Search

Simple Summary: Hepatocellular carcinoma is the most common type of liver cancer and is often seen in people with chronic liver diseases. For patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who cannot receive surgery, other treatments include atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, sorafenib, or lenvatinib. We compared the length of life among 1874 United States veterans who received these therapies, both in the overall population of patients and in groups by race/ethnicity. The results showed that the risk of death was 30% lower with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab compared with sorafenib, and 26% lower compared with lenvatinib. These trends were consistent across White, Black, and Hispanic patients. Thus, patients who received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab had improved survival outcomes compared with those treated with sorafenib or lenvatinib, regardless of race or ethnicity. Background/Objectives: This study evaluated comparative overall survival (OS) of United States veterans with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) receiving first-line (1L) atezolizumab plus bevacizumab vs. sorafenib or lenvatinib, overall and across racial and ethnic groups. Methods: In this retrospective study, patients with uHCC who initiated atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (post-2020) or sorafenib or lenvatinib (post-2018) were identified from the Veterans Health Administration National Corporate Data Warehouse (1 January 2017–31 December 2022). Patient characteristics were evaluated in the year prior to 1L treatment initiation. Kaplan–Meier and multivariable Cox regression methods were used to compare OS starting from treatment between cohorts, both overall and by race and ethnicity. Results: Among the 1874 patients included, 405 (21.6%) received 1L atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, 1016 (54.2%) received sorafenib, and 453 (24.2%) received lenvatinib, with a median follow-up time of 8.5, 7.6, and 8.2 months, respectively. Overall, patients receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab had longer unadjusted median OS (12.8 [95% CI: 10.6, 17.1] months) than patients receiving sorafenib (8.0 [7.1, 8.6] months) or lenvatinib (9.5 [7.8, 11.4] months; both log-rank p < 0.001). After adjustment, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab was associated with a reduced risk of death by 30% vs. sorafenib (adjusted HR: 0.70 [95% CI: 0.60, 0.82]) and by 26% vs. lenvatinib (0.74 [0.62, 0.88]; both p < 0.001). OS trends in the White, Black, and Hispanic patient cohorts were consistent with that of the overall population. Conclusions: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab was associated with improved survival outcomes compared with sorafenib and lenvatinib in patients with uHCC, both overall and across racial and ethnic subgroups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is a rare biliary cancer with a poor prognosis, even after surgery. This study aimed to assess the impact of perineural (Pn), lymphangio (L), and vascular (V) invasion on overall survival following surgical resection. Data from 214 patients who underwent surgery between 2013 and 2023 were analyzed. Of these, curative intended resection was achieved in 168 patients (78.5%). Perineural, lymphangio and vascular invasion were present in 79.2%, 17.3% and 14.3% of patients, respectively. L1 and V1 were significantly associated with each other. Vascular invasion was associated with a significantly worse overall survival, while perineural invasion showed a trend toward worse overall survival, although this was not statistically significant. In Bismuth type IV tumors, both L1 and V1 were significantly linked to poorer overall survival. Furthermore, the combination of Pn1 with the presence of either L1 or V1 (or both) was associated with worse overall survival, underscoring the prognostic importance of these factors, particularly in Bismuth type IV tumors. Introduction: Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is a rare malignancy of the biliary tract, for which surgery remains the treatment of choice. However, even after radical resection, the prognosis is poor. In addition to tumor size, depth of invasion and nodal/metastatic status, the TNM classification includes additional parameters such as perineural (Pn), lymphangio (L) and vascular (V) invasion. The prognostic impact of these factors is not yet fully understood. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of these parameters on overall survival after resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Material and Methods: Data from all patients who underwent surgical exploration for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma between January 2013 and December 2023 were included into an institutional database. The impact of perineural, lymphangio and vascular invasion on overall survival was analyzed. Results: Over the 11-year period, a total of 214 patients underwent surgical exploration for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Curative intended resection was possible in 168 patients (78.5%). Perineural invasion, lymphangio invasion and vascular invasion were present in 79.2%, in 17.3% and in 14.3% of patients, respectively. Cross tabulation revealed a significant association between the presence of L1 and V1 (p = 0.006). There was also a significant association of Pn1, L1, and V1 with R-status (p = 0.010; p = 0.006 and p ≤ 0.001). While V1 was associated with significantly worse overall survival across the entire cohort, Pn1 alone showed only a tendency towards worse overall survival without reaching statistical significance. In Bismuth type IV, both L1 and V1, but not Pn1, were significantly associated with worse overall survival (p = 0.001; p = 0.017 and p = 0.065). Conclusions: Perineural invasion is very common in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Although Pn1 was associated with a tendency toward worse survival, it did not reach statistical significance. In contrast, vascular invasion significantly worsened overall survival in the entire cohort, and lymphangio invasion was linked to worse overall survival in Bismuth type IV tumors. The combination of perineural invasion with positivity of more than one additional factor (either L or V) was also associated with worse overall survival. In patients with Bismuth type IV, these pathological markers appeared to have even greater prognostic relevance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This study assessed the prognostic impact of sarcopenic obesity (SO) in colorectal cancer patients. Among 211 sarcopenic patients, those with obesity (SO group) demonstrated significantly shorter cancer-related relapse-free survival (CRRFS) compared to their non-obese counterparts (non-SO group). While cancer-specific survival (CSS) was also poorer in the SO group, this difference did not reach statistical significance. Additionally, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between the two groups. Multivariate analysis identified sarcopenic obesity, elevated CEA levels, and unfavorable histological types as independent predictors of poor CRRFS. These findings underscore the importance of routine assessment of both sarcopenia and obesity in clinical practice. Moreover, they highlight the potential benefits of interventions aimed at increasing muscle mass and reducing visceral fat to enhance patient outcomes. Background: Sarcopenia, the age-related loss of muscle mass, is a negative prognostic factor in gastrointestinal cancer. Sarcopenia combined with visceral obesity (sarcopenic obesity) is associated with poor outcomes. We explored the influence of obesity and other factors on the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed with sarcopenia. Methods: We enrolled 211 patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed with preoperative sarcopenic obesity who underwent radical resection at Osaka University Hospital between January 2009 and January 2012. Muscle mass was assessed using the psoas muscle mass index. Obesity was evaluated by measuring the visceral fat area in the umbilical region. Patients were categorized into two groups: sarcopenia with obesity (SO) and sarcopenia without obesity (non-SO). Overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and cancer-related relapse-free survival (CRRFS) were compared between the two groups. Patient characteristics, including age, sex, body mass index, serum albumin, C-reactive protein, tumor markers, prognostic nutritional index (PNI), modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), and geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI), were also analyzed. Results: CRRFS was significantly shorter in the SO group than in the non-SO group (p = 0.028). PNI, mGPS, and GNRI were not identified as significant prognostic factors for CRRFS. Multivariate analysis highlighted sarcopenic obesity, elevated carcinoembryonic antigen levels, and unfavorable histological types as significant predictors of poor CRRFS outcomes. Conclusions: Sarcopenic obesity is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in patients with CRC. Thus, interventions aimed at increasing muscle mass and reducing visceral fat could potentially improve the prognosis of these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: We present a case series of 16 patients with pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma treated at our institution for whom available molecular information was evaluated. Most of the patients had metastatic disease, and all patients tested for KRAS mutations were KRAS wild type. Five of 12 patients who underwent DNA damage repair gene testing had germline and/or somatic mutations. One patient was found to have RET fusion and responded favorably to selpercatinib for over 42 months. We also include two additional cases who underwent BostonGene testing, including genomic alterations, RNA expression, and tumor microenvironment (TME) features. One of the two cases was found to have NTRK1 fusion. These findings highlight the need for further investigation of acinar cell carcinoma using larger samples to refine treatment strategies for this rare pancreatic cancer. Objectives: Acinar cell carcinoma (ACC) accounts for about 1% of pancreatic cancers. The molecular and clinical features of ACC are less characterized than those of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the clinical and molecular features of ACC patients who underwent germline and/or somatic molecular testing at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center from 2008 to 2022 and two cases from 2023–2024 who underwent RNA and TME analysis by Boston Gene. Patient information was extracted from our institutional database with the approval of the Institutional Review Board. Results: We identified 16 patients with available molecular testing results. Fourteen patients had metastatic disease, one had borderline resectable disease, and one had localized resectable disease at diagnosis. Fifteen patients were wild type for KRAS (one patient had unknown KRAS status). Somatic/germline mutations of DNA damage repair genes (BRCA1/2, PALB2, and ATM) were present in 5 of 12 patients tested for these genes. One patient was found to have RET fusion and responded favorably to selpercatinib for over 42 months. The median overall survival (OS) was 24 months for patients with metastatic disease. One of the additional two cases who underwent BostonGene testing was found to have NTRK1 fusion. RNA and TME analysis by Boston Gene of the two cases reported immune desert features and relatively lower RNA levels of CEACAM5, CD47, CD74, and MMP1 and higher RNA levels of CDH6 compared with PDAC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Although immunotherapy is well established for treating pleural mesothelioma, it has not shown a breakthrough in improving the overall survival of these patients. A detailed study of the tumor microenvironment could lead to a better understanding of the factors that influence tumor growth to optimize treatment. In our cohort, T cell infiltrate differences were strongly associated with overall survival. Background: Immunotherapy has significantly improved overall survival in patients with pleural mesothelioma, yet this benefit does not extend to those with the epithelioid subtype. Tumor growth is believed to be influenced by the immune response. This study aimed to analyze the tumor microenvironment to gain a better understanding of its influence on tumor growth. Methods: The tumor immune cell infiltration of 188 patients with pleural mesothelioma was characterized by multiplex immunofluorescence staining for CD3+ cells (CD3+), CD4+ cells (CD3+/CD4+), CD8+ cells (CD3+/CD8+), Treg (CD3+/CD4+/CD8-/CD163-/Foxp3+), PD1 cells (PD1+), and T helper cells (CD3+/CD4+/CD8-/CD163-/FoxP3-). The distribution of specific immune cells was correlated with clinical parameters. Results: A total of 188 patients with pleural mesothelioma (135 epithelioid, 9 sarcomatoid, 44 biphasic subtypes) were analyzed. The median age was 64.8 years. Overall survival was significantly longer in the epithelioid subtype than in the non-epithelioid subtype (p = 0.016). The presence of PD-L1 expression had a negative effect on overall survival (p = 0.041). A high ratio of CD4+ cells to regulatory T cells was associated with a significantly longer overall survival of more than 12 months (p = 0.015). The ratio of CD4+ cells to regulatory T cells retained its significant effect on overall survival in the multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Distinct differences in the T cell immune infiltrates in mesothelioma are strongly associated with overall survival. The tumor microenvironment could therefore serve as a source of prognostic biomarkers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This study evaluated the impact of intraoperative opioid use and anesthesia type on outcomes for patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Data from 508 patients treated between 2015 and 2022 were analyzed. Most (82%) received combined intravenous and epidural anesthesia, while the rest received intravenous-only anesthesia. Results showed that combined anesthesia was linked to better overall survival and fewer intensive care unit admissions. However, opioid dosage and type did not significantly affect survival, recurrence rates, or major perioperative outcomes. The findings are limited by the study's single-center, retrospective nature, and further research is needed to confirm the safety of opioids in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Background: An increased intraoperative opioid dose seems to lead to worse outcomes in several types of cancer. We assessed the effect of intraoperatively administered opioids as well as the type of anesthesia on survival, recurrence rates and major perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent radical cystectomy (RC) for urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Methods: We included patients who underwent open RC at our center between 2015 and 2022. The role of the type and dosage of intraoperative opioid agents, such as remifentanil, sufentanil and morphine milligram equivalents (MME), as well as the type of anesthesia (intravenous only versus intravenous/epidural), was assessed regarding perioperative and long-term outcomes after RC. Results: A total of 508 patients with a median age of 73 years (IQR: 64–78) were included. Overall, 92 (18%) patients received intravenous anesthesia, whereas 416 (82%) received combined anesthesia. At a median follow-up of 270 days (IQR: 98–808), 108 (21%) deaths and 106 (21%) recurrences occurred. Combined anesthesia was associated with better survival (HR:0.63, 95% CI: 0.4–0.97, p = 0.037) and lower intensive care unit admission rates (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.31–0.77, p = 0.002) in the univariate analysis (unadjusted). The type and dosage of intraoperative opioid agents did not affect long-term survival and recurrence rates, as well as major perioperative outcomes. Nevertheless, the findings of our study were limited by its single-center, retrospective design. Conclusion: The use of intraoperative opioids was not associated with worse outcomes in our cohort, while the use of additional epidural anesthesia seems to be beneficial in terms of overall survival and intensive care unit admissions. Nevertheless, further research is mandatory to validate the safety of opioids in patients undergoing RC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Sarcomas are rare and diverse tumors that develop in various tissues like bone, muscle, and fat. This study examines the outcomes of two types of surgical removal of these tumors: planned resections (PEs), where the tumor is diagnosed a-priori and surgically removed with a plan, and unplanned resections (UEs), where the tumor is removed without prior diagnosis. We found that planned surgeries, while better at completely removing the tumor initially, are associated with more advanced tumors that have a higher chance of spreading and leading to cancer-related deaths. On the other hand, unplanned surgeries tend to have higher chances of the tumor coming back locally but do not significantly affect long-term survival. These findings highlight the importance of early detection and timely treatment at specialized centers to improve patient outcomes. Our research aims to help develop better tools for predicting and managing sarcomas to enhance patient care. Background: Sarcomas, a diverse group of malignant tumors arising from mesenchymal tissues, pose significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. This study compares the outcomes of planned resections (PEs) and unplanned resections (UEs) to inform better clinical practices. Methods: Data were analyzed from the Swiss Sarcoma Network (SSN), including patients with soft tissue and bone sarcomas treated at two major hospitals. This study utilized logistic regression and Cox regression models to examine the odds of UEs and their impact on local recurrence-free survival. Results: Among 429 patients registered by SSN members, 323 (75%) underwent PEs and 106 (25%) experienced UEs. PEs were associated with significantly larger tumors (94 mm vs. 47 mm, p < 0.001) and higher-grade tumors (Grade 3: 50.5% vs. 37.4%, p = 0.03). Despite achieving superior resection margins (R0: 78.8% vs. 12.6%, p < 0.001), PEs showed higher metastasis rates at follow-up (31.0% vs. 10.4%, p < 0.001) and greater cancer-specific mortality (16.7% vs. 6.6%, p = 0.01). UEs, while linked to higher local recurrence, did not significantly affect metastasis-free survival (MFS) or overall survival (OS). Conclusions: PEs achieve superior immediate surgical outcomes but are linked to higher metastasis and cancer-specific mortality due to the advanced stage of tumors. UEs, while associated with higher local recurrence rates, do not significantly impact MFS or OS. Early detection, comprehensive diagnostics, and timely referrals to specialized sarcoma hubs are essential to avoid UEs and reduce metastatic risk. Future research should focus on developing diagnostic tools using individual tumor and patient characteristics to improve sarcoma management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: In a retrospective study of 86 patients, we identified independent predictors of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) after the resection of liver metastases of uveal melanoma using a multivariable Cox model. A disease-free interval of ≤24 months and a chromosome 8q surgain were associated with worse survival. With these two parameters, we built a novel clinico-genetic score that defined three risk groups with distinct prognoses. This novel score identified patients with a high risk of relapse after surgery. These patients may benefit from neoadjuvant or adjuvant systemic therapy following complete surgical resection with the hope of improving survival outcomes. Surgical treatment of liver metastases of uveal melanoma (LMUM) could be proposed for selected patients. This retrospective study examined the prognostic significance of the genetic profiles of liver metastases after LMUM resection. A total of 86 patients treated with resection for LMUM, who underwent genetic analysis of liver metastasis, were included. A multivariable Cox model identified the independent predictors of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). The disease-free interval (DFI) and a chromosome 8q surgain (>3 copies) were independent predictors and categorized patients into three risk groups with distinct postoperative prognoses. For the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk scores of recurrence, the median RFS values were 15 months (95% CI: 10–22), 6 months (95% CI: 4–11), and 4 months (95% CI: 2–7), and the median OS values were 86 months (95% CI: 55-NR), 25 months (95% CI: 17–48), and 19 months (95% CI: 12–22), respectively. The predictive accuracy of this scoring system was demonstrated by a mean area under the curve (AUC(t)) of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.65–0.90) for RFS and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.70–0.92) for OS. This novel score, based on a DFI of ≤24 months combined with a chromosome 8q surgain, identifies patients at a high risk of early recurrence and could help clinicians to propose perioperative treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Para-aortic lymphadenectomy can be used for both staging and therapeutic purposes in ovarian, endometrial, gastric and bladder cancers. However, Para-aortic lymphadenectomy is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality and with no evidence of benefits in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival. A systematic review of the literature was performed to look into the published randomized controlled studies (RCTs) that have reported the effectiveness of lymphadenectomy. The total number of patients was 4231. The studies reported that para-aortic lymphadenectomy did not improve overall survival and disease-free survival in advanced ovarian cancers, early endometrial cancers, advanced gastric, and bladder cancers. All of the studies had a low risk of bias. Conclusions: Para-aortic lymphadenectomy is not advised in advanced ovarian cancers, early endometrial cancers with low risks, advanced gastric cancers, and bladder cancers. Clinicians should inform patients regarding the benefits of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in terms of survival and the potential risks associated with it. Background: Para-aortic lymphadenectomy can be used for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes as it aids in staging, provides prognostic data, and influences the patient's options for adjuvant therapy. However, there is still contention over its potential in treating cancer. A systematic review of the literature was performed to look into the published randomized controlled studies (RCTs) that have reported the effectiveness of lymphadenectomy. Methods: Five different electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Clinical trials.gov, ICTRP, and Embase, were used to conduct a comprehensive search. Original RCTs reporting on the impact of lymphadenectomy on the overall survival in various cancers were included. Information related to the study population, intervention, type of cancer, primary endpoints, and key findings of the study were extracted. Quality assessment of the selected studies was conducted using the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool Rob 2 for randomized trials. Results: A total of 1693 citations, with 1511 from PubMed, 80 from the Cochrane Library, 67 from Embase, 18 from ICTRP, and 17 from Clinicaltrials.gov were retrieved. Preliminary screening was performed, and after applying selection criteria, nine articles were included in the final qualitative analysis. The total number of patients was 4231, and the sample size ranged from 70 to 1408. Among these nine studies, four studies were on genital cancers (two ovarian cancers, one endometrial cancer, and one cervical cancer); four on digestive cancers (advanced gastric cancers); and one on urinary cancer (advanced bladder cancer). These studies reported that para-aortic lymphadenectomy did not improve overall survival and disease-free survival in advanced ovarian cancers, early endometrial cancers, advanced gastric, and bladder cancers. All of the studies had a low risk of bias. Conclusions: Para-aortic lymphadenectomy is not advised in advanced ovarian cancers, early endometrial cancers with low risks, advanced gastric cancers, and bladder cancers. SNB could be an alternative to lymphadenectomy for ovarian cancer in the future. Clinicians should inform patients regarding the benefits of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in terms of survival and the potential risks associated with it. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This research was conducted to evaluate the impact of ipilimumab treatment in patients with metastatic melanoma when monotherapy with PD-1 inhibitors has failed. In particular, the aim was to evaluate the efficacy of ipilimumab in this setting based on the presence or absence of BRAF or NRAS mutations. The present study could allow us to understand when salvage treatment with ipilimumab would have the best impact, although an analysis on a larger patient cohort would be necessary. Background: When monotherapy with PD-1 inhibitors in metastatic melanoma fails, there are currently no standard second-line choices. In case of the unavailability of clinical trials, ipilimumab represents a possible alternative treatment. Methods: We collected data of 44 patients who received ipilimumab after the failure of PD-1 inhibitors from July 2017 to May 2023 at our Institute. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and post-progression survival (PPS) based on BRAF or NRAS mutation status, sex, and the presence of brain metastases were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox regression was used to evaluate independence in multivariate analysis. The objective response rate (ORR) was estimated based on RECIST 1.1. Results: Among the 44 patients enrolled in this study, 28 BRAF-wildtype, 9 BRAF-mutated, and 7 NRAS-mutated patients were identified. OS analysis showed a significant difference between wildtype and BRAF- or NRAS-mutated patients: 23.2 months vs 5.3 and 4.59, respectively, p = 0.017. The presence of brain metastases and BRAF or NRAS mutation were independent factors for mortality in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: In case of failure to enroll patients in innovative clinical trials, second-line ipilimumab still represents an effective therapy in patients with metastatic wildtype melanoma and in the absence of brain metastases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare condition, and the role of low HER2 expression (HER2 low) is not well understood. In this prospective study, 870 MBC patients treated between May 2009 and June 2023 were evaluated to investigate the prognostic significance of HER2 low status. After a median follow-up of 43 months, 659 patients were classified into three groups: 76% were HER2 low, 12.3% were HER2 zero, and 11.7% were HER2 positive. HER2 positivity was linked to younger age, higher tumor proliferation, and more aggressive cancer characteristics, but no differences were found between HER2 zero and HER2 low groups. Furthermore, HER2 low status did not influence disease-free or overall survival. However, HER2 low has a potential clinical impact on MBC as a treatment target. Background: Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare disease, and the potential influence of low expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2 low) remains unexplored. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, we evaluated 870 patients treated for MBC between May 2009 and June 2023 to assess HER2 low status and its prognostic implications. Results: With a median follow-up of 43 months (range 1–175 months), 659 eligible patients were categorized into three groups based on HER2 status: 501 (76%) HER2 low, 81 (12.3%) HER2 zero, and 77 (11.7%) HER2 positive. HER2 positivity correlated with younger age, higher proliferation index, non-specific type histology, lymphovascular invasion (LVSI), and low differentiation grade. Notably, all these parameters were equally distributed between the HER2 zero and HER2 low groups. Additionally, HER2 positivity was significantly associated with increased occurrences of regional and distant lymph nodes and pulmonary metastases. However, no statistically significant difference was observed between HER2 zero and HER2 low. Disease-free and overall survival showed no significant disparities between the groups. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that HER2 low status is frequently detected in MBC. Despite this, HER2 low did not correlate with clinical and pathological parameters, nor did it impact patients' survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This study investigates the real-world efficacy and safety of combining pembrolizumab, a novel immunotherapy agent, with chemotherapy in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer treatment. We specifically aimed to validate clinical trial results in routine practice. A total of 108 Turkish patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy were examined. The combined regimen demonstrated high efficacy, with 64% of patients achieving pathological complete response, and exhibited generally favorable safety profiles with predominantly mild adverse events. These findings support the use of this combination as a standard treatment for this aggressive breast cancer subtype. However, the results underscore the need for further research to identify optimal patient selection criteria, which can inform oncologists' decision-making and potentially enhance outcomes for patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Background/Objectives: Following the results of the phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 trial, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved pembrolizumab, a humanized IgG4 kappa monoclonal antibody, in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a new standard of care for high-risk early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). This retrospective, multicenter study in Türkiye assessed the real-world efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy in early-stage TNBC. Methods: The study included 108 patients treated between 2021 and 2023 across 14 oncology centers. Three distinct neoadjuvant regimens incorporating pembrolizumab were administered at the discretion of the treating physicians. The primary outcomes were the pathological complete response (pCR) rate after neoadjuvant therapy and the 2-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates. Results: The observed pCR rate was 63.9%, closely mirroring the 64.8% reported in the KEYNOTE-522 trial. At the two-year mark, the EFS rate was 87.2% and the OS rate was 92.3%. Multivariable analysis identified pCR as the sole independent predictor of both EFS and OS. The safety profile was consistent with previous clinical trial data, with most adverse events being of grade 1–2 in severity. Conclusions: These findings provide valuable real-world confirmation of the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab–chemotherapy in early-stage TNBC, complementing evidence from randomized trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This epidemiological study of adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) using data from the SEER system aims to investigate independent predictors of late mortality, including factors such as age, stage, and tumor location, as well as racial differences, geographical distribution, and lack of social support (being unmarried). A total of 5150 patients were identified. Our study revealed that stage, tumor location in the thoracic region, and treatment modalities, in addition to geographical distribution (Western region) and lack of social support (being unmarried), were identified as independent predictors of late mortality. While the SEER data are not designed to explain why disease patterns occur, they provide valuable insights into health-related issues that cannot be overlooked. Further studies are needed to determine why the Western region of the USA is associated with poorer survival compared to the Northeast. Objective: Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignant tumor that mainly arises in the head and neck area. We aimed to compare the long-term survival of patients with ACC based on their geographic regions within the United States using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry data. Methods: We queried the SEER database to evaluate the geographic distribution of ACC patients based on inpatient admissions. The states included in the study were divided into four geographical regions (Midwest, Northeast, South, and West) based on the U.S. Census Bureau-designated regions and divisions. Demographic and clinical variables were compared between the groups. Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox regression were used to assess late mortality. Results: A total of 5150 patients were included (4.2% from the Midwest, 17.2% from the Northeast, 22.5% from the South, and 56.1% from the West regions). The median follow-up was 12.3 (95% CI: 11.6–13.1 years). Median overall survival was 11.0 (95% CI: 9.2-NR years), 14.3 (95% CI: 12.4–16.4 years), 11.3 (95% CI: 9.7–14.8 years), and 12.0 (95% CI: 11.3–13.0 years) for Midwest, Northeast, South, and West regions, respectively. In multivariable analysis, older age, male sex, thoracic cancer, the presence of regional and distal disease, receiving chemotherapy, not undergoing surgical resection, and being treated in the West vs. Northeast region were found to be independent predictors of poor survival. We identified a significant survival difference between the different regions, with the West exhibiting the worst survival compared to the Northeast region. Conclusions: In addition to the well-known predictors of late mortality in ACC (tumor location, stage, and treatment modalities), our study identified a lack of social support (being unmarried) and geographic location (West region) as independent predictors of late mortality in multivariable analysis. Further research is needed to explore the causal relationships. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This structured review evaluated prospective trials that included non-metastatic advanced stage (Stage III) non-small cell lung cancer patients to determine if survival was different for high radiation dose per day (>2 Gy per day), given over a shortened number of radiation treatments (less than 30), known as hypofractionation, as compared to the usual standard radiation regimen, known as conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (2 Gy radiation dose, given once daily on weekdays for 30 daily treatments). There was no evidence that hypofractionation improves survival as compared to conventionally fractionated radiation therapy. Toxicity varied among the studies. Larger trials are needed to assess whether hypofractionated radiation is equivalent to conventional radiation. It is unclear whether the use of systemic therapy will improve survival outcomes with hypofractionated radiation and how the use of systemic therapy may negatively affect radiation toxicity with hypofractionation. Introduction: This systematic review evaluated whether curative intent hypofractionated radiation therapy improved survival (primary endpoint) as compared to standard conventionally fractionated radiation therapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Toxicity was also examined as a secondary endpoint. Methods: Electronic bibliographic databases were searched from 1 January 1990 to 31 March 2024. Phase II and phase III trials were included to assess survival (primary outcome) and toxicity (secondary outcome) for newly diagnosed stage III NSCLC patients. Results: Eight phase II trials (n = 349 participants), 3 randomized phase II trials (n = 382 participants), and 5 randomized phase III trials (n = 811 participants), for a total of 1542 participants, were identified. The published trials were heterogeneous, with a wide variety of dose prescriptions. A wide range of survivals (median survival 13.6 months–42.5 months) and toxicities such as grade 3 or higher esophagitis (0–42%) and grade 3 or higher pneumonitis (0–18%) were reported. Conclusions: There is no level 1 evidence to date that suggests that any hypofractionated regimen (dose escalated or not) improves survival as compared to conventionally fractionated radiation. The published phase III trials have been powered for superiority (not equivalence) for the hypofractionated arm. Toxicity with hypofractionated regimens may be similar to conventionally fractionated regimens when normal tissue radiotherapy constraints are kept within tolerance limits. It is unclear how the use of systemic therapy may negatively affect radiation toxicity with hypofractionated radiation therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: There is no literature that compares the clinical outcomes between intraperitoneal chemotherapy without bevacizumab and triweekly intravenous chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. The aim of this study was to elucidate whether, in the frontline treatment of advanced ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer, intraperitoneal cisplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy without bevacizumab will confer an improved survival benefit when compared with the combination of triweekly intravenous carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy and bevacizumab. We found that intraperitoneal chemotherapy without bevacizumab is associated with better survival when compared with intravenous chemotherapy with bevacizumab. Objectives: To compare the clinical outcomes of intravenous carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy plus bevacizumab versus intraperitoneal cisplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy without bevacizumab as the frontline treatment in women with advanced ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer. Methods: Between November 2012 and January 2024, medical records of all consecutive women with stage II~IV cancer treated with either frontline adjuvant intraperitoneal cisplatin/paclitaxel without bevacizumab (IP group), intravenous carboplatin/paclitaxel without bevacizumab (IV group) or intravenous carboplatin/paclitaxel with bevacizumab (IVB group) at a tertiary referral center were reviewed. Results: A total of 143 women (IP group, n = 57; IVB group, n = 23; IV group, n = 63) were reviewed. The IP group had greater progression-free survival compared to the IVB group (49.1 months, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 27.8 months to infinity, versus 11.9 months, 95% CI = 11.2 to 16.2 months; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.24 to 0.87, p = 0.017). Additionally, the IP group also had a higher overall survival compared to the IVB group (not reached, 95% CI = 55.6 months to infinity, versus 38.9 months, 95% CI = 21.9 months to infinity; adjusted HR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.79, p = 0.012). Conclusions: Intraperitoneal cisplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy without bevacizumab seems to offer a survival advantage when compared with intravenous carboplatin/paclitaxel with bevacizumab in the frontline treatment of women with advanced ovarian cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and H2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) are commonly used for acid reduction in patients with peptic ulcer disease or esophageal reflux. Previous studies have shown that acid-reducing agents (ARAs) might affect bevacizumab treatment. This study found that PPI use worsened the oncological outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) undergoing bevacizumab treatment. There was a negative dose–response relationship when compared to H2RA use. Physicians should consider the benefits and risks of long-term use of ARAs, especially PPIs, in mCRC patients treated with bevacizumab. Background: Approximately one-third of patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) and treated with bevacizumab are prescribed proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or H2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs). However, there is limited data on the effects of PPIs and H2RAs in these patients. To investigate the oncological outcomes of PPI and H2RA use in CRC patients treated with bevacizumab, we performed a retrospective cohort study using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database and Taiwan Cancer Registry Database from 2005 to 2020. Methods: In CRC patients treated with bevacizumab, the PPI users and H2RA users were matched with patients without acid-reducing agents (ARAs) by 1:4 propensity score matching. PPI users and H2RA users were matched with propensity scoring in a 1:1 ratio. We divided patients into 4 cumulative PPI dosage levels to assess the dose–response relationship. The primary endpoints were 5-year overall survival and cancer-specific survival. Results: Compared with ARA non-users, both H2RA users and PPI users were associated with reduced overall survival. PPI users were associated with more significant negative effects on overall survival. Compared with H2RA users, PPI users were associated with lower 5-year overall survival (aHR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.09–1.31) and cancer-specific survival (aHR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.09–1.31). A similar dose–response relationship was observed for PPI users in terms of 5-year overall survival and cancer-specific overall survival. Conclusions: Compared to H2AR use, PPI use was associated with dose-dependent poorer oncological outcomes in metastatic CRC patients treated with bevacizumab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Available studies suggest that radiomics and machine learning applied to PSMA-radioligand avid primary prostate carcinoma have potential to serve as an alternative for non-invasive Gleason score characterization, for the prediction of biochemical recurrence and to differentiate benign from malignant increased tracer uptake. However, prior to their implementation in clinical practice, additional, clinically relevant studies performed according to recently published guidelines and checklists, offering full transparency, including large enough datasets as well as external validation, are mandatory. Positron emission tomography (PET) using radiolabeled prostate-specific membrane antigen targeting PET-imaging agents has been increasingly used over the past decade for imaging and directing prostate carcinoma treatment. Here, we summarize the available literature data on radiomics and machine learning using these imaging agents in prostate carcinoma. Gleason scores derived from biopsy and after resection are discordant in a large number of prostate carcinoma patients. Available studies suggest that radiomics and machine learning applied to PSMA-radioligand avid primary prostate carcinoma might be better performing than biopsy-based Gleason-scoring and could serve as an alternative for non-invasive GS characterization. Furthermore, it may allow for the prediction of biochemical recurrence with a net benefit for clinical utilization. Machine learning based on PET/CT radiomics features was also shown to be able to differentiate benign from malignant increased tracer uptake on PSMA-targeting radioligand PET/CT examinations, thus paving the way for a fully automated image reading in nuclear medicine. As for prediction to treatment outcome following 177Lu-PSMA therapy and overall survival, a limited number of studies have reported promising results on radiomics and machine learning applied to PSMA-targeting radioligand PET/CT images for this purpose. Its added value to clinical parameters warrants further exploration in larger datasets of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a standard treatment for multiple myeloma (MM). This study examines gender-specific differences in response to treosulfan and melphalan (TreoMel) HDCT. Data from 112 MM patients treated at a single center were analyzed for outcomes such as response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicities. Results revealed that females had significantly higher treosulfan exposure than males, as shown by peak levels and area under the curve (AUC). Notably, higher treosulfan exposure in females was associated with increased mortality, with those having an AUC > 900 mg*h/L showing shorter OS. However, treosulfan exposure did not affect PFS in females, and no significantly increased mortality risk was observed in males. These findings suggest that higher treosulfan doses increase toxicity in females without improving outcomes, supporting the need for further investigation into lower dosing for female MM patients. Introduction: The growing body of evidence around sexual and gender dimorphism in medicine, particularly in oncology, has highlighted differences in treatment response, outcomes, and side effects between males and females. Differences in drug metabolism, distribution, and elimination, influenced by factors like body composition and enzyme expression, contribute to these variations. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data of 112 multiple myeloma (MM) patients treated with first-line high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with treosulfan and melphalan (TreoMel) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) at a single academic center between January 2020 and August 2022. We assessed response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicities in relation to gender and treosulfan exposure. Results: Our analysis revealed significant gender-specific differences in treosulfan exposure. Females had higher peak levels (343.8 vs. 309.0 mg/L, p = 0.0011) and area under the curve (AUC) (869.9 vs. 830.5 mg*h/L, p = 0.0427) compared to males. Higher treosulfan exposure was associated with increased mortality in females but not in males. Females with treosulfan AUC > 900 mg*h/L had significantly shorter overall survival, while PFS was unaffected by treosulfan exposure. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that female patients undergoing TreoMel HDCT have higher treosulfan exposure than males and that females with higher levels are at increased risk for toxicity and adverse outcomes. These data suggest that higher treosulfan doses do not confer a benefit in terms of better outcomes for females. Therefore, exploring lower treosulfan doses for female MM patients undergoing TreoMel HDCT may be warranted to mitigate toxicity and improve outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The study evaluated the long-term outcomes of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with S-1 after limited surgery for T1 or T2 lower rectal cancer. The 3-year and 5-year relapse-free survival rates were 90.17% and 85.87%, respectively, showing favorable outcomes for T1 cancer patients, with effective anal function preservation. However, further treatment is needed to improve outcomes for T2 cancer patients. Background: The short-term outcomes of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with S-1 (a combination of tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil) following limited surgery for patients with T1 or T2 lower rectal cancer have shown encouraging results. Objectives: This study was designed to delve deeper into the long-term outcomes of CRT with S-1 after limited surgery, with the goal of evaluating both the long-term efficacy and potential risks associated with this treatment approach in patients diagnosed with T1 or T2 lower rectal cancer. Methods: This was conducted as a multicenter, single-arm, prospective phase II trial. The patient population consisted of individuals clinically diagnosed with either T1 or T2 lower rectal or anal canal cancer, with a maximum tumor diameter of 30 mm and classified as N0 or M0. Patients underwent local excision or endoscopic resection. After surgery, CRT with S-1 was administered to patients meeting several criteria, including the confirmation of well-differentiated or moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, negative surgical margins, submucosal invasion depth of ≥1000 µm, and high tumor-budding grade (2/3). The primary endpoint of this study was relapse-free survival, while secondary endpoints included local recurrence-free survival, overall survival, anal sphincter preservation rate, and safety. Results: A total of 52 patients were included, with pathological diagnoses revealing T1 in 36 patients and T2 in 16 patients. The 3-year and 5-year relapse-free survival rates were 90.17% and 85.87%, respectively. The 3-year and 5-year local recurrence-free survival rates were 90.17% and 88.07%, respectively, while the 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates were 94.03% and 91.94%, respectively. Conclusions: CRT with S-1 after limited surgery for T1 lower rectal cancer demonstrated favorable outcomes in terms of recurrence, survival, and local control rates while effectively maintaining anal function in patients. However, further treatment approaches may be necessary to improve outcomes for patients diagnosed with stage T2 lower rectal cancer [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Since no randomized clinical trial has compared surgery to chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) in FIGO stage IB3 cervical cancer patients, the optimal management remains controversial. In our study, nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (nsLRH) proved to be safe and effective. The encouraging results on toxicity and survival, when compared to CTRT, warrant further investigation and reinforce the idea that surgery is a valid option for these patients. (1) Background: In 2018 FIGO reclassified tumors confined to the cervix larger than 4 cm as stage IB3. Although concurrent CTRT has been the standard of care and surgery the alternative, optimal management remains controversial due to the lack of direct comparison between surgery and CTRT. (2) Methods: This prospective observational study investigated the efficacy, safety and oncologic outcomes of nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (nsLRH) for FIGO stage IB3 cervical cancer patients (IB3). From 2009 to 2023, IB3 patients underwent laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomies with frozen section analysis, followed by a nsLRH if the lymph nodes were tumor-free. No uterine manipulator was used and the vaginal cuff was sealed before retrieving the specimen. Intermediate-risk patients were under close observation without adjuvant therapy. Outcomes were monitored until 2023. (3) Results: During the study period, 74 IB3 patients were treated. Sixty-eight (91.9%) underwent a nsLRH. A complete resection with negative margins was achieved in all cases. At a median of 68 months of follow-up, the disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 89.7% and the overall survival (OS) rate was 93.1%. The overall complication rate was 23.5% and there were no grade 4–5 complications. (4) Conclusions: In patients with IB3 cervical cancer, a nsLRH is safe and effective. While awaiting the results from ongoing randomized trials, these findings support nsLRH as a viable treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This study aimed to identify prognostic factors by combining clinicopathologic parameters with tumor microenvironment (TME) biomarkers in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) who underwent surgery following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). We analyzed CD8+ T cells, CXCR3, CXCL10, and α-SMA using immunohistochemical staining and incorporated AI-powered digital pathology to assess the spatial TME. Our findings showed that high expression of CD8+ T cells, CXCR3 in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and an inflamed phenotype were associated with better recurrence-free survival (RFS). However, these factors were not predictive of overall survival (OS). Patients with an immune-desert phenotype had a poor prognosis regardless of pathologic stage or the administration of postoperative chemotherapy. These results suggest that CD8+ T cells and AI-powered immune phenotypes, together with clinical factors, can guide personalized treatment strategies in LARC patients post-nCRT and highlight the potential benefits of modifying the tumor immune microenvironment (TiME) to reduce recurrence after surgery. Background/Objectives: The tumor microenvironment (TME) has emerged as a significant prognostic factor. This study aimed to identify prognostic factors by combining clinicopathologic parameters and the TME biomarkers in patients who underwent surgery following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Methods: CD8+ T cells, CXCR3, CXCL10, and α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) were analyzed via immunohistochemical staining. We also incorporated AI-powered digital pathology to assess the spatial TME. The associations between these biomarkers, clinicopathologic parameters, and survival outcomes were evaluated. Results: CD8+ T cell expression, CXCR3 expression in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and immune phenotypes were correlated. LARC patients with a high expression of CD8+ T cells, CXCR3 in TILs, and an inflamed phenotype had a significantly better prognosis than their counterparts did. In the multivariate analysis, the expression of CD8+ T cells and the inflamed/immune-excluded phenotype were significant tumor immune microenvironment (TiME) biomarkers for recurrence-free survival (RFS) but not for overall survival (OS). Notably, patients with the immune-desert phenotype had a poor prognosis regardless of pathologic stage, even if postoperative chemotherapy was administered (p < 0.001). Conclusions: CD8+ T cells and AI-powered immune phenotypes, alongside clinical factors, can guide personalized treatment in LARC patients receiving nCRT. A therapeutic strategy to modify the TiME after nCRT could help reduce recurrence after surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Cancer-associated cachexia is a serious complication that can arise in patients with head and neck cancer due to both the disease and its treatments. It causes severe weight loss, muscle and fat depletion, and systemic inflammation, which significantly diminish patients' quality of life and survival. This study uses advanced machine learning techniques to improve the prediction and understanding of cachexia. By analyzing detailed imaging and clinical data, the research seeks to identify early signs of cachexia, providing insights that could help shape future management strategies. Our findings suggest that specific imaging biomarkers, particularly pancreatic volume, could play a crucial role in predicting cachexia, potentially leading to improved treatment outcomes for affected patients. Background/Objectives: Cancer-associated cachexia in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is challenging to diagnose due to its complex pathophysiology. This study aimed to identify metabolic biomarkers linked to cachexia and survival in HNSCC patients using [18F]FDG-PET/CT imaging and machine learning (ML) techniques. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 253 HNSCC patients from Vienna General Hospital and the MD Anderson Cancer Center. Automated organ segmentation was employed to quantify metabolic and volumetric data from [18F]FDG-PET/CT scans across 29 tissues and organs. Patients were categorized into low weight loss (LoWL; grades 0–2) and high weight loss (HiWL; grades 3–4) groups, according to the weight loss grading system (WLGS). Machine learning models, combined with Cox regression, were used to identify survival predictors. Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) analysis was conducted to determine the significance of individual features. Results: The HiWL group exhibited increased glucose metabolism in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue (p = 0.01), while the LoWL group showed higher lung metabolism. The one-year survival rate was 84.1% in the LoWL group compared to 69.2% in the HiWL group (p < 0.01). Pancreatic volume emerged as a key biomarker associated with cachexia, with the ML model achieving an AUC of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.77–0.80) and an accuracy of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.81–0.83). Multivariate Cox regression confirmed pancreatic volume as an independent prognostic factor (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.46–0.95; p < 0.05). Conclusions: The integration of metabolic and volumetric data provided a strong predictive model, highlighting pancreatic volume as a key imaging biomarker in the metabolic assessment of cachexia in HNSCC. This finding enhances our understanding and may improve prognostic evaluations and therapeutic strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This study aimed to develop and validate a radiomic model for predicting overall survival (OS) in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients using pre-treatment MRI images. A retrospective dataset of 289 patients from multiple institutions was used to extract 660 radiomic features (RFs) from each patient's tumor volume. The initial model was enhanced by incorporating clinical variables and validated through repeated three-fold cross-validation. The final clinical–radiomic model utilized primary gross tumor volume (GTV) and T2-FLAIR MRI modality and includes the age variable and two robust RFs. The model achieved a moderately good discriminatory performance (C-Index: 0.69) and significant patient stratification (p = 7 × 10−5) on the validation cohort. Notably, the trained model exhibited the highest integrated area under curve (iAUC) at 11 months (0.81) in the literature. The study concluded that the validated clinical–radiomic model can effectively stratify GBM patients into low and high-risk groups based on OS. Future work will focus on integrating deep learning-based features and standardized convolutional filters to improve OS predictions. Purpose: To develop and validate an MRI-based radiomic model for predicting overall survival (OS) in patients diagnosed with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), utilizing a retrospective dataset from multiple institutions. Materials and Methods: Pre-treatment MRI images of 289 GBM patients were collected. From each patient's tumor volume, 660 radiomic features (RFs) were extracted and subjected to robustness analysis. The initial prognostic model with minimum RFs was subsequently enhanced by including clinical variables. The final clinical–radiomic model was derived through repeated three-fold cross-validation on the training dataset. Performance evaluation included assessment of concordance index (C-Index), integrated area under curve (iAUC) alongside patient stratification into low and high-risk groups for overall survival (OS). Results: The final prognostic model, which has the highest level of interpretability, utilized primary gross tumor volume (GTV) and one MRI modality (T2-FLAIR) as a predictor and integrated the age variable with two independent, robust RFs, achieving moderately good discriminatory performance (C-Index [95% confidence interval]: 0.69 [0.62–0.75]) with significant patient stratification (p = 7 × 10−5) on the validation cohort. Furthermore, the trained model exhibited the highest iAUC at 11 months (0.81) in the literature. Conclusion: We identified and validated a clinical–radiomic model for stratification of patients into low and high-risk groups based on OS in patients with GBM using a multicenter retrospective dataset. Future work will focus on the use of deep learning-based features, with recently standardized convolutional filters on OS tasks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: In this study, we investigated whether the anatomical location of metastases from posterior uveal melanoma affects survival. We found that patients with newly diagnosed metastatic posterior uveal melanoma who only have extrahepatic metastases had a significantly longer survival compared to patients with liver metastases. This insight could help clinicians improve the prediction of patient outcomes and enhance the selection of patients in clinical trials. Background/Objectives: Metastatic posterior uveal melanoma (PUM) is one of the deadliest types of melanomas. Though the median survival is short, some patients with metastatic disease live for a long time. In this study, we investigated whether the anatomical location of the metastatic lesions is associated with differences in survival. Methods: One hundred and seventy-eight patients with metastatic PUM with baseline whole-body imaging were retrospectively included. The patients were divided into three groups based on the anatomical location of metastases: (1) exclusive liver metastases (hepatic pattern), (2) both hepatic and extrahepatic metastatic lesions (hepatic–extrahepatic pattern), and (3) exclusive extrahepatic lesions (extrahepatic pattern). Survival was investigated using Kaplan–Meier plots, log-rank test, and the Cox proportional hazard model. Results: In total, 95 patients (53%) presented with hepatic pattern, 66 patients (37%) presented with hepatic–extrahepatic pattern, and 17 patients (10%) presented with extrahepatic pattern. Overall survival was significantly longer in patients with extrahepatic pattern (median 17.0 months) compared to those with hepatic pattern (median 11.0 months) and hepatic–extrahepatic pattern (median 7.0 months) (p < 0.001, log-rank test). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed increased hazard ratios (HR) for hepatic pattern (HR 2.37, 95% CI 1.08–5.17, p = 0.031) and hepatic–extrahepatic pattern (3.25, 95% CI 1.42–7.41, p = 0.005) compared to extrahepatic pattern. Most patients with hepatic (95%) and hepatic–extrahepatic patterns (82%) were diagnosed with metastases by liver ultrasonography screening, whereas 81% of patients with extrahepatic pattern developed symptoms that led to the diagnosis. Conclusions: Extrahepatic pattern was associated with prolonged survival in patients with metastatic PUM, despite there being a larger proportion of symptomatic patients. It is therefore important to consider the anatomical location of the metastatic lesions when stratifying patients into clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Inclusion of Black patients and other racial minorities has been limited (<2%) in urothelial carcinoma clinical trials. On meta-analysis of all recent ICIs, ADCs and targeted therapy phase III trials in UC (n = 17), women had inferior OS to men (RR 0.89; p = 0.04) on investigational agents. No OS differences by race or age were observed on meta-analysis. Background: Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is one of the most common cancers diagnosed worldwide. However, minority populations, such as female, elder, and Black patients, may have disparate outcomes and are commonly neglected in randomized prospective trials. This review aims to study the relationship between age, sex, and race on urothelial cancer prognosis, particularly focusing on contemporary therapy and its effect on overall survival. Methods: Phase III prospective trials since 2016 of immune checkpoint inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, or targeted therapies in urothelial carcinoma were identified from PubMed. Trials that did not report on survival by race, sex, or age distribution were excluded, and remaining trials (n = 17) were compared by subgroup. Results: Women were reported to have inferior OS on investigational agents compared to men in 9/17 trials. In a meta-analysis, women had inferior OS to men (OR 0.89 [95% CI: 0.78–0.99]; p = 0.04). Asian/Pacific Islander patients had inferior outcomes to White patients on investigational agents in 3/5 trials. In a meta-analysis, OS was not significant by race (OR 1.18 [0.90–1.46], p = 0.38). Black patients composed <2% of all trial patients, and no subgroup data were reported. Both 65 (n = 7) and 75 (n = 2) were reported as age cut-offs in trial subgroups, and survival data were mixed. Conclusions: Women in UC trials may have inferior survival outcomes to men. Racial diversity was poor and thus limited any conclusions on survival disparities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This study examined the outcomes of lung metastasectomy in urothelial carcinoma patients using data from a Japanese multi-institutional database. The study included 100 patients who underwent the procedure between 1985 and 2021. Results showed 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates of 59% and 46%, respectively. Larger tumor diameter and presence of distant metastases at primary cancer treatment were identified as significant adverse prognostic factors. The authors claim that this is the largest published case series on this topic, providing benchmark data for assessing long-term outcomes. Background/objectives: The efficacy of lung metastasectomy in patients with urothelial carcinoma remains inconclusive, as there is only limited evidence from small studies. In this study, we aimed to assess the prognostic outcomes of excising pulmonary metastases from urothelial carcinoma. Methods: In this study, we utilized data from the Metastatic Lung Tumor Study Group of Japan database, a multi-institutional prospective database of pulmonary metastasectomies. We examined the data of patients who had undergone pulmonary metastasectomy for urothelial carcinoma between 1985 and 2021. Exclusion criteria included insufficient clinical information and follow-up of <3 months. Results: The study cohort comprised 100 patients (63 bladder cancer, 37 renal pelvic and ureteral cancer), with a median follow-up of 34 months. There were 70 male and 30 female patients of average age 66.5 ± 10.4 years at lung metastasectomy. The median interval from treatment of the primary lesion to metastasectomy was 19 months and the maximum tumor diameter was 21 ± 15 mm. Three- and five-year overall survival rates were 69% and 59%, respectively. Three- and five-year disease-free survival rates were 56% and 46%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified larger tumor diameter (hazard ratio: 1.62, 95% confidence interval: 1.21–2.17) and distant metastases at the time of treatment of the primary cancer (hazard ratio: 4.23; 95% confidence interval: 1.54–11.6) as significant adverse prognostic factors for overall survival. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the largest published case series of pulmonary resection for metastatic urothelial carcinoma, providing benchmark data for the assessment of long-term outcomes of this rare entity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This study investigates the survival outcomes and palliative care needs of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who are not eligible for curative treatment. Analyzing a cohort of 142 patients, this research reveals a median overall survival of 10.6 months and a median cancer-specific survival of 11.9 months. Worse outcomes were associated with advanced disease stage and hydronephrosis. Notably, patients excluded from curative treatment solely due to advanced age had a relatively better prognosis compared to those with severe comorbidities. This study underlines the significant burden on this patient population, highlighting frequent emergency department visits and the need for palliative interventions. These findings emphasize the critical unmet need for tailored therapeutic approaches in patients with MIBC who cannot undergo curative treatment. Objective: To assess the survival outcomes of patients diagnosed with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who are not candidates for curative treatment and to identify the factors influencing these outcomes. Methods: We conducted an analysis of patients diagnosed with MIBC who were either unable or unwilling to undergo curative therapy. We evaluated overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) and examined their associations with various clinical variables. Additionally, we assessed emergency department visits and palliative procedures. Results: The study included 142 patients with a median age of 79.4 years and a Charlson Comorbidity Index of 9.8. At diagnosis, 59.2% of the patients had localized disease, 23.2% had metastatic disease, and 49.3% presented with hydronephrosis. Curative treatment was excluded due to comorbidities in 40.1% of cases and advanced disease stage in 36.6%. The 1-year and 2-year OS rates were 42.8% and 23.6%, respectively, with a median survival of 10.6 months. The 1-year and 2-year CSS rates were 49.6% and 30.2%, respectively, with a median survival of 11.9 months. Worse survival outcomes were associated with advanced disease stage and the presence of hydronephrosis. Patients excluded from curative treatment solely due to age had a relatively better prognosis. On average, patients visited the emergency department three times: 19% underwent palliative transurethral resection of the bladder tumor, 14.8% received radiotherapy to control hematuria, and nephrostomy tubes were placed in 26.1% of cases. Conclusions: Patients with MIBC who are unable or unwilling to undergo curative treatment have a median overall survival of less than one year, with worse outcomes observed in those with advanced disease stage and hydronephrosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: There is a significant gap in research and guidelines for treating octogenarian multiple myeloma (MM) patients. This retrospective study examined 101 MM patients, median age 84 years (80–98), treated outside clinical studies at TASMC between 2010 and 2023, aiming to review real-world practices and outcomes experienced by this vulnerable group of patients. Of these patients, 87% received a bortezomib-based regimen; 20% received lenalidomide ± bortezomib; 44% were treated with novel agent-based doublets, and 51% with triplets/quadruplets. Despite the employment of reduced doses of steroids and lenalidomide, treatment-related toxicity was high, including 9% who suffered grade 5 events. Of these patients, 67% received subsequent lines, resulting in an impressive median overall survival of 42 months (1–141) in the entire cohort. These results highlight the effectiveness of personalized therapy for octogenarian multiple myeloma (MM) patients and emphasize the need for further real-time studies to establish guidelines for the management of this vulnerable and growing population. Background: Data on the outcome of octogenarian multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts), especially if treated outside clinical studies, are scanty. Aims and Methods: MM pts ≥ 80 years, treated at TASMC with first-line therapy between 2010 and 2023, were reviewed. Characteristics and outcomes were analyzed. Results: A total number of 101 pts, of whom 54 were males with a median age of 84 years (80–98), were included. Among them, 67.4% had a Charlson comorbidity index of ≥5, 37% had ISS-3 (International staging system) and 20% had Revised-ISS-3. In our study, 44.5% received doublets and 50.5% received triplets/quadruplets. A bortezomib-based regimen was applied in 87%, and IMiDs were used in 27.7%. Despite an upfront employment of a low lenalidomide dose, dose reductions were required in 48%. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) (mainly infections) were documented in 36.6% of patients, including grade 5 events in 9%, all attributed to infections. The overall response rate was 69%, including 31% ≥ VGPRs (Very good partial response). Sixty-seven percent (67%) received second-line therapy, administered within a median period of 12 months (1–84). Within a median follow-up period of 36 m (1–141), the median overall survival (OS) approached 42 m (range: 1–141); being shorter in pts > 84 years (HR = 1.7, p = 0.03), pts with lung disease (HR = 1.8, p = 0.044) and pts with ISS = 3 and R-ISS = 3 (HR = 1.65, p = 0.0016 and HR = 2.45, p = 0.006, respectively); Conclusions: Octogenarians treated outside clinical studies often have a lower tolerance to treatment. Nevertheless, upfront administration of low doses of anti-MM agents provided a response in the majority of patients, translated into impressive OS. Nevertheless, mortality due to AEs was high, emphasizing the need for new, "octogenarian-oriented" treatment protocols. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Numerous different pathologies can primarily or secondarily affect the orbit. Among them, although rare in terms of incidence, biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma should be considered. It is a low-grade tumor of the sinonasal tract with a tendency to invade the adjacent anatomical structures, especially the orbit and anterior skull base, accounting for potentially severe morbidities. Well-defined guidelines of treatment and surveillance protocols are lacking. Therefore, we perform a systematic literature review by analyzing the demographic, clinical, radiological, and treatment features, separately report a personal illustrative case, and discuss the surgical strategies, with the aim of shedding more light on this apparently benign pathology. Background: Biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma is a rare low-grade tumor arising from the sinonasal tract, featuring locally aggressive biological behavior, with a tendency to invade the orbit and skull base. There are no defined guidelines of treatment; thus, the management varies among different institutions. The aim of the present study is to provide a modular system of surgical approaches according to the lesion pattern of growth from a literature review. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive and detailed literature review on the PubMed and Embase online electronic databases on biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma with orbital invasion was conducted. A personal case exhibiting peculiar features was also added. Demographic (patient's sex and age), clinical (presenting symptoms and time to treatment), neuroradiological (anatomical origin and pattern of growth), and treatment (type of treatment, surgical approach, extent of resection, peri- and postoperative complications, and adjuvant therapies) data, as well as clinical outcome, recurrence rates, and overall survival, were analyzed. Results: Thirty-one patients harboring biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma with orbital invasion were identified. Tumors mainly affected female patients (66.7%) and a middle-aged population (median 55.2 years old). Simultaneous skull base involvement occurred in most cases (80.6%). Surgery was performed in all but one case (97%), as unique treatment (59%) or in association with radio—(23.5%) and/or chemotherapy (5.9%/2.9%), allowing for gross total tumor resection in most cases (66.7%). The endoscopic endonasal approach was the most adopted surgical corridor (51.7%). The local recurrence rate was 19.3%, and only two cases of tumor-related mortality occurred. Conclusions: Surgery is the only curative treatment, with the main goal to restore/improve/arrest progression of clinical manifestations. The endoscopic endonasal route represents the master approach for lesions confined to the midline. Microsurgical transcranial and endoscopic transorbital approaches have a complementary role for addressing the lesion's component with large intracranial extension or affecting the paramedian aspect of the anterior cranial fossa and superior–lateral orbital compartment, respectively. The approach selection should be made case by case according to the tumor pattern of growth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Histopathological and molecular factors could play a role in determining LNM in colon cancer. Extended lymphadenectomies in right-sided patients have been associated with complications. We demonstrated that histopathological and molecular analysis can be useful in predicting LNM and therefore identify high risk patients which could potentially benefit from D3 lymphadenectomy/CME. Background: Lymphadenectomy plays a central role in the treatment of localized colon cancer. While in left colon cancer the D3 lymphadenectomy/CME is considered the standard of care, lymphatic stations to be removed in right colon cancer are still a matter of discussion. The individuation of LNM risk factors could help in choosing the lymphadenectomy in right-sided tumors. This study aims to analyze the correlation of histopathological and molecular characteristics with lymph node metastasis, both in right- and left-sided colon cancer, and their impact on survival; Methods: We conducted a single-center observational retrospective study. The following data were collected and analyzed for each patient: demographics, histopathological and molecular data, and intraoperative and perioperative data. Statistical analyses were performed, including descriptive statistics, multivariate logistic regression and survival analysis; Results: An association between tumor size (pT, p < 0.001), grading (p = 0.013), budding (p < 0.001), LVI (79,4% p < 0.001) and LNM was observed. A multivariate analysis identified pT4 (OR 5.45, p < 0.001) and LVI+ (OR 10.7, p < 0.001) as significant predictors of LNM. Right-sided patients presented a worse OS when associated with LNM, while no significant difference was observed in N0 patients; Conclusions: histological and molecular analysis can help identify high risk patients, which could benefit from extended lymphadenectomies. These patients could be ideal candidates for the D3 lymphadenectomy/CME. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: We examined the association of the entire submission of the tumor (ESOT) and the entire submission of the pancreas (ESOP) with clinicopathologic features and survival in 627 pancreatic cancer patients who received neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). We demonstrated that both ESOT and ESOP were associated with lower ypT, less frequent perineural invasion, and better tumor response. Both ESOT and ESOP were associated with less frequent recurrence/metastasis, better disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) in the overall study population. ESOP was associated with better DFS and OS in patients with ypT0/ypT1 or ypN0 tumors and better OS in patients with complete or near-complete response. ESOT was associated with better OS in patients with ypT0/ypT1 or ypN0 tumors. Both ESOT and ESOP were independent prognostic factors for OS in multivariate survival analyses. Therefore, ESOP and ESOT are associated with the prognosis of PDAC patients with complete or near-complete response and a ypT0/ypT1 tumor after NAT. Adequate sampling is essential to an accurate pathologic evaluation of pancreatectomy specimens resected for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). However, limited data are available for the association between the sampling and survival in these patients. We examined the association of the entire submission of the tumor (ESOT) and the entire submission of the pancreas (ESOP) with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), as well as their correlations with clinicopathologic features, for 627 patients with PDAC who received NAT and pancreaticoduodenectomy. We demonstrated that both ESOT and ESOP were associated with lower ypT, less frequent perineural invasion, and better tumor response (p < 0.05). ESOP was also associated with a smaller tumor size (p < 0.001), more lymph nodes (p < 0.001), a lower ypN stage (p < 0.001), better differentiation (p = 0.02), and less frequent lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.009). However, since ESOP and ESOT were primarily conducted for cases with no grossly identifiable tumor or minimal residual carcinoma in initial sections, potential bias cannot be excluded. Both ESOT and ESOP were associated with less frequent recurrence/metastasis and better DFS and OS (p < 0.05) in the overall study population. ESOP was associated with better DFS and better OS in patients with ypT0/ypT1 or ypN0 tumors and better OS in patients with complete or near-complete response (p < 0.05). ESOT was associated with better OS in patients with ypT0/ypT1 or ypN0 tumors (p < 0.05). Both ESOT and ESOP were independent prognostic factors for OS according to multivariate survival analyses. Therefore, accurate pathologic evaluation using ESOP and ESOT is associated with the prognosis in PDAC patients with complete or near-complete pathologic response and ypT0/ypT1 tumor after NAT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This study investigates racial disparities in the stage of gastric cancer at diagnosis and overall survival among different racial groups using data from the SEER database (2018–2021). The retrospective cohort study of 18,984 patients found that Hispanics are 19% more likely to be diagnosed at a later stage of gastric cancer compared to non-Hispanics. Additionally, both Hispanics and Black patients showed poorer overall survival compared to Non-Hispanic Whites. The disparities are attributed to factors such as healthcare access, insurance coverage, language barriers, and preventive health service utilization. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to address these disparities in cancer outcomes. Introduction: Racial disparities in gastric cancer outcomes, including stage at diagnosis and overall survival, continue to affect Hispanic and non-Hispanic populations. This study aims to evaluate these disparities across different racial groups. Patients and methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using SEER data from 2018 to 2021, including 18,984 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer. Patients were selected based on ICD-O-3 codes for "stomach" with malignant behavior. Using ordered logistic regression, the association between race and stage at diagnosis was analyzed, while Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess OS and CSS. Results: Hispanic patients were significantly more likely to be diagnosed at a later stage compared to non-Hispanic patients (OR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.10–1.28). Both Hispanic and Black patients had worse OS compared to Non-Hispanic Whites (HR 1.10 CI 1.03–1.17, p = 0.003 and HR 1.13 CI 1.04–1.22, p = 0.002, respectively) as well as CSS. Conclusions: Hispanic patients are more likely to be diagnosed with advanced-stage gastric cancer and have poorer survival outcomes compared to non-Hispanic Whites. These disparities may be linked to differences in healthcare access, insurance, language barriers, and preventive care utilization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Research shows that Black women generally have poorer breast cancer survival rates than White women in the U.S. Our study aims to identify genomic variants and socioeconomic determinants that might explain this racial disparity using mediation analysis. Based on the All of US research program, we identified 15 gene mutations along with factors age, general health, and general quality of life that can explain the observed racial disparity. By studying how these genes behave differently in Black and White breast cancer patients, researchers can gain important insights into the mechanism underlying the cancer development and prognosis among different populations. This understanding could help create better, personalized treatments, especially to address the differences in breast cancer outcomes among racial groups. Background: Breast cancer outcomes are worse among Black women in the U.S. compared to White women. While extensive research has focused on risk factors contributing to breast cancer; the role of genomic elements in health disparities between these racial groups remains unclear. This study aims to identify genomic variants and socioeconomic status (SES) determinants influencing racial disparities in breast cancer survival through multiple mediation analyses. Methods: Our investigation is based on the NIH-supported All of Us (AoU) program and analyzes 7452 female participants with malignant tumors of breast, including 5073 with genomic data. A log-rank test reveals significant racial differences in overall survival time between Black and White participants (p-value = 0.04). Multiple mediation analysis examines the effects of 9481 genetic variables across 23 chromosomes in explaining the racial disparity in survival, adjusting for SES variables. Results: 15 gene mutations, in addition to age, general health, and general quality of life, have significant effects (p-values < 0.001) in explaining the observed racial disparity. Mutations in TMEM132B, NARFL, SALL1, PAD12, RIPK1, ASB14, DCX, GNB1L, ARHGAP32, AL135787.1, WBP11, SLC16A12AS1, AP000345.1, IKBKB, and SUPT20H have significantly different distributions between Black and White participants. The disparity is completely explained by the included variables as the direct effect is insignificant (p-value = 0.73). Conclusions: The combined impact of SES determinants and genetic mutations can explain the observed differences in breast cancer survival among Black and White participants. Future studies will explore pathways and design in vivo and in vitro experiments to validate the functions of these genes [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a blood cancer which classically has a prolonged course of remissions and relapses. Several new highly efficacious medications have been developed for MM in recent years, including some that utilize the body's own immune cells to control the cancer. Alongside the development of these new medications has been the evolution of tests to track small amounts of (measurable) residual disease (MRD). Several MRD tests can now find and track as little as 1 residual cancer cell in 1 million in certain cases. Having no detectable MRD has been independently associated with improved cancer control and longer survival—here, we review how these tests might be used as a companion to new immune therapies for MM. Several novel T-cell-based therapies have recently become available for multiple myeloma (MM). These T-cell redirecting therapies (TRTs) include chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR-T) and bispecific antibodies (BiAbs). In both clinical trial and real-world data, these therapies have demonstrated high rates of deep clinical response, and some are now approved for second-line treatment for relapsed MM. The deep and sustained clinical responses these therapies are capable of inducing will require sophisticated response monitoring to provide meaningful information for patient care. Obtaining measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity has been validated as an independent positive prognostic marker for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in both newly diagnosed and relapsed refractory patients with multiple myeloma. Assessment for MRD negativity was performed in all of the trials for FDA-approved TRT. Here, we summarize pertinent data for MRD assessment following TRT in MM and provide a rationale and structured framework for conducting MRD testing post TRT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Renal cancer is the eighth most frequent cancer in Europe, and its prevalence is increasing. Surgery is the treatment of choice for localised renal cell carcinoma requiring interventional management, but less invasive treatment methods are emerging. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) utilises precise delivery of high doses of radiation to ablate the primary cancer. In our systematic review and meta-analysis, we pooled data from available prospective trials, including 13 studies involving 308 patients. The results of the meta-analysis show that SBRT for localised renal cell carcinoma is highly effective in controlling local diseases and has low complication rates. In the second year, 97% of patients were free from local recurrence. Only 3% experienced severe adverse events, which included abdominal pain and fatigue. SBRT presents a valuable treatment for patients who require treatment but cannot undergo surgery; however, it has not been yet confirmed to be equieffective to surgery as trials directly comparing these methods are missing. Context: Surgery is the gold standard for the local treatment of primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but alternatives are emerging. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the results of prospective studies using definitive stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to treat primary localised RCC. Evidence acquisition: This review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023447274). We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar for reports of prospective studies published since 2003, describing the outcomes of SBRT for localised RCC. Meta-analyses were performed for local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and rates of adverse events (AEs) using generalised linear mixed models (GLMMs). Outcomes were presented as rates with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Risk-of-bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Evidence synthesis: Of the 2983 records, 13 prospective studies (n = 308) were included in the meta-analysis. The median diameter of the irradiated tumours ranged between 1.9 and 5.5 cm in individual studies. Grade ≥ 3 AEs were reported in 15 patients, and their estimated rate was 0.03 (95%CI: 0.01–0.11; n = 291). One- and two-year LC rates were 0.98 (95%CI: 0.95–0.99; n = 293) and 0.97 (95%CI: 0.93–0.99; n = 253), while one- and two-year OS rates were 0.95 (95%CI: 0.88–0.98; n = 294) and 0.86 (95%CI: 0.77–0.91; n = 224). There was no statistically significant heterogeneity, and the estimations were consistent after excluding studies at a high risk of bias in a sensitivity analysis. Major limitations include a relatively short follow-up, inhomogeneous reporting of renal function deterioration, and a lack of prospective comparative evidence. Conclusions: The short-term results suggest that SBRT is a valuable treatment method for selected inoperable patients (or those who refuse surgery) with localised RCC associated with low rates of high-grade AEs and excellent LC. However, until the long-term data from randomised controlled trials are available, surgical management remains a standard of care in operable patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Patients with brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer are often managed by various treatment approaches including surgery, chemotherapy/immunotherapy, and radiation therapy. While patients with a good performance status and a limited burden of disease are often candidates for surgical resection, the selection of the optimal adjuvant treatment paradigm, in light of the development of novel treatments for tumors with actionable mutations, remains a challenge. In this study, we sought to examine the benefit of radiation therapy, systemic therapy, or a combination of treatments following surgery with respect to in-brain progression-free survival and overall survival. Our data demonstrate that a combination of radiation therapy and systemic therapy has a benefit in improving progression-free survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who have developed brain metastases. Background/Objectives: Brain metastases (BrMs) are a common complication of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), present in up to 50% of patients. While the treatment of BrMs requires a multidisciplinary approach with surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and systemic therapy, the advances in molecular sequencing have improved outcomes in patients with targetable mutations. With a push towards the molecular characterization of cancers, we evaluated the outcomes by treatment modality at our institution with respect to prioritizing RT and targeted therapies. Methods: We identified the patients with NSCLC BrMs treated with surgical resection. The primary endpoints were in-brain freedom from progression (FFP) and overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoint included index lesion recurrence. The tumor molecular profiles were reviewed. The outcomes were evaluated by treatment modality: surgery followed by adjuvant RT and/or adjuvant systemic therapy. Results: In total, 155/272 (57%) patients who received adjuvant therapy with adequate follow-up were included in this analysis. The patients treated with combination therapy vs. monotherapy had a median FFP time of 10.72 months vs. 5.38 months, respectively (p = 0.072). The patients of Hispanic/Latino vs. non-Hispanic/Latino descent had a statistically significant worse OS of 12.75 months vs. 53.15 months, respectively (p = 0.015). The patients who received multimodality therapy had a trend towards a reduction in index lesion recurrences (χ2 test, p = 0.063) with a statistically significant improvement in the patients receiving immunotherapy (χ2 test, p = 0.0018). Conclusions: We found that systemic therapy combined with RT may have an increasing role in delaying the time to progression; however, there was no statistically significant relationship between OS and treatment modality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Our study aimed to understand why some people with lung adenocarcinoma, a type of lung cancer, survive longer than others, even when their conditions seem similar. By studying the DNA of 1464 patients, we found six specific genetic differences that appear to affect survival. These differences are located in parts of the DNA that do not directly make proteins but might control how certain genes are turned on or off. The goal is to use this information to predict which patients might have better outcomes and to develop more personalized treatment options. Further research is needed to confirm these results and to understand the underlying biological mechanisms, but our findings could eventually improve how we treat lung cancer and understand its outcomes better. Background/Objectives: Lung cancer remains a global health concern, with substantial variation in patient survival. Despite advances in detection and treatment, the genetic basis for the divergent outcomes is not understood. We investigated germline polymorphisms that modulate overall survival in 1464 surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma patients. Methods: A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the association of more than seven million polymorphisms with overall survival at the 60-month follow-up, considering age, sex, pathological stage, decade of surgery and principal components as covariates. Genes in which variants were identified were studied in silico to investigate functional roles. Results: Six germline variants passed the genome-wide significance threshold. These single nucleotide polymorphisms were mapped to non-coding (intronic) regions on chromosomes 2, 3, and 5. The minor alleles of rs13000315, rs151212827, and rs190923216 (chr. 2, 3 and 5, respectively) were found to be independent negative prognostic factors. All six variants have been reported to regulate the expression of nine genes, seven of which are protein-coding, in different tissues. Survival-associated variants on chromosomes 2 and 3 were already reported to regulate the expression of NT5DC2 and NAGK, with high expression associated with the minor alleles. High NT5DC2 and NAGK expression in lung adenocarcinoma tissue was already shown to correlate with poor overall survival. Conclusions: This study highlights a potential regulatory role of the identified polymorphisms in influencing outcome and suggests a mechanistic link between these variants, gene expression regulation, and lung adenocarcinoma prognosis. Validation and functional studies are warranted to elucidate the mechanisms underlying these associations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Primary myelofibrosis and secondary myelofibrosis after polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia are sub-entities of myeloproliferative neoplasms with poor prognosis for long-term survival. Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation remains the only potentially curative therapy, but the risk of serious side effects and possible treatment-related mortality must be considered. In recent years, efforts have been made to optimize conditioning therapy, donor selection, and supportive therapy in order to improve the outcomes of stem-cell transplantation. We report on 36 patients with myelofibrosis who underwent stem-cell transplantation in our center. We compared the outcomes in earlier and more recent years and evaluated the influence of certain transplant- and patient-specific variables. Pretreatment with a JAK inhibitor, intensified conditioning, and the preferential use of haploidentical instead of mismatched unrelated donors for patients lacking an HLA-identical donor are most likely responsible for the improved outcome after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in myelofibrosis in recent years. (1) Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the only treatment with the potential for cure in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). However, the risk of graft rejection, which is particularly high in MF, and the risk of significant non-relapse mortality must be considered. (2) Methods: In this retrospective, single-center study, we compared allo-HSCT outcomes in 36 adult patients with MF transplanted at two-time intervals (2001–2015 versus 2016–2021). (3) Results: The estimated median overall survival was 48.9 months (95%CI 0.00–98.2) in the cohort transplanted before 2016 and not reached in the more recent years (p = 0.04) due to markedly lower non-relapse mortality (p = 0.02). The 3-year relapse incidence was low in both cohorts (11.1% and 12.5%, p > 0.99). When comparing only subgroups within the more recent cohort based on the presence or absence of total body irradiation (TBI) or the use of sequential regimens, OS and PFS were comparable. (4) Conclusion: Pretreatment with ruxolitinib, intensified conditioning, and the preferential use of haploidentical related instead of mismatched unrelated donors for patients lacking an HLA-identical donor are most likely responsible for the improved outcome after allo-HCT in MF in recent years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This study investigated the impact of radiation doses to the heart and lungs on overall survival (OS) in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) treated with radiotherapy. An analysis of 120 patients, each with exactly three years of follow-up, revealed that higher radiation doses to the heart and lungs were significantly associated with worse OS. Importantly, the combination of heart and lung radiation doses provided enhanced and more detailed risk stratification, making it a more powerful predictor of poor survival than individual doses alone. These findings suggest that minimizing combined radiation exposure to both organs may improve survival outcomes in LA-NSCLC patients. Background/Objectives: Despite advancements in treatment for patients with unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC), overall survival (OS) remains poor. The specific effects of varying heart and lung doses on OS in LA-NSCLC patients have not been thoroughly investigated, especially their combined impact on survival. This study aimed to examine the impact on OS of both individual and combined heart and lung doses in patients with LA-NSCLC treated with radiotherapy over a three-year follow-up period. Methods: A total of 120 patients who received definitive radiotherapy for LA-NSCLC (stage III, 92.5%) from January 2015 to January 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The endpoint in this study was OS. Each patient was followed for a fixed period of three years. Results: Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that OS was significantly related to mean heart dose (MHD, hazard ratio [HR], 3.4 [1.8–6.3]; p < 0.001), pericardium V40 (HR, 3.2 [1.7–6.0]; p < 0.001), and total lung V20 (HR, 2.6 [1.4–5.0]; p = 0.003), and these were independent predictors for worse OS in multivariate analysis. Kaplan–Meier curve analysis with log-rank tests revealed that survival was significantly worse in patients with higher MHD (p < 0.001), pericardium V40 (p < 0.001), and total lung V20 (p = 0.002). Combining MHD and total lung V20, and pericardium V40 and total lung V20 provided enhanced risk stratification for OS (p < 0.001 for both combinations). Conclusions: The combination of heart and lung doses provided enhanced and more detailed risk stratification in prediction of OS for a fixed period of three years in LA-NSCLC patients treated with radiotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The purpose of the present study was to determine the role of changes in the stage of colorectal cancer (CRC, Stage 0 to 4, with 0 be very early stage and 4 late stage) at diagnosis over time, and its impact on overall survival (OS) in our Health Network system. Two datasets were used, the Health Network (n = 1385) and a national dataset (n = 202,391). There was a significant increase in early CRC stages at diagnosis (Stage 0–1), and late diagnosis (Stage 4) with a concomitant decrease in the diagnosis of CRC Stage 2. The present findings confirmed CRC stage migration in our Health Network System, along with a national trend conducive to an increased OS for early CRC stages. Background/Objectives: Due to an increased rate of surveillance colonoscopy, we aim to determine the impact of stage migration on the incidence and overall survival (OS) of patients who underwent pathological staging of colorectal cancer (CRC) at our Health Network System. Methods: Two datasets were included: subjects from the tumor registry at a regional Comprehensive Cancer Center (n = 1385) and subjects from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) national database (n = 202,391). Results: A significant increase in the diagnosis of CRC Stage 1 and 4 was observed, with a decrease in stage 2, and no change in Stage 3 in the National datasets (p < 0.01). There was an increase in Stage 4 CRC diagnosis, with a concurrent decrease in stage 2, and no changes in stages 1 and 3 in the regional dataset (p < 0.05). OS followed the expected and progressive decrease in OS by stage (from 1 to 4, p < 0.01). Conclusions: The present findings confirmed CRC stage migration in our Health Network System, along with a national trend conducive to an increased OS for early CRC stages. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Although some of the novel systemic treatments, especially the group of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, have shown a durable central nervous system response, ionizing radiation remains the mainstay in the management of brain metastases (BM). Recent technological advancements have enabled the replacement of whole-brain radiotherapy with localized stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for treating up to 10 BM, either as a primary or combined treatment, reducing neurotoxicity and improving local control (LC). The delivered target dose and patient selection play a crucial role in enhancing treatment efficacy. However, there is still limited evidence supporting which factors most affect LC and which patients derive the greatest benefit from SRT. This retrospective single-institutional study evaluated treatment outcomes in a heterogeneous patient population treated with Linac-based SRT, with the aim of identifying potential dosimetric and clinical prognostic factors to better inform the decision-making process. Background/Objectives: To report on predictive factors in Linac-based SRT for single and multiple BM. Methods: Consecutive patients receiving either one or three fractions of single-isocenter coplanar VMAT SRT were retrospectively included. The GTV-PTV margin was 1–2 mm. The delivered target dose was estimated by recalculating the original plans on roto-translated CT according to errors recorded by post-treatment CBCT. The Kaplan–Meier method estimated local progression-free survival (LPFS), intracranial progression-free survival (IPFS), and overall survival (OS). Log-rank and Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney tests evaluated inter-group differences, whereas Cox regression analysis assessed prognostic factors. Results: Fifty females and fifty males, with a median age of 69 years, received 107 SRTs. A total of 213 BM (range, 1–10 per treatment) with a median volume of 0.22 cc were irradiated with a median minimum BED of 59.5 Gy. The median delivered GTV D95 reduction was −0.3%. The median follow-up was 11 months. Nineteen LP events and a 1-year LC rate of 90.1% were observed. The GTV coverage did not correlate with LC, while the GTV volume was a risk factor for LP, with the 1-year rate dropping to 73% for volumes ≥ 0.88 cc. The median LPFS, IPFS, and OS were 6, 5, and 7 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that patients with melanoma histology and those receiving a second or subsequent systemic therapy line had the worst outcomes, whereas patients with adenocarcinoma histology and mutations showed better results. Conclusions: The accuracy and efficacy of the Linac-based SRT approach for BM were confirmed, but the dose distribution alone failed to predict the treatment response, suggesting that other factors must be considered to maximize SRT outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: In this retrospective study, we compared the survival outcomes of first-line ICI regimens versus single-agent TKIs in patients with mRCC from two centres in Saudi Arabia. The patients receiving ICI regimens exhibited improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to those treated with TKIs. The choice of first-line therapy significantly improves the survival outcomes, underscoring the importance of personalized treatment approaches in managing mRCC. The findings emphasize the significance of baseline patient characteristics in tailoring treatment strategies for mRCC. This research contributes valuable insights into optimizing treatment strategies for mRCC, aiming to enhance patient outcomes in clinical practice. Background: Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) represents a challenging condition characterised by poor prognosis and limited response to chemoradiotherapy. In this retrospective study, we compared the survival outcomes of first-line ICI regimens versus single-agent TKIs in patients with mRCC from two centres in Saudi Arabia. Methods: This study included 84 patients diagnosed with clear cell mRCC between January 2016 and December 2023. Patients were grouped based on treatment regimens. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analysed using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: The median first-line PFS was 9.7 months (95% CI: 5.3–14.1) for the overall cohort, with no significant difference between the single-agent tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) group (9.4 months; 95% CI: 6.4–12.4), combination ICI group (9.0 months; 95% CI: 0.0–24.9), and single-agent ICI group (21.2 months; 95% CI: 2.6–39.8; p = 0.591). The median OS for the overall cohort was 42.0 months (95% CI: 14.9–69.2), with the single-agent TKI group having a median OS of 33.3 months (95% CI: 0.0–71.7), the combination ICI group, 42.0 months (95% CI: 0.06–84.0), and the single-agent ICI group, 23.0 months (95% CI: 19.2–26.7; p = 0.73). In comparison, the ICI-based combination therapy group exhibited a higher ORR of 41.0% (95% CI: 26.3–57.8%), while the single-agent ICI group had an ORR of 20.0% (95% CI: 3.5–55.8%). Cox regression identified liver metastasis as a significant independent predictor of PFS (HR = 1.8, p = 0.043), while a lower Karnofsky Performance Status was a significant independent predictor of OS (HR = 3.5, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In real-world practice from Saudi Arabia, first-line, single-agent ICI therapy offers promising anti-tumour activity and non-inferior survival outcomes compared to standard ICI-based combinations and single-agent TKIs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Myxoid liposarcoma (MLPS) is a rare soft tissue sarcoma, often affecting the proximal extremity. There is currently limited literature describing MLPS in older individuals. This retrospective study describes treatment outcomes and tolerability in older patients treated for non-metastatic MLPS. The study shows that older patients with MLPS tolerated systemic therapy, radiation therapy, and surgery with few toxicities. Background: Myxoid liposarcoma predominantly affects young and middle-aged individuals, and little is known regarding treatment tolerability and outcomes in older patients. This study aims to better understand this older patient population. Methods: This single institution retrospective study included patients aged 70 years and older with localized (non-metastatic) myxoid liposarcoma. Results: Sixteen patients were included. The median age was 75 years, and 9 (56%) were female. Fourteen (88%) were extremity tumors and two (12%) were trunk. The median tumor size was 10.4 cm (range, 3.6 to 28 cm). Five (31%) tumors had a round cell component. All patients had surgery. Fourteen (88%) had perioperative radiation, and three (19%) had perioperative chemotherapy. One patient had postoperative infection, and one patient had neutropenic fever from preoperative chemotherapy. The median follow up from surgery was 6.3 years. Eight (50%) patients died from MLPS. The median relapse-free survival and overall survival were 34 months and 75 months, respectively. Conclusions: Most older patients with localized MLPS received perioperative radiation therapy with surgery, and few serious toxicities were reported. Even with treatment, half of the patients relapsed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: In this article, we report the results of an interim analysis of 81 early-stage lung cancer patients undergoing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy with the CyberKnife M6 robotic radiosurgery system, with the endpoints being treatment efficacy and tolerance. Within a median follow-up of 20 months, a grade 2/3 lung toxicity of no clinical significance was reported in 6% of the patients. A higher biological effective dose and larger irradiation lung volumes were associated with increased toxicity. The projected 24-month local progression-free survival rate was 95%. These results confirm the safety and efficacy and further cement the role of robotic stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for early-stage lung cancer patients as an eventual alternative to surgery. Background/Objectives: Surgery is the primary treatment for early-stage lung cancer. Patients with medically inoperable lung carcinomas and patients who refuse to undergo surgery are treated with definite radiotherapy. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a compelling non-invasive therapeutic modality for this group of patients that confers promising results. Methods: We report an interim analysis of an ongoing trial. Eighty-one patients with medically inoperable early-stage (T1,2N0) lung cancer underwent SABR in our institution. SABR was delivered via the CyberKnife M6 robotic radiosurgery system. The endpoints of the analysis were treatment efficacy and tolerance. Results: There were no acute or late toxicities from the skin or the connective tissue of the thorax. A grade 2/3 lung injury of non-clinical significance was noted in 6% of patients, which was directly related to a higher biologically effective dose (BEDα/β = 3) and larger irradiation lung volumes in both univariate and multivariate analyses. A local control (LC) was achieved in 100% of the patients at the first follow-up, and the projected 24-month local progression-free survival (LPFS) rate was 95%. The projected 24-month disease-specific overall survival (OS) was 94%. Conclusions: High LC and OS rates can be achieved with SABR for early-stage lung cancer, with minimal toxicity. This study continues to recruit patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSC) is the most common type of cancer in the head and neck region, affecting areas like the mouth and throat. Understanding how these cancers grow and spread is crucial for developing better treatments. This study focuses on a group of proteins called solute carrier (SLC) transporters, which help cancer cells survive and grow by moving nutrients and other molecules in and out of cells. We investigated the levels of these transporters in cancerous tissues compared to normal tissues and found that certain SLC transporters are much more active in tumors. These transporters are linked to worse outcomes for patients. By targeting these specific transporters with new drugs, we hope to create more effective treatments that can block cancer growth and improve survival rates for patients with HNSC. Background: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSC) is the most prevalent cancer in the head and neck region, originating from the mucosal epithelium of the oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx. The solute carrier (SLC) transporter superfamily, consisting of over 400 proteins across 65 families, plays a crucial role in cellular functions and presents promising targets in precision oncology. This study aims to analyze the expression of SLC transporters in HNSC and their potential as biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Methods: We leveraged mRNA and protein expression data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and The Human Protein Atlas (HPA) to examine SLC transporter expression in HNSC. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was conducted to assess the involvement of SLC transporters in various oncogenic pathways. Results: Significant upregulation of SLC transporters was observed in tumor tissues compared to normal tissues, with notable increases in SLC16A3, SLC53A1, SLC25A32, and SLC2A3. This upregulation correlated with poorer overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). GSEA revealed that these transporters are significantly involved in critical oncogenic pathways, including epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), angiogenesis, and hypoxia, which are vital for cancer progression and metastasis. Conclusions: The study identifies SLC transporters as potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets in HNSC. Targeting these transporters with small molecule inhibitors could disrupt essential supply routes for cancer cells, enhancing treatment efficacy and improving patient outcomes. This study paves the way for developing SLC-based target therapies in precision oncology, with the goal of improving survival rates for patients with HNSC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The majority of newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients are eligible for active surveillance, and those at moderate to high risk frequently receive definitive treatments such as radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy. A considerable proportion of patients will experience biochemical recurrence, as well as localized and distant metastatic recurrence following definitive treatment. Salvage cryotherapy has emerged as a safe and effective alternative for treating localized recurrence. This review examines the oncologic and functional outcomes of whole-gland and focal salvage cryotherapy, as well as the crucial role of multiparametric prostate MRI and PSMA-targeted PET imaging. The outcomes of cryotherapy compared to those of other salvage ablation techniques like high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) are also explored. Prostate cancer is the most common non-cutaneous malignancy in men, with the majority of newly diagnosed patients eligible for active surveillance. Despite definitive treatment, a considerable percentage of men will experience biochemical recurrence and even regional and distant metastatic recurrence after radiation therapy or radical prostatectomy. Salvage prostatectomy, while oncologically effective, poses significant morbidity with poor functional outcomes. Salvage cryotherapy has emerged as a promising alternative for localized recurrence, demonstrating safety and efficacy. This review examines the oncologic and functional outcomes of whole-gland and focal salvage cryotherapy, including disease-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival. The crucial role of multiparametric prostate MRI and evolving role of next-generation PSMA-targeted PET imaging are also examined. The comparison of outcomes of cryotherapy to other salvage ablation modalities, such as high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), is also explored. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Traditional methods for predicting patient outcomes rely heavily on the physical characteristics of tumors. Our research aims to develop a new, simple risk score that uses three specific molecular markers found in tumor tissues. By examining the presence and levels of these markers, we hope to better predict which patients have a higher risk of poor outcomes. This can help doctors make more informed decisions about treatment options. Our findings may lead to improved survival rates by identifying high-risk patients who need more aggressive treatment and sparing low-risk patients from unnecessary procedures. Introduction: Several new molecular markers in colorectal carcinomas have been discovered; however, classical histopathological predictors are still being used to predict survival in patients. We present a novel risk score, which uses molecular markers, to predict outcomes in patients with colorectal carcinoma. Methods: The immunohistochemistry of tissue micro arrays was used to detect and quantify H2BUB1, RBM3 and Ki-67. Different intensities of staining were categorized for these markers and a score was established. A multivariate analysis was performed and survival curves were established. Results: 1791 patients were evaluated, and multivariate analysis revealed that our risk score, the 3-biomarker classifier, is an independent marker to predict survival. We found a high risk-score to be associated with dismal median survival for the patients. Conclusions: A more personalized score might be able to better discriminate low- and high-risk patients and suggest adjuvant treatment compared to classical pathological staging. Our score can serve as a tool to predict outcomes in patients suffering from colorectal carcinoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The no specific molecular profile (NSMP) subtype of endometrial cancers remains a poorly understood class from a molecular standpoint, with a wide range of prognoses due to their internal heterogeneity. In this article, we confirm the value of a previously proposed further subdivision of NSMP into two risk classes: low-risk and high-risk; they are characterized by marked differences in oncological outcomes, including both the risk of recurrence and mortality. We are confident that this subdivision could bring significant benefits in the near future, not only in terms of modulating adjuvant therapy but also in standardizing research cohorts for more consistent and reproducible data. (1) Background: Endometrial carcinoma (EC) classified as no specific molecular profile (NSMP) represents a heterogeneous group with variable prognoses. This retrospective, single-center study aims to further stratify NSMP ECs to tailor treatment strategies and improve outcomes. (2) Methods: From 2020 to 2023, we collected data on 51 patients diagnosed with NSMP EC following the introduction of molecular profiling at our institution. Patients were retrospectively analyzed for estrogen receptor (ER) status, histotype, and grade to identify potential prognostic subgroups. (3) Results: Our analysis identified two distinct subgroups within NSMP EC: low-risk and high-risk, based on ER status, histotype, and grade. The low-risk NSMP group demonstrated significantly better survival outcomes compared to the high-risk group. With a median follow-up time of 16 moths (IQR 13.0–29.7), the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for the low-risk group were 100%. For the high-risk group, the DFS and OS were 71.4% and 78.6%, respectively, which showed a statistically significantly difference (Log-Rank Mantel-Cox < 0.001). In the high-risk group, four patients experienced recurrence, and three of these patients died. (4) Conclusions: Stratifying NSMP EC into low-risk and high-risk categories based on ER status, histotype, and grade can lead to more accurate prognostic assessments. In time, it may require tailored adjuvant therapies and a personalized treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Relapses of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) remain a challenge despite the introduction of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO). Given the variability in salvage therapies and emerging evidence supporting the deferral of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in patients receiving ATO, we analyzed the outcomes of a multicentric cohort of 67 relapsed APL patients. Better outcomes were reported with ATO ± ATRA compared to chemo-based regimens and ATRA ± Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO). A significant survival advantage was observed for patients undergoing HCT in the chemo-based cohort (p = 0.017), but not in the ATO-based group (p = 0.12). Achieving molecular complete remission (CR) post salvage therapy emerged as the main prognostic factor for second relapses in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Our findings support the efficacy of ATO-based therapies in first relapse and enhance the role of molecular remission as an independent outcome predictor in both first and second APL relapses. Background: The introduction of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) has radically improved the prognosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), with cure rates above 80%. While relapse occurs in less than 20% of cases, addressing this issue remains challenging. Identifying effective salvage therapies for relapsed APL is crucial to improve patient outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on a multicentric cohort of 67 APL patients in first relapse, treated in three Italian hematology centers from June 1981 to November 2021. The overall survival (OS) and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) were calculated, and predictive factors were assessed using Cox regression models. Results: Overall, 61 patients (91%) received ATO ± ATRA (40.3%), chemo-based regimens (40.3%), or ATRA ± Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) (10.4%). Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 98.2% of patients (molecular CR, n = 71.4%). With a median follow-up time of 54.5 months, the 5-year OS was 73% in the ATO ± ATRA group, 44% in the chemo-based group, and 29% in the ATRA ± GO group (p = 0.035). The 5-year OS rate was also higher for transplant recipients vs. non-recipients within the chemo-based cohort (50% vs. 33%, p = 0.017), but not in the ATO-based cohort (p = 0.12). ATO-based salvage therapy resulted in better OS in both univariate (p = 0.025) and multivariate analyses (p = 0.026). The 2-year CIR was higher in patients without molecular CR vs. patients in molecular CR (66% vs. 24%, p = 0.034). Molecular CR was a significant predictor of second relapse in both univariate (p = 0.035) and multivariate analyses (p = 0.036). Conclusions: Our findings support the efficacy of ATO-based therapies in first relapse of APL and confirm the achievement of molecular remission as an independent outcome predictor in both first and second APL relapse. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Real-world studies comparing TNT and CRT are vital for advancing the treatment of LARC. Our study provides valuable insights reflecting the diverse patient populations and varied clinical practices encountered and demonstrates the advantage of TNT, providing a superior alternative to standard CRT and potentially enhancing treatment outcomes and quality of life. Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has emerged as a promising approach for managing locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), aiming to enhance resectability, increase pathological complete response (pCR), improve treatment compliance, survival, and sphincter preservation. This study compares the clinical outcomes of TNT, with either induction or consolidation chemotherapy, to those of the standard chemoradiotherapy (CRT). In this retrospective multi-institutional study, patients with stage II-III LARC who underwent CRT or TNT from seven oncology centers between 2021 and 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The TNT group was categorized into induction or consolidation groups based on the sequence of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Clinical and pathological data and treatment outcomes, including pCR, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS), were analyzed. Among the 276 patients, 105 received CRT and 171 underwent TNT. The TNT group showed significantly higher pCR (21.8% vs. 2.9%, p < 0.001) and lower lymphatic (26.3% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.009), vascular (15.8% vs. 32.7%, p = 0.002), and perineural invasion rates (20.3% vs. 37.6%, p = 0.003). Furthermore, 16.9% of TNT patients opted for non-operative management (NOM), compared to 0.9% in the CRT group (p < 0.001). The median interval between the end of radiotherapy and surgery was longer in the TNT group (17.6 weeks vs. 8.8 weeks, p < 0.001). The 3-year EFS was 58.3% for CRT and 71.1% for TNT (p = 0.06). TNT is associated with higher pCR, lower lymphatic and vascular invasion rates, and higher rates of NOM compared to CRT. This supports the use of TNT as a viable treatment strategy for LARC, offering potential benefits in quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]