Search

Simple Summary: TGF-β is an important cytokine shown to drive oncogenesis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) through its diverse influences on the tumor microenvironment. While this cytokine is vital in maintaining tissue homeostasis in normal head and neck epithelia, in cancer, it paradoxically drives metastasis, angiogenesis, immune evasion, and therapy resistance. Despite promising preclinical data, the outcome of clinical trials of TGF-β inhibitors for HNSCC has been suboptimal. Patient stratification is warranted to improve this targeted therapy. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the sixth leading cause of cancer worldwide according to GLOBOCAN estimates from 2022. Current therapy options for recurrent or metastatic disease are limited to conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy and immunotherapy, with few targeted therapy options readily available. Recent single-cell transcriptomic analyses identified TGF-β signaling as an important mediator of functional interplays between cancer-associated fibroblasts and a subset of mesenchymal cancer cells. This signaling was shown to drive invasiveness, treatment resistance, and immune evasion. These data provide renewed interest in the TGF-β pathway as an alternative therapeutic target, prompting a critical review of previous clinical data which suggest a lack of benefit from TGF-β inhibitors. While preclinical data have demonstrated the great anti-tumorigenic potential of TGF-β inhibitors, the underwhelming results of ongoing and completed clinical trials highlight the difficulty actualizing these benefits into clinical practice. This topical review will discuss the relevant preclinical and clinical findings for TGF-β inhibitors in HNSCC and will explore the potential role of patient stratification in the development of this therapeutic strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The YAP/TAZ signaling pathways, which is involved in tumor development and proliferation in a variety of solid tumors, inhibits hypoxia-induced cell death, increases and stabilizes angiogenesis, and activates tumor proliferation, both independently and in conjunction with HIF in hypoxic tumors. It also promotes tumor metastasis by regulating different TME environments. Therefore, understanding the activity of YAP/TAZ as a mechanism of tumor development may lead to the development of novel therapeutic strategies. In solid tumors such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), hypoxia is one of the important mechanisms of cancer development that closely influences cancer development, survival, and metastasis. The development of treatments for cancer was temporarily revolutionized by immunotherapy but continues to be constrained by limited response rates and the resistance and high costs required for the development of new and innovative strategies. In particular, solid tumors, including HCC, a multi-vascular tumor type, are sensitive to hypoxia and generate many blood vessels for metastasis and development, making it difficult to treat HCC, not only with immunotherapy but also with drugs targeting blood vessels. Therefore, in order to develop a treatment strategy for hypoxic tumors, various mechanisms must be explored and analyzed to treat these impregnable solid tumors. To date, tumor growth mechanisms linked to hypoxia are known to be complex and coexist with various signal pathways, but recently, mechanisms related to the Hippo signal pathway are emerging. Interestingly, Hippo YAP/TAZ, which appear during early tumor and normal tumor growth, and YAP/TAZ, which appear during hypoxia, help tumor growth and proliferation in different directions. Peculiarly, YAP/TAZ, which have different phosphorylation directions in the hypoxic environment of tumors, are involved in cancer proliferation and metastasis in various carcinomas, including HCC. Analyzing the mechanisms that regulate the function and expression of YAP in addition to HIF in the complex hypoxic environment of tumors may lead to a variety of anti-cancer strategies and combining HIF and YAP/TAZ may develop the potential to change the landscape of cancer treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Glioblastoma is the most common brain tumour, with a poor prognosis of about 15 months despite intensive treatment. Many trials have tested new drugs targeting specific genes, but none have succeeded, and treatments have not changed since 2005. This review explores why clinical trials with these drugs failed. It highlights the potential of combining different drugs to overcome resistance and suggests ways to improve future trials. The goal is to understand treatment failures and find new drug combinations to improve survival for GBM patients. Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most prevalent central nervous system tumour (CNS). Patients with GBM have a dismal prognosis of 15 months, despite an intensive treatment schedule consisting of surgery, chemoradiation and concurrent chemotherapy. In the last decades, many trials have been performed investigating small molecule inhibitors, which target specific genes involved in tumorigenesis. So far, these trials have been unsuccessful, and standard of care for GBM patients has remained the same since 2005. This review gives an overview of trials investigating small molecule inhibitors on their own, combined with chemotherapy or other small molecule inhibitors. We discuss possible resistance mechanisms in GBM, focussing on intra- and intertumoral heterogeneity, bypass mechanisms and the influence of the tumour microenvironment. Moreover, we emphasise how combining inhibitors can help overcome these resistance mechanisms. We also address strategies for improving trial outcomes through modifications to their design. In summary, this review aims to elucidate different resistance mechanisms against small molecule inhibitors, highlighting their significance in the search for novel therapeutic combinations to improve the overall survival of GBM patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: ICI-based combinations have led to a significant change in mRCC medical treatment. However, data from real-world (RW) cohorts are rare. In this multicenter study, we evaluated the safety and effectiveness of cabozantinib plus nivolumab in real-world cohorts from centers in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria. The median PFS in the overall cohort was 18.6 months. We also analyzed subgroups in relation to the IMDC, histology, and with regard to the presence of bone metastasis. In summary, our real-word data support the promising efficacy data of the pivotal trials, particularly in patients with non-ccRCC and those without bone metastases at the start of the treatment. Introduction: Combinations of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the standard of care (SOC) for treatment-naive metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients. In this multicenter study, we evaluated the RW safety and efficacy of cabozantinib plus nivolumab in mRCC patients. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from twelve cancer centers in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria. Patients with advanced or mRCC were eligible. The investigator-based objective response rate (ORR) and progression free survival (PFS) were calculated from the start of the treatment to progression or death. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan–Meier (KM) plots were utilized where appropriate. Results: In total, 96 eligible patients (66.6% male) with a median age of 66.0 years were included. The most common histology was clear-cell RCC (ccRCC) in 63.4% (n = 61). A prior nephrectomy was performed in 60.4% (n = 58). ECOG 0-1 was 68.8% (n = 66). A partial response was documented in 43.8% of patients (n = 42), a stable disease in 32.3% (n = 31), and a progressive disease in 8.3% (n = 8) as the best overall response. Response data were not evaluable in 13.5% (n = 13). The median follow-up time was 12.7 months (95% CI, 10.0–15.3). The PFS rate at 6 months was 89.8% in the overall population (86.8% for ccRCC; 90.0% for non-ccRCC). Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 82.3% (n = 79) for all grades and 41.7% (n = 40) for grades 3–5. Elevated liver enzymes (34.4%), diarrhea (31.3%), and hand–foot syndrome (29.2%) were the three most frequent AEs of any grade and causality. Discussion/Conclusions: In this real-world cohort of mRCC patients, the application of cabozantinib plus nivolumab was shown to be safe and feasible. Our data support the use of cabozantinib plus nivolumab as a first-line standard therapy in mRCC patients. Major limitations were the retrospective data capture and short follow-up time of our study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Glioblastoma (GBM) appears to be a challenging malignancy to completely eradicate, with few significant improvements in treatment. This review explores the mechanisms by which GBM tumors acquire resistance to antiangiogenic therapy, which are designed to inhibit the growth of blood vessels in tumors. This study addresses numerous mechanisms of resistance, including redundant pathways, heightened invasion, hypoxia, and immune modulation. This article additionally highlights potential strategies to overcome resistance, including combination therapies, personalized medicine, immunotherapy, and drug delivery using nanoparticles, with the goal of enhancing treatment results for patients with GBM. Malignant gliomas present great difficulties in treatment, with little change over the past 30 years in the median survival time of 15 months. Current treatment options include surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and chemotherapy. New therapies aimed at suppressing the formation of new vasculature (antiangiogenic treatments) or destroying formed tumor vasculature (vascular disrupting agents) show promise. This study summarizes the existing knowledge regarding the processes by which glioblastoma (GBM) tumors acquire resistance to antiangiogenic treatments. The discussion encompasses the activation of redundant proangiogenic pathways, heightened tumor cell invasion and metastasis, resistance induced by hypoxia, creation of vascular mimicry channels, and regulation of the tumor immune microenvironment. Subsequently, we explore potential strategies to overcome this resistance, such as combining antiangiogenic therapies with other treatment methods, personalizing treatments for each patient, focusing on new therapeutic targets, incorporating immunotherapy, and utilizing drug delivery systems based on nanoparticles. Additionally, we would like to discuss the limitations of existing methods and potential future directions to enhance the beneficial effects of antiangiogenic treatments for patients with GBM. Therefore, this review aims to enhance the research outcome for GBM and provide a more promising opportunity by thoroughly exploring the mechanisms of resistance and investigating novel therapeutic strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: It is unknown whether different types of exercise effect physical function, quality of life, mental wellbeing, and symptoms in older patients with blood cancers. No studies specifically focusing on patients over 65 years were identified. However, across adult age groups, we found that exercise has small to moderate positive effects on physical function, aerobic capacity, muscle strength, quality of life, fatigue, pain, anxiety, and depression. These benefits were generally consistent regardless of age, except for physical function and pain, which favored younger adults. Overall, exercise improves physical function and quality of life and reduces symptoms in adults with blood cancers undergoing treatment, but the role of age remains uncertain. Older patients receiving antineoplastic treatment face challenges such as frailty and reduced physical capacity and function. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of exercise interventions on physical function outcomes, health-related quality of life (QoL), and symptom burden in older patients above 65 years with hematological malignancies undergoing antineoplastic treatment. This review adheres to Cochrane guidelines, with the literature searches last updated on 27 March 2024, including studies with patients above 18 years. Screening of identified studies, data extraction, risk of bias, and GRADE assessments were performed independently by two authors. Meta-analyses evaluated the impact of exercise, considering advancing age. Forty-nine studies contributed data to the meta-analyses. Five studies included patients with a mean age above 60 years, and none included only patients above 60. Exercise interventions had moderate to small positive effects on QoL global (SMD 0.34, 95% CI [0.04–0.64]) and physical function (SMD 0.29, 95% CI [0.12–0.45]). Age did not explain the variability in exercise effects, except for physical function (slope 0.0401, 95% CI [0.0118–0.0683]) and pain (slope 0.0472, 95% CI [0.01–0.09]), which favored younger patients. Exercise interventions improve physical function and QoL and reduce symptoms in adults with hematological malignancies undergoing antineoplastic treatment; however, the influence of age remains inconclusive. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Induction regimens using 4-drugs for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma have shown impressive results in multiple trials. However, trials of 4-drug regimens typically use a 3-drug regimen as their comparator, which limits our ability to determine whether the benefit is from the specific combination of drugs or just the addition of more agents. We performed a meta-analysis to compare all trials that compared 4-drug to 3-drug regimens and found that the addition of an anti-CD38 antibody (daratumumab or isatuximab) resulted in improved responses, while 4-drug regimens without an anti-CD38 antibody performed similarly to 3-drug regimens. While the addition of an anti-CD38 antibody led to increased adverse effects, these were predominantly mild and easily managed. These data suggest that an anti-CD38 antibody should be part of all 4-drug induction regimens for newly diagnosed myeloma patients. The use of 4-drug induction regimens for treatment naïve newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) is associated with improved depth of response and progression-free survival (PFS). However, head-to-head trials of 4-drug combinations are lacking, and instead, these regimens are typically compared to 3-drug backbones; limiting the ability to discern whether any additional benefit (or toxicity) is simply additive or represents a synergy (or interaction). We conducted a meta-analysis of phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials that randomized treatment naïve NDMM patients to either a 4-drug or 3-drug induction regimen. We included 11 trials which represented 6509 unique patients. PFS for all trials in the meta-analysis was 54 months with a 4-drug induction and 8.9 months with a 3-drug induction (HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.45; 0.54), but there was no benefit to using a 4-drug induction that did not include an anti-CD38 antibody (PFS 4-drug 8.1 months, PFS 3-drug 8.0 months; HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.86; 1.06). Adverse events were more frequent with the quadruplet regimens but were predominately mild. High-grade (≥3) adverse events (AEs) that were more common with 4-drug regimens were infections (RR: 1.34; 95% CI 1.17; 1.54) and thrombocytopenia (RR: 1.39; 95% CI 1.12; 1.74). This study suggests that 4-drug induction regimens which include an anti-CD38 antibody improve efficacy although with additional toxicity in NDMM patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Multiple myeloma is a heterogenous hematological condition with a worldwide incidence of between 0.5–5 per 100,000. The standard front-line treatment algorithm suggests induction chemotherapy, early stem cell transplant in those eligible, followed by maintenance chemotherapy. Unfortunately, most people subsequently relapse and require salvage treatment. A wide array of options are available in the management of relapse/refractory multiple myeloma. Our review aims to describe the new, approved treatment modalities in this setting while describing data on the efficacy, tolerability, and nuances of each available option. Multiple myeloma is a heterogeneous condition characterized by the proliferation of monoclonal B-cells, for which there is currently no curative treatment available. Relapses are, unfortunately, common after first-line treatment. While the prognosis for relapsed refractory multiple myeloma is generally poor, advances in the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma offer hope. However, the expansion of effective options in targeted treatment offers renewed optimism and hope that patients who fail on older therapies may respond to newer modalities, which are often used in combination. We review currently approved and novel investigational agents classified by mechanisms of action, efficacy, approved setting, and adverse events. We delve into future directions of treatment for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, reviewing novel agents and therapeutic targets for the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Somatostatin analogs like lanreotide are considered first-line agents for the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NET). Although its effects on tumor proliferation and hormonal regulation are somewhat understood, its influence on the immune system has not been well elucidated. We used a double-pronged approach to understand the role of lanreotide in immune system regulation in healthy donor T cells in vitro as well as in vivo in cells obtained from 17 NET patients. We looked at cytokine signaling and differential gene expression to elucidate lanreotide's role in the treatment of NET through additional novel immune pathways. The CLARINET trial led to the approval of lanreotide for the treatment of patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). It is hypothesized that lanreotide regulates proliferation, hormone synthesis, and other cellular functions via binding to somatostatin receptors (SSTR1–5) present in NETs. However, our knowledge of how lanreotide affects the immune system is limited. In vitro studies have investigated functional immune response parameters with lanreotide treatment in healthy donor T cell subsets, encompassing the breadth of SSTR expression, apoptosis induction, cytokine production, and activity of transcription factor signaling pathways. In our study, we characterized in vitro immune mechanisms in healthy donor T cells in response to lanreotide. We also studied the in vivo effects by looking at differential gene expression pre- and post-lanreotide therapy in patients with NET. Immune-focused gene and protein expression profiling was performed on peripheral blood samples from 17 NET patients and correlated with clinical response. In vivo, lanreotide therapy showed reduced effects on wnt, T cell receptor (TCR), and nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-kB) signaling in CD8+ T cells in responders compared to non-responders. Compared to non-responders, responders showed reduced effects on cytokine and chemokine signaling but greater effects on ubiquitination and proteasome degradation genes. Our results suggest significant lanreotide pharmacodynamic effects on immune function in vivo, which correlate with responses in NET patients. This is not evident from experimental in vitro settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Human cells are typically diploid, that is, they contain two sets of chromosomes. Some cells, however, contain three or more sets of chromosomes and are called polyploid. In the early 2000s, Kirsten Walen and Rengaswami Rajaraman and his associates independently reported that polyploid human cells are capable of undergoing asymmetric division via nuclear budding and bursting (amitosis), giving rise to daughter cells that proliferate rapidly and can contribute to tumorigenesis (transformation of normal cells to a neoplastic state). This commentary provides an update on these intriguing discoveries. Cell division is crucial for the survival of living organisms. Human cells undergo three types of cell division: mitosis, meiosis, and amitosis. The former two types occur in somatic cells and germ cells, respectively. Amitosis involves nuclear budding and occurs in cells that exhibit abnormal nuclear morphology (e.g., polyploidy) with increased cell size. In the early 2000s, Kirsten Walen and Rengaswami Rajaraman and his associates independently reported that polyploid human cells are capable of producing progeny via amitotic cell division, and that a subset of emerging daughter cells proliferate rapidly, exhibit stem cell-like properties, and can contribute to tumorigenesis. Polyploid cells that arise in solid tumors/tumor-derived cell lines are referred to as polyploid giant cancer cells (PGCCs) and are known to contribute to therapy resistance and disease recurrence following anticancer treatment. This commentary provides an update on some of these intriguing discoveries as a tribute to Drs. Walen and Rajaraman. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Treatment personalization is essential in the era of precision medicine. Biomarkers are necessary to predict clinical outcomes and guide treatment selection to improve efficacy and reduce toxicity. Genomic human leukocyte antigen-class I (HLA-I) has been shown to correlate with outcomes among non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with immunotherapy. Here, we investigate whether the HLA genotype is predictive of outcomes in regard to the combination of immunotherapy with chemotherapy. We found that the HLA-I supertypes HLA-A01 and -A03, but not HLA homozygosity, overall correlated with survival in NSCLC patients treated with immunochemotherapy. While further validation is needed, these results highlight the potential and variability of the HLA genotyping as a biomarker for immunotherapy delivery. Introduction: Maximal heterozygosity on the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) loci has been found to be associated with improved survival and development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) among NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy. Here, we investigated the effect of germline HLA-I/-II on clinical outcomes among NSCLC patients treated with first-line pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy. Method: We prospectively recruited patients with NSCLC who were commencing first-line pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy. DNA from white blood cells was used for high-resolution HLA-I/II typing. Results: Of the 65 patients recruited, 53 complied with the inclusion criteria. We did not find an association between HLA-I/-II homozygosity and clinical outcome among the studied population. However, the presence of HLA-A01 was associated with unfavourable PFS (HR = 2.32, 95%CI 1.13–4.77, p = 0.022) and worsening OS (HR = 2.86, 95%CI 1.06–7.70, p = 0.038). The presence of HLA-B27 was associated with improved PFS (HR = 0.35, 95%CI 0.18–0.71, p = 0.004) and trends toward improving OS. None of the HLA-I supertypes were associated with the development or worsening of irAEs. Conclusions: The absence of association between genomic HLA-I/-II homozygosity and clinical outcome among patients with advanced NSCLC treated with pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy might reflect a diminished role for HLA molecules among patients with low or no PD-L1. HLA-A01 and HLA-B27 might have a role in predicting clinical outcomes among this cohort of patients. Further studies are needed to explore biomarkers for this group of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Adjuvant therapy with targeted therapy or immunotherapy has become the standard of care for fully resected stage III–IV melanoma. In this scenario, real-world data are needed to relate the actual effectiveness and safety of these regimens with the evidence provided in the clinical trials. This study provides clinicians and researchers with the results of an Italian single-center real-world experience on the use of adjuvant therapy in resected stage III–IV melanoma patients. Our findings confirm the real-world effectiveness and safety of adjuvant regimens, yet underscores the need for further research to explore biomarker-based predictors for relapse and to assess the translation of improved relapse-free survival into long-term overall survival benefit. This study was carried out at the Dermatologic Clinic of the University of Turin, Italy, to assess the effectiveness and safety of adjuvant therapy in patients who received either targeted therapy (TT: dabrafenib + trametinib) or immunotherapy (IT: nivolumab or pembrolizumab) for up to 12 months. A total of 163 patients participated, including 147 with stage III and 19 with stage IV with no evidence of disease. The primary outcomes were relapse-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS). At 48 months, both TT and IT approaches yielded comparable outcomes in terms of RFS (55.6–55.4%, p = 0.532), DMFS (58.2–59.8%, p = 0.761), and OS (62.4–69.5%, p = 0.889). Whilst temporary therapy suspension was more common among TT-treated patients compared to IT-treated individuals, therapy discontinuation due to adverse events occurred at comparable rates in both groups. Predictors of relapse included mitoses, lymphovascular invasion, ulceration, and positive sentinel lymph nodes. Overall, the proportion of BRAF-mutated patients receiving IT stood at 7.4%, lower than what was observed in clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This review explores the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to predict the effectiveness of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in cancer treatment. The problem addressed is the need for more accurate methods to predict how well cancer therapies will work, particularly in personalized medicine. This study's aim is to discuss how AI can enhance the precision of ADC therapy by analyzing data from clinical trials and molecular biomarkers. This review highlights that AI can significantly reduce the time and cost associated with drug discovery and improve the targeting of cancer cells, reducing side effects and increasing treatment efficacy. We conclude that as more data become available from ongoing clinical trials, AI has the potential to become a standard tool in predicting ADC responses, thereby improving patient outcomes and advancing cancer treatment. This research is valuable as it could lead to more effective and personalized cancer therapies, benefiting society by potentially saving lives and reducing healthcare costs. The medical research field has been tremendously galvanized to improve the prediction of therapy efficacy by the revolution in artificial intelligence (AI). An earnest desire to find better ways to predict the effectiveness of therapy with the use of AI has propelled the evolution of new models in which it can become more applicable in clinical settings such as breast cancer detection. However, in some instances, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration was obliged to back some previously approved inaccurate models for AI-based prognostic models because they eventually produce inaccurate prognoses for specific patients who might be at risk of heart failure. In light of instances in which the medical research community has often evolved some unrealistic expectations regarding the advances in AI and its potential use for medical purposes, implementing standard procedures for AI-based cancer models is critical. Specifically, models would have to meet some general parameters for standardization, transparency of their logistic modules, and avoidance of algorithm biases. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge about AI-based prognostic methods and describe how they may be used in the future for predicting antibody-drug conjugate efficacy in cancer patients. We also summarize the findings of recent late-phase clinical trials using these conjugates for cancer therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Abemaciclib is an important addition to the care of women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. To qualify for abemaciclib treatment, some women are advised to undergo axillary node clearance surgery as finding more than three axillary nodes with metastatic cancer allows access to abemaciclib. This paper explores the balance between the benefits of axillary node clearance in permitting access to abemaciclib and the harms of surgery. We examine how many women need to undergo axillary node clearance before one woman clinically benefits from the procedure. We show that for every 10 women undergoing axillary node clearance surgery, only one eventually qualifies for abemaciclib. The remaining nine would have axillary surgery but still not qualify for abemaciclib as less than four metastatic axillary nodes are found despite full axillary clearance. However, these women could still suffer the complications of axillary node clearance surgery. The monarchE study added the CDK4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib to the care of women with oestrogen-positive (ER+) breast cancers. Eligibility required meeting monarchE criteria—either >3 positive axillary nodes, or 1–3 positive sentinel nodes (SNB+) with tumour size >50 mm or grade 3 cancers. Women were advised to proceed to completion axillary node clearance (cANC) if size/grade criteria were not fulfilled for >3 positive nodes to be identified. However, cANC is associated with significant morbidity, conflicting with the potential benefits of abemaciclib. We analysed data of 229 consecutive women (2016-2022) with ER+ breast cancer and SNB+ who proceeded to cANC, keeping with contemporary treatment guidelines. We used this cohort to assess numbers that, under national guidance in place currently, would be advised to undergo cANC solely to check eligibility for abemaciclib treatment. Using monarchE criteria, 90 women (39%) would have accessed abemaciclib based on SNB+ and size/grade, without cANC. In total, 139 women would have been advised to proceed to cANC to check eligibility, with only 15/139 (11%) having >3 positive nodes after sentinel node biopsy and cANC. The remaining 124 (89%) would have undergone cANC but remained ineligible for abemaciclib. Size, age, grade, and Ki67 did not predict >3 nodes at cANC. Following cANC, a large majority of women with ER+, <50 mm, and grade 1–2 tumours remain ineligible for abemaciclib yet are subject to significant morbidity including lifelong lymphoedema risk. The monarchE authors state that 15 women need abemaciclib therapy for 1 to clinically benefit. Thus, in our cohort, 139 women undergoing cANC would lead to one woman benefitting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Squamous cell carcinoma of the anus or anal cancer is increasing in prevalence, and the standard treatment of mitomycin and 5-fluorouracil is too toxic for many patients. Unfortunately, there is currently no standard of care for what to do for this disease when someone is not a candidate for this aggressive treatment. Here, we demonstrate the promising preliminary toxicity profile and efficacy of the combination of weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy for patients with localized anal cancer. This regimen was able to complete 80% of the intended treatments with anticipated toxicities, and 89% achieved a complete clinical response. This combination is a promising regimen and is already being investigated further in a clinical trial. Background: Although squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is a relatively uncommon malignancy in the United States, it continues to increase in incidence. Treatment for locoregional disease includes mitomycin and 5-fluorouracil with radiation. This combination is associated with significant toxicity, limiting its use in patients who are older or have certain comorbidities. Carboplatin and paclitaxel (C/P) is an accepted treatment regimen for metastatic SCCA. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of weekly C/P given with radiation for patients unable to receive standard chemoradiation for SCCA. Methods: From our cancer registry, adult patients who received weekly intravenous C/P concurrent with standard-dose radiation for localized SCCA were included in this study. Clinical response was determined based on the evidence of disease on imaging and/or anoscopy. Toxicities were graded according to the CTCAE v5. Results: Ten patients were included; eight were female, and the median age was 75.5 years (54–87). Six had T2 disease, and four had T3 tumors. Four had node-positive disease. The majority (70%) of patients were dosed at standard C (AUC 2) and P (50 mg/m2), with a limited subset requiring dose reduction for baseline performance status. Patients completed a mean of 78.3% (40–100%) of the intended treatments. A total of 89% of the patients achieved a complete clinical response. With a median follow-up of 25.8 months (3.4–50.4 months), 67% of the patients are alive and without recurrence. Two patients have had local recurrence, and one patient had metastatic progression. The most common toxicities of any grade included leukopenia (100%), anemia (100%), radiation dermatitis (100%), diarrhea (100%), and fatigue (100%). Grade 3 or higher toxicities included neutropenic fever (20%), neutropenia (30%), and anemia (30%). Conclusions: This study demonstrates promising tolerability and efficacy for weekly C/P chemoradiation for patients with anal cancer unable to receive mitomycin and 5-fluorouracil. This regimen merits further investigation in prospective clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The many classifications of AML add richness to what practitioners should focus on when treating their patients. However, the differences between these classifications, especially if they implicate a difference in the choice of therapy, may complicate clinical judgment. This review aims to point out these differences and examine how they affect therapeutic decisions. Comprehensive analyses of the molecular heterogeneity of acute myelogenous leukemia, AML, particularly when malignant cells retain normal karyotype, has significantly evolved. In 2022, significant revisions were introduced in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification and the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2022 guidelines of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). These revisions coincided with the inception of the first version of the International Consensus Classification (ICC) for AML. These modifications aim to improve diagnosis and treatment outcomes via a comprehensive incorporation of sophisticated genetic and clinical parameters as well as facilitate accruals to innovative clinical trials. Key updates include modifications to the blast count criteria for AML diagnosis, with WHO 2022 eliminating the ≥20% blast requirement in the presence of AML-defining abnormalities and ICC 2022 setting a 10% cutoff for recurrent genetic abnormalities. Additionally, new categories, such as AML with mutated TP53 and MDS/AML, were introduced. ELN 2022 guidelines retained risk stratification approach and emphasized the critical role of measurable residual disease (MRD) that increased the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and flow cytometry testing. These revisions underscore the importance of precise classification for targeted treatment strategies and improved patient outcomes. How much difference versus concordance these classifications present and the impact of those on clinical practice is a continuing discussion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Although gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a relatively rare mesenchymal neoplasm of the digestive tract, molecular advancements in GISTs over the past two decades have caused a paradigm shift in the field of precision oncology. GISTs are mainly driven by activating mutations in the KIT or PDGFRA oncogenes, rendering them sensitive to targeted therapies. However, there is a significant lack of data from Kuwait that needs to be addressed. We carried out this retrospective analysis of a cohort of 200 GIST patients at the Kuwait Cancer Center to provide much-needed insights into the genetic makeup and clinicopathological characteristics of our population. We detailed the mutational spectrum in KIT and PDGFRA, identified a small subgroup of wild-type tumors, and shed some light on the clinical implications. This study opens the doors for potential larger-scale, multi-institutional outcome studies in the Arabian Gulf region. In gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), identifying prototypical mutations in the KIT/PDGFRA oncogenes, or in rare alternate genes, is essential for prognostication and predicting response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Conversely, wild-type GISTs (WT-GIST), which lack known mutations, have limited treatment options. Data on the mutational landscape of GISTs and their impact on disease progression are very limited in Kuwait. Using a targeted next-generation sequencing panel, we investigated the spectrum and frequency of KIT, PDGFRA, and RAS-pathway-related mutations in 95 out of 200 GISTs diagnosed at Kuwait Cancer Center from 2005 to 2023 and assessed their correlation with clinicopathological parameters. Among the 200 tumors (median age 55 years; 15–91), 54% originated in the stomach, 33% in the small bowel, 7% in the colorectum, 1.5% in the peritoneum, and 4.5% had an unknown primary site. Of the 95 molecularly profiled cases, 88% had a mutation: KIT (61%), PDGFRA (25%), NF1 (2%), and one NTRK1 rearrangement. Ten WT-GISTs were identified (stomach = 6, small bowel = 2, and colorectum = 2). WT-GISTs tended to be smaller (median 4.0 cm; 0.5–8.0) (p = 0.018), with mitosis ≤5/5 mm2, and were of lower risk (p = 0.019). KIT mutations were an adverse indicator of disease progression (p = 0.049), while wild-type status did not significantly impact progression (p = 0.934). The genetic landscape in this cohort mirrors that of global studies, but regional collaborations are needed to correlate outcomes with genetic variants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: RET fusions are relatively rare in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancers (NSCLCs), being around 1–2% of all NSCLCs. Chemotherapy and immunotherapy have a low impact on the prognosis of patients with RET fusions positive NSCLC. Multitargeted RET inhibitors have shown modest activity jeopardized by high toxicity. New potent and selective RET inhibitors (RET-Is) (pralsetinib and selpercatinib) have achieved a higher efficacy in minimizing the known toxicities of the old drugs. This review will focus on the advent of new potent and selective RET-Is. We will describe their efficacy as well as the main mechanisms of resistance to them. We will further proceed to deal with new drugs and strategies proposed to overcome the resistance to RET-Is. In the last section, we will also focus on the safety profile of RET-Is, dealing with the main toxicities as well as the rare but severe adverse events. RET fusions are relatively rare in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancers (NSCLCs), being around 1–2% of all NSCLCs. They share the same clinical features as the other fusion-driven NSCLC patients, as follows: younger age, adenocarcinoma histology, low exposure to tobacco, and high risk of spreading to the brain. Chemotherapy and immunotherapy have a low impact on the prognosis of these patients. Multitargeted RET inhibitors have shown modest activity jeopardized by high toxicity. New potent and selective RET inhibitors (RET-Is) (pralsetinib and selpercatinib) have achieved a higher efficacy minimizing the known toxicities of the multitargeted agents. This review will describe the sensitivity of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in RET fusion + NSCLC patients, as well their experiences with the 'old' multi-targeted RET inhibitors. This review will focus on the advent of new potent and selective RET-Is. We will describe their efficacy as well as the main mechanisms of resistance to them. We will further proceed to deal with the new drugs and strategies proposed to overcome the resistance to RET-Is. In the last section, we will also focus on the safety profile of RET-Is, dealing with the main toxicities as well as the rare but severe adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Relapse and treatment-related side effects pose significant challenges for older patients with high-risk blood cancers (myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/acute myeloid leukemia (AML)) undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplants from HLA-haploidentical donors. We compared two preparative treatment regimens to identify the most tolerable and effective approach: one using fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and melphalan, and the other using fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and treosulfan. Our goal was to determine which treatment offers better survival rates and fewer side effects. We found that both regimens resulted in similar survival outcomes. However, the melphalan regimen was associated with fewer relapses but more treatment-related deaths, while the treosulfan regimen had fewer side effects but exhibited poorer disease control. These findings suggest that treosulfan may be safer, though higher doses might improve disease control, providing valuable insights for future treatments. Relapse and regimen-related toxicities remain major challenges in achieving long-term survival, particularly among older patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Previous studies have demonstrated the feasibility of treosulfan-based conditioning, noting stable engraftment and low non-relapse mortality (NRM) in patients undergoing HLA-matched allo-HSCT. However, data on treosulfan-based conditioning in the HLA-haploidentical transplantation (HaploT) setting are limited. We retrospectively compared conditioning with fludarabine–cyclophosphamide (FC)–melphalan (110 mg/m2) and FC-treosulfan (30 g/m2) prior to HaploT using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in patients with high-risk MDS/AML patients ≥ 50 years, transplanted from 2009–2021 at our institution (n = 80). After balancing patient characteristics by a matched-pair analysis, we identified twenty-one matched pairs. Two-year OS and LFS were similar among the groups (OS 66% and LFS 66%, p = 0.8 and p = 0.57). However, FC-melphalan was associated with a significantly lower probability of relapse compared to FC-treosulfan (0% vs. 24%, p = 0.006), counterbalanced by a higher NRM (33% vs. 10%, p = 0.05). Time to engraftment and incidences of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) did not differ significantly. In conclusion, HaploT using FC-treosulfan in combination with PTCy in patients aged ≥50 years with MDS/AML appears safe and effective, particularly in advanced disease stages. We confirm the favorable extramedullary toxicity profile, allowing for potential dose intensification to enhance antileukemic activity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Regorafenib offers longer survival for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We aimed to identify biomarkers for regorafenib through preclinical and translational studies. In silico analysis identified matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-14 and MMP-9 as key biomarkers. Validation in patients receiving regorafenib or FTD/TPI showed that high MMP-14 levels were correlated with a better response to regorafenib. Additionally, lower MMP-9 levels before the second cycle were linked to improved disease control and survival. These findings suggest that MMP-14 and MMP-9 could serve as prognostic markers for regorafenib efficacy. In identifying biomarkers for anticancer drugs, the lack of objectivity in selecting candidate factors makes interpretation difficult. We performed preclinical analysis and a translational validation study to identify candidate biomarkers for regorafenib efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Using in silico COMPARE analysis with a human cancer cell line panel, JFCR39, we selected candidate biomarkers whose expression correlates with regorafenib sensitivity. We validated predictive values in mCRC patients receiving regorafenib (discovery, n = 53) and FTD/TPI (control, n = 16). Blood samples were obtained at baseline (BL), before the second cycle (2nd), and at progressive disease (PD), and biomarker levels were measured using ELISA. Our analysis showed that high matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-14 expression was associated with a high sensitivity to regorafenib. In the discovery cohort, high MMP-14 levels at BL and PD were correlated with tumor shrinkage and longer progression-free survival (PFS). A subsequent analysis of other related factors further indicated that the patients with decreased MMP-9 levels at the 2nd had higher disease control rates, tumor shrinkage, longer PFS, and overall survival than those with increased changes. These findings were not observed in the control cohort. Our study suggests MMP-14 and MMP-9 may serve as prognostic markers for regorafenib and provide insights into novel combination therapies with anti-MMP-9 agents or FTD/TPI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Breast cancer is one of the most dangerous cancers affecting women, so animal models of breast cancer have been created, new drugs are constantly being sought, and new procedures are being developed to destroy tumor cells. As to this last aspect, the use of high-intensity focused ultrasound is promising. It is a non-invasive technique, but its availability is significantly limited due to such devices' costliness and lack of versatility. Therefore, this project aimed to construct a low-cost, compact HIFU for precise destruction of cancer cells in the region of interest and to test the efficacy of the shortened-duration ablation procedure in a rat model of implantable breast cancer. Our research is preclinical and may also be applicable in veterinary medicine. The HIFU ablation technique is limited by the long duration of the procedure, which results from the large difference between the size of the HIFU beam's focus and the tumor size. Ablation of large tumors requires treating them with a sequence of single HIFU beams, with a specific time interval in-between. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biological effects induced in a malignant solid tumor of the rat mammary gland, implanted in adult Wistar rats, during HIFU treatment according to a new ablation plan which allowed researchers to significantly shorten the duration of the procedure. We used a custom, automated, ultrasound imaging-guided HIFU ablation device. Tumors with a 1 mm thickness margin of healthy tissue were subjected to HIFU. Three days later, the animals were sacrificed, and the HIFU-treated tissues were harvested. The biological effects were studied, employing morphological, histological, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural techniques. Massive cell death, hemorrhages, tissue loss, influx of immune cells, and induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines were observed in the HIFU-treated tumors. No damage to healthy tissues was observed in the area surrounding the safety margin. These results confirmed the efficacy of the proposed shortened duration of the HIFU ablation procedure and its potential for the treatment of solid tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Angiogenesis is a crucial process in the progression and metastasis of melanoma. Recent research has highlighted the significant role of epigenetic modifications in regulating angiogenesis. This review comprehensively examines the current understanding of how epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs, influence angiogenic pathways in melanoma, with some important therapeutic approaches. Angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels from pre-existing ones, is a crucial process in the progression and metastasis of melanoma. Recent research has highlighted the significant role of epigenetic modifications in regulating angiogenesis. This review comprehensively examines the current understanding of how epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs, influence angiogenic pathways in melanoma. DNA methylation, a key epigenetic modification, can silence angiogenesis inhibitors such as thrombospondin-1 and TIMP3 while promoting pro-angiogenic factors like vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Histone modifications, including methylation and acetylation, also play a pivotal role in regulating the expression of angiogenesis-related genes. For instance, the acetylation of histones H3 and H4 is associated with the upregulation of pro-angiogenic genes, whereas histone methylation patterns can either enhance or repress angiogenic signals, depending on the specific histone mark and context. Non-coding RNAs, particularly microRNAs (miRNAs) further modulate angiogenesis. miRNAs, such as miR-210, have been identified as key regulators, with miR-9 promoting angiogenesis by targeting E-cadherin and enhancing the expression of VEGF. This review also discusses the therapeutic potential of targeting epigenetic modifications to inhibit angiogenesis in melanoma. Epigenetic drugs, such as DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (e.g., 5-azacytidine) and histone deacetylase inhibitors (e.g., Vorinostat), have shown promise in preclinical models by reactivating angiogenesis inhibitors and downregulating pro-angiogenic factors. Moreover, the modulation of miRNAs and lncRNAs presents a novel approach for anti-angiogenic therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Pseudocirrhosis is a nodularity in the liver that it is typically associated with breast cancer liver metastases, and may occur as a response to chemotherapy and other systemic anticancer treatments. The types of patients who develop pseudocirrhosis, the treatments that they have received, and their outcomes are not well known. This study reviewed 170 patients with a diagnosis of pseudocirrhosis. A variety of different anticancer treatments were received, with taxanes (74.7%) and capecitabine (67.1%) being the most common. The median time between diagnosis of liver metastases and diagnosis of pseudocirrhosis was 17.1 months. The median overall survival once diagnosed with pseudocirrhosis was 7.6 months and patients with HER2+ disease had a statistically significant longer overall survival. To our knowledge, this is the largest dataset of pseudocirrhotic patients that has been published. It provides information to patients and clinicians on risk factors to develop pseudocirrhosis, and prognosis in different subtypes. Pseudocirrhosis is a diffuse nodularity of the liver that radiologically mimics cirrhosis but is a distinct pathological process. It is seen almost exclusively in patients with liver metastases and may represent a response to systemic treatment. Data on the risk factors for pseudocirrhosis and outcomes are limited. In total, 170 patients with a diagnosis of breast cancer and pseudocirrhosis in a 10-year period were identified and retrospectively analysed. Data were collected on baseline patient characteristics, treatments received, and outcomes. Median time between diagnosis of liver metastases and diagnosis of pseudocirrhosis was 17.1 months (range, 0–149 months). In total, 89.4% of patients received chemotherapy between their diagnosis of breast cancer liver metastases and their diagnosis of pseudocirrhosis, most commonly a taxane (74.7%) or capecitabine (67.1%), and the median treatment lines received was 3. Median OS from first diagnosis of pseudocirrhosis was 7.6 months (95% CI: 6.1–9.6 months) and was longer in patients with HER2+ disease at 16.7 months (95% CI: 6.4–32.9 months), which was statistically significant. In our study, pseudocirrhosis occurred in the presence of liver metastases and was associated with a poor prognosis. HER2+ patients with pseudocirrhosis had a better prognosis than other subtypes, but we did not identify other significant predictors of survival. Chemotherapy was not a prerequisite for pseudocirrhosis development, although the majority of patients had received at least one line of chemotherapy before pseudocirrhosis was diagnosed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Although atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is the standard first-line treatment for patients with advanced HCC, the optimal second-line regimen remains unknown. In this meta-analysis, we examined the subsequent regimen after the failure of atezolizumab–bevacizumab and found that sequential multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors, including sorafenib and lenvatinib, significantly prolonged the survival of patients, with a pooled OS of 11.45 months and a PFS of 3.78 months, respectively. Moreover, the subsequent use of sorafenib or lenvatinib has manageable toxicity. Therefore, our data indicate that sorafenib or lenvatinib treatment is a rational option for patients with advanced HCC after progression on atezolizumab–bevacizumab. Background: Although atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (hereinafter, atezolizumab–bevacizumab) is the standard first-line treatment for patients with advanced HCC, the optimal second-line regimen remains unknown. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of sorafenib and lenvatinib in patients with advanced HCC that progressed under atezolizumab–bevacizumab treatment. Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for articles published before November 2023. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to determine the pooled objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), comparing patients who received sorafenib versus lenvatinib. Results: Seven studies involving 387 patients were included. The pooled ORR, DCR, OS, and PFS for sorafenib and lenvatinib together were 26% (95% CI: 14–43%), 63% (95% CI: 47–77%), 11.45 months (95% CI: 7.12–15.77, I2 = 92%, p < 0.01), and 3.78 months (95% CI: 2.34–5.23, I2 = 67%, p = 0.02), respectively. Although lenvatinib users had a longer median OS (12.42 vs. 10.75 months) and PFS (5.15 vs. 2.58 months) than sorafenib users, the pooled ORR, DCR, median OS, and PFS for these medications were comparable. Additionally, the distributions of all-grade and grade ≥ 3 adverse events for sorafenib and lenvatinib were comparable to those for these two medications when used as first-line therapies. Conclusions: Sorafenib or lenvatinib can provide effective treatment with manageable toxicity in patients with advanced HCC after disease progression under atezolizumab–bevacizumab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Breast cancer typically originates and metastasizes from the mammary fat pad. The tumor within the fat pad is supported by enriched lymphatic vessels, to a greater degree than that of blood vessels. Recently, we have successfully co-formulated two physically disparate cancer drugs, water-soluble gemcitabine (G) and water-insoluble paclitaxel (T), into a drug combination nanoparticle (DcNP) referred to as GT-in-DcNP. This GT-in-DcNP dosage form is stable and scalable. When it is given to mice, it enables synchronized delivery of GT into tumors via enriched lymph vessels. A single dose of GT-in-DcNP in mice has been found to suppress breast tumor growth in the mammary fat pad more effectively than an equivalent dose of the free GT combination. We observed tumor regression and restoration of mammary fat tissue at higher doses of GT-in-DcNP. This concept has been extended to demonstrate the ability to suppress human breast cancer in a xenograft model. With these observations, GT-in-DcNP may be considered for clinical development to treat breast cancer. Early diagnosis, intervention, and therapeutic advancements have extended the lives of breast cancer patients; however, even with molecularly targeted therapies, many patients eventually progress to metastatic cancer. Recent data suggest that residual breast cancer cells often reside in the lymphatic system before rapidly spreading through the bloodstream. To address this challenge, an effective drug combination composed of gemcitabine (G) and paclitaxel (T) is administered intravenously in sequence at the metastatic stage, but intravenous GT infusion may limit lymphatic GT drug accessibility and asynchronous drug exposure in cancer cells within the lymph. To determine whether co-localization of intracellular gemcitabine and paclitaxel (referred to as GT) could overcome these limitations and enhance the efficacy of GT, we have evaluated a previously reported GT drug-combination formulated in nanoparticle (referred to as GT-in-DcNP) evaluated in an orthotopic breast tumor model. Previously, with indocyanine green-labeled nanoparticles, we reported that GT-in-DcNP particles after subcutaneous dosing were taken up rapidly and preferentially into the lymph instead of blood vessels. The pharmacokinetic study showed enhanced co-localization of GT within the tumors and likely through lymphatic access, before drug apparency in the plasma leading to apparent long-acting plasma time-course. The mechanisms may be related to significantly greater inhibitions of tumor growth—by 100 to 140 times—in both sub-iliac and axillary regions compared to the equivalent dosing with free-and-soluble GT formulation. Furthermore, GT-in-DcNP exhibited dose-dependent effects with significant tumor regression. In contrast, even at the highest dose of free GT combination, only a modest tumor growth reduction was notable. Preliminary studies with MDA-231-HM human breast cancer in an orthotopic xenograft model indicated that GT-in-DcNP may be effective in suppressing human breast tumor growth. Taken together, the synchronized delivery of GT-in-DcNP to mammary tumors through the lymphatic system offers enhanced cellular retention and greater efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Mutations in the gene, TP53, define the most treatment-resistant subtype of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patients with TP53-mutated AML invariably develop disease recurrence after treatment, leading to short survival times. Previous studies have shown that less than 10% of these patients survive beyond 2 years after diagnosis. Moreover, the best treatment approach for these patients is still unclear. Our study is the first to analyze therapy results beyond first-line treatment, highlighting the importance of therapy sequencing in managing these patients. We found that sequential treatment with intensive chemotherapy followed by a less-intensive regimen achieved the highest remission rate of over 65%. Eligible patients should then receive blood stem cell transplantation from a donor, which significantly improves long-term survival. Our study provides crucial data to guide management and optimize therapy sequencing for better survival in this treatment-resistant disease. Background: TP53 mutations (TP53m) define the most treatment-refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) subtype. Optimal treatment approaches have not been established in this setting. We reviewed our institutional experience to identify therapy sequencing, treatment response, and survival patterns in these patients. Methods: This study was a single-center, retrospective cohort analysis. Results: Our cohort includes 86 TP53m and 337 TP53 wild-type (TP53wt) adult AML patients. TP53m AML patients presented with lower bone marrow and peripheral blasts; none presented with hyperleukocytosis. Patients who received intensive treatment up front demonstrated superior overall survival (OS) over those receiving first-line non-intensive therapy (2-year OS 22% versus 7%; p = 0.02). However, the complete remission (CR) rates among the first-line intensive and non-intensive therapy groups were comparable (21.9% and 29.4%, respectively, p = 0.49). The improved OS is therefore attributed to superior cumulative CR in the intensive group. First-line intensively treated patients were more likely to receive and respond to salvage, leading to a cumulative CR rate of 65.7% (versus 29.4%, p = 0.003). Achieving CR at any point is strongly associated with superior survival outcomes with 2-year OS of 31% versus 0% for those not achieving CR ever (p < 0.01). Conclusions: We find that TP53m AML rarely presents with oncological emergencies, suggesting that clinical trial enrollment is feasible in this group. Additionally, in our cohort, intensive induction therapies lead to superior survival outcomes attributed to successful salvage therapy. These data suggest that strategic therapy sequencing and salvage therapy may be important in optimizing outcomes for TP53m AML patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Non-small-cell lung cancer is characterized by high morbidity and mortality. Currently, the precision medicine approach in the adenocarcinoma subtype of non-small-cell lung cancer aims to identify genomic alterations that can be targeted in individual patients and offer them appropriate treatment. Several biomarker-guided therapies have been approved, targeting genes frequently altered in adenocarcinoma, such as EGFR, BRAF, MET, ALK, ROS1, RET and NTRK. To overcome the emergence of resistance and increase the efficacy of these targeted therapies, the combination of chemotherapy and targeted therapy has been studied and validated in adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR mutations. This study proposes to examine whether this type of combined approach, which is difficult to study in clinical trials, could be more widely used by targeting other genetic alterations in the MAPK/PI3K pathways or against alterations in the CDNK2A gene in adenocarcinomas but also in squamous-cell carcinomas. The combination of chemotherapy and targeted therapy has been validated in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations. We therefore investigated whether this type of combined approach could be more widely used by targeting other genetic alterations present in NSCLC. PDXs were generated from patients with NSCLC adenocarcinomas (ADCs) and squamous-cell carcinomas (SCCs). Targeted NGS analyses identified various molecular abnormalities in the MAPK and PI3K pathways and in the cell cycle process in our PDX panel. The antitumor efficacy of targeted therapies alone or in combination with chemotherapy was then tested in vivo. We observed that trametinib, BKM120, AZD2014 and palbociclib increased the efficacy of each chemotherapy in SCC PDXs, in contrast to a non-insignificant or slight improvement in ADCs. Furthermore, we observed high efficacy of trametinib in KRAS-, HRAS- and NRAS-mutated tumors (ADCs and SCCs), suggesting that the MEK inhibitor may be useful in a wider population of NSCLC patients, not just those with KRAS-mutated ADCs. Our results suggest that the detection of pathogenic variants by NGS should be performed in all NSCLCs, and particularly in SCCs, to offer patients a more effective combination of chemotherapy and targeted therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Despite recent advances in treatment options, such as chemotherapy, cancer continues to be the second-leading cause of death worldwide. Significant hurdles in the success of chemotherapy regimens include severe adverse effects, as well as drug resistance. As such, there is a strong requirement for novel pharmacological interventions in the treatment of cancer. Natural products, such as monosaccharides, are a promising potential treatment option for cancer due to their low toxicity, high solubility, and high specificity for tumour cells. Several naturally occurring and synthetically modified sugars have displayed toxicity in a variety of cancer and tumour cells. A major hallmark of cancer is the reprogramming of cellular metabolism from oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) to glycolysis, a phenomenon known as the Warburg effect. To sustain high rates of glycolysis, cancer cells overexpress GLUT transporters and glycolytic enzymes, allowing for the enhanced uptake and consumption of glucose. The Warburg effect may be exploited in the treatment of cancer; certain epimers and derivatives of glucose can enter cancer cells and inhibit glycolytic enzymes, stunting metabolism and causing cell death. These include common dietary monosaccharides (ᴅ-mannose, ᴅ-galactose, ᴅ-glucosamine, ʟ-fucose), as well as some rare monosaccharides (xylitol, ᴅ-allose, ʟ-sorbose, ʟ-rhamnose). This article reviews the literature on these sugars in in vitro and in vivo models of cancer, discussing their mechanisms of cytotoxicity. In addition to this, the anticancer potential of some synthetically modified monosaccharides, such as 2-deoxy-ᴅ-glucose and its acetylated and halogenated derivatives, is reviewed. Further, this article reviews how certain monosaccharides can be used in combination with anticancer drugs to potentiate conventional chemotherapies and to help overcome chemoresistance. Finally, the limitations of administering two separate agents, a sugar and a chemotherapeutic drug, are discussed. The potential of the glycoconjugation of classical or repurposed chemotherapy drugs as a solution to these limitations is reviewed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: A model predicting responders to corticosteroid switch during abiraterone therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer is warranted. The model using logistic regression was developed in a cohort of 67 and validated in another cohort of 42 patients. The use of this model is easy and all needed parameters are available from routine laboratory and history of patients. The overall accuracy was 92%. Multivariate analysis revealed that responsiveness was a marker of longer treatment duration and overall survival. For non-responders a new systemic treatment was indicated. Background: The aim was to elaborate a predictive model to find responders for the corticosteroid switch (from prednisolone to dexamethasone) at the first prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression (≥25% increase) during abiraterone acetate (AA) treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. Methods: If PSA has decreased (≥25%) after switch, patients were considered responders. Logistic regression of 19 dichotomized parameters from routine laboratory and patients' history was used to find the best model in a cohort of 67 patients. The model was validated in another cohort of 42 patients. Results: The model provided 92.5% and 90.5% accuracy in the testing and the validation cohorts, respectively. Overall the accuracy was 91.7%. The AUC of ROC curve was 0.92 (95% CI 0.85–0.96). After a median follow-up of 27.9 (26.3–84) months, the median AA+dexamethasone treatment duration (TD) in non-responders and responders was 4.7 (3.1–6.5) and 11.1 (8.5–12.9) months and the median overall survival (OS) was 23.2 (15.6–25.8) and 33.5 (26.1–38) months, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression revealed that responsiveness was an independent marker of TD and OS. Conclusions: A high accuracy model was developed for mCRPC patients in predicting cases which might benefit from the switch. For non-responders, induction of the next systemic treatment is indicated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This study aimed to assess the 3-year time to relapse (TTR) and overall survival (OS) of melanoma, including acral and mucosal subtypes, treated with anti-PD-1 antibody (Ab) or the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib. The 3-year TTR of the acral and mucosal types was 28.1% and 38.5%, respectively. The acral subtype and TT were detected as important prognostic factors. In the 3-year OS, only tumor ulceration was associated with the OS in both univariate and multiple analyses. There was no significant difference in baseline or treatment-related factors of the mucosal type (p > 0.05). This study suggests that both acral and mucosal types in the adjuvant setting are less effective than non-acral cutaneous melanoma at the 3-year TTR. Background: Adjuvant therapy has improved the clinical prognosis for postoperative melanoma patients. However, the long-term efficacy of this therapy on the melanoma acral and mucosal subtypes has not been fully evaluated in previous trials. This study assessed the 3-year recurrence-free survival and overall survival of patients with melanoma, including the acral and mucosal subtypes, treated with anti-PD-1 antibody (Ab) or with the combination of the BRAF and MEK inhibitors dabrafenib and trametinib. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed both the 3-year time to relapse (TTR) and overall survival (OS) of 120 patients treated with anti-PD-1 antibody (Ab), or with the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib. Results: The overall median TTR was 18.4 months, with a range of 0.69 to 36 months. The 3-year TTR of the acral and mucosal types was 28.1% and 38.5%, respectively. Baseline tumor thickness (TT) and acral type were associated with the TTR in subgroup analysis. Moreover, we classified 104 acral and non-acral cutaneous patients into the anti-PD-1 Abs or dabrafenib plus trametinib combined therapies cohort in multiple analyses. The acral subtype and TT were detected as important prognostic factors. In the 3-year OS, only tumor ulceration was associated with the OS in both univariate and multiple analyses. There was no significant difference in baseline or treatment-related factors of the mucosal type (p > 0.05). Conclusion: This study suggests that adjuvant therapy is more effective with non-acral cutaneous melanoma than either the acral or mucosal types at the 3-year TTR endpoint. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Juvenile Myelomonocytic Leukemia (JMML) is a rare and clonal hematopoietic disorder of infancy and early childhood with myeloproliferative/myelodysplastic features resulting from germline or somatic mutations in the RAS pathway. Given its rarity, management is not standardized and varies widely, ranging from observation to bone marrow transplant depending on genomic and clinical features. We describe the course of JMML or Noonan Syndrome-associated Myeloproliferative Disorder in 22 pediatric patients treated at three institutions to provide guidance for monitoring versus intervention, including transplant, supported by patient outcomes. We provide additional insight into the expected time to spontaneous resolution in those with germline PTPN11 mutations and treatment approaches for patients with germline CBL mutations where no standard exists. Juvenile Myelomonocytic Leukemia (JMML) is a rare and clonal hematopoietic disorder of infancy and early childhood with myeloproliferative/myelodysplastic features resulting from germline or somatic mutations in the RAS pathway. Treatment is not uniform, with management varying from observation to stem cell transplant. The aim of our retrospective review is to describe the treatment and outcomes of a cohort of patients with JMML or Noonan Syndrome-associated Myeloproliferative Disorder (NS-MPD) to provide management guidance for this rare and heterogeneous disease. We report on 22 patients with JMML or NS-MPD managed at three institutions in the Texas Medical Center. Of patients with known genetic mutations and cytogenetics, 6 harbored germline mutations, 12 had somatic mutations, and 9 showed cytogenetic abnormalities. Overall, 14/22 patients are alive. Spontaneous clinical remission occurred in one patient with somatic NRAS mutation, as well as two with germline PTPN11 mutations with NS-MPD, and two others with germline PTPN11 mutations and NS-MPD remain under surveillance. Patients with NS-MPD were excluded from treatment analysis as none required chemotherapeutic intervention. All patients (5/5) treated with 5-azacitidine alone and one of the four treated with 6-mercaptopurine monotherapy had a reduction in mutant variant allele frequency. Transformation to acute myeloid leukemia was seen in two patients who both died. Among patients who received transplants, 7/13 are alive, and relapse post-transplant occurred in 3/13 with a median time to relapse of 3.55 months. This report provides insight into therapy responses and long-term outcomes across different genetic subsets of JMML and lends insight into the expected time to spontaneous resolution in patients with NS-MPD with germline PTPN11 mutations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Head and neck cancers are aggressive and challenging to treat due to the severe side effects and toxicity of current treatments. Bufalin, a natural compound from the Chinese toad, has shown promise in fighting various cancers but has not been thoroughly studied for head and neck cancers. Our research aims to explore how bufalin works against these specific cancer cells. By using different techniques, we discovered that bufalin could reduce cancer cell growth, induce cell death, and enhance the body's immune response against tumors. These findings suggest that bufalin could become a new, effective treatment option with potentially fewer side effects for patients with head and neck cancers. This research could pave the way for developing better therapies and improving outcomes for patients facing this difficult disease. Bufalin, a cardiotonic steroid derived from the Chinese toad (Bufo gargarizans), has demonstrated potent anticancer properties across various cancer types, positioning it as a promising therapeutic candidate. However, comprehensive mechanistic studies specific to head and neck cancers have been lacking. Our study aimed to bridge this gap by investigating bufalin's mechanisms of action in head and neck cancer cells. Using several methods, such as Western blotting, immunofluorescence, and flow cytometry, we observed bufalin's dose-dependent reduction in cell viability, disruption of cell membrane integrity, and inhibition of colony formation in both HPV-positive and HPV-negative cell lines. Bufalin induces apoptosis through the modulation of apoptosis-related proteins, mitochondrial function, and reactive oxygen species production. It also arrests the cell cycle at the G2/M phase and attenuates cell migration while affecting epithelial–mesenchymal transition markers and targeting pivotal signaling pathways, including Wnt/β-catenin, EGFR, and NF-κB. Additionally, bufalin exerted immunomodulatory effects by polarizing macrophages toward the M1 phenotype, bolstering antitumor immune responses. These findings underscore bufalin's potential as a multifaceted therapeutic agent against head and neck cancers, targeting essential pathways involved in proliferation, apoptosis, cell cycle regulation, metastasis, and immune modulation. Further research is warranted to validate these mechanisms and optimize bufalin's clinical application. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This study explored how genetic changes influence treatment effectiveness and survival in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. By examining tumors from 142 patients, researchers identified specific genetic mutations that can predict how well a patient responds to chemotherapy. Findings showed that mutations in certain genetic pathways are associated with longer survival and better treatment outcomes. This research highlights the importance of tailoring cancer treatment based on individual genetic profiles, potentially leading to more personalized and effective therapies for pancreatic cancer patients. (1) Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has low survival rates despite treatment advancements. Aim: This study aims to show how molecular profiling could possibly guide personalized treatment strategies, which may help improve survival outcomes in patients with PDAC. (2) Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 142 PDAC patients from a single academic center was conducted. Patients underwent chemotherapy and next-generation sequencing for molecular profiling. Key oncogenic pathways were identified using the Reactome pathway database. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox Proportional Hazards Regression. (3) Results: Patients mainly received FOLFIRINOX (n = 62) or gemcitabine nab-paclitaxel (n = 62) as initial chemotherapy. The median OS was 13.6 months. Longer median OS was noted in patients with NOTCH (15 vs. 12.3 months, p = 0.007) and KIT pathway mutations (21.3 vs. 12.12 months, p = 0.04). Combinatorial pathway analysis indicated potential synergistic effects on survival. In the PFS, PI3K pathway (6.6 vs. 5.7 months, p = 0.03) and KIT pathway (10.3 vs. 6.2 months, p = 0.03) mutations correlated with improved PFS within the gemcitabine nab-paclitaxel subgroup. (4) Conclusions: Molecular profiling could play a role in PDAC for predicting outcomes and responses to therapies like FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine nab-paclitaxel. Integrating genomic data into clinical decision-making can benefit PDAC treatment, though further validation is needed to fully utilize precision oncology in PDAC management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has dramatically changed following the availability of new drugs with targeted mechanisms of action. Traditional and new prognostic factors are being investigated to individualize and guide these new treatments. In this review, we discuss the clinical relevance of genomic factors including immunoglobulin heavy chain variable (IGHV) mutational status, TP53 abnormalities, complex karyotype, and prognostic scores in relation to new targeted agents. Novel drugs have profoundly changed the outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients, and the traditional prognostic factors that were identified in the era of chemoimmunotherapy need to be validated in the context of these new targeted therapies. Currently, the most important prognostic genetic biomarkers are the immunoglobulin heavy chain variable (IGHV) mutational status, genetic aberrations including del(17p)/TP53 abnormalities, and the complex karyotype. In this review, we discuss the prognostic role of these genomic markers in relation to novel treatments. Moreover, we present and discuss new scoring systems that were elaborated and validated in the era of new drugs. In routine clinical practice, the application of an extensive genomic work-up with validated prognostic markers could improve the identification of "very high-risk" CLL patients who could benefit from novel, more effective targeted treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Aquaporins (AQPs) have emerged as potential predictors of response to cancer therapy and as targets for increasing sensitivity to treatment. However, systemic therapeutic inhibition using pan-AQP or AQP-specific inhibitors has not been characterized for efficacy in treating breast cancer or as a component of combination treatment. We evaluated AQP inhibition using established AQP inhibitors in cytotoxicity and pharmacologic assays. This study identified AQPs as a targetable vulnerability in breast cancer. AQP inhibitors can increase therapeutic efficacy, both as single agents and in a combination therapy strategy, in treating breast cancer progression and metastasis. These results provide significant insights that support the future development of improved AQP inhibitors. AQPs contribute to breast cancer progression and metastasis. We previously found that genetic inhibition of Aqp7 reduces primary tumor burden and metastasis in breast cancer. In this study, we utilized two AQP inhibitors, Auphen and Z433927330, to evaluate the efficacy of therapeutic inhibition of AQPs in breast cancer treatment. The inhibitors were evaluated in breast cancer for both cytotoxicity and metabolic stability assays across both murine and human breast cancer cell lines. Both AQP inhibitors also affected the expression of other AQP transcripts and proteins, which demonstrates compensatory regulation between AQP family members. As a single agent, Auphen treatment in vivo extended overall survival but did not impact primary or metastatic tumor burden. However, Auphen treatment made cells more responsive to chemotherapy (doxorubicin) or endocrine treatment (tamoxifen, fulvestrant). In fact, treatment with Tamoxifen reduced overall AQP7 protein expression. RNA-seq of breast cancer cells treated with Auphen identified mitochondrial metabolism genes as impacted by Auphen and may contribute to reducing mammary tumor progression, lung metastasis, and increased therapeutic efficacy of endocrine therapy in breast cancer. Interestingly, we found that Auphen and tamoxifen cooperate to reduce breast cancer cell viability, which suggests that Auphen treatment makes the cells more susceptible to Tamoxifen. Together, this study highlights AQPs as therapeutic vulnerabilities of breast cancer metastasis that are promising and should be exploited. However, the pharmacologic results suggest additional chemical refinements and optimization of AQP inhibition are needed to make these AQP inhibitors appropriate to use for therapeutic benefit in overcoming endocrine therapy resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has a low 5-year survival rate due to delayed diagnosis, rapid growth, tumor complexity, and difficulties in surgical resection. Treatments involving new targeted chemotherapeutic options are required due to challenges such as drug resistance, low efficacy, severe toxicity, high metastatic potential, and clinical trial failures. This study demonstrates the preclinical efficacy and potential of the novel combination of abemaciclib and panobinostat in multiple pancreatic cancer cell lines. Our results depict that a novel combination of these agents aids in synergistic effects, causing cell death in pancreatic cancer cells. The current 5-year survival rate of pancreatic cancer is about 12%, making it one of the deadliest malignancies. The rapid metastasis, acquired drug resistance, and poor patient prognosis necessitate better therapeutic strategies for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Multiple studies show that combining chemotherapeutics for solid tumors has been successful. Targeting two distinct emerging hallmarks, such as non-mutational epigenetic changes by panobinostat (Pan) and delayed cell cycle progression by abemaciclib (Abe), inhibits pancreatic cancer growth. HDAC and CDK4/6 inhibitors are effective but are prone to drug resistance and failure as single agents. Therefore, we hypothesized that combining Abe and Pan could synergistically and lethally affect PDAC survival and proliferation. Multiple cell-based assays, enzymatic activity experiments, and flow cytometry experiments were performed to determine the effects of Abe, Pan, and their combination on PDAC cells and human dermal fibroblasts. Western blotting was used to determine the expression of cell cycle, epigenetic, and apoptosis markers. The Abe-Pan combination exhibited excellent efficacy and produced synergistic effects, altering the expression of cell cycle proteins and epigenetic markers. Pan, alone and in combination with Abe, caused apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells. Abe-Pan co-treatment showed relative safety in normal human dermal fibroblasts. Our novel combination treatment of Abe and Pan shows synergistic effects on PDAC cells. The combination induces apoptosis, shows relative safety, and merits further investigation due to its therapeutic potential in the treatment of PDAC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This study aimed to evaluate the derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) in predicting the prognosis of patients with locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma, as well as the survival benefits from induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). The dNLR is an independent negative predictive factor for the disease. Patients with cTNM stage III disease and a low dNLR may benefit from induction chemotherapy. Background: This study aimed to evaluate the derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) in predicting the prognosis of patients with locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma (LAOSCC) and to assess the survival benefits from docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (TPF) induction chemotherapy (IC). Methods: Patients from a phase III trial involving TPF IC in stage III/IVA OSCC patients (NCT01542931) were enrolled. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed, and the area under the curve was computed to determine dNLR cutoff points. Kaplan–Meier survival estimates and Cox proportional hazards models were used for longitudinal analysis. Results: A total of 224 patients were identified (median age: 55.4 years; range: 26 to 75 years; median follow-up: 90 months; range: 3.2 to 93 months). The cutoff point for the dNLR was 1.555. Multivariate analysis showed that the dNLR was an independent negative predictive factor for survival (overall survival (OS): hazard ratio (HR) = 1.154, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.018–1.309, p = 0.025; disease-free survival (DFS): HR = 1.123, 95% CI: 1.000–1.260, p = 0.050; local recurrence-free survival (LRFS): HR = 1.134, 95% CI: 1.002–1.283, p = 0.047; distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS): HR = 1.146, 95% CI: 1.010–1.300, p = 0.035). A low dNLR combined with cTNM stage III disease predicted benefit from TPF IC for the patients [OS (χ2 = 4.674, p = 0.031), DFS (χ2 = 7.134, p = 0.008), LRFS (χ2 = 5.937, p = 0.015), and DMFS (χ2 = 4.832, p = 0.028)]. Conclusions: The dNLR is an independent negative predictive factor in LAOSCC patients. Patients with cTNM stage III disease and a low dNLR can benefit from TPF IC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Roughly 430,000 new cases of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) occurred worldwide in 2022, and about one-third of RCC cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage of disease (aRCC). When patients with aRCC fail first-line treatment, they commonly receive one of the recommended second-line treatments, i.e., axitinib, cabozantinib, lenvatinib plus everolimus, pazopanib, sunitinib, or tivozanib. Axitinib is a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor that inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases 1, 2, and 3. It has been available since 2011 for the treatment of aRCC after the failure of prior therapy with sunitinib or cytokines. The aim of our research was to understand how axitinib compares with other treatment options considering data from clinical trials and observational studies that reflect real-world clinical practice. Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature review to summarise evidence on commonly used and recommended treatments in aRCC after the failure of prior therapy with sunitinib or cytokines. Background: We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) to identify clinical evidence on treatments in advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) after the failure of prior therapy with cytokines, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, or immune checkpoint inhibitors. Herein, we summarise the evidence for axitinib in aRCC after the failure of prior therapy with cytokines or sunitinib. Methods: This SLR was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023492931) and followed the 2020 PRISMA statement and the Cochrane guidelines. Comprehensive searches were conducted in MEDLINE and Embase as well as for conference proceedings. Study eligibility was defined according to population, intervention, comparator, outcome, and study design. Results: Of 1252 titles/abstracts screened, 266 peer-reviewed publications were reviewed, of which 182 were included. In addition, 28 conference abstracts were eligible. Data on axitinib were reported in 55 publications, of which 16 provided efficacy and/or safety outcomes on axitinib after therapy with sunitinib or cytokines. In these patients, median progression-free and overall survival ranged between 5.5 and 8.7 months and 11.0 and 69.5 months, respectively. Conclusions: Axitinib is commonly used in clinical practice and has a well-characterised safety and efficacy profile in the treatment of patients with aRCC after the failure of prior therapy with sunitinib or cytokines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Patients with stage IIB and IIC melanoma are considered to have high-risk localized disease and, in some cases, demonstrate worse recurrence-free and overall survival than patients with stage IIIA and even IIIB disease. The mainstay of treatment for patients with high-risk clinical stage II melanoma is surgical resection of the primary tumor and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), which confers accurate pathologic staging and prognostication for further treatment decisions. Building on the success of adjuvant therapy for stage III melanoma, the KEYNOTE-716 and CheckMate 76K trials found improved recurrence-free survival for patients with high-risk stage II melanoma with adjuvant pembrolizumab and nivolumab, respectively, after complete resection with SLNB. Given these findings, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network now recommends discussing adjuvant pembrolizumab or nivolumab with patients with high-risk stage IIB/C melanoma, weighing the risks of recurrence against the risks of treatment-related adverse events when making the decision regarding adjuvant therapy. Melanoma is the fifth most common cancer in the United States and accounts for the majority of all skin cancer-related deaths, making it the most lethal cutaneous malignancy. Systemic adjuvant therapy for stage IIB-IV melanoma is now approved for patients who have undergone surgical resection, given the appreciable risk of recurrence and mortality in this patient population. Despite the lower stage, high-risk stage II melanoma (stage IIB/IIC) can often exhibit an even more aggressive course when compared to stage IIIA/IIIB disease, thus justifying consideration of adjuvant therapy in these patients. In this review, we highlight the current standard of practice for the treatment of stage IIB/C melanoma, with a focus on adjuvant therapies supported by published landmark clinical trials, including anti-PD-1 therapy. Notably, adjuvant therapies approved thus far in this patient population have demonstrated an improvement in recurrence-free survival, while their impact on overall survival is pending. Finally, this review highlights currently ongoing trials and future directions for research and treatment possibilities for high-risk clinical stage II melanoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) arises from a stepwise acquisition of multiple genetic alterations in the hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell and is characterized by an accumulation of immature leukemic cells, called blasts, in the bone marrow and tissues. How the single gene alterations mediate the underlying processes is unclear in the majority of cases. IDH1/2 mutations are among the most frequent mutations in AML, accounting for about 15–20%, and are targets of specific small molecule inhibitors. Experimental evidence suggests that they occur early in leukemogenesis. Mostly, murine models of IDH1/2 mutations have been studied. Our study is the first to highlight that—in the human system—IDH1/2 mutants drive a complete block of hematopoietic cell differentiation in vitro, which is completely unleashed by the specific inhibitor, providing a model for early leukemogenesis studies in this setting. How hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) fate decisions are affected by genetic alterations acquired during AML leukemogenesis is poorly understood and mainly explored in animal models. Here, we study isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) gene mutations in the human model of HSPC and discuss the available literature on this topic. IDH1/2 mutations occur in ~20% of AML cases, are recognized among the mutations earliest acquired during leukemogenesis, and are targets of specific inhibitors (ivosidenib and enasidenib, respectively). In order to investigate the direct effects of these mutations on HSPCs, we expressed IDH1-R132H or IDH2-R140Q mutants into human CD34+ healthy donor cells via lentiviral transduction and analyzed the colony-forming unit (CFU) ability. CFU ability was dramatically compromised with a complete trilineage block of differentiation. Strikingly, the block was reversed by specific inhibitors, confirming that it was a specific effect induced by the mutants. In line with this observation, the CD34+ leukemic precursors isolated from a patient with IDH2-mutated AML at baseline and during enasidenib treatment showed progressive and marked improvements in their fitness over time, in terms of CFU ability and propensity to differentiate. They attained clonal trilinear reconstitution of hematopoiesis and complete hematological remission. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The chemotherapy combination rituximab, gemcitabine, and dexamethasone (R-GDP), followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation, is one of the standards of care for relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R NHL). Complete metabolic response before transplantation is the most important prognosis factor for a long duration of remission. Selinexor is an oral, selective inhibitor of the nuclear export compound (XPO1). For heavily pretreated patients with DLBCL, the single drug selinexor has previously shown an overall response rate of 29%. In this study, we evaluated selinexor in combination with RGDP for patients with R/R B-cell lymphoma. The results from our phase I clinical study indicate that weekly selinexor plus RGDP has a generally tolerable safety profile and durable efficacy in R/R B-NHL. Purpose: Selinexor is an oral selective inhibitor of exportine-1 (XPO1) with efficacy as a single agent in heavily pretreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We conducted a study investigating the combination of selinexor with rituximab and platinum-based chemotherapy in B-cell lymphoma. Patients and methods: We conducted a phase 1b, dose-escalation, and expansion trial, which enrolled patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Patients received oral selinexor according to a 3 + 3 design in combination with rituximab and dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, oxaliplatine (DHAOX) or gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin (GDP) chemotherapy. Results: A total of 39 patients were enrolled, 27 during the escalation phase and 12 during the expansion phase. Most patients had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL; 77%). Group R-DHAOX was prematurely closed to inclusion due to a recommendation from the French drug agency, independent of this trial. A recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of selinexor in association with R-GPD was established at 40 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. In a population of 18 patients treated at this dose of selinexor, the most frequent grade 3–4 adverse events were hematological. With this regimen, seven obtained a complete metabolic response and five a partial response. The median PFS was 5.8 months. Conclusions: Among the patients with R/R B-cell lymphoma, selinexor at a weekly dose of 40 mg with R-GDP is feasible for outpatients, with a generally acceptable safety profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Approximately one third of patients with non-small cell lung cancer are diagnosed with N2 disease corresponding to stages IIIA–IIIB, according to the current 8th TNM edition. The management of these tumors typically involves a combination of treatment modalities including surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy. However, N2 disease is highly heterogeneous and may be subcategorized into "single-station", "multi-station", "bulky", and "invasive", leading to different diagnostic, staging, and treatment approaches. Staging definitions are currently being reevaluated due to the complex nature of N2 disease and its prognostic implications. Diagnostic methods range from imaging studies to minimally invasive approaches (i.e., endoscopy) to more invasive surgical procedures (i.e., mediastinoscopy). Treatment options include surgery with or without additional perioperative treatments as well as definitive chemoradiotherapy for patients with unresectable tumors. Therefore, given this diversity, it is crucial for healthcare professionals to develop management strategies tailored on individual N2 patient characteristics. Patients with stage III NSCLC with N2 lymph node involvement carry a complex and diverse disease entity. Challenges persist in the areas of diagnosis, staging, multimodal management, and the determination of surgical indications and resectability criteria. Therefore, this review focuses on the latest updates in N2 disease staging and its prognostic and treatment implications. Emphasis is placed on the importance of accurate staging using imaging modalities such as [18F]FDG-PET/CT as well as minimally invasive mediastinal staging endoscopic techniques. The evolving role of surgery in the management of N2 disease is also explored. The benefits of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments have been demonstrated, along with the efficacy of a combined multimodal approach with chemo-immunotherapy in the perioperative setting, reigniting the debate of N2 disease subsets and optimal treatment options. Furthermore, this review addresses the controversies surrounding surgical approaches in upfront "borderline" resectable stage III NSCLC as well as the benefits of combined chemoradiotherapy with consolidation immunotherapy for patients with unresectable tumors. In conclusion, personalized diagnostic and treatment approaches tailored to individual patient characteristics, resource availability, and institutional expertise are essential for optimizing outcomes in patients with stage III-N2 NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major global health issue, causing many deaths each year. The current treatments often face challenges due to the cancer's resistance to drugs, making it hard to treat effectively. This research focuses on using patient-derived tumor organoids (PDTOs), which are small, three-dimensional models grown from a patient's tumor, to better understand and predict how CRC responds to treatments. PDTOs mimic the actual tumor environment closely, making them more reliable than traditional models. By studying PDTOs, researchers hope to find new ways to use existing drugs, understand why resistance happens, and develop better treatment plans tailored to individual patients. This approach could lead to significant advancements in how CRC is managed, potentially improving survival rates and patient outcomes. Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a significant health burden globally, being the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Despite significant therapeutic advancements, resistance to systemic antineoplastic agents remains an important obstacle, highlighting the need for innovative screening tools to tailor patient-specific treatment. This review explores the application of patient-derived tumor organoids (PDTOs), three-dimensional, self-organizing models derived from patient tumor samples, as screening tools for drug resistance in CRC. PDTOs offer unique advantages over traditional models by recapitulating the tumor architecture, cellular heterogeneity, and genomic landscape and are a valuable ex vivo predictive drug screening tool. This review provides an overview of the current literature surrounding the use of PDTOs as an instrument for predicting therapy responses in CRC. We also explore more complex models, such as co-cultures with important stromal cells, such as cancer-associated fibroblasts, and organ-on-a-chip models. Furthermore, we discuss the use of PDTOs for drug repurposing, offering a new approach to identify the existing drugs effective against drug-resistant CRC. Additionally, we explore how PDTOs serve as models to gain insights into drug resistance mechanisms, using newer techniques, such as single-cell RNA sequencing and CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing. Through this review, we aim to highlight the potential of PDTOs in advancing our understanding of predicting therapy responses, drug resistance, and biomarker identification in CRC management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The overexpression of c-MYC is implicated in many cancers, and it drives the tumors' aggressiveness and metastatic progression, but there is no clinically approved drug that targets MYC. We discovered that the MYC mRNA is stabilized by the poly U sequences on its 3′UTR. We engineered these stable elements into unstable forms in a way such that they degraded the target MYC mRNA through a process called nonsense-mediated decay. We developed the drug 3′UTRMYC1-18 and evaluated its therapeutic efficacy in a metastatic model of c-MYC-driven TNBC in vivo by delivering it with iron oxide nanocages. The constructs inhibited primary and metastatic lung and liver cancers by degrading the c-MYC-STAT5A/5B-PD-L1 complex and achieved significant survival outcomes. The in vivo data strongly suggests that this new drug is therapeutically effective in inhibiting c-MYC-driven triple-negative breast cancer and metastatic tumors. The drug was well tolerated and represents a new arsenal to target the deadly TNBC and will offer hope to patients who need it. c-MYC is overexpressed in 70% of human cancers, including triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), yet there is no clinically approved drug that directly targets it. Here, we engineered the mRNA-stabilizing poly U sequences within the 3′UTR of c-MYC to specifically destabilize and promote the degradation of c-MYC transcripts. Interestingly, the engineered derivative outcompetes the endogenous overexpressed c-MYC mRNA, leading to reduced c-MYC mRNA and protein levels. The iron oxide nanocages (IO-nanocages) complexed with MYC-destabilizing constructs inhibited primary and metastatic tumors in mice bearing TNBC and significantly prolonged survival by degrading the c-MYC-STAT5A/B-PD-L1 complexes that drive c-MYC-positive TNBC. Taken together, we have described a novel therapy for c-MYC-driven TNBC and uncovered c-MYC-STAT5A/B-PD-L1 interaction as the target. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the predominant form of primary liver cancer (about 85–90%). In the advanced stage of the disease, existing therapies cause toxic side effects and patients often develop chemoresistance. It is therefore important to identify new compounds with low toxicity that can be used in patients with compromised liver and advanced HCC. The objective of this research was to study the antitumoral activity of delta-tocotrienol, a natural compound derived from Vitamin E, on human hepatocarcinoma cell lines. This study supports the evidence that this compound exerts an antitumoral action activating the autophagic process, leading to cancer cell death. We believe that these data may provide a basis for considering delta-tocotrienol as a potential adjuvant therapy for the treatment of advanced HCC. (1) Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the predominant form of primary liver cancer. Surgical resection, tumor ablation, and liver transplantation are curative treatments indicated for early-stage HCC. The management of intermediate and advanced stages of pathology is based on the use of systemic therapies which often show important side effects. Vitamin E-derivative tocotrienols (TTs) play antitumoral properties in different tumors. Here, we analyzed the activity of delta-TT (δ-TT) on HCC human cell lines. (2) We analyzed the ability of δ-TT to trigger apoptosis, to induce oxidative stress, autophagy, and mitophagy in HepG2 cell line. We evaluated the correlation between the activation of autophagy with the ability of δ-TT to induce cell death. (3) The data obtained demonstrate that δ-TT exerts an antiproliferative and proapoptotic effect in HCC cells. Furthermore, δ-TT induces the release of mitochondrial ROS and causes a structural and functional alteration of the mitochondria compatible with a fission process. Finally, δ-TT triggers selective autophagy process removing dysfunctional mitochondria. Inhibition of autophagy reversed the cytotoxic action of δ-TT. (4) Our results demonstrate that δ-TT through the activation of autophagy could represent a potential new approach in the treatment of advanced HCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Glioblastoma is the most common and aggressive brain tumor in adults. Despite surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, survival rates remain low, which emphasizes the urgent need for improved therapies. Current preclinical models use untreated tumors, which do not reflect the clinical scenario where patients already receive initial treatments. This review examines the effects of current treatments on the properties of recurrent tumors and evaluates preclinical models that incorporate these standard treatments to better mimic real patient conditions. Improving these models could help to identify more effective treatments, potentially leading to better outcomes for glioblastoma patients. Glioblastoma (GBM) presents a significant public health challenge as the deadliest and most common malignant brain tumor in adults. Despite standard-of-care treatment, which includes surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, mortality rates are high, underscoring the critical need for advancing GBM therapy. Over the past two decades, numerous clinical trials have been performed, yet only a small fraction demonstrated a benefit, raising concerns about the predictability of current preclinical models. Traditionally, preclinical studies utilize treatment-naïve tumors, failing to model the clinical scenario where patients undergo standard-of-care treatment prior to recurrence. Recurrent GBM generally exhibits distinct molecular alterations influenced by treatment selection pressures. In this review, we discuss the impact of treatment—surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy—on GBM. We also provide a summary of treatments used in preclinical models, advocating for their integration to enhance the translation of novel strategies to improve therapeutic outcomes in GBM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Poly(adenosine diphosphate–ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARP-is) play crucial roles in the treatment of ovarian cancer. However, the best therapeutic strategy for recurrence during PARP-i maintenance therapy remains unknown. The aim of this study was to elucidate the efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy after PARP-i treatment in recurrent ovarian cancer. Eighteen patients were enrolled in the present study. The median progression-free survival (PFS) for all patients was 6.5 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 17.6 months. The evaluation of the risk factors for PFS revealed that bevacizumab use in subsequent therapies was significantly associated with extended PFS. The median PFS was significantly longer in the chemotherapy with the bevacizumab group than in chemotherapy alone (8.9 months vs. 3.1 months, log-rank p = 0.022). The present study highlighted that platinum-based chemotherapy with bevacizumab in subsequent therapies would provide substantial benefits in the PFS of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. The clinical outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer have been significantly improved by Poly(adenosine diphosphate–ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARP-is). However, the best therapeutic strategy for recurrence during PARP-i maintenance therapy remains unknown. Herein, we elucidated the efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy after PARP-i treatment in recurrent ovarian cancer. Eligible patients had experienced relapses during PARP-i maintenance therapy lasting at least 6 months and had received subsequent platinum-based chemotherapy at our institution between January 2019 and March 2024. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and risk factors for PFS were evaluated. Sixty-six patients were assessed for eligibility and eighteen were enrolled. The median follow-up period was 14.5 months. The PFS and OS of all patients were 6.5 and 17.6 months, respectively. The evaluation of the risk factors for PFS revealed that age, pathological type, duration of PARP-i maintenance therapy, prior lines of chemotherapy, and PARP-i dose reduction were not significant prognostic markers. However, bevacizumab use in subsequent therapies significantly extended the PFS. The median PFS was 3.1 months in the chemotherapy-alone group and 8.9 months in the chemotherapy with bevacizumab group (log-rank p = 0.022). Platinum-based chemotherapy with bevacizumab in subsequent therapies would provide substantial benefits in the PFS of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The development of HER2-inhibitors for the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer represented a breakthrough in targeted tumor therapy. However, as for other targeted therapeutics, drug resistance remains a serious challenge to the treatment of HER2+ BC. Recent research has identified critical biomarkers for HER2-inhibitor resistance and explored more effective treatment regimens in HER2+ breast cancer to overcome drug resistance; however, research on several potential biomarkers and promising alternative therapies remains incomplete. HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) is highly expressed in a variety of cancers, including breast, lung, gastric, and pancreatic cancers. Its amplification is linked to poor clinical outcomes. At the genetic level, HER2 is encoded by the ERBB2 gene (v-erb-b2 avian erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2), which is frequently mutated or amplified in cancers, thus spurring extensive research into HER2 modulation and inhibition as viable anti-cancer strategies. An impressive body of FDA-approved drugs, including anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs), and HER2-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), have demonstrated success in enhancing overall survival (OS) and disease progression-free survival (PFS). Yet, drug resistance remains a persistent challenge and raises the risks of metastatic potential and tumor relapse. Research into alternative therapeutic options for HER2+ breast cancer therefore proves critical for adapting to this ever-evolving landscape. This review highlights current HER2-targeted therapies, discusses predictive biomarkers for drug resistance, and introduces promising emergent therapies—especially combination therapies—that are aimed at overcoming drug resistance in the context of HER2+ breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: NSCLC is one of the most life-threatening forms of oncological diseases. Although targeted and immunotherapy treatments have improved NSCLC prognosis, the chance of surviving is still limited for many patients. Therefore, further efforts are required to improve NSCLC care. AdipoRon is emerging as an antineoplastic molecule in the treatment of different cancers, but its potential in NSCLC is yet to be explored. Herein, we demonstrated that AdipoRon strongly impairs viability, growth and stemness in NSCLC cells. We also recorded higher glucose consumption and lactate accumulation as a result of AdipoRon treatment. Remarkably, the employment of glycolytic-interfering agents enhanced its antiproliferative features. A signaling pathways analysis revealed a marked AMPK phosphorylation, while, in contrast, its abrogation by Compound-C significantly counteracted AdipoRon effectiveness. Altogether, these findings emphasize AdipoRon's anticancer feature even in NSCLC, supporting its endorsement as a future candidate in cancer and NSCLC therapy. Despite the countless therapeutic advances achieved over the years, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. To this primacy contribute both non-oncogene addicted and advanced NSCLCs, in which conventional therapies are only partially effective. The adiponectin receptor agonist AdipoRon has revealed antiproliferative action in different cancers, including osteosarcoma and pancreatic cancer. Herein, we investigated its potential anticancer role in NSCLC for the first time. We proved that AdipoRon strongly inhibits viability, growth and colony formation in H1299 and A549 NSCLC cells, mainly through a slowdown in cell cycle progression. Along with the biological behaviors, a metabolic switching was observed after AdipoRon administration in NSCLC cells, consisting of higher glucose consumption and lactate accumulation. Remarkably, both 2-Deoxy Glucose and Oxamate glycolytic-interfering agents greatly enhanced AdipoRon's antiproliferative features. As a master regulator of cell metabolism, AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) was activated by AdipoRon. Notably, the ablation of AdipoRon-induced AMPK phosphorylation by Compound-C significantly counteracted its effectiveness. However, the engagement of other pathways should be investigated afterwards. With a focus on NSCLC, our findings further support the ability of AdipoRon in acting as an anticancer molecule, driving its endorsement as a future candidate in NSCLC therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Lck is an important kinase that plays a key role in the physiological responses of T lymphocytes as well as in several other tissues such as the lung, intestine, brain, endometrium, and prostate. It can be found bound to the cell membrane, free in the cytosol, and even in the nucleus as it interacts with different proteins involved in various biological responses. Additionally, Lck is considered a proto-oncogene. Phosphatases and the Csk kinase control Lck activity: phosphatases can open and inactivate the structure, while Csk can only close it. The activation and modifications of Lck differ between normal and pathological conditions, such as cancer, allergy, autoimmunity, and graft vs. host disease. These differences may lead to new targets for pharmacological therapy. This overview briefly summarizes the characteristics and modulations of the enzyme. Lck, a member of the Src kinase family, is a non-receptor tyrosine kinase involved in immune cell activation, antigen recognition, tumor growth, and cytotoxic response. The enzyme has usually been linked to T lymphocyte activation upon antigen recognition. Lck activation is central to CD4, CD8, and NK activation. However, recently, it has become clearer that activating the enzyme in CD8 cells can be independent of antigen presentation and enhance the cytotoxic response. The role of Lck in NK cytotoxic function has been controversial in a similar fashion as the role of the enzyme in CAR T cells. Inhibiting tyrosine kinases has been a highly successful approach to treating hematologic malignancies. The inhibitors may be useful in treating other tumor types, and they may be useful to prevent cell exhaustion. New, more selective inhibitors have been documented, and they have shown interesting activities not only in tumor growth but in the treatment of autoimmune diseases, asthma, and graft vs. host disease. Drug repurposing and bioinformatics can aid in solving several unsolved issues about the role of Lck in cancer. In summary, the role of Lck in immune response and tumor growth is not a simple event and requires more research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]