Search

Simple Summary: Proton beam therapy delivered via pencil beam scanning is an advanced method for treating cancer. Two types of scanning modes are available for this method: discrete spot scanning (DSS) and continuous scanning. Continuous scanning has some advantages over DSS including improved proton beam delivery efficiency and reduced delivery time. However, continuous scanning delivers a dose between consecutive spots, and currently commercially available treatment planning systems do not account for this. Consequently, the continuous scanning delivered dose is inherently different from the planned one, which is discrete spot based. We conducted a proof-of-concept study of the ability of a prediction model to reduce the dose discrepancy between continuous scanning and discrete spot plan. Our findings suggest that selecting planning parameters with the prediction model reduces the dose discrepancy and therefore may permit relaxed dose delivery constraint, which further improves the benefits of continuous scanning. Pencil beam scanning delivered with continuous scanning has several advantages over conventional discrete spot scanning. Such advantages include improved beam delivery efficiency and reduced beam delivery time. However, a move dose is delivered between consecutive spots with continuous scanning, and current treatment planning systems do not take this into account. Therefore, continuous scanning and discrete spot plans have an inherent dose discrepancy. Using the operating parameters of the state-of-the-art particle therapy system, we conducted a proof-of-concept study in which we systematically generated 28 plans for cubic targets with different combinations of plan parameters and simulated the dose discrepancies between continuous scanning and a planned one. A nomograph to guide the selection of plan parameters was developed to reduce the dose discrepancy. The effectiveness of the nomograph was evaluated with two clinical cases (one prostate and one liver). Plans with parameters guided by the nomograph decreased dose discrepancy than those used standard plan parameters. Specifically, the 2%/2 mm gamma passing rate increased from 96.3% to 100% for the prostate case and from 97.8% to 99.7% for the liver case. The CTV DVH root mean square error decreased from 2.2% to 0.2% for the prostate case and from 1.8% to 0.9% for the liver case. The decreased dose discrepancy may allow the relaxing of the delivery constraint for some cases, leading to greater benefits in continuous scanning. Further investigation is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]