Search

Simple Summary: This epidemiological study of adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) using data from the SEER system aims to investigate independent predictors of late mortality, including factors such as age, stage, and tumor location, as well as racial differences, geographical distribution, and lack of social support (being unmarried). A total of 5150 patients were identified. Our study revealed that stage, tumor location in the thoracic region, and treatment modalities, in addition to geographical distribution (Western region) and lack of social support (being unmarried), were identified as independent predictors of late mortality. While the SEER data are not designed to explain why disease patterns occur, they provide valuable insights into health-related issues that cannot be overlooked. Further studies are needed to determine why the Western region of the USA is associated with poorer survival compared to the Northeast. Objective: Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignant tumor that mainly arises in the head and neck area. We aimed to compare the long-term survival of patients with ACC based on their geographic regions within the United States using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry data. Methods: We queried the SEER database to evaluate the geographic distribution of ACC patients based on inpatient admissions. The states included in the study were divided into four geographical regions (Midwest, Northeast, South, and West) based on the U.S. Census Bureau-designated regions and divisions. Demographic and clinical variables were compared between the groups. Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox regression were used to assess late mortality. Results: A total of 5150 patients were included (4.2% from the Midwest, 17.2% from the Northeast, 22.5% from the South, and 56.1% from the West regions). The median follow-up was 12.3 (95% CI: 11.6–13.1 years). Median overall survival was 11.0 (95% CI: 9.2-NR years), 14.3 (95% CI: 12.4–16.4 years), 11.3 (95% CI: 9.7–14.8 years), and 12.0 (95% CI: 11.3–13.0 years) for Midwest, Northeast, South, and West regions, respectively. In multivariable analysis, older age, male sex, thoracic cancer, the presence of regional and distal disease, receiving chemotherapy, not undergoing surgical resection, and being treated in the West vs. Northeast region were found to be independent predictors of poor survival. We identified a significant survival difference between the different regions, with the West exhibiting the worst survival compared to the Northeast region. Conclusions: In addition to the well-known predictors of late mortality in ACC (tumor location, stage, and treatment modalities), our study identified a lack of social support (being unmarried) and geographic location (West region) as independent predictors of late mortality in multivariable analysis. Further research is needed to explore the causal relationships. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This study investigates racial disparities in the stage of gastric cancer at diagnosis and overall survival among different racial groups using data from the SEER database (2018–2021). The retrospective cohort study of 18,984 patients found that Hispanics are 19% more likely to be diagnosed at a later stage of gastric cancer compared to non-Hispanics. Additionally, both Hispanics and Black patients showed poorer overall survival compared to Non-Hispanic Whites. The disparities are attributed to factors such as healthcare access, insurance coverage, language barriers, and preventive health service utilization. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to address these disparities in cancer outcomes. Introduction: Racial disparities in gastric cancer outcomes, including stage at diagnosis and overall survival, continue to affect Hispanic and non-Hispanic populations. This study aims to evaluate these disparities across different racial groups. Patients and methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using SEER data from 2018 to 2021, including 18,984 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer. Patients were selected based on ICD-O-3 codes for "stomach" with malignant behavior. Using ordered logistic regression, the association between race and stage at diagnosis was analyzed, while Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess OS and CSS. Results: Hispanic patients were significantly more likely to be diagnosed at a later stage compared to non-Hispanic patients (OR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.10–1.28). Both Hispanic and Black patients had worse OS compared to Non-Hispanic Whites (HR 1.10 CI 1.03–1.17, p = 0.003 and HR 1.13 CI 1.04–1.22, p = 0.002, respectively) as well as CSS. Conclusions: Hispanic patients are more likely to be diagnosed with advanced-stage gastric cancer and have poorer survival outcomes compared to non-Hispanic Whites. These disparities may be linked to differences in healthcare access, insurance, language barriers, and preventive care utilization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The purpose of the present study was to determine the role of changes in the stage of colorectal cancer (CRC, Stage 0 to 4, with 0 be very early stage and 4 late stage) at diagnosis over time, and its impact on overall survival (OS) in our Health Network system. Two datasets were used, the Health Network (n = 1385) and a national dataset (n = 202,391). There was a significant increase in early CRC stages at diagnosis (Stage 0–1), and late diagnosis (Stage 4) with a concomitant decrease in the diagnosis of CRC Stage 2. The present findings confirmed CRC stage migration in our Health Network System, along with a national trend conducive to an increased OS for early CRC stages. Background/Objectives: Due to an increased rate of surveillance colonoscopy, we aim to determine the impact of stage migration on the incidence and overall survival (OS) of patients who underwent pathological staging of colorectal cancer (CRC) at our Health Network System. Methods: Two datasets were included: subjects from the tumor registry at a regional Comprehensive Cancer Center (n = 1385) and subjects from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) national database (n = 202,391). Results: A significant increase in the diagnosis of CRC Stage 1 and 4 was observed, with a decrease in stage 2, and no change in Stage 3 in the National datasets (p < 0.01). There was an increase in Stage 4 CRC diagnosis, with a concurrent decrease in stage 2, and no changes in stages 1 and 3 in the regional dataset (p < 0.05). OS followed the expected and progressive decrease in OS by stage (from 1 to 4, p < 0.01). Conclusions: The present findings confirmed CRC stage migration in our Health Network System, along with a national trend conducive to an increased OS for early CRC stages. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Brain metastases from systemic cancer are the most common tumors of the central nervous system. For prostate metastases to the brain, the clinical progression is poorly understood. This retrospective study aims to elucidate clinical risk factors associated with overall survival (OS; months post-diagnosis) in prostate metastases to the brain, and then develop a nomogram to aid in clinical decision making for this vulnerable population. We identified several factors associated with survival, including race, tumor size, and the presence of additional metastases. This study should serve as a clinical framework for prognostication in metastatic prostate cancer to the brain. Brain metastases are an uncommon yet life-limiting manifestation of prostate cancer. However, there is limited insight into the natural progression, therapeutics, and patient outcomes for prostate cancer once metastasized to the brain. This is a retrospective study of 461 patients with metastatic prostate cancer to the brain with a primary outcome of median overall survival (OS). The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was examined using Cox regression univariate and multivariable analyses, and a corresponding nomogram was developed. The median overall survival was 15 months. In the multivariable analysis, Hispanic patients had significantly increased OS (median OS 17 months, p = 0.005). Patients with tumor sizes greater than three centimeters exhibited significantly reduced OS (median OS 19 months, p = 0.014). Patients with additional metastases to the liver exhibited significantly reduced OS (median OS 3.5 months, p < 0.001). Increased survival was demonstrated in patients treated with chemotherapy or systemic treatment (median OS 19 months, p = 0.039), in addition to radiation and chemotherapy (median OS 25 months, p = 0.002). The nomogram had a C-index of 0.641. For patients with prostate metastases to the brain, median OS is influenced by race, tumor size, presence of additional metastases, and treatment. The lack of an association between traditional prostate cancer prognosis metrics, including Gleason and ISUP grading, and mortality highlights the need for individualized, metastasis-specific prognosis metrics. This prognostic nomogram for prostate metastases to the brain can be used to guide the management of affected patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has a low 5-year survival rate due to delayed diagnosis, rapid growth, tumor complexity, and difficulties in surgical resection. Treatments involving new targeted chemotherapeutic options are required due to challenges such as drug resistance, low efficacy, severe toxicity, high metastatic potential, and clinical trial failures. This study demonstrates the preclinical efficacy and potential of the novel combination of abemaciclib and panobinostat in multiple pancreatic cancer cell lines. Our results depict that a novel combination of these agents aids in synergistic effects, causing cell death in pancreatic cancer cells. The current 5-year survival rate of pancreatic cancer is about 12%, making it one of the deadliest malignancies. The rapid metastasis, acquired drug resistance, and poor patient prognosis necessitate better therapeutic strategies for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Multiple studies show that combining chemotherapeutics for solid tumors has been successful. Targeting two distinct emerging hallmarks, such as non-mutational epigenetic changes by panobinostat (Pan) and delayed cell cycle progression by abemaciclib (Abe), inhibits pancreatic cancer growth. HDAC and CDK4/6 inhibitors are effective but are prone to drug resistance and failure as single agents. Therefore, we hypothesized that combining Abe and Pan could synergistically and lethally affect PDAC survival and proliferation. Multiple cell-based assays, enzymatic activity experiments, and flow cytometry experiments were performed to determine the effects of Abe, Pan, and their combination on PDAC cells and human dermal fibroblasts. Western blotting was used to determine the expression of cell cycle, epigenetic, and apoptosis markers. The Abe-Pan combination exhibited excellent efficacy and produced synergistic effects, altering the expression of cell cycle proteins and epigenetic markers. Pan, alone and in combination with Abe, caused apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells. Abe-Pan co-treatment showed relative safety in normal human dermal fibroblasts. Our novel combination treatment of Abe and Pan shows synergistic effects on PDAC cells. The combination induces apoptosis, shows relative safety, and merits further investigation due to its therapeutic potential in the treatment of PDAC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Patients with stage IIB and IIC melanoma are considered to have high-risk localized disease and, in some cases, demonstrate worse recurrence-free and overall survival than patients with stage IIIA and even IIIB disease. The mainstay of treatment for patients with high-risk clinical stage II melanoma is surgical resection of the primary tumor and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), which confers accurate pathologic staging and prognostication for further treatment decisions. Building on the success of adjuvant therapy for stage III melanoma, the KEYNOTE-716 and CheckMate 76K trials found improved recurrence-free survival for patients with high-risk stage II melanoma with adjuvant pembrolizumab and nivolumab, respectively, after complete resection with SLNB. Given these findings, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network now recommends discussing adjuvant pembrolizumab or nivolumab with patients with high-risk stage IIB/C melanoma, weighing the risks of recurrence against the risks of treatment-related adverse events when making the decision regarding adjuvant therapy. Melanoma is the fifth most common cancer in the United States and accounts for the majority of all skin cancer-related deaths, making it the most lethal cutaneous malignancy. Systemic adjuvant therapy for stage IIB-IV melanoma is now approved for patients who have undergone surgical resection, given the appreciable risk of recurrence and mortality in this patient population. Despite the lower stage, high-risk stage II melanoma (stage IIB/IIC) can often exhibit an even more aggressive course when compared to stage IIIA/IIIB disease, thus justifying consideration of adjuvant therapy in these patients. In this review, we highlight the current standard of practice for the treatment of stage IIB/C melanoma, with a focus on adjuvant therapies supported by published landmark clinical trials, including anti-PD-1 therapy. Notably, adjuvant therapies approved thus far in this patient population have demonstrated an improvement in recurrence-free survival, while their impact on overall survival is pending. Finally, this review highlights currently ongoing trials and future directions for research and treatment possibilities for high-risk clinical stage II melanoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: We evaluated a novel proprietary murine B7-H3 antibody 8H8 for flow cytometric analyses of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The results showed substantial B7-H3 expression in a significant proportion of AML cases, particularly in the M5 group and in those with intermediate or poor risk profiles. The correlation between high B7-H3 expression and poorer overall and progression-free survival suggests that B7-H3 may serve as an additional promising negative prognostic marker to be considered in treatment decisions in AML. Despite recent advances in immunophenotyping, the prognosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is still mainly estimated using age and genetic markers. As the genetic heterogeneity of AML patients is high, flow cytometry-based classification with appropriate biomarkers can efficiently complement risk stratification and treatment selection. An increased expression of B7-H3 (CD276), an immune checkpoint protein, has been reported and associated with poor prognosis. However, the available data are limited and heterogeneous. Here, we used a novel, proprietary murine anti-B7-H3 8H8 antibody for the flow cytometric analysis of B7-H3 expression in AML blasts from 77 patients. Our antibody reliably detected substantial B7-H3 expression in 62.3% of AML patients. B7-H3 expression was higher in the monocytic French–American–British (FAB) M5 group and in intermediate and poor risk patients according to the European Leukemia Network. Using receiver operating characteristics (ROCs), we identified a specific fluorescence intensity cut-off of 4.45 to discriminate between B7-H3high and B7-H3low expression. High B7-H3 expression was associated with shorter overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). In conclusion, we have developed a novel B7-H3 antibody that serves as a new tool for the detection of B7-H3 expression in AML and may help to facilitate risk stratification and treatment selection in AML patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Neoadjuvant treatment is an increasingly used treatment option for patients with both advanced and early-stage breast cancer to achieve downstaging and to improve prognosis. Therefore, it is important to evaluate its role in the multidisciplinary management of breast cancer patients and its effects on surgical outcomes and disease-free and overall survival. Achieving a pathologic complete response seems to improve disease-free and overall survival and even a partial response can be useful as an in-vivo chemosensitivity test for tailored adjuvant therapy. Clinical features, histology, and immunohistochemical findings play a role in achieving a pathological response. Therefore, they should be thoroughly investigated beforehand to better evaluate the treatment burden–benefits ratio and to predict the response. The correlation between TNM staging and histology variations in a sample of patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy demonstrates a positive impact on both increasing conservative surgery and achieving pCR, resulting in better outcomes in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and the risk of relapse. Benefits have also been highlighted in terms of cosmetic outcomes, postoperative complications, and psychological benefits. However, the overall outcomes must be evaluated according to the subtype and individual characteristics of the patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a type of immunotherapy used to treat a variety of cancers by helping a patient's own immune system to kill cancer cells. ICIs received their regulatory approval based on the results of large, randomized clinical trials. However, certain patient groups were excluded from these trials, so their outcomes are unknown. We performed a multicenter, retrospective study of real-world data in the United States in patients who had received at least one cycle of ICI treatment to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICIs in patient groups underrepresented in clinical trials. Unique patient groups included age > 75 years, non-White race, positive smoking history, poor performance status, obesity, autoimmune diseases, chronic viral infections, multiple previous cancer therapies, or >three metastatic sites. Overall, ICIs were safe and efficacious in these patient groups. We noted that poor performance status and a history of multiple cancer therapies were associated with poor ICI efficacy, and Black patients, compared to White patients, experienced fewer immune-related adverse events. Regulatory approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) was based on results of large, randomized clinical trials, resulting in limited outcomes data in patient cohorts typically underrepresented in such trials. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICIs in these unique patient cohorts. This is a multicenter, retrospective analysis of real-world data at six academic and community clinics in the United States from 1 January 2011 to 1 April 2018. Patients were included if they had received at least one cycle of ICI treatment. Unique patient cohorts included age > 75 years, non-White race, positive smoking history, ECOG performance status (PS) ≥ 2, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, autoimmune diseases (AIDs), chronic viral infections (CVI), extensive prior lines of therapy (LOTs), or >three metastatic sites. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs), overall survival (OS), and time to treatment failure were evaluated in the entire cohort and in NSCLC patients treated with PD-(L)1 monotherapy. Outcomes and their association with unique patient cohorts were compared on univariate analysis and multivariate analysis to those without a particular characteristic in the entire NSCLC PD-(L)1 monotherapy cohorts. In total, 1453 patients were included: 56.5%—smokers, 30.4%—non-White, 22.8%—elderly, 20.8%—ECOG PS ≥ 2, 15.7%—history of AIDs, and 4.7%—history of CVI. The common ICIs were nivolumab (37.1%) and pembrolizumab (22.2%). Black patients, compared to White patients, experienced fewer irAEs (OR 0.54, p < 0.001). An ECOG PS of ≥2 (HR = 2.01, p < 0.001) and an increased number of previous LOTs were associated with poor OS (the median OS of 26.2 vs. 16.2 vs. 9.6 months for one vs. two vs. three prior LOTs, p < 0.001). The above results were confirmed in anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy non-small cell lung cancer patients (n = 384). Overall, ICIs were safe and efficacious in these typically underrepresented patient cohorts. We noted ECOG PS ≥ 2 and an increased prior LOTs were associated with poor ICI efficacy, and Black patients, compared to White patients, experienced fewer irAEs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Pediatric patients with recurrent and metastatic cancers often present with substantial tumor and symptom burden. Local control is an important factor to consider in this setting. Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) offers a therapeutic advantage with higher, ablative doses potentially providing durable local control and a shorter fractionation schedule allowing minimum interruptions in systemic therapy and disruption in quality of life. In this study, we evaluate the outcomes of pediatric patients treated with SABR. We observed that SABR is well tolerated with local failure rates of <10% at 1 year and a median survival of 16.9 months. Patients with oligometastatic disease had a better survival rate than patients with widely metastatic disease, suggesting that the total consolidation of all metastatic sites in patients with a limited metastatic burden may be associated with better survival outcomes. Higher local control was associated with a higher radiation dose and sarcoma histology. Future studies evaluating SABR in combination with systemic therapy are warranted. Background: Pediatric patients with metastatic and/or recurrent solid tumors have poor survival outcomes despite standard-of-care systemic therapy. Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) may improve tumor control. We report the outcomes with the use of SABR in our pediatric solid tumor population. Methods: This was a single-institutional study in patients < 30 years treated with SABR. The primary endpoint was local control (LC), while the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. The survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier estimates in R v4.2.3. Results: In total, 48 patients receiving 135 SABR courses were included. The median age was 15.6 years (interquartile range, IQR 14–23 y) and the median follow-up was 18.1 months (IQR: 7.7–29.1). The median SABR dose was 30 Gy (IQR 25–35 Gy). The most common primary histologies were Ewing sarcoma (25%), rhabdomyosarcoma (17%), osteosarcoma (13%), and central nervous system (CNS) gliomas (13%). Furthermore, 57% of patients had oligometastatic disease (≤5 lesions) at the time of SABR. The one-year LC, PFS, and OS rates were 94%, 22%, and 70%, respectively. No grade 4 or higher toxicities were observed, while the rates of any grade 1, 2, and 3 toxicities were 11.8%, 3.7%, and 4.4%, respectively. Patients with oligometastatic disease, lung, or brain metastases and those who underwent surgery for a metastatic site had a significantly longer PFS. LC at 1-year was significantly higher for patients with a sarcoma histology (95.7% vs. 86.5%, p = 0.01) and for those who received a biological equivalent dose (BED10) > 48 Gy (100% vs. 91.2%, p = 0.001). Conclusions: SABR is well tolerated in pediatric patients with 1-year local failure and OS rates of <10% and 70%, respectively. Future studies evaluating SABR in combination with systemic therapy are needed to address progression outside of the irradiated field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) of the tubular gastrointestinal tract are rare and associated with worse clinical outcomes. Data from 10,387 patients were collected from the SEER database with a median age of 63 years. The most common primary tumor site was the small intestine. women had a superior 5-year survival rate. Age > 65 years, descending colon and anorectal sites were associated with worse prognosis. Surgical intervention and tumors located in the small intestine and appendix showed a better prognosis. Background: Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) of the tubular gastrointestinal tract (GI-NECs) are rare and associated with worse clinical outcomes. This population-based study aims to highlight key demographics, clinicopathological factors, and survival outcomes in the US population. Methods: Data from 10,387 patients with GI-NECs were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database from 2000 to 2020. Results: Most patients were >40 years old at the time of presentation with a median age of 63 years old, with almost equal ethnic distribution per US population data. The most common primary tumor site was the small intestine (33.6%). The metastatic spread was localized in 34.8%, regional in 27.8%, and distant in 37.3% of cases, and the liver was the most common site of metastasis (19.9%) in known cases of metastases. Most NEC patients underwent surgery, presenting the highest 5-year overall survival of 73.2% with a 95% confidence interval (CI) (95% CI 72.0–74.4%), while chemotherapy alone had the lowest 5-year survival of 8.0% (95% CI 6.4–10.0%). Compared to men, women had a superior 5-year survival rate of 59.0% (95% CI 57.6–60.5%). On multivariate analysis, age > 65 (HR 2.49, 95% CI 2.36–2.54%, p ≤ 0.001), distant metastasis (HR 2.57, 95% CI 2.52–2.62%, p ≤ 0.001), tumor size > 4 mm (HR 1.98, 95%, CI 1.70–2.31%, p ≤ 0.001), esophageal (HR 1.49, 95% CI 0.86–2.58%, p ≤ 0.001), transverse colon (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.15–3.33%, p ≤ 0.01), descending colon (HR 2.12, 95% CI 1.12, 3.97%, p = 0.02) anorectal sites, and liver or lung metastases were associated with worse survival. Surgical intervention and tumors located in the small intestine or appendix showed a better prognosis. Conclusion: GI-NECs are a group of rare malignancies associated with a poor prognosis. Therefore, epidemiological studies analyzing national databases may be the best alternative to have a more comprehensive understanding of this condition, assess the impact of current practices, and generate prognosis tools. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Although women 70 years of age and older represent a large percentage of newly diagnosed breast cancer cases, older individuals are drastically underrepresented in clinical trials. Most women diagnosed with breast cancer at 70 years of age and older present with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer. Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor-based therapy has become the standard of care for metastatic HR+ breast cancer. This study reports that metastatic breast cancer patients ≥70 years of age receiving CDK4/6 inhibitor-based treatment, particularly when combined with an aromatase inhibitor, experience prolonged progression-free survival but display no such prolongation in overall survival and report more frequent adverse effects to treatment. The reported findings can aid in the development of optimized treatments based on age and help older patients weigh treatment options. The largest portion of breast cancer patients diagnosed after 70 years of age present with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer subtypes. Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor treatment, in conjunction with endocrine therapy, has become standard-of-care for metastatic HR+ breast cancer. In total, 320 patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving CDK4/6 inhibitor combined with fulvestrant or an aromatase inhibitor were enrolled in an ongoing observational study or were included in an IRB-approved retrospective study. All patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitor-based therapy that were ≥70 years of age (n = 111) displayed prolonged progression-free survival (27.6 months) as compared to patients <70 years of age (n = 209, 21.1 months, HR = 1.38, p < 0.05). Specifically, patients receiving a CDK4/6 inhibitor with an aromatase inhibitor who were ≥70 years of age (n = 79) displayed exceptionally prolonged progression-free survival (46.0 months) as compared to patients receiving the same treatment who were <70 years of age (n = 161, 21.8 months, HR = 1.71, p < 0.01). However, patients ≥70 years of age also experienced more frequent adverse responses to CDK4/6 inhibitor-based treatment leading to dose reduction, hold, or discontinuation than the younger cohort (69% and 53%, respectively). Treatment strategies that may decrease toxicity without affecting efficacy (such as dose titration) are worth further exploration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Endometrial carcinoma is the most frequently diagnosed gynecologic cancer in the United States. It used to be known as a disease of only postmenopausal women. Currently, pre-menopausal women are being diagnosed with endometrial cancer at a higher rate; however, this condition is primarily a disease of post-menopausal women. Hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and pelvic lymph node dissection followed by adjuvant therapy have been the standard treatment of endometrial carcinoma. Management of advanced endometrial carcinoma has become more advanced and individualized. The introduction of minimally invasive surgery, immunotherapy, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy as treatment approaches has resulted in improved short- to long-term outcomes. The results of this study indicate that, despite an increase in the number of individuals with advanced endometrial carcinoma, the overall survival rate has improved significantly, probably due to advancements in treatment options and patient care. Endometrial cancer has continued to see a rising incidence in the US over the years. The main aim of this study was to assess current trends in patients' characteristics and outcomes of treatment for endometrial carcinoma over 16 years. A dataset from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for patients diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma from 2005 to 2020 was used in this retrospective, case series study. The main outcomes and measures of interest included tumor characteristics, hospitalization, treatments, mortality, and overall survival. Then, 569,817 patients who were diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma were included in this study. The mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 62.7 (11.6) years, but 66,184 patients (11.6%) were younger than 50 years, indicating that more patients are getting diagnosed at younger ages. Of the patients studied, 37,079 (6.3%) were Hispanic, 52,801 (9.3%) were non-Hispanic Black, 432,058 (75.8%) were non-Hispanic White, and 48,879 (8.6%) were other non-Hispanic. Patients in the 4th period from 2017 to 2020 were diagnosed more with stage IV (7.1% vs. 5.2% vs. 5.4% vs. 5.9%; p < 0.001) disease compared with those in the other three periods. More patients with severe comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index score of three) were seen in period 4 compared to the first three periods (3.9% vs. ≤1.9%). Systemic chemotherapy use (14.1% vs. 17.7% vs. 20.4% vs. 21.1%; p < 0.001) and immunotherapy (0.01% vs. 0.01% vs. 0.2% vs. 1.1%; p < 0.001) significantly increased from period 1 to 4. The use of laparotomy decreased significantly from 42.1% in period 2 to 16.7% in period 4, while robotic surgery usage significantly increased from 41.5% in period 2 to 64.3% in period 4. The 30-day and 90-day mortality decreased from 0.6% in period 1 to 0.2% in period 4 and 1.4% in period 1 to 0.6% in period 4, respectively. Over the period studied, we found increased use of immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and minimally invasive surgery for the management of endometrial cancer. Overall, the time interval from cancer diagnosis to final surgery increased by about 6 days. The improvements observed in the outcomes examined can probably be associated with the treatment trends observed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: There is controversy over the optimal recommended screening practice for colorectal cancer. Between direct visualization methods, colonoscopy is more used more frequently, although randomized data suggest benefits from sigmoidoscopy rather than colonoscopy. We used the SEER database to assess the proportion of cancers that could be visualized with each screening strategy and found that 58% could be seen by sigmoidoscopy, including 73% of tumors for patients diagnosed younger than 50 years (early onset colorectal cancer). We recommend consideration of recommending flexible sigmoidoscopy as a population-based screening strategy for younger individuals who may be hesitant to undergo colonoscopy. Objectives: The effectiveness of colonoscopy to reduce colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality is extrapolated from cohort studies in the absence of randomized controlled trial (RCT) data, whereas flexible sigmoidoscopy is supported by RCT data and may be easier to implement in practice. We characterized the anatomic distribution of CRC to determine the proportion that is visible with sigmoidoscopy. Methods: Patients with a primary diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (2000–2020). Tumors from the rectum to the descending colon were categorized as visible by sigmoidoscopy, whereas more proximal tumors required colonoscopy. Differential prognosis between tumor locations, stratified by age groups and stage, was assessed using the overall restricted mean survival time (RMST) at 2, 5, and 10 years. Results: Among 309,466 patients, 58% had tumors visible by sigmoidoscopy, including 73% of those under age 50 (OR 2.10, 95% CI 2.03–2.16 age < 45, OR 2.20, 95% CI 2.13–2.27 age 45–49 versus age ≥ 50). Male sex (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.51–1.56) and Asian or Pacific Islander race (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.56–1.64) were also positively associated with tumors visualizable by sigmoidoscopy. Across age groups, for local disease, RMST was comparable for tumors visible versus not visible on sigmoidoscopy. For regional and metastatic cancer, patients with tumors visible by sigmoidoscopy had improved RMST versus those with more proximal tumors. Conclusions: 58% of CRC arises in locations visible by flexible sigmoidoscopy. Flexible sigmoidoscopy should be considered as a viable option for CRC screening, particularly in younger patients unwilling or unable to undergo colonoscopy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (atezo + bev) is a preferred front-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, there is limited real-world evidence regarding the use of atezo + bev and subsequent HCC therapies in clinical practice. This retrospective cohort study aimed to characterize the time to discontinuation of atezo + bev, sequencing of systemic therapy after atezo + bev, and time to next treatment. We identified 825 adults with HCC who were initiated on atezo + bev between June 2020 and June 2022. During a median follow-up of 15.3 months, most patients (72%) discontinued atezo + bev, with a median time to discontinuation of 3.5 months. Less than one in five (19%) received subsequent therapies (median time to subsequent treatment of 5.4 months); the most common subsequent agents were lenvatinib (6%), cabozantinib (4%), and nivolumab (4%). Further research is needed to identify those most likely to benefit from atezo + bev and evaluate optimal sequential HCC therapies to maximize overall survival. Real-world (RW) evidence is needed to evaluate atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (atezo + bev) utilization for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in clinical practice. This retrospective cohort study used administrative claims databases to evaluate treatment patterns in individuals with HCC ≥18 years of age who were initiated on atezo + bev between June 2020 and June 2022. The endpoints of this study were the proportion of individuals who discontinued atezo + bev and received subsequent systemic therapies, time to discontinuation (TTD), and time to next treatment. Overall, 825 individuals were eligible (median age 67 years; 80% male). Over a median follow-up of 15.3 months, most (72%) discontinued atezo + bev, with a median TTD of 3.5 months. A minority (19%) received subsequent therapies, with the most common second-line agents being lenvatinib (6%), cabozantinib (4%), and nivolumab (4%). The median time from index to next treatment post-atezo + bev was 5.4 months. Further research is needed to identify the patients who are most likely to benefit from atezo + bev as well as later-line HCC therapies to optimize overall survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Palbociclib combined with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) has been shown to be effective in clinical trials for people with HR+/HER2− breast cancer that has spread to other areas of the body, such as the lungs or liver. Evidence of palbociclib effectiveness in routine clinical practice can provide complementary support for clinical trial findings. This study used electronic health records of people with breast cancer that had spread to their lungs and/or liver to determine how well palbociclib plus an AI worked compared to an AI alone. The study showed that palbociclib plus an AI compared with an AI alone was associated with a 38% or 27% reduction in the risk of death for patients with breast cancer that had spread to the lungs or liver, respectively. These findings support the use of palbociclib plus an AI for people whose breast cancer has spread to their lungs or liver. A cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor combined with endocrine therapy is the standard of care for patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor 2-negative (HR+/HER2−) metastatic breast cancer (mBC), but real-world effectiveness data for patients with lung or liver metastases are limited. This retrospective study included data from the US Flatiron Health database of patients with HR+/HER2− mBC and lung or liver metastases treated with first-line palbociclib (PAL) plus an aromatase inhibitor (AI) or an AI alone in routine clinical practice. Overall survival (OS) and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) were assessed. A total of 891 patients were included (622 with lung metastasis, 376 with liver metastasis, and 107 with both lung and liver metastasis). After stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance patient characteristics, PAL + AI versus AI alone was associated with significantly prolonged OS (HR = 0.62; p < 0.001) and rwPFS (HR = 0.55; p < 0.001) in patients with lung metastases and numerically longer OS (HR = 0.73; p = 0.056) and significantly longer rwPFS (HR = 0.57, p < 0.001) for those with liver metastases. Overall, PAL + AI versus AI alone was associated with prolonged OS and rwPFS in routine clinical practice, supporting the use of first-line PAL + AI for patients with HR+/HER2− mBC with lung and/or liver metastases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: In gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma cases, a prognosis based on ypTNM staging could be affected by preoperative therapy. In this study, we investigated 11,340 patients with GEJ adenocarcinoma who received preoperative therapy followed by curative-intent surgery and examined the clinicopathologic factors associated with overall survival (OS). We found that median OS durations in patients with GEJ adenocarcinoma, when sorted by stage, were substantially different from those of patients with adenocarcinoma of the upper or middle esophagus or of the non-cardia stomach. Additionally, preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CXRT) was associated with lower OS rates than chemotherapy after adjustment for the ypT and ypN categories. These results indicate that we should develop an independent GEJ staging system, rather than separating GEJ cancers into either esophageal or gastric cancers and using those staging systems, for better OS prediction. The OS prediction nomogram developed in this study, which included a preoperative therapy regimen, provided reasonable OS prediction. In gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma cases, a prognosis based on ypTNM staging could be affected by preoperative therapy. Patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma and gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent preoperative therapy followed by surgical resection from 2006 through 2017 were identified in the National Cancer Database. To enable stage-by-stage OS comparisons, tumors were classified into four gross ypTNM groups: ypT1/2, N-negative; ypT1/2, N-positive; ypT3/4, N-negative; and ypT3/4, N-positive. Prognostic factors were examined, and an OS prediction nomogram was developed for patients with abdominal/lower esophageal and gastric cardia adenocarcinoma, representing GEJ cancers. We examined 25,463 patient records. When compared by gross ypTNM group, the abdominal/lower esophageal and gastric cardia adenocarcinoma groups had similar OS rates, differing from those of other esophageal or gastric cancers. Cox regression analysis of patients with GEJ cancers showed that preoperative chemoradiotherapy was associated with shorter OS than preoperative chemotherapy after adjustment for the ypTNM group (hazard ratio 1.31, 95% CI 1.24–1.39, p < 0.001), likely owing to downstaging effects. The nomogram had a concordance index of 0.833 and a time-dependent area under the curve of 0.669. OS prediction in GEJ adenocarcinoma cases should include preoperative therapy regimens. Our OS prediction nomogram provided reasonable OS prediction for patients with GEJ adenocarcinoma, and future validation is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Pure erythroid leukemia (PEL), a rare subtype of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), is characterized by the proliferation of malignant erythroid precursors. To understand the status of PEL at the population level, a retrospective analysis was conducted using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database from 2000 to 2019. The study included 968 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of PEL, with a median age of 68 years and a higher proportion of males (62%). Among the patients, 62.5% received chemotherapy. The overall survival (OS) rates varied significantly based on age, with better outcomes seen in younger age groups. Chemotherapy was associated with improved OS both in adults and children. However, there were no significant differences in OS based on sex, race, ethnicity, or median household income. Over the two decades of the study, there was no notable improvement in OS, indicating poor outcomes with current chemotherapeutic agents. The study underscores the urgent need for investigational agents that are capable of inducing remission. Background: Acute erythroid leukemia (AEL), also known as pure erythroid leukemia, is a rare subtype of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) characterized by the proliferation of malignant erythroid precursors. Outcome data at the population level are scarce. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. All cases with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of acute (pure) erythroid leukemia during the period of 2000–2019 were included in the study. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to perform survival analysis. The significance of differences between overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the log-rank test. Results: In total, 968 patients were included in the study. The median age was 68 years (range 0–95), 62% of patients were males, and 62.5% (n = 605) were treated with chemotherapy. The median OS for <18, 18–49, 50–64, 65–79 and 80+ age groups was 69, 18, 8, 3 and 1 month, respectively (p < 0.0001). Patients who received chemotherapy had significantly improved OS compared to patients who did not, among both adults (p < 0.0001) and children (p = 0.004). There were no significant differences in OS based on sex, race, ethnicity and median household income. Median OS for adults diagnosed in 2000–2004, 2005–2009, 2010–2014, 2015–2019 was 4, 6, 6 and 3 months, respectively, with no significant differences in OS between these groups. Conclusion: AEL occurs in all age groups but is most common in the elderly. Outcomes are poor with current chemotherapeutic agents, with no improvement in the last two decades. This study stresses the urgent need for investigational agents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Racial disparities in head and neck cancers contribute to mortality in racial/ethnic (R/E) minorities, but the specific risk factors associated with inferior survival are poorly understood. The aim of our retrospective study was to describe and report clinical and treatment-related survival outcomes by specific racial and ethnic groups, and determine if specific demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic factors could be associated with inferior outcomes among R/E minorities. In this study, we demonstrated that Black race was independently associated with worse overall survival rates across multiple head and neck disease subsites. We also showed that Black patients presented with more advanced stage of disease and had longer total treatment package times compared to White patients. We conclude that more research is needed to understand the biological basis for the worse outcomes identified in our results, after controlling for the social determinants of health. Background: Racial/ethnic (R/E) minorities with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) have worse survival outcomes compared to White patients. While disparities in patient outcomes for R/E minorities have been well documented, the specific drivers of the inferior outcomes remain poorly understood. Patients and Methods: This was a population-based retrospective cohort study that analyzed HNSCC patients using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2000–2016. Patient outcomes were stratified by R/E groups including White, Black, Hispanic, Native American/Other, and Asian. The main outcome in this study was overall survival (OS). Univariate time-to-event survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan–Meier product limit estimates and the log-rank test to evaluate the differences between strata. Results: There were 304,138 patients with HNSCC identified in this study, of which 262,762 (86.3%) were White, 32,528 (10.6%) were Black, 6191 were Asian (2.0%), and 2657 were Native American/Other (0.9%). Black R/E minorities were more likely to be uninsured (9% vs. 5%, p < 0.0001), have Medicaid insurance (22% vs. 8%, p < 0.0001), be in a lower income quartile (<30,000, 42% vs. 13%, p < 0.0001), have metastatic disease (5% vs. 2%, p < 0.001), and have a total treatment time 6 days longer than White patients (median 107 vs. 101 days, p < 0.001). The 5-year OS for White, Black, Native American/Other, and Asian patients was 50.8%, 38.6%, 51.1%, and 55.8%, respectively. Among the oropharynx HNSCC patients, the 5-year OS rates in p16+ White, Black, and Asian patients were 65.7%, 39.4%%, and 55%, respectively. After a multivariate analysis, Black race was still associated with an inferior OS (HR:1.09, 95% CI: 1.03–1.15, p = 0.002). Conclusions: This large cohort study of HNSCC patients demonstrates that Black race is independently associated with worse OS, in part due to socioeconomic, clinical, and treatment-related factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Oncology-specific evidence-based treatment guidelines aim to improve cancer care. Less is known about the effect of guideline adherence on anal squamous cell carcinoma outcomes. Our study aimed to analyze adherence to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network treatment guidelines for anal squamous cell carcinoma in California and the associated impacts on survival. From our retrospective analysis, we found those with male sex, Medicaid insurance, and low socioeconomic status were less likely to receive adherent care. Race/ethnicity was not associated with receipt of adherent care. Adherent care was also associated with improved overall and disease-specific survival. Our study further contributes to the literature that shows guideline-adherent care improves cancer outcomes. Further efforts must therefore be made to increase guideline adherence in anal squamous cell carcinoma, especially in vulnerable populations. Purpose: We analyzed adherence to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network treatment guidelines for anal squamous cell carcinoma in California and the associated impacts on survival. Methods: This was a retrospective study of patients in the California Cancer Registry aged 18 to 79 years with recent diagnoses of anal squamous cell carcinoma. Predefined criteria were used to determine adherence. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated for those receiving adherent care. Disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) were examined with a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: 4740 patients were analyzed. Female sex was positively associated with adherent care. Medicaid status and low socioeconomic status were negatively associated with adherent care. Non-adherent care was associated with worse OS (Adjusted HR 1.87, 95% CI = 1.66, 2.12, p < 0.0001). DSS was worse in patients receiving non-adherent care (Adjusted HR 1.96, 95% CI = 1.56, 2.46, p < 0.0001). Female sex was associated with improved DSS and OS. Black race, Medicare/Medicaid, and low socioeconomic status were associated with worse OS. Conclusions: Male patients, those with Medicaid insurance, or those with low socioeconomic status are less likely to receive adherent care. Adherent care was associated with improved DSS and OS in anal carcinoma patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: A solitary fibrous tumor (SFT)/hemangiopericytoma (HPC) of the central nervous system (CNS) represents a rare meningeal tumor with the propensity to recur almost invariably and to metastasize extracranially. Given the rarity of the disease, there are no prospective trials by which to guide its management, and indications for radiotherapy are unclear. The NRG Oncology and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) cooperative groups recently completed the first prospective trials to evaluate risk-adapted radiotherapeutic strategies for meningiomas, based on tumor grade and extent of resection. Using a similar approach, we created three risk categories using two large national US datasets. Our risk categories were highly prognostic of overall and cause-specific survival. Furthermore, our risk categories predicted the survival benefit associated with radiotherapy, which was limited to the high-risk group and, potentially, the intermediate-risk group. Our data suggest that a risk-adapted approach may be employed for the management of SFT/HPC of the CNS. These risk categories may be used in future retrospective and/or prospective studies. Introduction: Solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma (SFT/HPC) of the central nervous system (CNS) is a rare meningeal tumor. Given the absence of prospective or randomized data, there are no standard indications for radiotherapy. Recently, the NRG Oncology and EORTC cooperative groups successfully accrued and completed the first prospective trials evaluating risk-adapted adjuvant radiotherapy strategies for meningiomas. Using a similar framework, we sought to develop prognostic risk categories that may predict the survival benefit associated with radiotherapy, using two large national datasets. Methods: We queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases for all newly diagnosed cases of SFT/HPC within the CNS. Risk categories were created, as follows: low risk—grade 1, with any extent of resection (EOR) and grade 2, with gross–total resection; intermediate risk—grade 2, with biopsy/subtotal resection; high risk—grade 3 with any EOR. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to determine the association of risk categories with overall and cause-specific survival. We then determined the association of radiotherapy with overall survival in the NCDB, stratified by risk group. Results: We identified 866 and 683 patients from the NCDB and SEER databases who were evaluated, respectively. In the NCDB, the 75% survival times for low- (n = 312), intermediate- (n = 239), and high-risk (n = 315) patients were not reached, 86 months (HR 1.60 (95% CI 1.01–2.55)), and 55 months (HR 2.56 (95% CI 1.68–3.89)), respectively. Our risk categories were validated for overall and cause-specific survival in the SEER dataset. Radiotherapy was associated with improved survival in the high- (HR 0.46 (0.29–0.74)) and intermediate-risk groups (HR 0.52 (0.27–0.99)) but not in the low-risk group (HR 1.26 (0.60–2.65)). The association of radiotherapy with overall survival remained significant in the multivariable analysis for the high-risk group (HR 0.55 (0.34–0.89)) but not for the intermediate-risk group (HR 0.74 (0.38–1.47)). Similar results were observed in a time-dependent landmark sensitivity analysis. Conclusion: Risk stratification based on grade and EOR is prognostic of overall and cause-specific survival for SFT/HPCs of the CNS and performs better than any individual clinical factor. These risk categories appear to predict the survival benefit from radiotherapy, which is limited to the high-risk group and, potentially, the intermediate-risk group. These data may serve as the basis for a prospective study evaluating the management of meningeal SFT/HPCs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality among males in the US. Definitive radiation therapy (RT) plays an important role in curative-intent treatment for localized PCa and can be delivered with several different techniques, depending on the availability of resources and patient-specific criteria. With an analysis of the extensive National Cancer Database, this paper investigates trends in utilization, survival probability, and factors associated with overall survival of six common RT modalities utilized for the treatment of PCa patients—stratified by the three risk groups. Background: In this study, the utilization rates and survival outcomes of different radiotherapy techniques are compared in prostate cancer (PCa) patients stratified by risk group. Methods: We analyzed an extensive data set of N0, M0, non-surgical PCa patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Patients were grouped into six categories based on RT modality: an intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) group with brachytherapy (BT) boost, IMRT with/without IMRT boost, proton therapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), low-dose-rate brachytherapy (BT LDR), and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (BT HDR). Patients were also stratified by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines: low-risk (clinical stage T1–T2a, Gleason Score (GS) ≤ 6, and Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) < 10), intermediate-risk (clinical stage T2b or T2c, GS of 7, or PSA of 10–20), and high-risk (clinical stage T3–T4, or GS of 8–10, or PSA > 20). Overall survival (OS) probability was determined using a Kaplan–Meier estimator. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by risk group for the six treatment modalities. Results: The most utilized treatment modality for all PCa patients was IMRT (53.1%). Over the years, a steady increase in SBRT utilization was observed, whereas BT HDR usage declined. IMRT-treated patient groups exhibited relatively lower survival probability in all risk categories. A slightly better survival probability was observed for the proton therapy group. Hormonal therapy was used for a large number of patients in all risk groups. Conclusion: This study revealed that IMRT was the most common treatment modality for PCa patients. Brachytherapy, SBRT, and IMRT+BT exhibited similar survival rates, whereas proton showed slightly better overall survival across the three risk groups. However, analysis of the demographics indicates that these differences are at least in part due to selection bias. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States (US), and real-world studies are needed to understand effectiveness of cancer therapies for patients treated outside of cancer clinical trials. Pembrolizumab, an immunotherapy agent that aids the body's immune system in fighting cancer, is administered for up to 2 years when treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated the real-world time on treatment (rwToT), a surrogate indicator that has been associated with survival in NSCLC studies, for over 1000 patients with advanced NSCLC treated initially with pembrolizumab at US oncology clinics. The median rwToT for patients with good performance status (similar to those in clinical trials) was 7.4 months, consistent with the median treatment duration in the KEYNOTE-024 trial (7.9 months). Our findings suggest long-term benefit of first-line pembrolizumab for patients with advanced NSCLC and good performance status at the start of therapy who are treated in real-world settings. Our aim was to evaluate real-world time on treatment (rwToT), overall and by KRAS mutation status, with first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in real-world oncology practice in the US. rwToT is a readily available, intermediate-range endpoint that is moderately to highly correlated with overall survival in clinical trials and real-world data. Using deidentified electronic medical record data, we studied patients with ECOG performance status (PS) of 0–2 who initiated pembrolizumab (1 November 2016 to 31 March 2020) for advanced NSCLC with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 50% and without EGFR/ALK/ROS1 genomic alterations. The data cutoff was 31 March 2021, and the median study follow-up was 34 months. The Kaplan–Meier median rwToT with first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy was 7.4 months (95% CI, 6.3–8.1) for 807 patients with PS 0–1, which was consistent with the median treatment duration in the KEYNOTE-024 trial (7.9 months). The median rwToT for 237 patients with PS 2 was 2.1 months (95% CI, 1.4–2.8). For those with KRAS-mutated and KRAS wild-type nonsquamous NSCLC and PS 0–1, the median rwToT was 7.6 months and 7.0 months, respectively. Our findings suggest long-term benefit of first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 expression ≥ 50% in real-world settings in the US, particularly for patients with good performance status at the start of therapy, irrespective of KRAS status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]