Search

Simple Summary: The primary risk regarding Helicobacter pylori infection is that it is associated with gastric cancer. The lack of eradication of Helicobacter pylori has led to an increase in the prevalence of gastric cancer. We examined the literature from the year 2024 related to the Helicobacter pylori/gastric cancer association. Immunological studies increased, but they did not convince in the study of this infection. Most of the examined studies address the clinical treatment of this bacterium. However, to the same extent, other studies have investigated genetically individualized treatment. If, until now, clinical treatments have not yet been able to eradicate this bacterium, we recommend genetically individualized treatment. Numerous studies have been performed on Helicobacter pylori infection because of the high death rate linked to this illness and gastric cancer. An update on the key developments in recent years in the investigation of Helicobacter pylori and gastric cancer is the goal of this review. Using the search term "Helicobacter pylori, gastric cancer", the PubMed database was searched. Only papers published in 2024 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Because case report papers were not part of our investigation, they satisfied the exclusion criteria. Most of the research on the variable genes of Helicobacter pylori is guided by genetics to determine potential treatments. Studies on clinical treatments for the eradication of H. pylori with promising therapeutic options are needed. We found the fewest studies related to the immunopathology of H. pylori infection, which is still unknown. In conclusion, priority should be given to this kind of research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Tumour-homing bacteria present as an ideal chassis for cancer treatment and detection. A decade of pre-clinical and clinical research with the tumour-homing bacteria Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 (EcN) has demonstrated that genetic modification for payload delivery can lead to significant tumour regression and, more recently, tumour detection. Currently unknown in the field is a deep mechanistic understanding of why bacteria home to and colonise tumours. This review summarises existing literature to provide insight into the tumour-homing and colonising ability of EcN, in addition to exploring other tumour-homing strains and pathogenic bacteria for a more in-depth view. A mechanistic understanding of this capability could prove invaluable in the development of the next-generation EcN chassis for tumour detection and treatment, as well as address biosafety and containment concerns necessary for clinical translation. The last decade has seen a rapid increase in studies utilising a genetically modified probiotic, Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 (EcN), as a chassis for cancer treatment and detection. This approach relies on the ability of EcN to home to and selectively colonise tumours over normal tissue, a characteristic common to some bacteria that is thought to result from the low-oxygen, nutrient-rich and immune-privileged niche the tumour provides. Pre-clinical studies have used genetically modified EcN to deliver therapeutic payloads that show efficacy in reducing tumour burden as a result of high-tumour and low off-target colonisation. Most recently, the EcN chassis has been expanded into an effective tumour-detection tool. These advances provide strong justification for the movement of genetically modified EcN into clinical oncology trials. What is currently unknown in the field is a deep mechanistic understanding of how EcN distributes to and localises within tumours. This review summarises the existing EcN literature, with the inclusion of research undertaken with other tumour-homing and pathogenic bacteria, to provide insights into possible mechanisms of EcN tumour homing for future validation. Understanding exactly how and why EcN colonises neoplastic tissue will inform the design and testing of the next generation of EcN chassis strains to address biosafety and containment concerns and optimise the detection and treatment of cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab is a standard treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. This study investigated the relationship between the gut microbiome and treatment efficacy. Fecal samples from 37 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with this combination were analyzed. Patients were divided into responders (n = 28) and non-responders (n = 9). While overall microbiome diversity was similar, certain bacteria, such as Bacteroides stercoris and Parabacteroides merdae were more abundant in responders. Patients lacking these bacteria had worse prognoses. This suggests that differences in gut microbiota play a role in the effectiveness of atezolizumab and bevacizumab therapy. The combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab has become the first-line treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, no studies have reported on specific intestinal microbiota associated with the efficacy of atezolizumab and bevacizumab. In this study, we analyzed fecal samples collected before treatment to investigate the relationship between the intestinal microbiome and the efficacy of atezolizumab and bevacizumab. A total of 37 patients with advanced HCC who were treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab were enrolled. Fecal samples were collected from the patients, and they were divided into responder (n = 28) and non-responder (n = 9) groups. We compared the intestinal microbiota of the two groups and analyzed the intestinal bacteria associated with prognosis using QIIME2. The alpha and beta diversities were not significantly different between both groups, and the proportion of microbiota was similar. The relative abundance of Bacteroides stercoris and Parabacteroides merdae was higher in the responder group than in the non-responder group. When the prognosis was analyzed by the presence or absence of those bacteria, patients without both had a significantly poorer prognosis. Differences in intestinal microbiome are involved in the therapeutic effect of atezolizumab and bevacizumab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]