating CRC patients, the current therapies and control measures are insufficient in improving outcomes. This study aims to assess the potential effectiveness of immunotherapy utilizing γδ T cells for CRC. To accomplish this, conventional in vitro cultures and spheroids, a practical 3D culture system, were employed as a reliable in vitro model to examine the characteristics and behavior of CRC tumor cells. New antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) were developed to specifically target EGFR+ CRC cells and activate the Vδ2-T-cell-mediated response by delivering an aminobisphosphonate, ultimately leading to the killing of CRC cells. The efficacy and cytotoxicity of these ADCs were assessed to determine the relevance of this conjugation approach for eliminating tumor cells. Antibody––drug conjugates (ADCs) are a promising delivery system that involves linking a monoclonal antibody (mAb) to a specific drug, such as a cytotoxic agent, to target tumor cells. This new class of antitumor therapy acts as a "biological missile" that can destroy tumor cells while increasing the therapeutic index and decreasing toxicity. One of the most critical factors in ADC design is selecting a target antigen that is highly expressed on the surface of cancer cells. In this study, we conjugated Cetuximab (Cet), a monoclonal antibody that targets the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), to aminobisphosphonates (N-BPs) such as ibandronate (IBA) or risedronate (RIS) or zoledronate (ZA). Cetuximab is administered to patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) with a wild-type (WT) EGFR transduction pathway. Also, it is well established that N-BPs can trigger the antitumor activity of Vδ2 T cells in both in vitro and in vivo experimental models. The resulting ADCs were added in co-culture to assess the effect on CRC cell line proliferation and sensitivity to Vδ2 T antitumor lymphocytes in comparison with the native antibody. These assays have been performed both in conventional and 3D spheroid cultures. We found that all three ADCs can increase the inhibitory effect on cell proliferation of the WT-EGFR cell line Caco-2 while only Cet-RIS and Cet-ZA can increase the cytotoxicity mediated by Vδ2 T cells against both WT and EGFR-mutated CRC cell lines (Caco-2, DLD-1, and HCT-116). Also, the ADCs can trigger the cell proliferation of Vδ2 T cells present in peripheral blood and tumor specimens. Our findings indicate that anti-EGFR antibodies bound to N-BPs can improve the antitumor effects of the native antibody possibly increasing the therapeutic effect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The majority of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who initially respond to treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), will ultimately develop resistance within four years. ICI rechallenge is considered in real-world practice, but its effectiveness following disease progression is not well-established. The aim of this review was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of rechallenge ICI therapy following disease progression, based on the critical assessment of the published data. The evidence shows limited efficacy of rechallenge immunotherapy in unselected patient populations who progressed during initial immunotherapy, yet promising efficacy in those who relapsed after treatment completion. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are at the forefront of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. Still, only 27–46% of patients respond to initial therapy with ICIs, and of those, up to 65% develop resistance within four years. After disease progression (PD), treatment options are limited, with 10% Objective Response Rate (ORR) to second or third-line chemotherapy. In this context, ICI rechallenge is an appealing option for NSCLC. Most data on the efficacy of ICI rechallenge are based on retrospective real-world studies of small, heavily pretreated, and heterogeneous patient groups. Despite these limitations, these studies suggest that ICI monotherapy rechallenge in unselected NSCLC patient populations who discontinued initial ICI due to PD is generally ineffective, with a median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) of 1.6–3.1 months and a Disease Control Rate (DCR) of 21.4–41.6%. However, there is a subpopulation that benefits from this strategy, and further characterization of this subgroup is essential. Furthermore, immunotherapy rechallenge in patients who discontinued initial immunotherapy following treatment protocol completion and progressed after an immunotherapy-free interval showed promising efficacy, with a DCR of 75–81%, according to post hoc analyses of several clinical trials. Future research on ICI rechallenge for NSCLC should focus on better patient stratification to reflect the underlying biology of immunotherapy resistance more accurately. In this review, we summarize evidence regarding rechallenge immunotherapy efficacy following NSCLC disease progression or relapse, as well as ongoing trials on immunotherapy rechallenge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) stands as a remarkable success in achieving high cure rates with chemotherapy-free treatment regimens. Despite these remarkable outcomes, hematologists managing patients with APL take into consideration the distinct side effects associated with the two dual differentiation agents, i.e., all-transretinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO). The objective of this paper is to review relevant literature data and discuss the recommended management strategies of non-hematologic early and late complications that arosein patients diagnosed with APL who were treated with ATO and ATRA-based regimens. The hallmark of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is the presence of the characteristic fusion transcript of the promyelocytic leukemia gene with the retinoic acid receptor α gene (PML::RARA). The PML::RARA fusion is a molecular target for all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO). Therapies based on ATRA plus ATO have excellent outcomes in terms of complete remission rates, overall survival, and achievement of deep and durable molecular responses with a very low incidence of relapse. However, although the combination of ATRA and ATO has lower hematologic toxicity than standard chemotherapy, its use is associated with a spectrum of distinctive toxicities, such as differentiation syndrome, liver toxicity, QT interval prolongation, and neurotoxicity. Rigorous monitoring of patients' clinical evolution is indispensable for identifying and addressing each complication. The objective is to maintain an equilibrium between treatment-induced adverse events and therapeutic efficacy. This paper focused on non-hematologic complications associated with the combination of ATRA and ATO. Additionally, we discuss late-onset complications of this therapy. In summary, the majority of treatment-related adverse events are manageable, self-limiting, and reversible. More so, there seems to be a lower incidence rate of secondary neoplasms compared to standard chemotherapy. However, further research is required to assess how the ATRA plus ATO regimen affects the emergence of additional comorbidities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is recognized for its heightened aggressiveness compared to other breast cancer subtypes. Given the lack of an associated biomarker or molecular target, therapeutic options are limited. In an effort to expand the therapeutic landscape of TNBC, interest has been mounting in the exploitation of the DNA damage response pathway (DDR), particularly with regard to agents that inhibit ATR kinase and Checkpoint Kinases 1/2 (CHK1/2). ATR and CHK1/2 inhibitors show potential as prospective treatment options for TNBC by interfering with the cell cycle regulation of cancer cells. Initial findings indicate that the co-administration of ATR and CHK1/2 inhibitors alongside chemotherapy effectively inhibits tumor growth in TNBC. In this literature review, we explore ATR and CHK1/2 inhibition as a promising therapeutic approach in the management of TNBC and highlight challenges arising during the administration of these novel agents. Worldwide, breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy in women, with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) being the most aggressive molecular subtype. Due to the dearth of effective therapeutic options for TNBC, novel agents targeting key mechanisms and pathways in cancer cells are continuously explored; these include ATR inhibitors, which target the ATR kinase involved in the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway, and CHK1/2 inhibitors, which target the Checkpoint Kinase 1/2 (CHK1/2) involved in cell cycle arrest and DNA repair. ATR and CHK1/2 inhibitors show potential as prospective treatments for TNBC by focusing on the DDR and interfering with cell cycle regulation in cancer cells. Preliminary preclinical and clinical findings suggest that when combined with chemotherapy, ATR and CHK1/2 inhibitors demonstrate significant anti-proliferative efficacy against TNBC. In this article, we introduce ATR and CHK1/2 inhibitors as promising therapeutic approaches for the management of TNBC. Preclinical and clinical studies performed evaluating ATR and CHK1/2 inhibitors for the treatment of TNBC and associated challenges encountered in this context to date are reviewed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The study explores a promising treatment avenue for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), emphasizing the drug combination venetoclax and azacitidine (VEN plus AZA) to improve patient survival and enable stem cell transplantation in those unsuitable for intensive chemotherapy. Comparative analysis with conventional treatment shows comparable survival rates, influenced by genetic factors. In conclusion, for older AML patients unable to endure intensive chemotherapy, the VEN plus AZA regimen emerges as a viable, less taxing option, offering the potential for curative stem cell transplantation. Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is rarely recommended for unfit patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patient survival can improve with venetoclax plus azacitidine (VEN plus AZA). However, the long-term outcome of this treatment strategy is still unsatisfactory. The high response and low treatment toxicity rates of patients receiving VEN plus AZA can provide an opportunity for HSCT among unfit patients. Nevertheless, the outcomes and complications of VEN plus AZA, followed by HSCT, remain unclear. Methods: This single-center retrospective study aimed to compare patients with newly diagnosed AML receiving VEN plus AZA as induction therapy (n = 27) to those receiving the conventional I3A7 regimen as induction therapy (n = 34). Result: The 1-year overall survival, relapse, and non-relapse mortality rates in the two groups were similar. The cytogenetic risks and the hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index are the most significant predictive factors of overall survival. Conclusion: In older patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy, a low-intensity regimen with VEN plus AZA is a suitable bridge therapy. Furthermore, allo-HSCT is feasible and can be a curative option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Outcomes for high-risk myeloma patients are still poor, despite many advances in treatment. In addition, scarce data exist on double maintenance in transplant-eligible high-risk newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. We present the results of a prospective study on 120 transplant-eligible NDMM patients with prolonged cytogenetic risk-based all-oral maintenance with lenalidomide + ixazomib (IR) for high-risk patients and lenalidomide (R) alone for non-high-risk patients after ixazomib–lenalidomide–dexamethasone (IRD) induction plus autologous stem cell transplantation followed by IRD consolidation. We found that high-risk cytogenetics had no impact on the proportion of patients achieving sustained undetectable minimal residual disease or on the rate of progression-free survival with IR maintenance. Our data suggest that prolonged use of all-oral double maintenance with IR with reasonable adverse effects would be a potential option for high-risk myeloma patients. Scarce data exist on double maintenance in transplant-eligible high-risk (HR) newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. This prospective phase 2 study enrolled 120 transplant-eligible NDMM patients. The treatment consisted of four cycles of ixazomib–lenalidomide–dexamethasone (IRD) induction plus autologous stem cell transplantation followed by IRD consolidation and cytogenetic risk-based maintenance therapy with lenalidomide + ixazomib (IR) for HR patients and lenalidomide (R) alone for NHR patients. The main endpoint of the study was undetectable minimal residual disease (MRD) with sensitivity of <10−5 by flow cytometry at any time, and other endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We present the preplanned analysis after the last patient has been two years on maintenance. At any time during protocol treatment, 28% (34/120) had MRD < 10−5 at least once. At two years on maintenance, 66% of the patients in the HR group and 76% in the NHR group were progression-free (p = 0.395) and 36% (43/120) were CR or better, of which 42% (18/43) had undetectable flow MRD <10−5. Altogether 95% of the patients with sustained MRD <10−5, 82% of the patients who turned MRD-positive, and 61% of those with positive MRD had no disease progression at two years on maintenance (p < 0.001). To conclude, prolonged maintenance with all-oral ixazomib plus lenalidomide might improve PFS in HR patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Ripretinib is a novel drug used to treat patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors. We investigated its efficacy and safety in a group of 45 patients treated in a real-world setting in the UK. We investigated the safety of the drug and its activity in causing tumor shrinkage and delaying tumor progression or death. Importantly, we also investigated the overall duration of the treatment, including when it was continued after radiological progression on the basis of clinical benefit, which is a common practice in the real-world setting. Our results show that both the efficacy and the safety of ripretinib in this group of patients were comparable to what had been reported in available clinical trials, supporting its use in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Ripretinib, a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor used in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) resistant to standard therapies, was assessed in the United Kingdom (UK) within an Expanded Access Program (EAP). A retrospective review of patients treated between January 2020 and October 2021 within the ripretinib EAP in our Institution was conducted. Clinician-documented and mRECIST 1.1 assessments were collected. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD). Treatment beyond progression (TBP), overall survival (OS), objective response rates and safety data were also analyzed. Survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan–Meier method, and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed. All analyses were performed with R software. Overall, forty-five patients were included. After a median follow-up of 24.2 (95% CI 19.7–29.7) months, the median PFS of the group receiving 150 mg ripretinib once daily (OD) was 7.9 (95% CI 5.6–19.3) months. In the cohort of 22 patients with dose escalation upon tumor progression to 150 mg ripretinib twice daily (BD), the median PFS from BD was 5.4 (95% CI 2.8–9.3) months. Overall, median PFS and OS values for patients on ripretinib were 9.7 (95% CI 8.3–18.1) and 14.0 (95% CI 9.9–NA) months, respectively. TTD was similar to PFS. TBP was observed in about one third of all patients. Objective responses to ripretinib OD and BD treatments were observed in 16.7% and 10.0% of the patients, respectively. No new safety signals were identified. In conclusion, patients with advanced GIST receiving ripretinib in the UK within the EAP reported prolonged benefits, in line with the recent phase III clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Venetoclax has proven a viable option for treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), with high response rates and a generally manageable safety profile. Management considerations associated with venetoclax initiation include the risk of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS), which requires close attention and prompt management. Administration of venetoclax in a safe manner through a slow ramping up of the dose over a 5-week period, along with proper assessment, preparation, and initiation, are essential and have been successful in reducing the risk of TLS in patients with CLL. This review summarizes hypothetical patient case scenarios and emphasizes the importance of a collaborative team effort, with perspectives from highly respected clinicians in the field offering invaluable insight for optimal patient care and treatment strategies. Venetoclax, a highly selective, oral B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitor, provides a robust targeted-therapy option for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), including patients with high-risk del(17p)/mutated-TP53 and immunoglobulin heavy variable region unmutated CLL and those refractory to chemoimmunotherapy across all age groups. Due to the potent pro-apoptotic effect of venetoclax, treatment initiation carries a risk of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS). Prompt and appropriate management is needed to limit clinical TLS, which may entail serious adverse events and death. Venetoclax ramp-up involves gradual, stepwise increases in daily venetoclax dosing from 20 mg to 400 mg (target dose) over 5 weeks; adherence to on-label scheduling provides a tumor debulking phase, reducing the risk of TLS. The key components of safe venetoclax therapy involve assessment (radiographic evaluation and baseline blood chemistry), preparation (adequate hydration), and initiation (blood chemistry monitoring). In addition to summarizing the evidence for venetoclax's efficacy and safety, this review uses hypothetical patient scenarios based on risk level for TLS (high, medium, low) to share the authors' clinical experience with venetoclax initiation and present global approaches utilized in various treatment settings. These hypothetical scenarios highlight the importance of a multidisciplinary approach and shared decision-making, outlining best practices for venetoclax initiation and overall optimal treatment strategies in patients with CLL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The heterogeneous expression of signaling molecules within the tumor, including kinases, is the major contributor to the acquisition of drug resistance and poor survival observed in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). The addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy has only marginally prolonged survival in patients with extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC). Recent clinical trials have combined immunotherapy with the pharmacological inhibitors of kinases often dysregulated in SCLC. However, the regime has not been effective in the long term. Here, we review studies and clinical trials exploring dysregulated kinases in SCLC progression and resistance to chemotherapies and immunotherapies. We also discuss the possibility of repurposing kinase inhibitors against SCLC that have already demonstrated promising results for other types of cancers. SCLC is refractory to conventional therapies; targeted therapies and immunological checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) molecules have prolonged survival only marginally. In addition, ICIs help only a subgroup of SCLC patients. Different types of kinases play pivotal roles in therapeutics-driven cellular functions. Therefore, there is a significant need to understand the roles of kinases in regulating therapeutic responses, acknowledge the existing knowledge gaps, and discuss future directions for improved therapeutics for recalcitrant SCLC. Here, we extensively review the effect of dysregulated kinases in SCLC. We further discuss the pharmacological inhibitors of kinases used in targeted therapies for recalcitrant SCLC. We also describe the role of kinases in the ICI-mediated activation of antitumor immune responses. Finally, we summarize the clinical trials evaluating the potential of kinase inhibitors and ICIs. This review overviews dysregulated kinases in SCLC and summarizes their potential as targeted therapeutic agents. We also discuss their clinical efficacy in enhancing anticancer responses mediated by ICIs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Recent observations have led to an expansion of the role of neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) as a component of a multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, some issues related to this treatment remain unclear, including (1) the appropriate indications for NAT (as opposed to up-front surgery); (2) predictors of response to NAT; (3) the effect of the response to NAT on the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (AC); and (4) the establishment of an adjuvant treatment policy based on post-neoadjuvant therapy/surgery histopathological findings. In this article, we discuss these issues based on a review of the literature and the authors' own experience of NAT using gemcitabine plus S-1. In addition to established evidence of the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), evidence of the effects of neoadjuvant treatments (NATs), including chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy, has also been accumulating. Recent results from prospective studies and meta-analyses suggest that NATs may be beneficial not only for borderline resectable PDAC, but also for resectable PDAC, by increasing the likelihood of successful R0 resection, decreasing the likelihood of the development of lymph node metastasis, and improving recurrence-free and overall survival. In addition, response to NAT may be informative for predicting the clinical course after preoperative NAT followed by surgery; in this way, the postoperative treatment strategy can be revised based on the effect of NAT and the post-neoadjuvant therapy/surgery histopathological findings. On the other hand, the response to NAT and AC is also influenced by the tumor biology and the patient's immune/nutritional status; therefore, planning of the treatment strategy and meticulous management of NAT, surgery, and AC is required on a patient-by-patient basis. Our experience of using gemcitabine plus S-1 showed that this NAT regimen achieved tumor shrinkage and decreased the levels of tumor markers but failed to provide a survival benefit. Our results also suggested that response/adverse events to NAT may be predictive of the efficacy of AC, as well as survival outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a heterogenous group consisting of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, distal cholangiocarcinoma, and gallbladder cancer. First-line chemotherapy in advanced BTC has been established, but evidence on second-line chemotherapy remains sparse. Advances in comprehensive genomic analysis have revealed various specific driver genes depending on BTC subtype, and nearly half of BTC cases harbor targetable genetic alterations. Here, we summarize the current knowledge on precision medicine for advanced BTC. First-line chemotherapy has been established for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). However, few treatment options are available as second-line treatment. Advances in comprehensive genomic analysis revealed that nearly half of patients with BTC harbor targetable genetic alterations such as fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH), BRAF, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), microsatellite instability (MSI)-high, neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK), rearranged during transfection (RET), and poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP). This review summarizes currently available options in precision medicine and clinical trials for patients with advanced BTC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The risk of early progression to metastatic disease in the event of biochemical recurrence (BCR) after primary treatment for prostate cancer (PC) is extremely variable. PSA-doubling time (DT) is the best parameter currently available to define patients who are at a higher risk of progression, but a single temporal parameter is not sufficient to describe the heterogeneity of this condition. A real precision medicine approach is strongly suggested to offer tailored management to patients with biochemical relapse. At present, patients with low-risk BCR should be offered active observation, while patients with high-risk BCR are likely to benefit from early systemic therapy. Results from the EMBARK study are likely to impact how physicians choose to manage high-risk BCR. The introduction of the concept of anticipation and intensification of treatment through the use of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) and ADT combination therapy in this indolent but crucial phase is the main innovation of the study. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the definition, classification, diagnosis, and treatment modalities of BCR, with a focus on the latest innovations and ongoing trials in the management of high-risk BCR. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) after primary treatments for prostate cancer (PC) is an extremely heterogeneous phase and at least a stratification into low- and high-risk cases for early progression in metastatic disease is necessary. At present, PSA-DT represents the best parameter to define low- and high-risk BCR PC, but real precision medicine is strongly suggested to define tailored management for patients with BCR. Before defining management, it is necessary to exclude the presence of low-volume metastasis associated with PSA progression using new-generation imaging, preferably with PSMA PET/CT. Low-risk BCR cases should be actively observed without early systemic therapies. Early treatment of low-risk BCR with continuous androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) can produce disadvantages such as the development of castration resistance before the appearance of metastases (non-metastatic castration-resistant PC). Patients with high-risk BCR benefit from early systemic therapy. Even with overall survival (OS) as the primary treatment endpoint, metastasis-free survival (MFS) should be used as a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials, especially in long survival stages of the disease. The EMBARK study has greatly influenced the management of high-risk BCR, by introducing the concept of anticipation and intensification through the use of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) and ADT combination therapy. In high-risk (PSA-DT ≤ 9 months) BCR cases, the combination of enzalutamide with leuprolide significantly improves MFS when compared to leuprolide alone, maintaining an unchanged quality of life in the asymptomatic phase of the disease. The possibility of using ARSIs alone in this early disease setting is suggested by the EMBARK study (arm with enzalutamide alone) with less evidence than with the intensification of the combination therapy. Continued use versus discontinuation of enzalutamide plus leuprolide intensified therapy upon reaching undetectable PSA levels needs to be better defined with further analysis. Real-world analysis must verify the significant results obtained in the context of a phase 3 study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The response rate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains limited. Moreover, there are currently no biomarkers enabling an individual prediction of therapeutic efficacy. The aim of this study was the identification of serum biomarkers of early response to NAC. The elevated level of IL-6 prior to treatment and cycle 2 of the FLOT regimen might be a predictor of pathological response to NAC in locally advanced gastric cancer (GC) or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer. The results were obtained from a small group of patients and currently cannot be used in everyday clinical practice. Confirmation of the results in a larger group of patients seems to be essential from a clinical point of view, bearing in mind that IL-6 plays a significant role in gastric cancer biology, particularly in metastasis formation and in the mechanism of chemotherapeutic resistance. Background: Perioperative treatment is a gold standard in locally advanced gastric cancer or GEJ cancer in the Western population. Unfortunately, the response rate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains limited. Moreover, there are currently no biomarkers enabling an individual prediction of therapeutic efficacy. The aim of this study was the identification of serum biomarkers of early response to NAC. Methods: We conducted this prospective study in the MSCNRIO in Warsaw, Poland. A total of 71 patients and 15 healthy volunteers gave informed consent. Complete blood count, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carcinoma antigen 125 (CA125), carcinoma antigen 19.9 (CA19.9), and fibrinogen (F) were measured at baseline and before every cycle. Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), and interleukin-10 (IL-10) were measured in a pilot group of 40 patients at baseline and before cycle two (C2) and cycle three (C3). Results: Of all the measured parameters, only the IL-6 serum level was statistically significant. The IL-6 level before C2 of chemotherapy was significantly decreased in the complete pathological response (pCR) vs. the non-pCR group (3.71 pg/mL vs. 7.63 pg/mL, p = 0.004). In all patients with an IL-6 level below 5.0 pg/mL in C2, tumour regression TRG1a/1b according to the Becker classification and ypN0 were detected in postoperative histopathological specimens. The IL-6 level before C1 of chemotherapy was significantly elevated in ypN+ vs. ypN0 (7.69 pg/mL vs. 2.89 pg/mL, p = 0.022). Conclusions: The trial showed that an elevated level of IL-6 prior to treatment and C2 might be a predictor of pathological response to NAC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Treatment with targeted agents is an emerging concept for cholangiocarcinoma, a rare cancer with a lack of effective therapies. However, there is limited real-world evidence regarding the use of targeted agents using molecular profiling data from liquid biopsies in clinical practice. This single-centre retrospective study aimed to characterise treatment efficacy and predictors of clinical benefit in cholangiocarcinoma following targeted therapies. Our findings suggest that patients with exposure to targeted agents and response to such treatment are the greatest beneficiaries of this personalized treatment approach; those with previous localised approaches such as surgery had further benefit, suggesting that localised treatment options can be considered in appropriate cases. Further research is needed to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from targeted agents using the liquid biopsy approach and evaluate the optimal sequence of such therapies to maximise treatment response and survival outcomes in this challenging clinical population. Background: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is associated with poor outcomes and limited treatment options, leading to increased use of targeted therapies for its management. Here, we performed one of the largest single-centre reviews evaluating outcomes following personalised targeted agents in CCA patients. Methods: All consecutive CCA patients receiving systemic therapy between January 2010 and April 2023 at UCLH were included. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate treatment response, survival outcomes and predictors of clinical benefit in CCA patients treated with molecularly guided therapies. Patient demographic factors, disease characteristics and survival outcomes were evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional-hazards models. Results: Of the 227 consecutive CCA patients, 162 (71%) had molecular profiling, of whom 56 (35%) were eligible and 55 received molecular-targeted treatment. CCA histological classifications comprised intrahepatic (N = 32), extrahepatic (N = 11), hilar (N = 4) and unknown (N = 9) subtypes. Most patients received targeted agents based on genomic profiling in a second treatment line setting (N = 34). Frequently observed genomic alterations occurred in the FGFR2 (N = 21), IDH1 (N = 7) and BRCA2 (N = 6) genes. Median progression-free survival (PFS) following first-, second- and third-line systemic therapy and overall survival (OS) were 8.44 (95% CI, 7.49–12.78), 5.65 (95% CI, 3.71–7.13), 5.55 (2.79–12.58) and 29.01 (24.21–42.91) months, respectively. CCA subtype and FGFR/BRCA molecular aberration status were not associated with PFS or OS. However, a prior CCA-related surgical history was predictive of OS (p = 0.02). Stratification by best overall response to second-line targeted agents demonstrated an association with PFS (p = 0.002) and OS (p = 0.02). Duration of treatment with second-line targeted therapy was associated with OS (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients receiving targeted therapeutics achieved promising outcomes, especially those attaining a favourable treatment response and those receiving targeted agents for longer periods. Liquid biopsies can reliably provide information on extended molecular profiling to aid patient selection for personalised therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The overall 5-year survival rate for children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has increased over time and is now in the range of 65% to 70%, but survival for patients who relapse continues to be poor. A phase I/II clinical trial was conducted by the pediatric consortium Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia & Lymphoma, with the aim to study immunotherapy along with azacitidine in children with relapsed AML. The combination was well tolerated in all the patients enrolled on the trial, with 33% having stable disease. In future studies, this combination in select pediatric patients with AML should be explored. Improvements in survival have been made over the past two decades for childhood acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but the approximately 40% of patients who relapse continue to have poor outcomes. A combination of checkpoint-inhibitor nivolumab and azacitidine has demonstrated improvements in median survival in adults with AML. This phase I/II study with nivolumab and azacitidine in children with relapsed/refractory AML (NCT03825367) was conducted through the Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia & Lymphoma consortium. Thirteen patients, median age 13.7 years, were enrolled. Patients had refractory disease with multiple reinduction attempts. Twelve evaluable patients were treated at the recommended phase II dose (established at dose level 1, 3 mg/kg/dose). Four patients (33%) maintained stable disease. This combination was well tolerated, with no dose-limiting toxicities observed. Grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) were primarily hematological. Febrile neutropenia was the most common AE ≥ grade 3. A trend to improved quality of life was noted. Increases in CD8+ T cells and reductions in CD4+/CD8+ T cells and demethylation were observed. The combination was well tolerated and had an acceptable safety profile in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory AML. Future studies might explore this combination for the maintenance of remission in children with AML at high risk of relapse. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: In older AML patients, their clinical fitness is of utmost importance for choosing the most appropriate therapy. Therefore, treatment-specific fitness criteria were devised in 2013 by SIE/SIES/GITMO to select patients deemed unfit for intensive chemotherapy (ICT) or even hypomethylating agents (HMAs). Since then, the therapeutic armamentarium for patients unfit for ICT has been enriched. In the present analysis of over 500 patients treated in REL centres, venetoclax/HMAs emerged as the most frequently used treatment. Considering its unique toxicity profile, an update of treatment-specific fitness criteria for selecting candidates for venetoclax/HMAs would be desirable. REL hematologists, who have gained experience with the combination over the last years, were asked if they actually restrict SIE/SIES/GITMO fitness criteria for HMAs when candidating patients to venetoclax/HMAs. A broad consensus emerged on limiting its choice to patients younger than 80–85, with a cardiac EF > 40%, without significant pulmonary comorbidities, and with an adequate caregiver. A retrospective survey was conducted in hematologic centres of the Rete Ematologica Lombarda (REL) on 529 older AML patients seen between 2020–2022. Compared to 2008–2016, the use of intensive chemotherapy (ICT) decreased from 40% to 18.1% and of hypomethylating agents (HMAs) from 19.5% to 13%, whereas the combination of Venetoclax/HMA, initially not available, increased from 0% to 36.7%. Objective treatment-specific fitness criteria proposed by SIE/SIES/GITMO in 2013 allow an appropriate choice between ICT and HMAs by balancing their efficacy and toxicity. Venetoclax/HMA, registered for patients unfit to ICT, has a unique toxicity profile because of prolonged granulocytopenia and increased infectious risk. Aiming at defining specific fitness criteria for the safe use of Venetoclax/HMA, a preliminary investigation was conducted among expert REL hematologists, asking for modifications of SIE/SIES/GITMO criteria they used to select candidates for Venetoclax/HMA. While opinions among experts varied, a general consensus emerged on restricting SIE/SIES/GITMO criteria for ICT-unfit patients to an age limit of 80–85, cardiac function > 40%, and absence of recurrent lung infections, bronchiectasis, or exacerbating COPD. Also, the presence of an adequate caregiver was considered mandatory. Such expert opinions may be clinically useful and may be considered when treatment-specific fitness criteria are updated to include Venetoclax/HMA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Metastatic urothelial carcinoma is sensitive to immunomodulation. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been FDA approved for use as single agents to treat locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) since 2016. Immunotherapy has a lower incidence of side effects and longer durability of response compared to chemotherapy. Most recently, both the first-line combinations of pembrolizumab plus enfortumab vedotin and of nivolumab plus gemcitabine plus cisplatin showed significant overall survival benefit over prior standard-of-care chemotherapy and will be the fifth and sixth new drug regimens approved for mUC in the past four years. Treatment options for mUC are expected to continue to rapidly evolve. Here, we summarize clinical trials of immunotherapy that have led to the current standard of care for mUC, then review clinical trials testing novel immunotherapeutic approaches. A comprehensive understanding of current clinical trials will enable anticipation of upcoming developments and future research directions for mUC. Urothelial cancer is an immune-responsive cancer, but only a subset of patients benefits from immune checkpoint inhibition. Currently, single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and the combination of pembrolizumab with the antibody–drug conjugate enfortumab vedotin are approved to treat patients with metastatic UC (mUC). Approval of first-line nivolumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin is expected imminently. Many treatment approaches are being investigated to better harness the immune system to fight mUC. In this review, we summarize the landmark clinical trials of ICIs that led to their incorporation into the current standard of care for mUC. We further discuss recent and ongoing clinical trials in mUC, which are investigating ICIs in combination with other agents, including chemotherapy, antibody–drug conjugates, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and novel antibodies. Lastly, we review novel approaches utilizing bispecific antibodies, cellular therapies, and vaccines. The landscape of immunotherapy for mUC is rapidly evolving and will hopefully lead to better outcomes for patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death, and identifying effective treatments is crucial. In this study, we focused on patients with advanced liver cancer and explored how a specific protein in the blood, i.e., stem cell growth factor beta (SCGF-β), could indicate how well patients would respond to a common cancer drug combination. By analyzing blood samples from patients with HCC before and after treatment, we discovered that high SCGF-β levels predicted poorer outcomes. Accordingly, our research suggests that measuring SCGF-β levels could help physicians better understand patient prognosis and tailor treatment plans more effectively. The insights from our study could lead to more personalized and successful treatment strategies for patients with HCC. In this retrospective study, we investigated the potential application of serum stem cell growth factor beta (SCGF-β) as a biomarker for predicting the therapeutic response and prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing atezolizumab and bevacizumab (Atz/Bev) combination therapy. Pre- and post-treatment serum SCGF-β levels were measured and analyzed in relation to treatment outcomes and overall survival (OS). Pretreatment SCGF-β levels were associated with treatment response. Patients with SCGF-β levels exceeding the 163,295 pg/mL cutoff experienced significantly reduced OS, with a median OS of 12.03 months, compared to 28.87 months in those with SCGF-β levels at or below this threshold. These findings suggest that SCGF-β can serve as a predictive marker for clinical outcomes in HCC treatment, highlighting the need for prospective studies to further validate these results and clarify the mechanisms underlying SCGF-β-related therapeutic resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Advanced soft tissue sarcomas (aSTSs) have scarce treatment options due to their low incidence, being considered by the World Health Organization as a rare disease; low investment by principal actors in trial designs; and high variability in treatment responses. The combination of gemcitabine and dacarbazine has been demonstrated to be effective in aSTSs in terms of progression-free survival and overall survival in three phase I–II clinical trials. Some pathological, clinical, and analytical variables have been analyzed as possible prognostic and predictive factors, providing a clue for clinicians to select the most optimal treatment in this setting. Background: The combination of gemcitabine and dacarbazine has exhibited efficacy in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for aSTSs, albeit without robust confirmation from larger clinical trials. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study in a single institution involving aSTS patients treated with gemcitabine and dacarbazine. Results: 95 patients were assessed, pointing to a benefit in PFS of 3.5 months and an OS of 14.2 months. Patients with translocated histotypes had better PFS, while those with platelet–lymphocyte ratios (PLRs) surpassing a specific threshold or lower albumin levels had poorer overall survival. Conclusions: This study validates previous findings from three phase I–II trials, affirming the utility of this treatment approach in routine clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Carcinoma in situ of the bladder is an aggressive type of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer characterized as a flat, high-grade tumour confined to the urothelial layer. Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer comprises approximately 75% to 80% of all bladder cancers, with Carcinoma in situ found in about 10% of cases. Intravesical instillations of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin immunotherapy is the standard of care for high-risk and intermediate-risk papillary non-muscle invasive bladder cancer as well as for Carcinoma in situ. Evidence supports that the different Bacillus Calmette-Guérin strains, despite genetic variability, are equally effective clinically for preventing the recurrence and progression of papillary non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. The available evidence regarding possible differences in clinical efficacy between various Bacillus Calmette-Guérin strains specifically against Carcinoma in situ is lacking. We therefore reviewed the literature on this topic. We found that the clinical efficacy of the various Bacillus Calmette-Guérin strains against Carcinoma in situ appears similar. However, our conclusions should be considered with caution as most studies were underpowered, and none of the trials were designed as head-to-head comparisons. Randomized studies should be encouraged in this space to draw definitive conclusions. Introduction: Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) immunotherapy is the standard of care for high-risk and intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) as well as for Carcinoma in situ (CIS). Evidence supports that the different BCG strains, despite genetic variability, are equally effective clinically for preventing the recurrence and progression of papillary NMIBC. The available evidence regarding possible differences in clinical efficacy between various BCG strains in CIS is lacking. Methods: We reviewed the literature on the efficacy of different BCG strains in patients with CIS (whether primary, secondary, concomitant, or unifocal/multifocal), including randomized clinical trials (RCTs), phase II/prospective trials, and retrospective studies with complete response rates (CRR), recurrence-free survival (RFS), or progression-free survival (PFS) as endpoints. Results: In most studies, being RCTs, phase II prospective trials, or retrospective studies, genetic differences between BCG strains did not translate into meaningful differences in clinical efficacy against CIS, regardless of the CIS subset (primary, secondary, or concurrent) or CIS focality (unifocal or multifocal). CRR, RFS, and PFS were not statistically different between various BCG strains. None of these trials were designed as head-to-head comparisons between BCG strains focusing specifically on CIS. Limitations include the small sample size of many studies and most comparisons between strains being indirect rather than head-to-head. Conclusions: This review suggests that the clinical efficacy of the various BCG strains appears similar, irrespective of CIS characteristics. However, based on the weak level of evidence available and underpowered studies, randomized studies in this space should be encouraged as no definitive conclusion can be drawn at this stage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The lysosomal lipid hydrolase acid ceramidase is upregulated in acute myeloid leukemia and promotes leukemic blast survival, underscoring its potential for therapeutic targeting. B-13 is an established ceramidase inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy in multiple solid cancers. Next-generation lysosome-localizing prodrugs of B-13 have been developed but have not been evaluated in AML. This study characterizes the in vitro anti-leukemic efficacy and cell death mechanisms of the B-13 analog and acid ceramidase inhibitor LCL-805 in acute myeloid leukemia. Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive hematologic malignancy requiring urgent treatment advancements. Ceramide is a cell-death-promoting signaling lipid that plays a central role in therapy-induced cell death. We previously determined that acid ceramidase (AC), a ceramide-depleting enzyme, is overexpressed in AML and promotes leukemic survival and drug resistance. The ceramidase inhibitor B-13 and next-generation lysosomal-localizing derivatives termed dimethylglycine (DMG)-B-13 prodrugs have been developed but remain untested in AML. Here, we report the in vitro anti-leukemic efficacy and mechanism of DMG-B-13 prodrug LCL-805 across AML cell lines and primary patient samples. LCL-805 inhibited AC enzymatic activity, increased total ceramides, and reduced sphingosine levels. A median EC50 value of 11.7 μM was achieved for LCL-805 in cell viability assays across 32 human AML cell lines. As a single agent tested across a panel of 71 primary AML patient samples, a median EC50 value of 15.8 μM was achieved. Exogenous ceramide supplementation with C6-ceramide nanoliposomes, which is entering phase I/II clinical trial for relapsed/refractory AML, significantly enhanced LCL-805 killing. Mechanistically, LCL-805 antagonized Akt signaling and led to iron-dependent cell death distinct from canonical ferroptosis. These findings elucidated key factors involved in LCL-805 cytotoxicity and demonstrated the potency of combining AC inhibition with exogenous ceramide. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: On rare occasions, a handful of innovative cancer drugs may successfully go through clinical trials and manage to obtain simultaneous regulatory approvals to treat a specific disease, providing hope for improved treatment outcomes. In the past few years, physicians in North America, Europe, and other countries with stronger economies have been able to use several of the recently approved drugs to treat a blood cancer called multiple myeloma, once older therapies have failed. This study looked at the treatment outcomes associated with the wave of newer drugs in patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma in Greece. The results showed that approximately three-quarters of patients who received one of the newer drugs after having progressed on front-line therapies remained in remission a year after initiating treatment. This finding was comparable to the results from previous studies in Greek patients who were diagnosed with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma and had previously used other therapies. Newer methodologies are needed to assess the real-world comparative effectiveness of a "generation" of pharmaceutical innovation versus the prior standard of care. This chart review study aimed to first evaluate the cumulative clinical benefits of pharmaceutical innovation in everyday relapse/refractory multiple myeloma before analyzing findings in the context of respective real-world outcomes from the bortezomib/lenalidomide era. Study endpoints included the 52-week PFS rate in second and third line of therapy (LOT), mPFS-2 across the first and second LOT, the ORR, reasons for discontinuation, and the treatment duration per therapeutic algorithm. Data from 107 patients were collected. The median follow-up was 2.0 years. Of the subjects who met the selection criteria for the second LOT, 72.2% maintained the PFS at 52 weeks. In the third-line setting, the PFS rate at 52 weeks was 63.5%. The mPFS across the first and second, the second, and the third LOTs were 26, 17, and 15 months, respectively. The ORR was 76.1% in the second and 69.7% in the third LOT. After non-response or progression, the main reason for drug discontinuation was treatment intolerability. The second-line ORR and the 52-week PFS rate were similar to previous real-world findings from the bortezomib/lenalidomide era. The cumulative mPFS across the second and third LOTs was higher than the respective mPFS across the first and second LOTs. Despite its limitations, the methodology and findings from this study may be used in future clinical and economic evaluations across all hematological malignancies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The intrinsic architecture of pancreatic cancer is limiting the efficient dispersion of systemically administered drugs. The research in a mouse model presented herein aims to demonstrate that a multifocal intratumoral drug injection for wider dispersion combined with systemic therapy offers a significant clinical advantage compared to a similar treatment at the same local dosage at a single focus. The encouraging findings obtained may be translated into clinical practice to enhance the quality of life and life expectancy of pancreatic cancer patients. Introduction: Locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC) has a dismal prognosis, with intratumoral therapies showing limited benefits. We assume that the dense stroma within these tumors hampers drug dispersion. Aim: This study explores the efficacy of multisite intratumoral injections in improving a drug's distribution while minimizing its side effects. Methods and Results: In mice with orthotopic LAPC tumors, weekly intratumoral injections of oxaliplatin at four separate sites reduced the tumor growth by 46% compared with saline (p < 0.003). Oxaliplatin exhibited the greatest impact on the tumor microenvironment relative to gemcitabine, Abraxane, or their combination, with increased necrosis, apoptosis, fibroblasts, inflammation, and infiltrating lymphocytes (p < 0.008). When combined with intravenous FOLFIRINOX (FFX), multisite intratumoral oxaliplatin reduced the tumor weight by 35% compared with single-site injection (p = 0.007). No additional visible toxicity was observed even at a 10-fold occurrence of intratumoral treatment. This co-modality treatment significantly improved survival compared with other groups (p = 0.007). Conclusions: Multisite intratumoral therapy in tandem with systemic treatment holds promise for reducing the tumor size and enhancing the overall survival in LAPC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Remarkable strides have been performed in the treatment of adults diagnosed with Philadelphia-positive lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) through the integration of newer-generation tyrosine-kinase inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. However, it is crucial to acknowledge that most medical centers worldwide lack access to these therapies. As a result, primary strategies employed for curing this disease continue to rely on a combination of chemotherapy and allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. Additionally, the scarcity of comprehensive literature makes it particularly challenging to provide straightforward treatment recommendations. In this narrative review, our aim is to offer a real-world perspective on the monitoring and management of Ph+ ALL patients, with an emphasis on less-resourced scenarios. Recent studies have indicated that more than half of adult patients newly diagnosed with Ph+ ALL can now achieve a cure. However, determining the most suitable protocol for less-resourced settings can be challenging. In these situations, we must consider the potential for treatment toxicity and limited access to newer agents and alloSCT facilities. Currently, it is advisable to use less intensive induction regimens for Ph+ ALL. These regimens can achieve high rates of complete remission while causing fewer induction deaths. For consolidation therapy, chemotherapy should remain relatively intensive, with careful monitoring of the BCR-ABL1 molecular transcript and minimal residual disease. AlloSCT may be considered, especially for patients who do not achieve complete molecular remission or have high-risk genetic abnormalities, such as IKZF1-plus. If there is a loss of molecular response, it is essential to screen patients for ABL mutations and, ideally, change the TKI therapy. The T315I mutation is the most common mechanism for disease resistance, being targetable to ponatinib. Blinatumomab, a bispecific antibody, has shown significant synergy with TKIs in treating this disease. It serves as an excellent salvage therapy, aside from achieving outstanding results when incorporated into the frontline. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death globally. Developing liquid biopsies that aid in the detection and monitoring of recurrent CRC may improve clinical management and patient outcomes. In this study, we investigated a serially sampled blood assay of methylated DNA markers (MDMs) in combination with carcinoembryonic antigen as a clinical tool to surveil and monitor recurrent cancer in a prospective cohort of patients who completed curative-intent therapy for CRC. We demonstrated that the MDMs detected recurrent CRC before the clinical or radiographic detection of recurrence. In a small number of patients, we further showed that the MDMs may correlate with the tumor burden. These data highlight the importance of incorporating epigenetic signatures into liquid biopsies and support further research to validate the correlations of circulating tumor DNA with the tumor burden. Background: Radiographic surveillance of colorectal cancer (CRC) after curative-intent therapy is costly and unreliable. Methylated DNA markers (MDMs) detected primary CRC and metastatic recurrence with high sensitivity and specificity in cross-sectional studies. This study evaluated using serial MDMs to detect recurrence and monitor the treatment response to anti-cancer therapies. Methods: A nested case-control study was drawn from a prospective cohort of patients with CRC who completed curative-intent therapy for CRC of all stages. Plasma MDMs were assayed vis target enrichment long-probe quantitative-amplified signal assays, normalized to B3GALT6, and analyzed in combination with serum carcinoembryonic antigen to yield an MDM score. Clinical information, including treatment and radiographic measurements of the tumor burden, were longitudinally collected. Results: Of the 35 patients, 18 had recurrence and 17 had no evidence of disease during the study period. The MDM score was positive in 16 out of 18 patients who recurred and only 2 of the 17 patients without recurrence. The MDM score detected recurrence in 12 patients preceding clinical or radiographic detection of recurrent CRC by a median of 106 days (range 90–232 days). Conclusions: Plasma MDMs can detect recurrent CRC prior to radiographic detection; this tumor-agnostic liquid biopsy approach may assist cancer surveillance and monitoring. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Third-line or further treatments are rarely given to patients with refractory mCRC. In this regard, two noteworthy innovative therapy options, with varying toxicity profiles and statistically significant improvements in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease control, are regorafenib (R) and trifluridine/tipiracil (T). This study is a subset analysis of a larger retrospective study that we have already published, with the aim of evaluating patient outcomes when R and T were administered in that order. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the relationship between survival outcomes and the first drug treatment duration (<3 months, 3 to <6 months, and ≥6 months) in patients who had received the regorafenib-to-trifluridine/tipiracil sequence or vice versa. Our substudy found that administering R three to six months prior to T can prolong both OS and PFS in comparison to the opposite sequence. Background: Patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) rarely receive third-line or further treatment. In this context, regorafenib (R) and trifluridine/tipiracil (T) are two important novel therapeutic choices with statistically significant increases in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease control, with different toxicity profiles. This study is a subgroup analysis of our larger retrospective study, already published, whose objective was to assess the outcomes of patients when R and T were given sequentially. Patients and Methods: The study involved thirteen Italian cancer centers on a 10-year retrospective observation (2012–2022). In this subgroup analysis, we focused our attention on the correlation between the first drug treatment duration (<3 months, 3 to <6 months and ≥6 months) and survival outcomes in patients who had received the sequence regorafenib-to-trifluridine/tipiracil, or vice versa. Results: The initial study included 866 patients with mCRC who received sequential T/R, or R/T, or T or R alone. This analysis is focused on evaluating the impact of the duration of the first treatment in the sequence on clinical outcomes (OS, PFS) and includes 146 and 116 patients of the T/R and R/T sequences, respectively. Based on the duration of the first drug treatment, subgroups for the T/R sequence included 27 patients (18.4%) who received T for <3 months, 86 (58.9%) treated for 3 to <6 months, and 33 (22.6%) treated for ≥6 months; in the reverse sequence (R as the first drug), subgroups included 18 patients (15.5%) who received their first treatment for <3 months, 62 (53.4%) treated for 3 to <6 months, and 35 (31.0%) treated for ≥6 months. In patients who received their first drug treatment for a period of 3 to <6 months, the R/T sequence had a significantly longer median OS (13.7 vs. 10.8 months, p = 0.0069) and a longer median PFS (10.8 vs. 8.5 months, p = 0.0003) than the T/R group. There were no statistically significant differences between groups with first drug treatment durations of <3 months and ≥6 months. Conclusions: Our analysis seems to suggest that the administration of R for a period of 3 to <6 months before that of T can prolong both OS and PFS, as compared to the opposite sequence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Nexavant, a newly reported TLR3 agonist, has advantages over Poly(I:C) in terms of quality control and pre-clinical efficacy. Here, we further investigated the physicochemical properties, downstream signaling pathways, anti-cancer efficacy, and mechanism of action of Nexavant. The Nexavant was homogenous in solution and less sensitive to RNase A, and showed thermostability compared with Poly(I:C). Unlike Poly(I:C), which activates TLR3, RIG-I, and MDA5, Nexavant only activated TLR3 and RIG-I, not MDA5. The administration of Nexavant via either the intratumoral route or the intranasal route suppressed tumor growth in various cancer models. Combination therapy with anti-PD-1 antibodies resulted in better, synergistic tumor growth inhibition compared to the respective monotherapies. This study demonstrated that Nexavant could be more suitable for clinical use than Poly(I:C) and applied as an anti-cancer agent in the presence or absence of anti-PD-1 antibodies. Nexavant was reported as an alternative to the TLR3 agonist of Poly(I:C) and its derivatives. The physicochemical properties, signaling pathways, anti-cancer effects, and mechanisms of Nexavant were investigated. The distinctive characteristics of Nexavant compared to that of Poly(I:C) were demonstrated by precise quantification, enhanced thermostability, and increased resistance to RNase A. Unlike Poly(I:C), which activates TLR3, RIG-I, and MDA5, Nexavant stimulates signaling through TLR3 and RIG-I but not through MDA5. Compared to Poly(I:C), an intratumoral Nexavant treatment led to a unique immune response, immune cell infiltration, and suppression of tumor growth in various animal cancer models. Nexavant therapy outperformed anti-PD-1 antibody treatment in all the tested models and showed a synergistic effect in combinational therapy, especially in well-defined cold tumor models. The effect was similar to that of nivolumab in a humanized mouse model. Intranasal instillation of Nexavant led to the recruitment of immune cells (NK, CD4+ T, and CD8+ T) to the lungs, suppressing lung metastasis and improving animal survival. Our study highlighted Nexavant's defined nature for clinical use and unique signaling pathways and its potential as a standalone anti-cancer agent or in combination with anti-PD-1 antibodies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treatment includes surgery, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy with the aim of eradicating cancer cells without affecting normal tissues. HNSCC expresses epidermal growth factor receptor and cetuximab, an IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting epidermal growth factor receptor, has been approved for the treatment of HNSCC. However, cetuximab has low reactivity. Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) were reported to enhance the local antitumor effects of radiotherapy without damaging normal cells. This study investigated the in vitro and in vivo effects of single and combination therapy with AuNPs, cetuximab, and radiotherapy on a human HNSCC cell line. Combination treatment of AuNPs + cetuximab + radiotherapy markedly reduced HNSCC cell numbers and proliferation and enhanced apoptosis compared with single and double combination treatments. Furthermore, the in vivo combination treatment (AuNPs + cetuximab + radiotherapy) reduced the tumor volume compared with the controls. This study showed that AuNPs sensitize tumors to radiotherapy and bind to cetuximab, leading to enhanced antitumor effects. Introduction: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treatment includes surgery, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy with the aim of eradicating cancer cells without affecting normal tissues. HNSCC expresses epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and cetuximab, an IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting epidermal growth factor receptor, has been approved for the treatment of HNSCC. However, cetuximab has low reactivity and induces serious side effects. Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) were reported to enhance the local antitumor effects of radiotherapy without damaging normal cells. Methods and Results: This study investigated the in vitro effects of single and combination therapy with AuNPs (1.0 nM), cetuximab (30 nM), and radiotherapy (4 Gy) on a human HNSCC cell line, HSC-3. Combination treatment of AuNPs + cetuximab + radiotherapy markedly reduced HSC-3 numbers and proliferation and enhanced apoptosis compared with single and double combination treatments. Furthermore, the in vivo combination treatment (AuNPs + cetuximab + radiotherapy) of a xenograft model of HSC-3 cells transplanted into nude mice (BALB/cAJcl-nu/nu) reduced the tumor volume compared with the controls. Scanning electron microscopy demonstrated the presence of AuNPs in tumor tissues and toxicity analysis indicated that AuNPs had no toxic effect on normal tissues. Conclusions: This study showed that AuNPs alone do not have a tumor-suppressing effect, but they sensitize tumors to radiotherapy and bind to cetuximab, leading to enhanced antitumor effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Gastric cancer (GC) peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is treatment refractory, and GCPC patient survival remains poor despite the use of better systemic and regional therapeutic strategies. Alternative approaches are required to overcome the distinct barriers to improve outcomes in GCPC patients. Here, we review recent developments in CAR T cell therapy and oncolytic virotherapy in GCPC and present the exciting potential of a combination immunotherapeutic approach. Precision immune oncology capitalizes on identifying and targeting tumor-specific antigens to enhance anti-tumor immunity and improve the treatment outcomes of solid tumors. Gastric cancer (GC) is a molecularly heterogeneous disease where monoclonal antibodies against human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) combined with systemic chemotherapy have improved survival in patients with unresectable or metastatic GC. However, intratumoral molecular heterogeneity, variable molecular target expression, and loss of target expression have limited antibody use and the durability of response. Often immunogenically "cold" and diffusely spread throughout the peritoneum, GC peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is a particularly challenging, treatment-refractory entity for current systemic strategies. More adaptable immunotherapeutic approaches, such as oncolytic viruses (OVs) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, have emerged as promising GC and GCPC treatments that circumvent these challenges. In this study, we provide an up-to-date review of the pre-clinical and clinical efficacy of CAR T cell therapy for key primary antigen targets and provide a translational overview of the types, modifications, and mechanisms for OVs used against GC and GCPC. Finally, we present a novel, summary-based discussion on the potential synergistic interplay between OVs and CAR T cells to treat GCPC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]