Search

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases (BM) occur in up to 50% of patients (pts) with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and are associated with high morbidity and mortality. While the treatment outcomes of patients (pts) without BM are largely determined by their extra-cranial activity, the outcomes of pts with BM are also influenced by the treatment’s activity in the central nervous system (CNS). TKI-based regimens, have been incorporated into the management of pts with HER2+ MBC. This systematic review aims to assess the clinical outcomes of in pts with or without BM treated with TKI-containing regimens vs those treated with non-TKI-containing regimens. METHODS: A systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and conference proceedings (ASCO, SABCS, ESMO, and ESMO Breast) up to June 20, 2021, was conducted to identify randomized clinical trials (RCT) comparing systemic therapies with anti-HER2 TKI-containing regimens and non-TKI-regimens in pts with HER2+ MBC (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021252332). Studies were screened for the availability of data on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in subgroups of pts with and without BM at baseline. A random-effect model was used to calculate PFS and OS, reported as pooled hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The Higgins I2 index was used to evaluate the heterogeneity between studies. To assess whether the pooled HRs estimates were stable or strongly dependent on one or few studies, sensitivity analyses were conducted by interactively recalculating the pooled HRs estimates after exclusion of each single study. RESULTS: Of 1,671 identified records, 5 RCT were included involving 2,437 pts (490 with and 1,947 without BM at baseline). Intervention arms included tucatinib, lapatinib, pyrotinib or afatinib in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy ± trastuzumab; control arms included cytotoxic chemotherapy ± trastuzumab or T-DM1. No trial evaluating neratinib met inclusion criteria. All trials allowed the inclusion of pts with stable and asymptomatic BM, while one (HER2CLIMB) also included pts with progressing/untreated BM. Previous treatment with trastuzumab was reported in 92.8% (n=2,262) of the pts. Regarding PFS, a non-statistically significant trend favoring TKI-containing regimens was observed both in pts with BM (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.41-1.12, p=0.13) and without BM (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.24-1.26, p=0.16). Substantial heterogeneity was detected in both subgroups (I2 = 64.4%, p=0.024 and I2 = 95.6%, p 0.001, respectively). Sensitivity analysis, excluding each study one by one, demonstrated a significant PFS benefit favoring TKI-containing regimens in pts with BM after the exclusion from the analysis of afatinib (Lux-Breast1), a non-HER2-specific TKI (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.35-0.90, p=0.016), with no significant heterogeneity (I2 = 46.9%, p=0.13). Regarding OS, a non-statistically significant trend favoring non-TKI regimens was observed both in pts with BM (HR 1.28, 95% CI 0.48-3.40, p=0.62) and without BM (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.53-1.98, p=0.94). Substantial heterogeneity was detected in both subgroups (I2 = 86.8%, p=0.001 and I2 = 85.7%, p=0.008, respectively). Sensitivity analysis showed no significant impact on OS after exclusion of each study one by one. No publication bias was detected by Egger’s test. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest a similar magnitude of OS and PFS benefit from anti-HER2 TKI-containing regimens in pts with or without BM. Sensitivity analysis including only trials that evaluated regimens containing tucatinib, lapatinib or pyrotinib demonstrated a significant PFS benefit favoring TKI-containing regimens in pts with BM, emphasizing the relevance of CNS involvement for the interpretation of the results of studies evaluating this class of agents. Citation Format: Guilherme Nader-Marta, Diogo Martins-Branco, Elisa Agostinetto, Marco Bruzzone, Marcello Ceppi, Matteo Lambertini, Nuria Kotecki, Ahmad Awada, Evandro de Azambuja. Efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in the treatment of patients with HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer with or without brain metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-21-03.

Background: Our prior analysis of the MONARCH2/3 trials showed no difference in progression-free survival rates according to BMI in patients treated with abemaciclib and endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (Franzoi et al, JNCI 2021). However, a statistically inferior overall response rate with abemaciclib and endocrine therapy was observed in patients with BMI ≥25. In the present study, we examined the impact of baseline BMI on mean KI67% changes, achievement of complete cell cycle arrest (CCCA) and clinical and radiological responses in patients included in the phase II NEOMONARCH trial, which randomized patients to receive a 2-week initial treatment with either abemaciclib, letrozole, or abemaciclib and letrozole followed by 14 weeks of the combination of abemaciclib and letrozole as neoadjuvant therapy for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer patients. Patients and methods: This is an exploratory, individual patient-level, post-hoc analysis of the NEOMONARCH study. Data was assessed through a research proposal submission in the Vivli platform. Patients were classified according to baseline BMI into underweight/normal weight (BMI Citation Format: Maria Alice Franzoi, Matteo Lambertini, Marcello Ceppi, Marco Bruzonne, Evandro de Azambuja. Implications of body mass index (BMI) on the biological and clinical effects of endocrine therapy and abemaciclib in the neoadjuvant setting [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-13-07.

Background: Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for oocyte/embryo cryopreservation before starting chemotherapy is standard of care for young women with breast cancer wishing to preserve fertility. However, some oncologists remain concerned on the safety of COS, particularly in patients with hormone-sensitive tumors. Moreover, limited evidence exists on the safety of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in breast cancer survivors after completion of anticancer treatments. Material and methods: A systematic literature review with no date restriction up to June 30, 2021 was conducted to identify studies reporting results of oncological outcomes in breast cancer patients and survivors who underwent COS or other ART compared to patients and survivors who did not access these techniques. From each included study, recurrence ratio, event-free survival (EFS) and mortality rate were extracted. Pooled relative risks (RRs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the random effects models. Results: Out of 15 included studies (n=4,643), 11 reported outcomes of patients who underwent COS for fertility preservation before starting chemotherapy, and 4 of survivors who underwent ART following anticancer treatment completion. Compared to women who did not receive fertility preservation at diagnosis (n=2,386), those who underwent COS (n=1,594) had reduced risk of recurrence (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.46-0.73) or mortality (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.38-0.76). No detrimental effect of COS on EFS was observed (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.55-1.06). A similar trend of better outcomes in terms of EFS was observed in women with hormone-receptor positive disease who underwent COS (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.20-0.65).Compared to women not exposed to ART following completion of anticancer treatments (n=540), those exposed to ART (n=123) showed a tendency for better outcomes in terms of recurrence ratio (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.17-0.70) and EFS (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.17-1.11). Conclusions: Despite including mostly retrospective studies, this meta-analysis suggests that accessing COS at diagnosis, also in hormone receptor-positive disease, or ART following treatment completion is not associated with detrimental prognostic effect in young women with breast cancer. These results are important to reassure patients and oncologists on the safety of these procedures to increase the chances of future conception. Citation Format: Luca Arecco, Eva Blondeaux, Marco Bruzzone, Marcello Ceppi, Maria Maddalena Latocca, Andrea Boutros, Camilla Marrocco, Maria Grazia Razeti, Maurizio Cosso, Stefano Spinaci, Margherita Condorelli, Claudia Massarotti, Lucia Del Mastro, Isabelle Demeestere, Matteo Lambertini. Safety of assisted reproductive technologies before and after anticancer treatments in young women with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD5-07.

Background: Young breast cancer patients (pts) carrying a germline BRCA mutation (mBRCA) have similar outcomes as non-carriers. However, there is currently lack of evidence regarding the impact of mBRCA type and hormone receptor status on clinical behavior and outcomes of mBRCA breast cancer. We aim to address these questions in the largest dataset to date of young mBRCA breast cancer pts. Methods: This was an international, multicenter, hospital-based, retrospective cohort study. Women harboring deleterious germline mBRCA1 or mBRCA2 that received a diagnosis of stage I-III invasive early breast cancer at age ≤40 years between January 2000 and December 2012 were included. Baseline pts, tumor, and treatment characteristics, pattern and risk over time of disease-free survival (DFS) events, and survival outcomes (DFS, distant recurrence-free interval [DRFI] and overall survival [OS]) were compared between mBRCA1 and mBRCA2 pts overall and by hormone receptor status. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare hazard rates (HRs). Results: 1,236 young mBRCA breast cancer pts were included. Among 808 and 428 pts with mBRCA1 or mBRCA2, respectively, 191 (23.6%) and 356 (83.2%) had hormone receptor-positive tumors while 617 (76.4%) and 72 (16.8%) hormone receptor-negative disease (p Conclusions: In this large unique dataset, young mBRCA1 breast cancer pts had worse DFS than those with mBRCA2 mostly due to higher rates of second primary malignancies. Hormone receptor positivity had no positive prognostic value in young mBRCA breast cancer pts with a trend towards worse DRFI in those with hormone receptor-negative disease. These results provide important information for counseling young mBRCA breast cancer pts regarding treatment, prevention and follow-up care strategies. Citation Format: Matteo Lambertini, Marcello Ceppi, Anne-Sophie Hamy, Olivier Caron, Philip D. Poorvu, Estela Carrasco, Albert Grinshpun, Kevin Punie, Christine Rousset-Jablonski, Alberta Ferrari, Shani Paluch-Shimon, Angela Toss, Claire Senechal, Fabio Puglisi, Katarzyna Pogoda, Jose Alejandro Pérez-Fidalgo, Laura De Marchis, Riccardo Ponzone, Luca Livraghi, Maria Del Pilar Estevez-Diz, Cynthia Villarreal-Garza, Maria Vittoria Dieci, Florian Clatot, Francois P. Duhoux, Rossella Graffeo, Luis Teixeira, Octavi Córdoba, Amir Sonnenblick, Arlindo R. Ferreira, Ann H. Partridge, Antonio Di Meglio, Claire Saule, Fedro A. Peccatori, Marco Bruzzone, Lucia Del Mastro, Lieveke Ameye, Judith Balmaña, Hatem A. Azim, Jr. Clinical behavior and outcomes of BRCA-mutated breast cancer in young patients according to type of BRCA mutation and hormone receptor status: Results from an international cohort study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD10-06.

Background: Pregnancy-related issues are a priority for young breast cancer (BC) patients. Increasing evidence has shown that pregnancy after prior BC diagnosis is feasible. Nevertheless, few BC survivors conceive following anticancer treatment completion and many physicians remain concerned about the potentially detrimental effects of pregnancy after BC in terms of fetal/obstetrical outcomes and maternal prognosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims at providing updated and solid evidence on these important issues. Methods: A systematic literature review up to January 31, 2020 with no language restriction was conducted to identify studies including patients with a pregnancy after prior BC diagnosis. Chances of pregnancy after BC, fetal and obstetrical outcomes, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Pooled relative risks (RRs), hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratio (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the random effects models. The study is registered with the PROSPERO registration number CRD42020158324. Results: Overall, 39 studies were included. Out of the 8,265,713 young women included in these studies, 8,093,401 were from the general population, 57,739 had cancers other than BC, 114,573 had BC. Among the 114,573 BC patients, 7,505 had a pregnancy after BC diagnosis and 107,068 did not. Compared to women from the general population, BC patients had 60% reduced chances of having a pregnancy following anticancer treatment completion (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.32-0.49). Among other cancer patients, only women with prior cervical cancer had lower pregnancy rates (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.31-0.35) than BC patients. Compared to the general population, BC survivors had significantly increased risks of low birth weight (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.31-1.73), small for gestational age (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01-1.33), preterm delivery (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.11-1.88) and caesarean section (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.04-1.25). No significant increased risk of congenital abnormalities (OR 1.63, 95% CI 0.89-2.98) or other pregnancy or delivery complications (spontaneous or induced abortion, gestosis, antepartum or postpartum hemorrhage) was observed. Prior chemotherapy exposure or short pregnancy interval (defined as Pregnancy after BC was not associated with a negative impact on patients’ outcomes. Compared to BC patients without subsequent pregnancy, those with pregnancy after BC had better OS (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.46-0.67) and DFS (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.56-0.94). Similar results were observed in the studies correcting for the potential “healthy mother effect” (OS: HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.42-0.65; DFS: HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58-0.96). No detrimental prognostic effect of pregnancy after BC was observed in patients with hormone-receptor positive disease (DFS: HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.73-1.66), while better outcomes were observed for those with hormone-receptor negative disease (DFS: HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55-0.95). The safety of pregnancy after BC was observed irrespective of BRCA status, nodal status, previous chemotherapy exposure, pregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes. Conclusions: This large meta-analysis provides solid evidence on the safety of pregnancy after prior BC diagnosis. The increased risk of fetal and obstetrical complications (but not of congenital abnormalities) calls for ensuring a closer monitoring of these pregnancies. The significantly reduced chances of conceiving as compared to the general population and other cancer patients should raise further awareness on the need to improve the oncofertility counseling of young BC patients wishing to complete their family planning following anticancer treatment completion. Citation Format: Eva Blondeaux, Marta Perachino, Marco Bruzzone, Richard A. Anderson, Evandro De Azambuja, Philip D. Poorvu, Hee Jeong Kim, Cynthia Villarreal-Garza, Barbara Pistilli, Ines Vaz-Luis, Cristina Saura, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Maria Alice Franzoi, Chiara Sertoli, Marcello Ceppi, Hatem A. Azim, Jr., Frederic Amant, Isabelle Demeestere, Lucia Del Mastro, Ann H. Partridge, Olivia Pagani, Fedro A. Peccatori, Matteo Lambertini. Chances of pregnancy after breast cancer, reproductive and disease outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS3-09.

Background: The number of people living with HIV is increasing worldwide thanks to the use of effective antiretroviral therapy. As these individuals get older, their risk of being diagnosed with cancer increases, including non-AIDS defining cancers such as breast cancer (BC). Most reports reveal that HIV+ patients (pts) with BC tend to be younger than HIV-uninfected (HIV-) pts. However, epidemiological data is yet conflicting regarding tumor stage at diagnosis, distribution of BC subtypes and overall survival (OS) of HIV+ pts as compared to HIV- pts. This meta-analysis aims to assess differences of baseline clinicopathological characteristics and OS of HIV+ vs HIV- BC pts. Methods: We performed a systematic review using MEDLINE, Scielo, and conference abstracts up to June 10, 2019, with no language restrictions. Cohort studies and consecutive series comparing baseline characteristics (age, stage at diagnosis or BC subtypes) and/or OS of HIV+ vs HIV- BC pts were included. BC subtypes were defined according to 2 classifications: 1) “classic” immunohistochemical (IHC) subtypes (ER+/HER2-; HER2+; triple-negative BC); 2) surrogate intrinsic subtypes as per the St. Gallen Consensus (luminal A-like, luminal B-like, HER2-enriched and basal-like). Summary risk estimates (pooled mean ratios [pMR] and odds ratios [pOR]) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random effects models. OS data were pooled as hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI and modeled using a random effects model. The main endpoints were age (as a continuous variable), stage at diagnosis (early [0-II] vs late [III-IV]), distribution of BC subtypes and OS (using both adjusted and unadjusted HR). Subgroup analysis of each endpoint was performed according to region of the world. Results: A total of 16 studies (4 from North America and 12 from Sub-Saharan Africa [SSA]) published from 2005-2019 were included in this meta-analysis (with 1,764 HIV+ and 1,330,122 HIV- pts). HIV+ pts were younger than HIV- pts (pooled mean age of 41.1 vs 50.5 years, respectively; pMR 0.82, 95% CI 0.76-0.90, p < 0.001) and had a 45% increased risk of presenting with late stage disease (pOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.25-1.68, p < 0.001). There were no differences regarding distribution of BC subtypes, both by the “classic” IHC or by the St. Gallen classification. Overall, HIV+ pts had a 91% increased risk of dying as compared to HIV- pts (adjusted HR for OS: 1.91, 95% CI 1.06-3.45, p = 0.031 and unadjusted HR for OS: HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.10-1.95, p = 0.008). Subgroup analysis of OS according to region of the world showed that, in North America, HIV+ pts had a significantly increased risk of dying as compared to HIV- pts (adjusted HR 2.96, 95% CI 1.06-8.25, p = 0.038). In SSA, the increased mortality risk among HIV+ pts was also significant (adjusted HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.26-2.00, p < 0.001). Sensitivity analysis showed similar findings. Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides for the first time a comprehensive comparison of baseline characteristics and survival outcomes between HIV+ vs HIV- BC pts. Our results consistently demonstrate that HIV+ pts are diagnosed with BC at a younger age and at a more advanced stage. Additionally, even after adjusting for known prognostic factors, HIV+ pts have a worse OS as compared to HIV- pts, not only in developing countries (SSA) but also and particularly in developed countries (North America). There were no apparent differences in terms of distribution of BC subtypes. These results should raise the awareness of clinicians and policy makers regarding the detection and survival gap among HIV+ BC pts. This underserved population should be the focus of more research efforts, in order to better understand the reasons behind these disparities, which can be related to the HIV infection itself, to a more aggressive BC biology, and/or to a lower access to timely diagnosis and effective treatment. Citation Format: Mariana Brandão, Marco Bruzzone, Maria Alice Franzoi, Claudia De Angelis, Daniel Eiger, Rafael Caparica, Martine Piccart-Gebhart, Laurence Buisseret, Marcello Ceppi, Evandro de Azambuja, Matteo Lambertini. Characteristics and survival outcomes of HIV-positive breast cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-11-03.

BACKGROUND: Young breast cancer (BC) survivors are at risk of infertility. Ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation before (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy is standard of care. Research efforts have shown no negative prognostic effect of pregnancy following BC therapy, also among BRCA carriers. Currently, poor evidence is available on the safety to undergo ART following BC treatment, with no data in carriers of germline BRCA pathogenic variants. To provide evidence on the safety of fertility treatments in this specific population, we assessed the outcomes of a cohort of BRCA-mutated BC survivors who had a pregnancy after prior BC history by comparing the group of patients who underwent ART to achieve pregnancy to the group with spontaneous pregnancy. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study across 30 centers worldwide including women diagnosed at ≤ 40 years with stage I-III BC, between January 2000 and December 2012, bearing germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. Survivors with a pregnancy (any outcome) after BC, with no disease-free survival (DFS) event before pregnancy, were assigned to the ART and non-ART group if their pregnancy was achieved through ART or spontaneously, respectively. ART procedures included ovulation induction, ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), and embryo transfer under hormonal replacement therapy (HRT). RESULTS: Of 1,424 patients registered in the study, 168 with a pregnancy after BC were included in the present analysis. A total of 22 patients were included in the ART group and 146 in the non-ART group. Before BC diagnosis, 18.2% patients in the ART group had at least one child, compared to 38.4% in the non-ART group (P=0.030). Patients had a median age at BC diagnosis of 33.0 vs 30.2 years old in the ART group and in the non-ART group, respectively (P=0.004); 45.4% and 17.1% had grade 1-2 tumors, respectively (P=0.008), and 59.1% vs 31.5% had hormone receptor-positive tumors, respectively (P=0.016). Both cohorts had similar tumor size and nodal stage characteristics. Type and duration of endocrine therapy were comparable between groups. The type of ART was not specified in 5 survivors (22.7%). Ovulation induction was used in 1 patient (4.5%), ovarian stimulation in 7 patients (31.8%), embryo transfer under HRT following oocyte donation in 5 patients (22.7%), and embryo transfer under HRT following oocyte and/or embryo cryopreservation for fertility preservation in 4 patients (18.2%). Median age at conception among survivors was 39.7 years in the ART group versus 35.4 years in the non-ART group (P Citation Format: Margherita Condorelli, Marco Bruzzone, Marcello Ceppi, Alberta Ferrari, Albert Grinshpun, Anne-Sophie Hamy, Evandro de Azambuja, Estela Carrasco, Fedro A. Peccatori, Antonio Di Meglio, Shani Paluch-Shimon, Philip D. Poorvu, Marta Venturelli, Christine Rousset-Jablonski, Claire Senechal, Luca Livraghi, Riccardo Ponzone, Laura De Marchis, Katarzyna Pogoda, Amir Sonnenblick, Cynthia Villarreal-Garza, Octavi Córdoba, Luis Teixeira, Florian Clatot, Kevin Punie, Rossella Graffeo Galbiati, Maria Vittoria Dieci, Alejandro Pérez-Fidalgo, Francois P. Duhoux, Fabio Puglisi, Arlindo R. Ferreira, Eva Blondeaux, Tamar Peretz-Yablonski, Olivier Caron, Claire Saule, Lieveke Ameye, Judith Balmaña, Ann H. Partridge, Hatem A. Azim, Jr, Isabelle Demeestere, Matteo Lambertini. Safety of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) following treatment completion in young women with germline BRCA pathogenic variants having a pregnancy after breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD5-06.

Background: Knowledge regarding risk of treatment-induced premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) is crucial for appropriate oncofertility counseling. While the gonadotoxicity of anthracycline- and cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy (CT) in young breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) is well established, the impact of anti-HER2 agents remains largely unknown and limited conflicting evidence exists for taxanes. Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) is an established biomarker of ovarian reserve; its measurements during systemic therapies may aid in diagnosis and prediction of POI. The NeoALTTO trial represented a unique setting to explore the acute gonadotoxicity of anti-HER2 therapy alone and in combination with weekly paclitaxel in pts not previously exposed to any other potentially gonadotoxic anticancer treatment. Methods: NeoALTTO (NCT00553358) is a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase III neoadjuvant trial in HER2-positive early BC pts randomized to receive lapatinib (L), trastuzumab (T), or their combination (L+T) alone for 6 weeks followed by the addition of paclitaxel for 12 weeks before surgery.The present analysis included only premenopausal women aged ≤45 years with available frozen serum samples at baseline (i.e. before administering any anticancer treatment), at week 2 (i.e. “biological window” of anti-HER2 therapy alone) and/or at surgery (i.e. after completion of paclitaxel plus anti-HER2 therapy). Central AMH testing was performed at Erasme Hospital (Brussels, Belgium) with the Roche Elecsys® AMH Plus assay (LoD=0.010 ng/ml). AMH levels during anti-HER2 therapy alone and then combined with paclitaxel were assessed as a measure of treatment impact on ovarian reserve. The impact of different anti-HER2 agents (T and/or L), pts’ age and baseline AMH levels on treatment gonadotoxicity were also investigated. Results: The present analysis included 130 pts with a median age of 38 years (IQR: 33-42 years), of whom 86 (66.2%) were ≤40 years. At baseline, median AMH levels were 1.29 ng/mL (IQR 0.56 - 2.62 ng/mL). At week 2, a small but significant reduction in AMH levels was observed (median value: 1.10 ng/mL, IQR 0.45 - 2.09 ng/mL, p Citation Format: Matteo Lambertini, Marcello Ceppi, Richard A. Anderson, David A. Cameron, Marco Bruzzone, Maria Alice Franzoi, Claudia Massarotti, Sarra El-Abed, Yingbo Wang, Christophe Lecocq, Paolo Nuciforo, Rebecca Rolyance, Lajos Pusztai, Joohyuk Sohn, Jacopo Ligato, Maria Maddalena Latocca, Luca Arecco, Barbara Pistilli, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Alberto Ballestrero, Lucia Del Mastro, Fedro A. Peccatori, Ann H. Partridge, Cristina Saura, Michael Untch, Martine Piccart, Serena Di Cosimo, Evandro de Azambuja, Isabelle Demeestere. Impact of anti-HER2 therapy alone and in association with weekly paclitaxel on the ovarian reserve of young women with HER2-positive early breast cancer: Biomarker analysis of the NeoALTTO trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD5-05.

Background The role of temporary ovarian suppression with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs (GnRHa) during chemotherapy as a strategy to preserve ovarian function and fertility in premenopausal early breast cancer patients remains highly controversial. This option is considered experimental by the ASCO and ESMO guidelines on fertility preservation in cancer patients. The present pooled analysis aimed at elucidating the efficacy and safety of temporary ovarian suppression with GnRHa during chemotherapy as a strategy to preserve ovarian function and fertility in premenopausal early breast cancer patients. Patients and methods This study included individual patient data from 5 trials (PROMISE-GIM6, POEMS/SWOG S0230, Anglo Celtic Group OPTION, GBG-37 ZORO, Moffitt-led trial) in which premenopausal women with early breast cancer were randomized to receive (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy alone or with concurrent administration of GnRHa. Efficacy endpoints were premature ovarian insufficiency (POI, according to the definition used as primary endpoint in the included trials), 1- and 2-year amenorrhea rates and post-treatment pregnancy rate. Safety endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Odds ratio (OR), incidence rate ratio (IRR) and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for the effect of adding GnRHa to chemotherapy alone. As each study represents a cluster, statistical analysis has been performed using a random effects model. The study is registered with the PROSPERO registration number CRD42014015638. Results A total of 873 patients from 5 randomized trials were included. Median age was 38 years (interquartile range: 34-42 years). POI rate was 14.1% in the GnRHa group and 30.9% in the control group (adjusted OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.26-0.57; p < 0.001). The incidence of 1-year amenorrhea was 36.8% in the GnRHa group and 40.4% in the control group (adjusted OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.66-1.28; p = 0.623). The incidence of 2-year amenorrhea was 18.2% in the GnRHa group and 30.0% in the control group (adjusted OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.31-0.85; p = 0.009). A total of 37 patients had at least one post-treatment pregnancy in the GnRHa group and 20 in the control group (IRR 1.83; 95% CI 1.06-3.15; p = 0.030). There were no significant differences in DFS (adjusted HR 1.01; 95% CI 0.72-1.42; p = 0.999) or OS (adjusted HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.42-1.06; p = 0.083) between the GnRHa and control groups. Subgroup analyses of both efficacy and safety endpoints according to age of the patients, hormone receptor status, type and duration of chemotherapy will be presented at the conference. Conclusions This study provides level 1A of evidence for the efficacy and safety of temporary ovarian suppression with GnRHa during chemotherapy in premenopausal early breast cancer patients. Given the findings of this pooled analysis, temporary ovarian suppression with GnRHa during chemotherapy should be considered as a new standard option to reduce the likelihood of chemotherapy-induced POF and possibly improve future fertility in premenopausal early breast cancer patients. Citation Format: Lambertini M, Moore HCF, Leonard RCF, Loibl S, Munster P, Bruzzone M, Boni L, Unger JM, Anderson RA, Mehta K, Minton S, Poggio F, Albain KS, Adamson DJA, Gerber B, Cripps A, Bertelli G, Seiler S, Ceppi M, Partridge AH, Del Mastro L. Pooled analysis of five randomized trials investigating temporary ovarian suppression with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs during chemotherapy as a strategy to preserve ovarian function and fertility in premenopausal early breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-01.