Search

Simple Summary: Plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma (PUC) is a rare and aggressive histologic subtype of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (BC) with high rates of upstaging and metastases. The aim of our study was to characterize treatment patterns and outcomes using a large national database and our institutional experiences, combating the challenge posed by the rarity of this variant. We demonstrated that, despite an improved pT0 rate associated with NAC, there remains an inconclusive overall survival increase. Additionally, PUC demonstrated a high predilection for peritoneal metastasis, further highlighting the need for investigation into more effective and subtype-tailored treatment options. Background: Plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma (PUC) is a rare histologic subtype of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (BC). Our objective was to characterize treatment patterns and outcomes of PUC in the NCDB and our recent institutional experience. Methods: The NCDB was queried for localized PUC cases between 2004 and 2020. Patients with PUC from a single institution (Yale School of Medicine) were also incorporated from 2021 onwards to not double-count patients. The primary outcomes were overall survival and treatment trends. Results: A total of 146 patients were included, 123 from NCDB and 23 from Yale. The median overall survival (mOS) was 28 [IQR 7.5, 50.3] months, 23 [IQR 8.4, 46.3] months for the NCDB patients, and 36 [IQR 4.3, 68.1] for the Yale patients. The mOS for patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) was 60.0 [28.0, 91.9] vs. 14.8 months [0, 34.3] for patients without NAC, p = 0.038, though the benefit was not preserved in a Cox proportional hazard analysis incorporating the clinical stage, receipt of NAC, and age. The peritoneum was the most common site of metastasis (78.3%), followed by the liver and bones. Conclusion: Our findings underscore the formidable challenge posed by PUC, emphasizing its limited response to current therapies. Despite higher pT0 rates with NAC, the OS benefit remains inconclusive, highlighting the need for more effective treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Brain metastases from systemic cancer are the most common tumors of the central nervous system. For prostate metastases to the brain, the clinical progression is poorly understood. This retrospective study aims to elucidate clinical risk factors associated with overall survival (OS; months post-diagnosis) in prostate metastases to the brain, and then develop a nomogram to aid in clinical decision making for this vulnerable population. We identified several factors associated with survival, including race, tumor size, and the presence of additional metastases. This study should serve as a clinical framework for prognostication in metastatic prostate cancer to the brain. Brain metastases are an uncommon yet life-limiting manifestation of prostate cancer. However, there is limited insight into the natural progression, therapeutics, and patient outcomes for prostate cancer once metastasized to the brain. This is a retrospective study of 461 patients with metastatic prostate cancer to the brain with a primary outcome of median overall survival (OS). The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was examined using Cox regression univariate and multivariable analyses, and a corresponding nomogram was developed. The median overall survival was 15 months. In the multivariable analysis, Hispanic patients had significantly increased OS (median OS 17 months, p = 0.005). Patients with tumor sizes greater than three centimeters exhibited significantly reduced OS (median OS 19 months, p = 0.014). Patients with additional metastases to the liver exhibited significantly reduced OS (median OS 3.5 months, p < 0.001). Increased survival was demonstrated in patients treated with chemotherapy or systemic treatment (median OS 19 months, p = 0.039), in addition to radiation and chemotherapy (median OS 25 months, p = 0.002). The nomogram had a C-index of 0.641. For patients with prostate metastases to the brain, median OS is influenced by race, tumor size, presence of additional metastases, and treatment. The lack of an association between traditional prostate cancer prognosis metrics, including Gleason and ISUP grading, and mortality highlights the need for individualized, metastasis-specific prognosis metrics. This prognostic nomogram for prostate metastases to the brain can be used to guide the management of affected patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: We retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcomes of lung metastasectomy in 147 patients with pulmonary metastases from primary liver tumors at three medical centers. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that surgical resection as the initial primary liver tumor treatment and lower MELD-Na scores significantly correlated with better OS. These findings can guide thoracic surgeons in patient selection and predicting surgical outcomes. Oligopulmonary metastases from primary liver tumors are typically treated surgically. We evaluated the clinical outcomes after lung metastasectomy in patients with pulmonary metastases from primary liver tumors. We retrospectively enrolled 147 consecutive patients with lung metastases from liver cancer who had undergone pulmonary metastasectomies at three medical centers between February 2007 and December 2020. All patients were pathologically confirmed to have lung metastases from liver cancer. Among the 147 patients, 110, 17, and 20 initially underwent surgical resection, radiofrequency ablation, and transcatheter arterial embolization, respectively. The 5-year overall survival (OS) in the study cohort was 22%. Univariate analysis revealed four factors associated with better OS: surgical resection as the initial primary liver tumor treatment (p = 0.004), a disease-free interval exceeding 12 months after the initial liver surgery (p = 0.036), a lower Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD)-Na score (≤20) for liver cirrhosis (p = 0.044), and the absence of local liver tumor recurrence at the time of pulmonary metastasectomy (p = 0.004). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that surgical resection as the initial primary liver tumor treatment and lower MELD-Na scores significantly correlated with better OS. Our findings can assist thoracic surgeons in selecting suitable patients for surgery and predicting surgical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) and Capecitabine/Temozolomide (CAPTEM) are cornerstones of systemic therapy for metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). In clinical practice, most patients receive more than one regimen, and the optimal sequence of treatments for these patients remains poorly understood. We present a real-world comparison of progression-free survival (PFS) between PRRT and CAPTEM in PNETs. Our analysis found that clinical outcomes were comparable to previously reported data in the real-world setting and were similar for both regimens. PFS for patients without extrahepatic metastases and those with MEN1, DAXX, and/or ATRX mutations might be prolonged with PRRT. Patients with grade 3 disease might fare better with CAPTEM initially. Candidates for surgical debulking or those with tumor-induced symptoms may benefit from initial treatment with CAPTEM due to the shorter time to response. Background: Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT), a form of Radioligand Therapy (RLT), and Capecitabine/Temozolomide (CAPTEM) are cornerstones of systemic therapy for metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). Data regarding comparative efficacy are lacking. Herein, we compare the efficacy of PRRT vs. CAPTEM as second-line/beyond regimens and treatment sequencing. Methods: Clinicopathologic, radiographic, and genomic data were captured for metastatic PNETs seen in our multi-disciplinary NET clinic between 2013 and 2023. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS) after progression on a previous line of systemic therapy. The secondary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), time to response (TTR), and overall survival (OS). Results: Fifty-nine cases were included. PFS was similar in the PRRT (n = 29) and CAPTEM (n = 30) groups (PRRT = 21.90 months vs. CAPTEM = 20.03 months; HR 0.99; p = 0.97). On subgroup analysis, PRRT had longer PFS in cases without extrahepatic metastases (26.47 months vs. 17.67 months; p = 0.03) and cases with a mutation in the MEN1, DAXX, and/or ATRX genes (28.43 months vs. 18.67 months; p = 0.03). PRRT had reduced PFS in patients with grade 3 disease (7.83 months vs. 16.33 months; p = 0.02). ORR did not vary significantly (34.78% vs. 40.91%; p = 0.67). CAPTEM responders showed shorter TTR (6.03 months vs. 11.15 months; p = 0.03). In patients who received both, OS did not vary based on the sequence (HR 1.20; p = 0.75). Conclusions: PFS, ORR, and OS are similar when using PRRT vs. CAPTEM as second-line-and-beyond therapy for patients with metastatic PNETs. However, patients with MEN1, DAXX, and/or ATRX mutations or without extrahepatic metastases might better benefit from PRRT and patients with grade 3 disease from CAPTEM. Candidates for surgical debulking or with tumor-induced symptoms may benefit from initial treatment with CAPTEM due to shorter TTR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer are linked to a poor prognosis, with median survival ranging from 2 to 9 months. Standard treatments, including systemic chemotherapy and targeted therapies, have demonstrated only limited effectiveness. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is an experimental approach under investigation for treating these metastases, but its widespread clinical use is hindered by insufficient evidence regarding its safety and efficacy. This retrospective study presents outcomes from the first PIPAC program in Lithuania, where 32 patients underwent 71 PIPAC procedures between 2015 and 2022. Intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred in 4.2% of cases. Although reductions in peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) and ascites volume were noted, they were not statistically significant. The median overall survival after PM diagnosis was 12.5 months. These findings suggest that PIPAC is a safe and feasible treatment, but further research is needed to establish its efficacy. Background: Peritoneal metastases (PM) of gastric cancer (GC) are considered a terminal condition, with reported median survival ranging from 2 to 9 months. Standard treatment typically involves systemic chemotherapy alone or combined with targeted therapy or immunotherapy, though efficacy is limited. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) has emerged as a novel technique for treating GC PM, although it remains an experimental treatment under investigation. This study aimed to summarize the outcomes of GC PM treatment with PIPAC from the Lithuanian PIPAC program. Methods: All patients who underwent PIPAC for GC PM at Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos between 2015 and 2022 were included in this retrospective study. The safety of PIPAC was assessed by postoperative complications according to the Clavien–Dindo classification. Efficacy was evaluated based on the peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI), ascites dynamics throughout the treatment, and long-term outcomes. Results: In total, 32 patients underwent 71 PIPAC procedures. Intraoperative and postoperative morbidity related to PIPAC occurred after three (4.2%) procedures. Following PIPAC, there was a tendency towards a decrease in median PCI from 10 (Q1 3; Q3 13) to 7 (Q1 2; Q3 12), p = 0.75, and a decrease in median ascites volume from 1300 mL (Q1 500; Q3 3600) at the first PIPAC to 700 mL (Q1 250; Q3 4750) at the last PIPAC, p = 0.56; however, these differences were not statistically significant. The median overall survival after PM diagnosis was 12.5 months (95% CI 10–17), and the median survival after the first PIPAC procedure was 5 months (95% CI 4–10). Conclusions: PIPAC is a safe and feasible treatment option for GC PM; however, well-designed prospective studies are needed to fully assess its efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Studies analyzing specific treatment-related prognostic factors can provide important information about disease biology and improve the use of biomarkers to optimize treatment decisions. The aim of our retrospective study was to determine the prognostic performance of clinicopathological factors and blood biomarkers in patients with unresectable metastatic melanoma treated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors. A total of 199 patients were included in the multivariate analysis of the risk of progression and death. We found that primary tumor localization on the limbs, Clark invasion level V, M1c stage or M1d stage at the start of therapy, and elevated baseline serum S100B level were independently and significantly associated with poor outcomes. The present study suggests that clinicopathological factors, including primary tumor characteristics and stage of metastatic disease, as well as serum markers may provide information on the probability of survival in patients with advanced melanoma treated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors. Prognostic studies can provide important information about disease biology and improve the use of biomarkers to optimize treatment decisions. Methods: A total of 199 patients with advanced melanoma treated with BRAF + MEK inhibitors were included in our single-center retrospective study. We analyzed the risk of progression and death using multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. The predictive effect of prognostic factors on progression-free survival (PFS) was evaluated in ROC analysis. Results: We found that primary tumor localization, Clark level, pT category, baseline M stage and baseline serum S100B are independent and significant prognostic factors for PFS. The discriminative power of the combination of these factors was excellent for predicting 18 month PFS (AUC 0.822 [95% CI 0.727; 0.916], p < 0.001). Primary tumor localization on the extremities, Clark level V, baseline M1c stage or M1d stage, and elevated baseline serum S100B and LDH levels were independently and significantly associated with unfavorable overall survival (OS). Conclusion: Baseline M stage and serum S100B appear to be independent prognostic factors for both PFS and OS in melanoma patients treated with BRAF + MEK inhibitors. We newly identified significant and independent prognostic effects of primary tumor localization and Clark level on survival that warrant further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents a significant challenge in oncology, and systemic therapy remains the primary treatment modality. Radiation therapy (RT) offers a non-invasive ablative approach to the management of oligometastatic disease, and the use of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) has demonstrated remarkably high disease control. Within the broad spectrum of oligometastatic disease, we evaluated the efficacy of SABR on oligorecurrent RCC systemic treatment-naïve, and we aimed to identify predictive factors for long-term disease control. We demonstrated the potential of SABR to delay the need for systemic therapy and confirmed the long-term efficacy of SABR for oligometastatic RCC patients, with a superior benefit for patients with single lung metastasis, potentially refining patient selection processes to tailor treatments. Background: Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is emerging as a potential local treatment option for oligometastatic RCC. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of SABR in patients with oligorecurrent RCC. Methods: A total of 50 patients with histologically confirmed RCC underwent SABR for oligorecurrence between 2006 and 2022. Eligible patients had up to five extracranial metastases and were systemic treatment-naïve at the time of irradiation. The primary endpoints of the analysis were overall survival (OS), local control (LC), distant metastasis–free survival (DMFS), and time to systemic therapy initiation. Results: The median OS was not reached, with 1- and 3-year OS rates of 93.8% and 77.5%, respectively. LC rates at one and three years were 95.8% and 86.5%, respectively. The median time to systemic therapy initiation was 63.8 months, and the median DMFS was 17.9 months, with one- and three-year rates of 63.4% and 36.6%, respectively. Multiple metastases were a negative predictive factor for DMFS (HR 2.39, p = 0.023), whereas lung metastases were associated with a more favorable outcome (HR 0.38, p = 0.011). Conclusions: SABR offers a valuable treatment option for oligometastatic RCC, demonstrating significant potential for achieving long-term disease control and delaying the need for systemic therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The Fas/Fas ligand (FasL) system is an apoptosis-regulating pathway that holds a key role in tumor immune surveillance and metastasis. Although this pathway has been extensively investigated in pre-clinical models and in primary tumor tissues, however its role in the periphery is largely unexplored. To this end, the expression of Fas/FasL was for the first time assessed on circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and matched peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in the peripheral blood of patients with metastatic breast cancer (BC). The results show that Fas and FasL are frequently expressed on BC patients' CTCs, with Fas/FasL-co-expressing CTCs emerging as a poor prognostic marker predicting a high risk for disease progression. On the other hand, Fas and FasL were also frequently expressed on BC patients' PBMCs, and Fas/FasL co-expression on PBMCs emerged as a favorable prognostic marker associated with a low risk for death. These results show that the assessment of Fas/FasL expression on CTCs and PBMCs can provide valuable prognostic information for patients with metastatic BC, and highlight their potential role in the peripheral immune response and metastatic progression of BC. The Fas/Fas ligand (FasL) system is a major apoptosis-regulating pathway with a key role in tumor immune surveillance and metastasis. The expression of Fas/FasL on mammary tumor tissues holds prognostic value for breast cancer (BC) patients. We herein assessed Fas/FasL expression on circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and matched peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from 98 patients with metastatic BC receiving first-line treatment. Fas+, FasL+, and Fas+/FasL+ CTCs were identified in 88.5%, 92.3%, and 84.6% of CTC-positive patients, respectively. In addition, Fas+/FasL+, Fas-/FasL+, and Fas-/FasL- PBMCs were identified in 70.3%, 24.2%, and 5.5% of patients, respectively. A reduced progression-free survival (PFS) was revealed among CTC-positive patients (median PFS: 9.5 versus 13.4 months; p = 0.004), and specifically among those harboring Fas+/FasL+ CTCs (median PFS: 9.5 vs. 13.4 months; p = 0.009). On the other hand, an increased overall survival (OS) was demonstrated among patients with Fas+/FasL+ PBMCs rather than those with Fas-/FasL+ and Fas-/FasL- PBMCs (median OS: 35.7 vs. 25.9 vs. 14.4 months, respectively; p = 0.008). These data provide for the first time evidence on Fas/FasL expression on CTCs and PBMCs with significant prognostic value for patients with metastatic BC, thus highlighting the role of the Fas/FasL system in the peripheral immune response and metastatic progression of BC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality. This study investigates the clinical interest of whole exome sequencing for analyzing somatic mutational signatures in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC treated with the current standard of care. Investigating somatic mutational signatures as well as structural variations, we evaluated the association between genomic features and patient outcomes in a cohort of 132 patients. This study identified specific signatures associated with poor response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy and chemotherapy, potentially aiding treatment selection and identifying patients unlikely to benefit from these approaches. Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality. This study investigates the clinical interest of whole exome sequencing (WES) for analyzing somatic mutational signatures in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC treated with the current standard of care. Methods: Exome sequencing data and clinical characteristics from 132 patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC were analyzed. Somatic mutational signatures including single base substitutions (SBSs), double base substitutions (DBSs), and copy number signatures were evaluated. Structural variations including tumor mutational burden (TMB), the number of neoantigens, TCR clonality, homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), copy number alterations (CNAs), and microsatellite instability (MSI) score were determined. The association between these genomic features, NSCLC subtypes, and patient outcomes (progression-free and overall survival) was evaluated. Conclusions: Exome sequencing offers valuable insights into somatic mutational signatures in NSCLC. This study identified specific signatures associated with a poor response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy and chemotherapy, potentially aiding treatment selection and identifying patients unlikely to benefit from these approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases (BM) is challenging, especially when brain involvement is the first sign of cancer. This study retrospectively analyzed 25 patients with newly diagnosed brain metastatic NSCLC without EGFR or ALK alterations. The findings suggest that patients with symptomatic BM at diagnosis may have better survival outcomes due to increased use of multimodal local treatments. Combining local approaches with first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and chemotherapy appears to improve survival in these patients. Additionally, a nonsystematic literature review was conducted to better understand the topic and explore the potential benefits of various immunotherapy-based combinations for brain metastatic NSCLC. This research aims to highlight the survival outcomes of this underrepresented population and provide insights into optimal treatment strategies. In the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), managing non-oncogene driven non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases (BM) is challenging, especially when brain involvement is the initial sign. Patients with newly diagnosed brain metastatic NSCLC without epidermal growth factor receptor (EFGR) nor anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) alterations were retrospectively included. Twenty-five patients were analyzed; 15 (60%) had symptomatic BM as the first sign (group 1), while 10 (40%) had BM discovered during complementary examinations (group 2). Fourteen patients (56%) had concomitant extracerebral metastases, primarily in group 2. Eight (32%) had oligometastatic disease, with seven in group 1. Over half received chemotherapy and pembrolizumab as first-line treatment. BM surgical resection occurred in twelve (80%) patients in group 1 and one in group 2. Median cerebral progression-free survival was 10 months: 12 in group 1 and 5 in group 2. Median overall survival was 25 months: not reached in group 1 and 6 months in group 2. This case series highlights survival outcomes for patients with inaugural BM, a demographic underrepresented in pivotal trials. Oligometastatic disease and symptomatic BM as initial signs seem associated with better prognosis due to increased use of multimodal local approaches. Combining local approaches with first-line ICI+/− chemotherapy appears to improve survival in brain metastatic NSCLC. A literature review was conducted to explore key questions regarding upfront ICI alone or in combination with systemic drugs or local approaches in brain metastatic NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This study investigated one of the treatment options for advanced breast cancer patients after they completed standard therapy that combines hormone therapy and specific targeted agents called cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors. We wanted to understand why in real-world patients start chemotherapy after finishing standard initial treatment, how they respond to it, and what factors might affect their outcomes. We found that chemotherapy was often used when patients faced dissemination to internal organs with the risk of further progression, but it provided limited benefits. We suggest that modern drugs recommended by guidelines before chemotherapy should be better reimbursed in Poland. This research could help doctors make better treatment decisions and improve future clinical trials. The standard therapy for hormone-receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer includes the use of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) with endocrine therapy. The optimal post-CDK4/6i treatment sequence is unclear. This cohort study evaluated the initiation, characteristics, and outcomes of chemotherapy following CDK4/6i-based treatment. Among the 227 patients who began CDK4/6i therapy, 114 completed it. Seventy-nine female patients received further treatment, including 55 receiving chemotherapy. The average age was 60.1 years. Post-CDK4/6i chemotherapy was typically (69.1%) first-line due to an impending visceral crisis. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 3.0 months (range 0.5–18.9), and the median overall survival (mOS) was 8.3 months (0.5–26.1). The median OS from the end of CDK4/6i treatment was 12.4 months (1.5–26.8). In univariate analysis, neither mPFS nor mOS was associated with age, tumor grade, receptor status, Ki67 status, time from diagnosis to CDK4/6i cessation, therapy line, or CDK4/6i type. Dose reduction occurred in 12 patients (21.8%), and chemotherapy was ceased due to adverse events in 8 patients (14.6%). Chemotherapy showed limited benefit regardless of the regimen. The role of chemotherapy may evolve with broader CDK4/6i use in adjuvant treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Lung cancer continues to be the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Many patients present advanced disease at the time of the diagnosis. Neoadjuvant therapy aims to reduce the tumor stage and improve the operability of patients, and simultaneously leads to tumor regression. The tumor regression grade reflects the degree of pathological response to therapy. Thus, we conducted this study to identify the predictors for pathologic response after neoadjuvant treatment followed by surgery. The second goal of our research was to find the relationship between survival and tumor regression. Our study revealed that the histology of the primary tumor, lymph node size in the preoperative CT scan (>1.7 cm), and absolute tumor size reduction after neoadjuvant treatment (>2.6 cm) independently predict the effectiveness of tumor regression. Age > 70 years, extended resection > one lobe, and tumor recurrence or metastasis were identified as significant independent predictors of reduced overall survival. Our study aimed to identify predictors for the effectiveness of tumor regression in lung cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant treatment and cancer resections. Patients admitted between 2016 and 2022 were included in the study. Based on the histology of the tumor, patients were categorized into a lung adenocarcinoma group (LUAD) and squamous cell carcinoma group (SQCA). Ninety-five patients with non-small-cell lung cancer were included in the study. A total of 58 (61.1%) and 37 (38.9%) patients were included in the LUAD and SQCA groups, respectively. Additionally, 9 (9.5%), 56 (58.9%), and 30 (31.6%) patients were categorized with a tumor regression score of I, II, and III, respectively. In multivariable analyses, histology of the primary tumor (SQCA), lymph node size in the preoperative CT scan (>1.7 cm), and absolute tumor size reduction after neoadjuvant treatment (>2.6 cm) independently predict effectiveness of tumor regression (OR [95% confidence interval, p-value] of 6.88 [2.40–19.77, p < 0.0001], 3.13 [1.11–8.83, p = 0.0310], and 3.76 [1.20–11.81, p = 0.0233], respectively). Age > 70 years, extended resection > one lobe, and tumor recurrence or metastasis were identified as significant independent predictors of reduced overall survival. Assessment of tumor size before and after neoadjuvant treatment might help to identify high-risk patients with decreased survival and to improve patient management and care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Regorafenib offers longer survival for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We aimed to identify biomarkers for regorafenib through preclinical and translational studies. In silico analysis identified matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-14 and MMP-9 as key biomarkers. Validation in patients receiving regorafenib or FTD/TPI showed that high MMP-14 levels were correlated with a better response to regorafenib. Additionally, lower MMP-9 levels before the second cycle were linked to improved disease control and survival. These findings suggest that MMP-14 and MMP-9 could serve as prognostic markers for regorafenib efficacy. In identifying biomarkers for anticancer drugs, the lack of objectivity in selecting candidate factors makes interpretation difficult. We performed preclinical analysis and a translational validation study to identify candidate biomarkers for regorafenib efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Using in silico COMPARE analysis with a human cancer cell line panel, JFCR39, we selected candidate biomarkers whose expression correlates with regorafenib sensitivity. We validated predictive values in mCRC patients receiving regorafenib (discovery, n = 53) and FTD/TPI (control, n = 16). Blood samples were obtained at baseline (BL), before the second cycle (2nd), and at progressive disease (PD), and biomarker levels were measured using ELISA. Our analysis showed that high matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-14 expression was associated with a high sensitivity to regorafenib. In the discovery cohort, high MMP-14 levels at BL and PD were correlated with tumor shrinkage and longer progression-free survival (PFS). A subsequent analysis of other related factors further indicated that the patients with decreased MMP-9 levels at the 2nd had higher disease control rates, tumor shrinkage, longer PFS, and overall survival than those with increased changes. These findings were not observed in the control cohort. Our study suggests MMP-14 and MMP-9 may serve as prognostic markers for regorafenib and provide insights into novel combination therapies with anti-MMP-9 agents or FTD/TPI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The combination of chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (trimodality therapy) is considered standard of care for patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma, but many potential candidates for surgery receive curative-intent chemoradiotherapy alone. This study compared the outcomes of patients who received trimodality therapy to those who received curative-intent chemoradiotherapy. Our primary analysis found that trimodality therapy reduced the risk of local tumor recurrences, but we did not detect statistically significant differences in the risks of distant metastases or mortality. These results can help patients and clinicians make informed treatment decisions, although further studies are needed to refine our understanding of the trade-offs between the two treatment strategies. The optimal management of patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma is unclear. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy (trimodality therapy) is supported as a standard of care, but definitive chemoradiotherapy is frequently given in practice to patients who may have been surgical candidates. This multi-institutional retrospective cohort study compared the outcomes of consecutive patients diagnosed with stage II to IVA esophageal adenocarcinoma between 2004 and 2018 who planned to undergo trimodality therapy or definitive chemoradiotherapy. A total of 493 patients were included, of whom 435 intended to undergo trimodality therapy and 56 intended to undergo definitive chemoradiotherapy. After a median follow-up of 7.3 years, trimodality therapy was associated with a lower risk of locoregional failure (5-year risk, 30.5% vs. 61.3%; HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.24–0.62; p < 0.001 ) but not distant metastases (5-year risk, 58.2% vs. 53.9%; HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.77–1.91; p = 0.40 ). There were no differences in overall survival (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.56–1.09; p = 0.14 ) or cancer-specific survival (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.57–1.21; p = 0.33 ). Findings were consistent on propensity score-matched sensitivity analyses. In conclusion, trimodality therapy was associated with a lower risk of locoregional failure, but this did not translate into a significantly lower risk of distant failure or improved survival. Further studies are required to accurately estimate the trade-offs between the two treatment strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Malignant diseases represent a central challenge in modern medicine. Despite improved screening approaches and advanced diagnostics, malignant diseases such as HCC are still diagnosed at non-resectable/advanced stages. In these cases, minimally invasive treatment methods such as SIRT or other radioablation procedures are of particular importance as part of personalized oncological therapy. When choosing the right minimally invasive procedure, it would be useful to be able to use biomarkers as predictors of treatment response. With this background, the aim of this study is to evaluate the usefulness of CCL2 as a predictor of treatment response and survival. Purpose: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the largest subgroup of primary liver tumors. Ablative therapies, such as selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT), are used in late stages for patients with unresectable liver metastases and no response to other therapies. CCL2 (C-C motif chemokine ligand 2) is a potent monocyte chemoattractant. It is associated with tumor progression and metastasis. The role of circulating CCL2 as a biomarker in HCC undergoing selective internal radiation therapy remains unclear. Methods: A total of 41 patients (8 female, 33 male) suffering from HCC and undergoing SIRT were enrolled. Pre- and post-therapy changes in circulating CCL2 levels were determined by bead-based immunoassay and compared with clinical laboratory parameters and patient data. Results: A total of 32 patients exhibited survival beyond 60 days. It was observed that levels of CCL2 correlated with scores indicating a higher likelihood of non-survival and with the severity of the disease. Moreover, a significant inverse correlation was discovered between CCL2 levels and the survival of patients over 60 days in relation to counts of leukocytes, granulocytes, monocytes, and C-reactive protein. Conclusions: CCL2 may serve as a potential marker for patient survival after SIRT. The prediction of which HCC patients are likely to benefit from SIRT may be helpful in guiding therapeutic management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This study explores the use of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) in the surgical resection of brain metastases (BMs). The research aims to determine how iMRI can improve the precision of tumor removal, thereby enhancing patient outcomes. By providing real-time, high-resolution images during surgery, iMRI assists surgeons in achieving more complete tumor resection, potentially reducing recurrence rates and improving survival chances. Integrating iMRI into surgical protocols helps preserve neurological functions, especially for patients with BM in critical brain areas. This study highlights the safety and effectiveness of iMRI in neurosurgery and suggests its broader adoption for the better management of BMs. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) has witnessed significant growth in the field of neurosurgery, particularly in glioma surgery, enhancing image-guided neuronavigation and optimizing the extent of resection (EOR). Despite its extensive use in the treatment of gliomas, its utility in brain metastases (BMs) remains unexplored. This study examined the effect of iMRI on BM resection. This retrospective study was conducted at the neurosurgical center of the University Hospital of the Technical University of Munich and involved 25 patients with BM who underwent resection using 3-Tesla iMRI between 2018 and 2022. Volumetric measurements of the resected contrast-enhancing metastases were performed using preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative MRI images. The Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) and neurological status of the patients were assessed pre- and postoperatively. Local recurrence and in-brain progression were reported in patients who underwent follow-up MRI at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. In this cohort (n = 25, mean age 63.6 years), non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was the most common origin (28%). The mean surgical duration was 219.9 min, and that of iMRI was 61.7 min. Indications for iMRI were primarily associated with preoperative imaging, suggesting an unclear entity that is often suspicious for glioma. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 21 patients (84%). Continued resection was pursued after iMRI in six cases (24%), resulting in an improved EOR of 100% in five cases and 97.6% in one case. Neurological status postoperatively remained stable in 60%, improved in 24%, and worsened in 16% of patients. No wound healing or postoperative complications were observed. Among the thirteen patients who underwent follow-up MRI 3 months postoperatively, one patient showed local recurrence at the site of resection, and seven patients showed in-brain progression. Of the eight patients who underwent a 6-month follow-up MRI, two showed local recurrence, while three exhibited in-brain progression. The observed favorable profiles of GTR, coupled with the notable absence of wound-healing problems and acute postoperative complications, affirm the safety and feasibility of incorporating iMRI into the neurosurgical workflow for resecting BM with specific indications. The real-time imaging capabilities of iMRI offer unparalleled precision, aiding meticulous tumor delineation and informed decision-making, ultimately contributing to improved patient outcomes. Although our experience suggests the potential benefits of iMRI as a safe tool for enhancing EOR, we acknowledge the need for larger prospective clinical trials. Comprehensive investigations on a broader scale are imperative to further elucidate the specific indications for iMRI in the context of BMs and to study its impact on survival. Rigorous prospective studies will refine our understanding of the clinical scenarios in which iMRI can maximize its impact, guiding neurosurgeons toward more informed and tailored decision-making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: A model predicting responders to corticosteroid switch during abiraterone therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer is warranted. The model using logistic regression was developed in a cohort of 67 and validated in another cohort of 42 patients. The use of this model is easy and all needed parameters are available from routine laboratory and history of patients. The overall accuracy was 92%. Multivariate analysis revealed that responsiveness was a marker of longer treatment duration and overall survival. For non-responders a new systemic treatment was indicated. Background: The aim was to elaborate a predictive model to find responders for the corticosteroid switch (from prednisolone to dexamethasone) at the first prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression (≥25% increase) during abiraterone acetate (AA) treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. Methods: If PSA has decreased (≥25%) after switch, patients were considered responders. Logistic regression of 19 dichotomized parameters from routine laboratory and patients' history was used to find the best model in a cohort of 67 patients. The model was validated in another cohort of 42 patients. Results: The model provided 92.5% and 90.5% accuracy in the testing and the validation cohorts, respectively. Overall the accuracy was 91.7%. The AUC of ROC curve was 0.92 (95% CI 0.85–0.96). After a median follow-up of 27.9 (26.3–84) months, the median AA+dexamethasone treatment duration (TD) in non-responders and responders was 4.7 (3.1–6.5) and 11.1 (8.5–12.9) months and the median overall survival (OS) was 23.2 (15.6–25.8) and 33.5 (26.1–38) months, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression revealed that responsiveness was an independent marker of TD and OS. Conclusions: A high accuracy model was developed for mCRPC patients in predicting cases which might benefit from the switch. For non-responders, induction of the next systemic treatment is indicated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Aquaporins (AQPs) have emerged as potential predictors of response to cancer therapy and as targets for increasing sensitivity to treatment. However, systemic therapeutic inhibition using pan-AQP or AQP-specific inhibitors has not been characterized for efficacy in treating breast cancer or as a component of combination treatment. We evaluated AQP inhibition using established AQP inhibitors in cytotoxicity and pharmacologic assays. This study identified AQPs as a targetable vulnerability in breast cancer. AQP inhibitors can increase therapeutic efficacy, both as single agents and in a combination therapy strategy, in treating breast cancer progression and metastasis. These results provide significant insights that support the future development of improved AQP inhibitors. AQPs contribute to breast cancer progression and metastasis. We previously found that genetic inhibition of Aqp7 reduces primary tumor burden and metastasis in breast cancer. In this study, we utilized two AQP inhibitors, Auphen and Z433927330, to evaluate the efficacy of therapeutic inhibition of AQPs in breast cancer treatment. The inhibitors were evaluated in breast cancer for both cytotoxicity and metabolic stability assays across both murine and human breast cancer cell lines. Both AQP inhibitors also affected the expression of other AQP transcripts and proteins, which demonstrates compensatory regulation between AQP family members. As a single agent, Auphen treatment in vivo extended overall survival but did not impact primary or metastatic tumor burden. However, Auphen treatment made cells more responsive to chemotherapy (doxorubicin) or endocrine treatment (tamoxifen, fulvestrant). In fact, treatment with Tamoxifen reduced overall AQP7 protein expression. RNA-seq of breast cancer cells treated with Auphen identified mitochondrial metabolism genes as impacted by Auphen and may contribute to reducing mammary tumor progression, lung metastasis, and increased therapeutic efficacy of endocrine therapy in breast cancer. Interestingly, we found that Auphen and tamoxifen cooperate to reduce breast cancer cell viability, which suggests that Auphen treatment makes the cells more susceptible to Tamoxifen. Together, this study highlights AQPs as therapeutic vulnerabilities of breast cancer metastasis that are promising and should be exploited. However, the pharmacologic results suggest additional chemical refinements and optimization of AQP inhibition are needed to make these AQP inhibitors appropriate to use for therapeutic benefit in overcoming endocrine therapy resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) arise in non-lymphoid tissues due to inflammation or cancer and play a key role in adaptive immune responses. In this study, we analyzed the TLS maturity in 78 patients with pathological T4 colorectal cancer (CRC). Mature TLS, identified by organized T (CD3+) and B (CD20+) lymphocytes with Ki-67-positive B cells, have been linked to microsatellite instability and improved cancer-specific and post-recurrence survival. High tumor Ki-67 expression correlated with poorer outcomes. The absence of mature TLS independently predicted poor survival. Tumors with mature TLS showed a higher infiltration of CD3+ T cells, FOXP3+ T cells, and CD86+ immune cells, including M1-like macrophages. Focusing on the Ki-67 expression pattern, the simultaneous evaluation of TLS maturity and tumor proliferation potency is suggested to be a potential prognostic indicator in CRC. Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) are complex lymphocyte clusters that arise in non-lymphoid tissues due to inflammation or cancer. A mature TLS with proliferating germinal centers is associated with a favorable prognosis in various cancers. However, the effect of TLS maturity on advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unexplored. We analyzed the significance of TLS maturity and tumor Ki-67 expression in surgically resected tumors from 78 patients with pathological T4 CRC. Mature TLS was defined as the organized infiltration of T and B cells with Ki-67-positive proliferating germinal centers. We analyzed the relationship between TLS maturity and intratumoral immune cell infiltration. Mature TLS with germinal center Ki-67 expression was associated with microsatellite instability and improved survival; however, high tumor Ki-67 expression was associated with poor survival in the same cohort. Multivariate analysis identified the absence of mature TLS as an independent predictor of poor post-recurrence overall survival. Intratumoral infiltration of T lymphocytes and macrophages was significantly elevated in tumors with mature TLS compared to those lacking it. High Ki-67 levels and absent mature TLS were identified as poor prognostic factors in advanced CRC. Mature TLS could serve as a promising marker for patients at high-risk of CRC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The adrenal glands represent a frequent localization area for metastases of various primary tumors. The standard of care for treating adrenal metastases is currently surgical resection, but radiotherapy is becoming a feasible and well-tolerated treatment alternative. However, the literature shows contradictory results regarding the optimal local treatment for adrenal metastases. This study analyzed oncological outcomes (local control, progression free survival, and overall survival) and complication rates after stereotactic body radiotherapy or surgical resection of adrenal metastases to further asses the benefits of stereotactic body radiotherapy. To our knowledge, this analysis is the first direct comparison of stereotactic body radiotherapy and adrenalectomy for adrenal metastases. Background: This single-center retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity profiles of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and surgical resection in patients with adrenal metastases originating from solid tumors. Methods/Materials: Patients with advanced tumor conditions or comorbidities typically received SBRT, whereas those considered physically fit underwent standard surgical treatment. Endpoints included local control (LC), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and complication rates (CR). Results: 41 patients with 48 adrenal metastases were included, with 27 (65.9%) patients receiving SBRT and 14 (34.1%) patients undergoing adrenalectomy. One- and two-year LC values were 100% for both periods after adrenalectomy, and 70.0% and 52.5% after SBRT (p = 0.001). PFS showed values of 40.2% and 32.1% at one and two years after adrenalectomy and of 10.6% for both periods after SBRT (p = 0.223). OS was 83.3% both one and two years after surgery and 67.0% and 40.2% after SBRT (p = 0.031). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding acute complications (p = 0.123). Conclusion: Despite potential confounders, adrenalectomy exhibited statistically significant superior LC and OS compared to SBRT in managing adrenal metastases, while both treatment methods displayed acceptable toxicity profiles. However, patient selection bias must be taken into account when directly comparing the two therapy modalities. Nevertheless, the study provides new and important results for the scientific and medical communities regarding oncological outcomes after SBRT or surgical resection of adrenal metastases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma have a poor prognosis. Enfortumab vedotin, administered after cisplatin-based chemotherapy and followed by immune checkpoint inhibitors, is widely known to prolong overall survival (OS). However, the predictive factors of enfortumab vedotin treatment that prolong OS remain unclear. In this study, patients who received enfortumab vedotin with shrinking tumors showed a significant increase in OS compared to those who received chemotherapy other than enfortumab vedotin or those who did not receive any treatment. Multivariate analysis identified neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and dysgeusia as potential predictors of OS. Patients without these factors had a significantly prolonged OS compared to those with both factors. In real-world practice, enfortumab vedotin therapy is effective for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Randomized phase III trial results have demonstrated enfortumab vedotin (EV), an antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) consisting of an anti-Nectin-4 human IgG1 monoclonal antibody and monomethyl auristatin E, is a useful treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) that progressed after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies. This multicenter retrospective cohort study aimed to identify predictive factors for the efficacy of EV therapy and prolonged overall survival (OS) of patients in clinical practice. This study included patients with la/mUC who received ICI treatment. Patients who subsequently received EV treatment, those who received non-EV chemotherapy, and those who received no treatment were defined as EV, non-EV, and best supportive care (BSC) groups, respectively. The median OS was 20, 15, and 7 months in the EV, non-EV, and BSC groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Patients with la/mUC who had a complete or partial response after EV treatment had a significantly prolonged OS compared with those with stable or progressive disease. Univariate analysis showed age, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), dysgeusia, and rash as independent predictors of OS improvement. NLR and dysgeusia were independent predictors of OS after EV in multivariate analysis. Patients without these factors had a significantly prolonged OS compared to those with both factors. In real-world practice, EV therapy is an effective treatment for patients with la/mUC after ICI treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Brain metastases (BMs) are common in cancer patients, and stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) is a preferred treatment. This retrospective study analyzed patients treated with SRT for a single BM and compared two subgroups: "Cohort 1" (no cerebral re-irradiation) and "Cohort 2" (received subsequent SRT sessions for recurrence). Patients treated with SRT for a single BM between January 2010 and June 2020 were included. Cohort 1 had 152 patients, and Cohort 2 had 46 patients. Cohort 2 had younger patients with higher Karnofsky performance status (KPS). Median overall survival was longer in Cohort 2 (21.8 months) compared to Cohort 1 (6.1 months). Recurrence rates were higher in Cohort 2 (p < 0.001), likely due to patient selection and longer survival. Age and KPS were predictive of survival, especially for patients under 65 with KPS > 80. Age and KPS predict better survival in patients with BMs. Background: Brain metastases (BMs) frequently occur in cancer patients, and stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) is a preferred treatment option. In this retrospective study, we analyzed patients treated by SRT for a single BM during their first SRT session and we compared two subgroups: "Cohort 1" with patients did not undergo cerebral re-irradiation and "Cohort 2" with patients received at least one subsequent SRT session for cerebral recurrence. Methods: We included patients who received SRT for a single BM between January 2010 and June 2020. Cohort 1 comprised 152 patients, and Cohort 2 had 46 patients. Results: Cohort 2 exhibited younger patients with higher Karnofsky performance status (KPS). Median overall survival was considerably longer in Cohort 2 (21.8 months) compared to Cohort 1 (6.1 months). Local and cerebral recurrence rates were significantly higher in Cohort 2 (p < 0.001), attributed to patient selection and longer survival. The combined score of age and KPS proved to be a predictive factor for survival, with patients under 65 years of age and KPS > 80 showing the best survival rates in the overall population. Conclusion: This retrospective study highlights that the combined score of age and KPS can predict better survival, especially for patients under 65 years with a KPS score above 80. Further research involving larger and more diverse populations is essential to validate and expand upon these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains a challenging cancer to treat, especially when patients do not respond to initial immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. This systematic review aims to identify effective second-line treatments for patients who have failed first-line ICI therapy. By analyzing 27 studies involving 1970 patients, we found that both VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and ICIs can be beneficial as second-line treatments, with VEGFR TKIs showing slightly higher response rates. The findings from this research could guide oncologists in personalizing treatment strategies, ultimately improving outcomes for patients with metastatic RCC. Introduction: There is a significant gap in the literature concerning the effective management of second-line therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who have received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Most of the published articles were small multicenter series or phase 2 studies. To our knowledge, a systematic review that comprehensively outlines the range of treatment options available for patients with metastatic RCC who do not respond to first-line ICIs has not yet been conducted. Our aim was to synthesize evidence on second-line therapies for patients with metastatic RCC after initial treatment with ICIs and to offer recommendations on the best treatment regimens based on the current literature. Material and Methods: We conducted a search in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library on 29 February 2024, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We selected articles that met the predetermined inclusion criteria (written in English, retrospective observational studies, prospective series, and randomized trials reporting second-line therapy for metastatic RCC after failure of ICI-based therapy). Relevant articles were identified in the reference lists. The main endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR), with the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) as secondary endpoints. Results: We included 27 studies reporting the outcomes of 1970 patients. Salvage therapies were classified as targeted therapy (VEGFR TKIs) in 18 studies and ICIs in 8 studies. In studies where TKIs were the second line of choice, the pooled ORR was 34% (95% CI: 30.2–38%). In studies where ICIs, alone or in combination with TKIs, were used as second-line therapies, the ORR was 25.7% (95% CI: 15.7–39.2%). In studies where TKIs and ICIs were the second-line choices, the pooled median PFS values were 11.4 months (95% CI: 9.5–13.6 months) and 9.8 months (95% CI: 7.5–12.7 months), respectively. Conclusions: This systematic review shows that VEGFR TKIs and ICIs are effective second-line therapies following an initial treatment with anti-PD(L)1 alone or in combination. The treatment choice should be personalized, taking into account the patient's response to first-line ICIs, the site of the disease, the type of first-line combination (with or without VEGFR TKIs), and the patient's overall condition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This retrospective database review of Danish real-world patients with asymptomatic melanoma brain metastases (MBM) treated with first-line ipilimumab and nivolumab demonstrates a similar complete response (CR), Progression-Free Survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) rates when compared to previously published phase II trials. Combination immunotherapy using ipilimumab/nivolumab is the golden standard treatment for patients with melanoma and asymptomatic brain metastases (MBM). However, it remains uncertain if real-world patients have the same treatment effects compared to patients enrolled in clinical trials. The aim of this study was to compare clinical benefits between real-world patients and patients enrolled in clinical trials when administering ipilimumab/nivolumab in treatment-naive patients with asymptomatic MBM. Using data from the Danish Metastatic Melanoma Database (DAMMED), 79 patients with clinical parameters similar to the inclusion criteria from two phase II trials, the ABC and the CheckMate-204 trials, were included in the analyses. Thirteen patients (16.5%) achieved complete response (CR) and an overall response rate (ORR) of 46.9%. We found an overall 6-month Progression-Free Survival (PFS) rate of 53.5% and a median PFS of 6.5 months. Median overall survival (mOS) was not reached during the 5-year follow-up. These results were comparable to the phase II trials. In conclusion, clinical benefits from phase II studies were comparable to Danish real-world data regarding OS, PFS, and CR. Confirming that combination immunotherapy can be recommended as first-line treatment for patients with asymptomatic, treatment-naive melanoma brain metastases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Based on this study, we define a new biomarker termed lymphocyte-to-albumin ratio (LAR) that may predict the prognosis for patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with immunotherapy. This study aims to determine the relationship of the LA index with patients' survival rate through studying the records of 227 patients who were treated with nivolumab after one or multiple cycles of chemotherapy. Therefore, the results showed that a higher LA index is significantly related to better overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Overall, the LA index deserves its merit of being a simple, cost-effective, noninvasive method applicable in NSCLC immunotherapy as a clinically practical tool for predicting treatment outcomes. Objective: Immunotherapies are commonly employed for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, predictive biomarkers still need to be improved to predict responses to these agents. The lymphocyte–albumin (LA) laboratory index has not been evaluated before in this patient group. The aim of this study was to analyze the relation between the LA index and the survival rate of metastatic NSCLC patients who had immunotherapy after at least one round of chemotherapy. Methods: The research included 227 patients diagnosed with metastatic NSCLC, who were administered nivolumab after at least one round of chemotherapy. The LA index was calculated by multiplying lymphocyte count and albumin concentration. The optimal threshold values for the index were established by the examination of the ROC curve for both overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Oncological data were obtained retrospectively from patient files, and survival analyses were performed. Results: The median follow-up was 7.9 months. Progression was observed in 129 (56.9%) patients. A total of 97 (42.7%) patients died during the follow-up. The cutoff values of the LA index to predict OS and PFS were determined as 52.87 and 57.67, respectively. The low-LA group had significantly lowered OS and PFS compared to the high-LA group. LA was found to be an independent prognostic factor for PFS (hazard ratio 4.47; 95% confidence interval, 2.73–7.34; p < 0.001) and OS (hazard ratio 6.24; 95% confidence interval, 3.46–11.25; p < 0.001) in the multivariate regression analysis. Conclusions: In this study, we observed that the LA index independently predicts OS and PFS in immunotherapy-treated metastatic NSCLC patients. Its ease of application, low cost, and noninvasive nature make it a potential guide for clinicians in predicting treatment responses and survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy (HITHOC) is an intraoperative and topical administration of chemotherapeutic drugs with simultaneous warming of the thoracic cavity. This procedure was first described by Spratt in 1980 as a thermal transfusion infiltration system, performed on canine models to treat malignant effusions of metastatic abdominal cancers. The main tumors causing malignant pleural effusion, which have been seen to benefit from hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy, are mesothelioma, thymic malignancies and lung cancer: despite the high prevalence of MPE in patients with metastatic breast and ovarian cancers, there are still inadequate data on the use of HITHOC as a treatment option for these malignancies. Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is a rare but aggressive thoracic tumor with a poor prognosis. Multimodal treatment—including induction chemotherapy, aggressive surgical resection, radiotherapy and immunotherapy in selected cases—currently represents the best therapeutic option. Single-center studies advocate hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy (HITHOC) during surgical resection as an additional therapeutic option, although its impact on post-operative morbidity and survival has not yet been evaluated on a larger scale. HITHOC can be applied not only in the case of mesothelioma, but also in the case of thymoma with pleural involvement or—in very selected cases—in patients with secondary pleural metastases. Despite favorable outcomes and reduced clinical risks, there is no uniform approach to HITHOC, and a wide variety of indications and technical applications are still reported. Based on available data, HITHOC seems to offer a clear benefit in regard to overall survival of all mesothelioma patients; however, multicenter randomized controlled trials are required to validate and standardize this approach. The aim of this review is to focus on the present role of HITHOC in thoracic tumors with pleural involvement as well as on future challenges, particularly in the light of possible combined therapy of thoracic tumors still presenting poor prognoses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This study examines the validity of the NETest, a blood biomarker, in patients with small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms (Si-NENs). Two groups were studied: those with metastatic Si-NENs (Group 1) and those without macroscopic disease, post-operatively (Group 2). In Group 1, results showed that NETest scores were associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in metastatic Si-NENs. Factors including tumour growth rate (TGR), elevated chromogranin A (CgA) levels, and presence of lung metastases were also predictive of PFS or OS. In Group 2, NETest monitoring after surgery may have potential in helping to predict early local or metastatic disease recurrence. This study suggests potential benefits of using NETest alongside other predictors for Si-NEN management. Further research with longer follow-up periods is needed to confirm the utility of the NETest. Current biomarkers do not adequately predict the behaviour of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). This study assessed the NETest, a multianalyte blood biomarker, in patients with small intestinal NENs (Si-NENs). We studied two patient groups: Group 1: metastatic Si-NENs (n = 102) and Group 2: post-operatively disease-free according to 68Ga-DOTATATE PET (n = 16). NETest scores were ≤20% (normal), 21–40% (low), 41–79% (intermediate), or ≥80% (high). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. In Group 1, the median NETest score was 40% (IQR: 33.3–46.7%). The NETest value (HR: 1.032, 95% CI: 1.003–1.062, p = 0.033) and high-risk NETest category (HR: 10.5, 95% CI: 1.35–81.7, p = 0.025) were independent predictors of PFS, along with presence of lung metastases, CgA levels > 10 × ULN, and tumour growth rate (TGR). Independent predictors of OS were the NETest value (HR: 1.035, 95% CI: 1.005–1.066, p = 0.024) and high-risk NETest category (HR: 15.2, 95% CI: 1.52–151, p = 0.02), along with presence of lung metastases and CgA levels > 10 × ULN. In Group 2, ROC analysis identified an AUC of 0.909 (95% CI: 0.75–0.100) for prediction of local or metastatic recurrence. Blood NETest scores were associated with PFS and OS in patients with metastatic Si-NENs, along with TGR, CgA > 10 × ULN, and presence of lung metastases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Brain metastases are a major challenge for patients with HER2+ breast cancer. Traditional treatments, like radiotherapy, can help but often cause severe side effects and may not provide lasting control. Researchers are exploring new, more precise treatments, including antibodies, drug-antibody combinations, and small molecule drugs that can better penetrate the brain. These new therapies have shown promise in clinical trials, helping to control brain tumors more effectively and with fewer side effects than radiotherapy. The goal of this review is to improve treatments for HER2+ breast cancer patients who develop brain metastases, enhancing their survival rates and quality of life. The findings from this research could significantly impact the medical community by offering better alternatives to radiotherapy and improving how brain metastases are managed. This progress could provide new hope for patients facing this challenging condition and potentially transform treatment strategies in the future. Brain metastases (BM) pose a significant challenge in the management of HER2+ breast cancer since almost 50% of patients with HER2+ breast cancer develop brain tumors. The complex process of brain metastases involves genetic mutations, adaptations and mechanisms to overcome the blood–brain barrier. While radiotherapy is still fundamental in local therapy, its use is associated with cognitive adverse effects and limited long-term control, necessitating the exploration of alternative treatments. Targeted therapies, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and antibody–drug conjugates, offer promising options for HER2+ breast cancer patients with BM. Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of these agents in controlling tumor growth and improving patient outcomes, posing the question of whether radiotherapy is always the unique choice in treating this cancer. Ongoing research into novel anti-HER2 antibodies and innovative combination therapies holds promise for advancing treatment outcomes and enhancing patient care in this clinical scenario. This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of traditional medical treatments, molecularly targeted therapy and investigational agents in the management of HER2+ breast cancer with BM, highlighting the evolving landscape and potential future directions in treatment strategies to improve patient survival and quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This study investigates the prognostic value of C-reactive protein (CRP) kinetics in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M-HNSCC) treated with checkpoint inhibitors (CPI). We analyzed data from 44 patients treated between 2018 and 2023, applying two existing CRP classifications and developing a new one. While the existing classifications did not correlate with overall survival (OS), our novel CRP kinetic classification showed a significant association with OS (p = 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified our CRP classification (p = 0.007) and the outcome of the first re-staging (p = 0.002) as independent prognostic factors. These findings suggest that our new CRP kinetic classification could serve as a valuable prognostic marker for R/M-HNSCC patients undergoing CPI therapy, though further validation with larger patient cohorts is needed. Introduction The kinetic of C-reactive protein (CRP) in the early phase of therapy with checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) and its prognostic value has already been investigated in several tumor entities. In particular, flare dynamics have been described as a positive prognostic parameter. The aim of this retrospective study is to examine the extent to which such an application can also be transferred to patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region (R/M-HNSCC). Material and Methods All patients treated with CPI for R/M-HNSCC at our clinic between 2018 and 2023 were included (n = 44). Demographic, clinical, histopathologic and laboratory data were extracted from the digital patient records and statistically analyzed. We then examined the CRP kinetic using two previously published classifications and proposed a new classification ourselves. Subsequently, correlation analyses were performed with the overall survival (OS) of the patients. Results Of the two CRP kinetic classifications previously published, only one showed a correlation with the result of the first re-staging, and neither showed a correlation with the OS of R/M-HNSCC patients. Our new CRP kinetic classification showed a significant association with OS in R/M-HNSCC patients (p = 0.05). In a multivariate analysis, our CRP kinetic classification (p = 0.007) and the outcome of the first re-staging (p = 0.002) were significant independent factors for OS. Discussion Our novel CRP kinetic classification significantly correlates with OS in R/M-HNSCC patients, indicating a potential prognostic marker. Existing classifications from other cancer entities showed limited prognostic significance, emphasizing the need for tailored markers. For validation, however, testing on larger R/M-HNSCC patient collectives is necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Y-90 Selective Internal Radiotherapy (SIRT) uses injectable radioactive microspheres to treat inoperable liver metastases. It is poorly understood how the effective local control of small-volume metastatic disease with Y-90 SIRT may improve patient survival. Here, we demonstrate that failure to locally control liver metastases with ytrritum-90 (Y-90) SIRT is associated with worse 1-year overall survival for patients with ≤5 metastases, emphasizing the importance of disease control in those with early metastatic disease. Y-90 Selective Internal Radiotherapy (SIRT) is an ablative therapy used for inoperable liver metastasis. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the impact of local control after SIRT on overall survival (OS) in oligometastatic patients. A retrospective, single-institution study identified oligometastatic patients with ≤5 non-intracranial metastases receiving unilateral or bilateral lobar Y-90 SIRT from 2009 to 2021. The primary endpoint was OS defined from Y-90 SIRT completion to the date of death or last follow-up. Local failure was classified as a progressive disease at the target lesion(s) by RECIST v1.1 criteria starting at 3 months after SIRT. With a median follow-up of 15.7 months, 33 patients were identified who had a total of 79 oligometastatic lesions treated with SIRT, with the majority histology of colorectal adenocarcinoma (n = 22). In total, 94% of patients completed the Y-90 lobectomy. Of the 79 individual lesions treated, 22 (27.8%) failed. Thirteen patients received salvage liver-directed therapy following intrahepatic failure; ten received repeat SIRT. Median OS (mOS) was 20.1 months, and 12-month OS was 68.2%. Intralesional failure was associated with worse 1 y OS (52.3% vs. 86.2%, p = 0.004). These results suggest that intralesional failure following Y-90 may be associated with inferior OS, emphasizing the importance of disease control in low-metastatic-burden patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Recently, numerous treatments have been approved for patients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer. These combinations prolong survival compared to chemotherapy, which is generally considered the standard of care. Since direct head-to-head comparisons between these innovative treatments are not available, our analysis was aimed at performing indirect comparisons among these agents, including chemotherapy as a common comparator. In handling these indirect comparisons, our study used an innovative evidence-based method (the IPDfromKM technique) that reconstructs individual patient data from published clinical trials. Overall survival was the endpoint of our analysis. Our results showed that enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab was the most effective treatment at levels of statistical significance. The combinations of a PD(L)-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy ranked second, while monotherapies with a PD(L)-1 inhibitor ranked third. One strength of this analysis is represented by the large number of different treatments that were evaluated and compared to each other. Background: Patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial cancer have been conventionally treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Recently, numerous new treatments have been proposed to improve overall survival (OS) and reduce adverse effects, but no direct head-to-head comparisons among these agents are available. Methods: The treatments evaluated in our analyses included (a) monotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI); (b) combinations of an ICI with chemotherapy; and (c) combinations of an ICI with other drugs. Using OS as the endpoint, a series of indirect comparisons were performed to rank the most effective regimens against both chemotherapy and each other. Our analysis was based on the application of an artificial intelligence software program (IPDfromKM method) that reconstructs individual patient data from the information reported in the graphs of Kaplan–Meier curves. Results: A total of five studies published in six articles were included. In our main analysis, nivolumab plus chemotherapy showed better OS compared to chemotherapy (HR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.59–0.82), while durvalumab plus tremelimumab showed no OS benefit (HR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.82–1.11). More interestingly, enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab significantly prolonged OS compared to both chemotherapy alone (HR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.45–0.63) and nivolumab plus chemotherapy (HR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.60–0.97). Discussion and conclusion: Among new treatments for locally advanced and metastatic urothelial cancer, enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab showed the best efficacy in terms of OS. Our results support the use of this combination as a first-line treatment in this setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Advancements in immune, targeted, and regional therapies have emerged in the past fifteen years in the management of high-risk, advanced, and metastatic melanomas. Rare melanoma variants include acral, mucosal, uveal, and desmoplastic melanoma. Though underrepresented in larger landmark trials for modern therapeutic options, results from these trials have been extrapolated and applied in the management of these rarer subtypes of melanoma. This article aims to review the current treatment recommendations for acral, mucosal, uveal, and desmoplastic melanomas. Rare histologic subtypes of melanoma, including acral, mucosal, uveal, and desmoplastic melanomas, only make up 5% of all diagnosed melanomas and are often underrepresented in large, randomized trials. Recent advancements in systemic therapy have shown marked improvement in pathologic response rates, improving progression-free and overall survival among cutaneous melanoma patients, but there are limited data to demonstrate improved survival among rarer subtypes of melanoma. Acral melanoma has a poor response to immunotherapy and is associated with worse survival. Mucosal melanoma has a large variability in its presentation, a poor prognosis, and a low mutational burden. Uveal melanoma is associated with a high rate of liver metastasis; recent adoption of infusion and perfusion therapies has demonstrated improved survival among these patients. Desmoplastic melanoma, a high-risk cutaneous melanoma, is associated with high locoregional recurrence rates and mutational burden, suggesting this melanoma may have enhanced response to immunotherapy. While these variants of melanoma represent distinct disease entities, this review highlights the clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment recommendations for each of these rare melanomas and highlights the utility of modern therapies for each of them. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: In the following study, we aimed to analyze the characteristics, treatment modalities, and outcomes of patients with brain metastases (BMs) from thyroid cancer. To achieve this, from a total of 4320 thyroid cancer patients recorded in our institutional database over a 30-year period, data on 20 patients with brain metastases were retrospectively collected and analyzed. While thyroid cancer patients generally have a favorable prognosis, those with BMs often face a poorer outlook, marked by shorter survival times. Patients who experienced a longer interval (more than 24 months) between the diagnosis of thyroid cancer and the appearance of BMs had significantly better overall survival (OS). Surgical resection, combined with multidisciplinary adjuvant treatment, is essential for managing patients with BMs from thyroid cancer. Intracranial metastases from thyroid cancer are rare. Although the prognosis of thyroid cancer patients is generally favorable, the prognosis of patients with intracranial metastases from thyroid cancer has been considered unfavorable owing to lower survival rates among such patients compared to those without intracranial involvement. Many questions about their management remain unclear. The aim of the present study was to analyze the characteristics, treatment modalities, and outcomes of patients with brain metastases from thyroid cancer. Among 4320 patients with thyroid cancer recorded in our institutional database over a 30-year period, the data of 20 patients with brain metastasis were retrospectively collected and analyzed. The clinical characteristics, histological type of primary cancer and metastatic brain tumor, additional previous distant metastasis, treatment modalities, locations and characteristics on radiologic findings, time interval between the first diagnosis of primary thyroid cancer and brain metastasis, and survival were analyzed. Among our patient cohort, the mean age at initial diagnosis was 59.3 ± 14.1 years, and at the manifestation of diagnosis of cerebral metastasis, the mean age was found to be 64.8 ± 14.9 years. The histological types of primary thyroid cancer were identified as papillary in ten patients, follicular in seven, and poorly differentiated carcinoma in three. The average interval between the diagnosis of thyroid cancer and brain metastasis was 63.4 ± 58.4 months (range: 0–180 months). Ten patients were identified as having a single intracranial lesion, and ten patients were found to have multiple lesions. Surgical resection was primarily performed in fifteen patients, and whole-brain radiotherapy, radiotherapy, or tyrosine kinase inhibitors were applied in the remaining five patients. The overall median survival time was 15 months after the diagnosis of BMs from TC (range: 1–252 months). Patients with thyroid cancer can develop brain metastasis even many years after the diagnosis of the primary tumor. The results of our study demonstrate increased overall survival in patients younger than 60 years of age at the time of diagnosis of brain metastasis. There was no difference in survival between patients with brain metastasis from papillary carcinoma and those with follicular thyroid carcinoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Adrenal metastases are frequent in solid malignancies such as lung cancer and melanoma. Recent studies support the use of ablative local therapies in oligometastatic or oligoprogressive patients. Online adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy improves tumor coverage and organ-at-risk sparing compared to non-adaptive radiotherapy. However, clinical data, especially the long-term results of this promising technique, are still limited. We here report the long-term outcomes of a large single-center cohort. (1) Background: Recent publications foster stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with adrenal oligometastases or oligoprogression. However, local control (LC) after non-adaptive SBRT shows the potential for improvement. Online adaptive MR-guided SBRT (MRgSBRT) improves tumor coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing. Long-term results of adaptive MRgSBRT are still sparse. (2) Methods: Adaptive MRgSBRT was performed on a 0.35 T MR-Linac. LC, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and toxicity were assessed. (3) Results: 35 patients with 40 adrenal metastases were analyzed. The median gross tumor volume was 30.6 cc. The most common regimen was 10 fractions at 5 Gy. The median biologically effective dose (BED10) was 75.0 Gy. Plan adaptation was performed in 98% of all fractions. The median follow-up was 7.9 months. One local failure occurred after 16.6 months, resulting in estimated LC rates of 100% at one year and 90% at two years. ORR was 67.5%. The median OS was 22.4 months, and the median PFS was 5.1 months. No toxicity > CTCAE grade 2 occurred. (4) Conclusions: LC and ORR after adrenal adaptive MRgSBRT were excellent, even in a cohort with comparably large metastases. A BED10 of 75 Gy seems sufficient for improved LC in comparison to non-adaptive SBRT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: In the present study, the intraoperative fluorescence of brain metastases after the administration of 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) is investigated in 80 cases. Brain metastases fluoresced in 57.5% of cases, with no significant correlation between fluorescence and primary tumor or histological subtype. Complete resection of brain metastases was detected in 82.5%, of which 56.1% were fluorescence positive, compared to 43.9% which were non-fluorescent. Thus, prior administration of 5-ALA tended to improve the resectability rate by 12.1%. Fluorescence-positive and -negative metastases showed significantly different overall survival in this study. Therefore, administration of 5-ALA as a surgical adjuvant may be beneficial in resecting brain metastases and may potentially optimize the surgical procedure. (1) Background: In this study, the intraoperative fluorescence behavior of brain metastases after the administration of 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) was analyzed. The aim was to investigate whether the resection of brain metastases using 5-ALA fluorescence also leads to a more complete resections and thus to a prolongation of survival; (2) Methods: The following variables have been considered: age, sex, number of metastases, localization, involvement of eloquent area, correlation between fluorescence and primary tumor/subtype, resection, and survival time. The influence on the degree of resection was determined with a control MRI within the first three postoperative days; (3) Results: Brain metastases fluoresced in 57.5% of cases. The highest fluorescence rates of 73.3% were found in breast carcinoma metastases and the histologic subtype adenocarcinoma (68.1%). No correlation between fluorescence behavior and localization, primary tumor, or histological subtype was found. Complete resection was detected in 82.5%, of which 56.1% were fluorescence positive. There was a trend towards improved resectability (increase of 12.1%) and a significantly longer survival time (p = 0.009) in the fluorescence-positive group; (4) Conclusions: 5-ALA-assisted extirpation leads to a more complete resection and longer survival and can therefore represent a low-risk addition to modern surgery for brain metastases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: For patients with solid tumor brain metastases that progress after whole-brain radiotherapy, there are limited treatment options. The aim of our prospective trial was to examine the usage of bevacizumab as salvage therapy in this specific patient population, with primary endpoints being radiologic response, survival, safety, and quality of life. Our data show that bevacizumab was well tolerated, maintained quality of life, and improved overall survival with radiologic response. Patients with solid tumor brain metastases that progress after whole-brain radiation have limited options. This prospective trial investigated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of bevacizumab as salvage therapy in this population. Eligible patients received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks until progression. The primary endpoint was radiologic response using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria. The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response, and safety. Quality of life (QOL) was studied using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br) scale. Twenty-seven patients were enrolled, with twenty-four having evaluable data for response. The majority of histologies (n = 21, 78%) were breast cancer. The remaining histologies were non-small-cell lung cancer (n = 4, 15%), neuroendocrine cancer (n = 1, 3%), and papillary fallopian serous adenocarcinoma (n = 1, 3%). Eighteen patients had radiologic response, with two patients demonstrating partial response (8.33%) and sixteen patients demonstrating stable disease (66.7%). The median duration of response was 203 days. PFS at 6 months was 46%, median PFS was 5.3 m, and median OS was 9.5 m. Treatment was well tolerated, with six patients experiencing grade 3 lymphopenia and hypertension. There was one grade 3 thromboembolism. QOL was not negatively impacted. Bevacizumab is a safe and feasible salvage treatment with durable response and favorable overall survival for patients with progressive brain metastases after whole-brain radiation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive, MRI-guided procedure that causes localized tissue hyperthermia. This results in the ablation of targeted cells and disruption of the blood–brain barrier. LITT offers an alternative treatment option to standard-of-care resection for glioma in addition to potentially enhancing drug delivery of adjuvant therapy. Here, we present the first meta-analysis since the fifth edition of the WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System (WHO CNS5) to assess the current literature on the safety and efficacy of LITT in the upfront treatment of primary brain tumors. This study summarizes the current relevant literature on LITT and supports its viability as a treatment option for glioblastoma and IDH-mutant astrocytoma. Although primary studies have reported the safety and efficacy of LITT as a primary treatment in glioma, they are limited by sample sizes and institutional variation in stereotactic parameters such as temperature and laser power. The current literature has yet to provide pooled statistics on outcomes solely for primary brain tumors according to the 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System (WHO CNS5). In the present study, we identify recent articles on primary CNS neoplasms treated with LITT without prior intervention, focusing on relationships with molecular profile, PFS, and OS. This meta-analysis includes the extraction of data from primary sources across four databases using the Covidence systematic review manager. The pooled data suggest LITT may be a safe primary management option with tumor ablation rates of 94.8% and 84.6% in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and IDH-mutant astrocytoma, respectively. For IDH-wildtype GBM, the pooled PFS and OS were 5.0 and 9.0 months, respectively. Similar to rates reported in the prior literature, the neurologic and non-neurologic complication rates for IDH-wildtype GBM were 10.3% and 4.8%, respectively. The neurologic and non-neurologic complication rates were somewhat higher in the IDH-mutant astrocytoma cohort at 33% and 8.3%, likely due to a smaller cohort size. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The optimal radiotherapy (RT) dose for tracheobronchial adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) remains unclear due to its scarcity. This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of dose-escalated RT for primary tracheobronchial ACC by dividing patients into groups of either low (<70.0 Gy EQD2) or high (≥70.0 Gy EQD2) RT doses. In the definitive RT group, the high-dose group showed better local control and survival rates compared to the low-dose group. The treatment related toxicities were the trachea or main bronchus stenosis. Dose-escalated RT may be effective for the definitive treatment of tracheobronchial ACC. Primary tracheobronchial adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignancy, so the optimal radiotherapy (RT) dose remains unestablished. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of dose-escalated RT for primary tracheobronchial ACC. We retrospectively reviewed 48 patients who had undergone definitive or postoperative RT. Patients classified into the low- and high-dose groups received RT doses <70.0 and ≥70.0 Gy in EQD2, respectively. The primary endpoint was freedom from local progression (FFLP) and overall survival (OS). Throughout the follow-up period, seven patients (14.6%) experienced local progression, while 31 (64.6%) exhibited distant metastasis, most commonly in the lungs. In total, the 5-year FFLP and OS rates were 85.7 and 84.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that regional lymph node metastasis at diagnosis and receipt of definitive RT were associated with poorer OS. In the subgroup analysis, the definitive RT group had a 5-year FFLP rate of 33.3 and 78.2% in the low- and high-dose groups (p = 0.065), whereas 5-year OS rates were 66.7 and 79.0%, respectively (p = 0.022). Four patients (8.3%) experienced Grade 3 toxicity with tracheal or main bronchus stenosis. Dose-escalated RT with conventional fractionation may be effective in patients with tracheobronchial ACC, especially for a definitive aim. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Pediatric patients with recurrent and metastatic cancers often present with substantial tumor and symptom burden. Local control is an important factor to consider in this setting. Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) offers a therapeutic advantage with higher, ablative doses potentially providing durable local control and a shorter fractionation schedule allowing minimum interruptions in systemic therapy and disruption in quality of life. In this study, we evaluate the outcomes of pediatric patients treated with SABR. We observed that SABR is well tolerated with local failure rates of <10% at 1 year and a median survival of 16.9 months. Patients with oligometastatic disease had a better survival rate than patients with widely metastatic disease, suggesting that the total consolidation of all metastatic sites in patients with a limited metastatic burden may be associated with better survival outcomes. Higher local control was associated with a higher radiation dose and sarcoma histology. Future studies evaluating SABR in combination with systemic therapy are warranted. Background: Pediatric patients with metastatic and/or recurrent solid tumors have poor survival outcomes despite standard-of-care systemic therapy. Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) may improve tumor control. We report the outcomes with the use of SABR in our pediatric solid tumor population. Methods: This was a single-institutional study in patients < 30 years treated with SABR. The primary endpoint was local control (LC), while the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. The survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier estimates in R v4.2.3. Results: In total, 48 patients receiving 135 SABR courses were included. The median age was 15.6 years (interquartile range, IQR 14–23 y) and the median follow-up was 18.1 months (IQR: 7.7–29.1). The median SABR dose was 30 Gy (IQR 25–35 Gy). The most common primary histologies were Ewing sarcoma (25%), rhabdomyosarcoma (17%), osteosarcoma (13%), and central nervous system (CNS) gliomas (13%). Furthermore, 57% of patients had oligometastatic disease (≤5 lesions) at the time of SABR. The one-year LC, PFS, and OS rates were 94%, 22%, and 70%, respectively. No grade 4 or higher toxicities were observed, while the rates of any grade 1, 2, and 3 toxicities were 11.8%, 3.7%, and 4.4%, respectively. Patients with oligometastatic disease, lung, or brain metastases and those who underwent surgery for a metastatic site had a significantly longer PFS. LC at 1-year was significantly higher for patients with a sarcoma histology (95.7% vs. 86.5%, p = 0.01) and for those who received a biological equivalent dose (BED10) > 48 Gy (100% vs. 91.2%, p = 0.001). Conclusions: SABR is well tolerated in pediatric patients with 1-year local failure and OS rates of <10% and 70%, respectively. Future studies evaluating SABR in combination with systemic therapy are needed to address progression outside of the irradiated field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Over the last decade, early-onset colorectal cancer incidence has continued to increase. The disparities in outcomes and overall survival (OS) between early-onset colorectal cancer and average-onset colorectal cancer remain controversial. The aim of our study was to compare survival rates and identify potential influential factors affecting outcomes between these two groups. Our results show better overall survival and cancer specific survival in patients with early-onset colorectal cancer which could be contributed to better general health, fewer comorbidities and higher likelihood of receiving aggressive cancer treatments. Background: Early-onset colorectal cancer (EO-CRC) is defined as colorectal cancer diagnosed before the age of 50 years, and its incidence has been increasing over the last decade, now accounting for 10% of all new CRC diagnoses. Average-onset colorectal cancer (AO-CRC) has shown a steady decline in its incidence and related mortality over the past 20 years. The disparities in outcomes and overall survival (OS) between EO-CRC and AO-CRC are controversial. Our study compared OS and cause-specific survival (CSS) between metastatic EO-CRC (mEO-CRC) and metastatic AO-CRC (mAO-CRC) and identified the associated factors. Methods: Data on patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, incidence, and mortality were obtained from the SEER database from 2010 to 2020. We identified 23,278 individuals aged > 18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of all histological subtypes of metastatic CRC (M1 on TNM stage) using ICD-O-3 site codes. mEO-CRC and mAO-CRC were compared. OS distributions and CCS were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test to assess differences. A Cox regression model was used to assess the associations between variables. Results: mEO-CRC constituted 17.79% of the cases, whereas 82.21% had mAO-CRC. Most patients with mEO-CRC were 45–49 years old (47.66%), male (52.16%) and White (72.57%) and had adenocarcinoma histology (87.30%). Left colon tumors were most prevalent in both groups (40.26%) but were more prevalent in mEO-CRC patients than in mAO-CRC patients (49.63% vs. 38.23%, p < 0.001). Patients with mEO-CRC had higher OS (p < 0.001) and CSS (p < 0.001) than those with mAO-CRC. Patients with mEO-CRC also had significantly better median overall survival (30 months vs. 18 months, p < 0.001). The factors associated with worse OS included mAO-CRC (p < 0.001), mucinous adenocarcinoma (p < 0.001), male sex (p = 0.003), and a lack of surgical intervention (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Most patients with mEO-CRC fall within the range of 45 to 49 years of age. Patients with mEO-CRC were more likely to receive cancer-directed therapy (including chemotherapy and radiotherapy) and had better OS and CSS than those with mAO-CRC. This is likely attributable to the better performance status, fewer comorbidities, and better tolerance to cancer-directed therapy in mEO-CRC patients. The factors associated with worse OS and CSS were age > 50 years, mucinous adenocarcinoma, male sex, and no surgical treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) of the tubular gastrointestinal tract are rare and associated with worse clinical outcomes. Data from 10,387 patients were collected from the SEER database with a median age of 63 years. The most common primary tumor site was the small intestine. women had a superior 5-year survival rate. Age > 65 years, descending colon and anorectal sites were associated with worse prognosis. Surgical intervention and tumors located in the small intestine and appendix showed a better prognosis. Background: Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) of the tubular gastrointestinal tract (GI-NECs) are rare and associated with worse clinical outcomes. This population-based study aims to highlight key demographics, clinicopathological factors, and survival outcomes in the US population. Methods: Data from 10,387 patients with GI-NECs were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database from 2000 to 2020. Results: Most patients were >40 years old at the time of presentation with a median age of 63 years old, with almost equal ethnic distribution per US population data. The most common primary tumor site was the small intestine (33.6%). The metastatic spread was localized in 34.8%, regional in 27.8%, and distant in 37.3% of cases, and the liver was the most common site of metastasis (19.9%) in known cases of metastases. Most NEC patients underwent surgery, presenting the highest 5-year overall survival of 73.2% with a 95% confidence interval (CI) (95% CI 72.0–74.4%), while chemotherapy alone had the lowest 5-year survival of 8.0% (95% CI 6.4–10.0%). Compared to men, women had a superior 5-year survival rate of 59.0% (95% CI 57.6–60.5%). On multivariate analysis, age > 65 (HR 2.49, 95% CI 2.36–2.54%, p ≤ 0.001), distant metastasis (HR 2.57, 95% CI 2.52–2.62%, p ≤ 0.001), tumor size > 4 mm (HR 1.98, 95%, CI 1.70–2.31%, p ≤ 0.001), esophageal (HR 1.49, 95% CI 0.86–2.58%, p ≤ 0.001), transverse colon (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.15–3.33%, p ≤ 0.01), descending colon (HR 2.12, 95% CI 1.12, 3.97%, p = 0.02) anorectal sites, and liver or lung metastases were associated with worse survival. Surgical intervention and tumors located in the small intestine or appendix showed a better prognosis. Conclusion: GI-NECs are a group of rare malignancies associated with a poor prognosis. Therefore, epidemiological studies analyzing national databases may be the best alternative to have a more comprehensive understanding of this condition, assess the impact of current practices, and generate prognosis tools. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The VELOUR randomized phase III trial established aflibercept (an anti-angiogenic targeting VEGF-A, VEGF-B, and placenta growth factor) combined with FOLFIRI as an effective treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) failing a prior oxaliplatin-based regimen. This real-world study mandated by Polish Health Authorities aimed at assessing the benefits/risks of aflibercept plus FOLFIRI prescribed to Polish patients with mCRC according to reimbursement criteria. The activity of aflibercept plus FOLFIRI in such patients was confirmed, and no new safety signal was reported. Background: This was an observational study prospectively evaluating the effectiveness and safety of aflibercept/FOLFIRI administered in second-line mCRC per the reimbursement criteria in Poland. Methods: Consecutive mCRC patients who progressed with first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy received aflibercept (4 mg/kg IV) followed by FOLFIRI every 2 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); overall survival (OS) and safety were the secondary endpoints. Results: A total of 93 patients were treated at 17 Polish sites. A median of 10 cycles was administered. Over a median treatment duration of 5.3 months, median PFS and median OS were 8.4 months [95% CI, 6.9–9.9] and 27.0 months [95% CI, 23.9–30.1], respectively. There was no significant impact of primary tumor location, metastatic site, or KRAS status on PFS and OS. Main grade ≥ 3 adverse events were neutropenia (16%), hypertension (8%), diarrhea (4%), and stomatitis (4%). Conclusions: The benefits/risks of Aflibercept plus FOLFIRI administered per the Polish reimbursement criteria in second-line treatment of mCRC after failure of a prior oxaliplatin-based regimen is confirmed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Talimogene laherparepvec (TVEC), a modified virus, is a local injected therapy that has been demonstrated to be an effective treatment in patients with advanced melanoma. Recent reports have suggested that radiation treatment (RT) may activate the immune system when combined with TVEC to further improve both local and systemic responses. However, studies on the combined effect of TVEC and RT remain limited. Here, we reviewed twenty melanoma patients who had received TVEC and RT (fourteen patients to the same region and six patients to different regions of the body) and found a benefit in progression-free survival (PFS) and time to distance metastasis (DM) with a combined regional approach of TVEC and RT. These results suggest that the regional approach of using these two treatment modalities may confer a therapeutic benefit. Talimogene laherparepvec (TVEC) is a genetically modified oncolytic herpes simplex virus (HSV-1) that is used for the intralesional treatment of advanced or metastatic melanoma. Given that TVEC produces the granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), recent reports have suggested that radiation treatment (RT) given in conjunction with TVEC may provide synergistic immune activation at the site, and possibly systemically. However, studies on combining RT with TVEC remain limited. We conducted a retrospective review of melanoma patients from a single cancer center who received TVEC and RT in the same region of the body and compared them to patients who received TVEC with RT at another site (other than the site of TVEC injection). Between January 2015 and September 2022, we identified twenty patients who were treated with TVEC and RT; fourteen patients received TVEC and RT in the same region, and six had treatments in separate regions. Regions were determined at the time of analysis and were based on anatomic sites (such as arm, leg, torso, etc.). Kaplan–Meier analysis of progression-free survival (PFS), analyses of time to distant metastasis (DM), overall survival (OS), and locoregional control (LRC), and the corresponding log-rank test were performed. With a median follow-up of 10.5 months [mos] (range 1.0–58.7 mos), we found an improvement in PFS with TVEC and RT in the same region compared to different regions, which were 6.4 mos (95% CI, 2.4–NR mos) and 2.8 mos (95% CI, 0.7–4.4 mos), respectively; p = 0.005. There was also a significant improvement in DM when TVEC and RT were used in the same region compared to different regions: 13.8 mos (95% CI, 4.6–NR mos) and 2.8 mos (95% CI, 0.7–4.4 mos), respectively (p = 0.001). However, we found no difference in overall survival (OS) between patients who had TVEC and RT in the same region (19.0 mos, 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.1–not reached [NR] mos) and those who received treatments in different regions (18.5 mos, 95% CI, 1.0–NR mos); p = 0.366. There was no statistically significant improvement in locoregional control (LRC) in patients who had TVEC and RT in the same region was 26.0 mos (95% CI, 6.4–26.0 mos) compared to patients who received TVEC and RT in different regions (4.4 mos) (95% CI, 0.7–NR mos) (p = 0.115). No grade 3 or higher toxicities were documented in either group. Overall, there were improvements in PFS and DM when TVEC and RT were delivered to the same region of the body compared to when they were used in different regions. However, we did not find a significant difference in locoregional recurrence or OS. Future studies are needed to assess the sequence and timing of combining RT and TVEC to potentially enhance the immune response both locally and distantly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The evaluation of therapeutic approaches over a decade at a tertiary cancer center in Germany was undertaken due to the frequent and critical discussions surrounding the selection of chemotherapy regimens and the incorporation of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in the management of limited disease small cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC). We found significant differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between patients treated with carboplatin and etoposide (CP) and those treated with cisplatin and etoposide (EP), with EP showing better outcomes. Concomitant chemotherapy was also associated with improved PFS and OS. Notably, PCI was found to significantly improve OS and showed a trend towards improved PFS. Female patients had better OS, and the type of chemotherapy and PCI remained independent predictors of survival. This research provides valuable insights into treatment patterns, outcomes, and survival predictors for LD-SCLC, emphasizing the importance of personalized treatment approaches and the potential benefits of PCI. However, the study's retrospective nature and sample-size limitations should be considered, highlighting the need for further prospective studies in this field. In this study, we investigated the outcomes and factors influencing treatment efficacy in 93 patients with limited disease small cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC), with a median age of 64 years. We focused on the impact of chemotherapy regimens, prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI), and patient-related variables. The median follow-up for OS was 17.3 months. We observed a statistically significant difference in PFS between LD-SCLC patients treated with cisplatin and etoposide (EP) and those treated with carboplatin and etoposide (CP) (PFS: EP 13.63 months vs. CP 6.54 months, p < 0.01). Patients treated with EP had better overall survival (OS) than CP-treated patients (OS: EP 26.9 months vs. CP 16.16 months, p < 0.01). Concomitant chemotherapy was associated with improved PFS (p = 0.003) and OS (p = 0.002). Patients receiving PCI showed superior OS (p = 0.05) and a trend towards improved PFS (p = 0.057). Female gender was associated with better OS (p = 0.025). Most patients had an ECOG performance status of 0 (71%). This real-world study underscores the importance of multidisciplinary LD-SCLC management, emphasizing the roles of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and PCI. These findings inform personalized treatment strategies and emphasize the need for prospective trials to validate these results and optimize LD-SCLC treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Radiation-associated sarcomas pose a significant clinical challenge due to their complexity, aggressiveness, and poor prognosis. Our retrospective study is one of the largest descriptions of radiation-associated sarcomas, aiming to shed light on their clinicopathologic characteristics and highlight treatment approaches. Our research found a significant association between high radiation-associated sarcoma histologic grade and inferior clinical outcomes. We also found that localized radiation-associated sarcoma patients who underwent margin-negative resections lived significantly longer than their counterparts. Our analysis thus confirms the paramount role of tumor grade and the central importance of margin-negative oncologic resection in determining clinical outcomes for radiation-associated sarcomas. Radiation-associated sarcomas (RASs) are rare tumors with limited contemporary data to inform prognostication and management. We sought to identify the clinical presentation, patterns of care, and prognostic factors of RASs. RAS patients treated at a single institution from 2015 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed for clinicopathologic variables, treatment strategies, and outcomes. Thirty-eight patients were identified with a median follow-up of 30.5 months. The median age at RAS diagnosis was 68.4 years (27.9–85.4), with a median latency from index radiotherapy (RT) of 9.1 years (3.7–46.3). RAS histologies included angiosarcoma (26%), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (21%), and osteosarcoma (18%). Most were high-grade (76%). Genomic profiling revealed low tumor mutational burden, frequent inactivating TP53 mutations (44%), CDKN2A deletions (26%), and MYC amplifications (22%), particularly in breast angiosarcomas. Of 38 patients, 33 presented with localized disease, 26 of whom were treated with curative intent. Overall, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.5 months (1.4–34.7), and the overall survival (OS) was 11.1 months (0.6–31.6). Patients with localized vs. metastatic RASs had a longer PFS (HR, 3.0 [1.1–8.5]; p = 0.03) and OS (HR, 3.0 [1.04–8.68]; p = 0.03). Among localized RAS patients, high grade was associated with shorter OS (HR, 4.6 [1.04–20.30]; p = 0.03) and resection with longer OS (mean 58.8 vs. 6.1 months, HR, 0.1 [0.03–0.28]; p < 0.001). Among patients undergoing resection, negative margins were associated with improved OS (mean 71.0 vs. 15.5 months, HR, 5.1 [1.4–18.2]; p = 0.006). Patients with localized disease, particularly those undergoing R0 resection, demonstrated significantly better outcomes. Novel strategies are urgently needed to improve treatment outcomes in this challenging group of diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide, with a significant number of patients presenting with liver metastases at diagnosis. The best treatment currently involves the surgical removal of these metastases, yet the optimal timing and method for this surgery are still debated among experts. Our analysis revealed no significant difference in overall survival and disease-free survival between a simultaneous surgery approach and a "bowel-first" approach, while a better 5-year overall survival (5-OS) was found when comparing the former to a "liver-first" approach. However, simultaneous surgeries are associated with a higher risk of perioperative mortality, suggesting that staged surgery might be more beneficial for high-risk patients. This emphasizes the need for personalized treatment plans. Our findings also suggest that anatomic and non-anatomic resections offer similar long-term survival benefits, highlighting the potential for more conservative surgeries to preserve liver function without compromising the effectiveness of cancer treatment. Surgical resection is the gold standard for treating synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). The resection of the primary tumor and metastatic lesions can follow different sequences: "simultaneous", "bowel-first", and "liver-first". Conservative approaches, such as parenchymal-sparing surgery and segmentectomy, may serve as alternatives to major hepatectomy. A comprehensive search of Medline, Epistemonikos, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was conducted. Studies evaluating patients who underwent surgery for CRLM and reported survival results were included. Other secondary outcomes were analyzed, including disease-free survival, perioperative complications and mortality, and recurrence rates. Quality assessment was performed using the AMSTAR-2 method. No significant differences in overall survival, disease-free survival, and secondary outcomes were observed when comparing simultaneous to "bowel-first" resections, despite a higher rate of perioperative mortality in the former group. The 5-year OS was significantly higher for simultaneous resection compared to "liver-first" resection. No significant differences in OS and DFS were noted when comparing "liver-first" to "bowel-first" resection, or anatomic to non-anatomic resection. Our umbrella review validates simultaneous surgery as an effective oncological approach for treating SCRLM, though the increased risk of perioperative morbidity highlights the importance of selecting suitable patients. Non-anatomic resections might be favored to preserve liver function and enable future surgical interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Angiosarcoma is a rare type of soft tissue sarcoma with a progressive and unpredictable disease course. Currently, surgery is the only well-defined treatment option. Adjuvant oncological treatment remains inconclusive. In effort to provide evidence for improved management and follow-up, the purpose of this study was to assess treatment outcomes and identify prognostic factors. We identified a nation-wide cohort of 154 patients with complete follow-up. Adjuvant oncological treatment did not benefit overall survival, risk of metastasis, or recurrence. Cutaneous tumors, surgery, and negative margin showed improved overall survival, yet without reducing the risk of recurrence and metastasis, resulting in a grave overall survival rate. Angiosarcoma is a rare aggressive and understudied soft tissue sarcoma with pending evidence-based treatment guidelines due to varying study cohorts and inconsistent outcome measures. Surgery with wide resection is currently considered to be the cornerstone in management. In a population-based cohort identified from Danish National Health Registers between 2000 and 2017, this study aimed to define prognostic factors in patients with newly diagnosed soft tissue angiosarcoma. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis demonstrated 5-year overall survival of 28%. Competing risk analysis demonstrated cumulative incidence of local recurrence of 30% and metastasis of 43%. Multivariable Cox models among 154 included patients demonstrated age above 60 years and metastasis to be independently associated with worse overall survival. Cutaneous tumors, surgery, and negative resection margin were independently associated with improved overall survival. Adjuvant oncological treatment did not improve overall survival, risk of metastasis, or recurrence. Negative margin was not associated with lower risk of recurrence and metastasis. We conclude that, despite demonstrated improved survival after surgery with wide resection, overall survival remains poor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapy is a standard first- or later-line of treatment for HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Real-world studies provide valuable addition to pivotal trials by including a heterogeneous patient population, particularly subgroups that are often underrepresented (e.g., elderly patients). This study retrospectively collected data on the efficacy and safety of abemaciclib in a real-world patient population. The safety and efficacy of the treatment were consistent with the pivotal studies, including in elderly patients. Comparable survival outcomes were observed between the first two lines of treatment. Additionally, metastatic disease survival was greatly prolonged, exceeding 5 years compared to historical data. The study provides further reassurance that dose reductions do not affect survival. The safety profile of abemaciclib was consistent with previous findings, and no new adverse events (AEs) were identified. Although abemaciclib was well tolerated in elderly patients, the careful monitoring and management of AEs is still warranted. (1) Background: Abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy is a standard first- or later-line of treatment for HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to describe the outcomes of patients treated in a real-world setting, with particular focus on elderly patients. (2) Patients and methods: Patients treated with abemaciclib between November 2019 and February 2022 were included in the study. Data were collected from electronic medical records. The primary objective was to determine real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), and secondary objectives included median overall survival (mOS) and safety. (3) Results: Analysis included 134 patients, with a median follow-up of 42 months. Median age was 62 years, with 29.9% aged 70+ years. A total of 51.5% of patients received abemaciclib in first-line, predominantly with aromatase inhibitor (68.1%). Median rwPFS was 21 in first-line and 20 months in the second-line, with no significant difference between treatment lines (HR 0.96; p = 0.88). Patients treated in the third- or later-line had a significantly shorter rwPFS, at 7 months (HR 1.48, p = 0.003). mOS was not reached in the first-line setting. For second- and third- or later-lines, mOS was 29 and 19 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in mOS between first- or second-line (HR 1.37, p = 0.36). In the 70+ group, median rwPFS was 15 months and mOS was 25 months with no significant difference compared to younger patients (rwPFS HR 1.1; p = 0.65; OS HR 1.4; p = 0.21). Most common adverse events (AEs) were diarrhoea (68.7%), anaemia (64.9%), and increased serum creatinine (63.4%). Grade 3/4 AEs were reported in 21.6% of patients. Dose reductions occurred in 30.6% of patients and were more frequent in patients 70+ (40%) compared to younger patients (28%); the difference was not significant (p = 0.22). At study cut-off, 64.9% of patients discontinued abemaciclib, primarily due to disease progression (73.5%). (4) Conclusions: Our study provides valuable insights into the effectiveness and safety of abemaciclib for the treatment of MBC. We observed comparable outcomes in terms of rwPFS and OS between the first two lines, suggesting consistent effectiveness across treatment lines. In addition, our findings suggest that older age (70+) does not significantly impact the effectiveness and tolerability of abemaciclib, although the careful monitoring and management of AEs are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Pembrolizumab monotherapy remains the first-line standard of care for patients with metastatic NSCLC and a PD-L1 tumor proportion score ≥ 50%. However, although other real-world studies have been published, long-term follow-up data on progression-free survival, overall survival, treatment response, and safety in a large cohort of patients are still lacking. We evaluated these outcomes in a cohort of 880 patients treated with first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy in 16 Italian centers. We also analyzed the prognostic impact of variables such as age, sex, histology, PD-L1 expression, ECOG, habitual smoking, and the presence of brain metastases. Median PFS and OS were 8.6 and 25.5 months, respectively, consistent with the results of Keynote-024. According to univariate analysis, it was determined that PD-L1 expression, ECOG, and habitual smoking had an impact on PFS, while age, sex, ECOG, histology, and habitual smoking had an impact on OS. However, results from univariate analysis should be considered with caution. Results from the phase III Keynote-024 clinical trial established pembrolizumab monotherapy as the first-line standard of care for patients with metastatic NSCLC who have PD-L1 expression ≥ 50%, EGFR, and ALK wild-type tumors. However, given the differences between patients treated in routine clinical practice and those treated in a clinical trial, real-world data are needed to confirm the treatment benefit in standard practice. Given the lack of data on large cohorts of patients with long follow-ups, we designed an observational retrospective study of patients with metastatic NSCLC who were treated with pembrolizumab, starting from its reimbursement eligibility until December 2020. The primary endpoints were PFS and OS, determined using the Kaplan–Meier method. Response and safety were also evaluated. We followed 880 patients (median follow-up: 35.1 months) until February 2022. Median PFS and OS were 8.6 months (95% CI: 7.6–10.0) and 25.5 months (95% CI: 21.8–31.6), respectively. We also found that ECOG PS, PD-L1 expression, and habitual smoking were prognostic factors for PFS, while age, sex, ECOG PS, habitual smoking and histology had an impact on OS. Multivariable analysis confirms the prognostic role of PD-L1 for PFS and of ECOG for both PFS and OS. 39.9% of patients reported an adverse event, but only 6.3% of patients discontinued therapy due to toxicity. Our results suggest a long-term benefit of pembrolizumab in the first-line setting, as well as a safety profile consistent with the results of Keynote-024. Many collected variables appear to influence clinical outcome, but results from these exploratory unadjusted analyses should be interpreted with caution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer is an aggressive cancer with an average survival of 8 to 13 months. However, survival varies significantly among patients. We studied a large group of women in the National Cancer Database to better understand these survival differences. We found that the key factors influencing survival were comorbidity score (overall health status), histology (cancer subtype), number of metastatic sites (extent of cancer spread), and whether or not they received chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Our study's findings can help better predict survival based on an individual's specific factors and guide treatment strategies. Background: Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is aggressive with poor median overall survival (OS) ranging from 8 to 13 months. There exists considerable heterogeneity in survival at the individual patient level. To better understand the survival heterogeneity and improve risk stratification, our study aims to identify the factors influencing survival, utilizing a large patient sample from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Methods: Women diagnosed with metastatic TNBC from 2010 to 2020 in the NCDB were included. Demographic, clinicopathological, and treatment data and overall survival (OS) outcomes were collected. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to estimate OS. The log-rank test was used to identify OS differences between groups for each variable in the univariate analysis. For the multivariate analysis, the Cox proportional hazard model with backward elimination was used to identify factors affecting OS. Adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals are presented. Results: In this sample, 2273 women had a median overall survival of 13.6 months. Factors associated with statistically significantly worse OS included older age, higher comorbidity scores, specific histologies, higher number of metastatic sites, presence of liver or other site metastases in those with only one metastatic site (excluding brain metastases), presence of cranial and extra-cranial metastases, lack of chemotherapy, lack of immunotherapy, lack of surgery to distant sites, lack of radiation to distant sites, and receipt of palliative treatment to alleviate symptoms. In the multivariate analysis, comorbidity score, histology, number of metastatic sites, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy had a statistically significant effect on OS. Conclusions: Through NCDB analysis, we have identified prognostic factors for metastatic TNBC. These findings will help individualize prognostication at diagnosis, optimize treatment strategies, and facilitate patient stratification in future clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]