Search

MicroRNA-34a (miR-34a) is a transcriptional target of p53 that is down-regulated in some cancer cell lines. We studied the expression, targets, and functional effects of miR-34a in brain tumor cells and human gliomas. Transfection of miR-34a down-regulated c-Met in human glioma and medulloblastoma cells and Notch-1, Notch-2, and CDK6 protein expressions in glioma cells. miR-34a expression inhibited c-Met reporter activities in glioma and medulloblastoma cells and Notch-1 and Notch-2 3′-untranslated region reporter activities in glioma cells and stem cells. Analysis of human specimens showed that miR-34a expression is down-regulated in glioblastoma tissues as compared with normal brain and in mutant p53 gliomas as compared with wild-type p53 gliomas. miR-34a levels in human gliomas inversely correlated to c-Met levels measured in the same tumors. Transient transfection of miR-34a into glioma and medulloblastoma cell lines strongly inhibited cell proliferation, cell cycle progression, cell survival, and cell invasion, but transfection of miR-34a into human astrocytes did not affect cell survival and cell cycle status. Forced expression of c-Met or Notch-1/Notch-2 transcripts lacking the 3′-untranslated region sequences partially reversed the effects of miR-34a on cell cycle arrest and cell death in glioma cells and stem cells, respectively. Also, transient expression of miR-34a in glioblastoma cells strongly inhibited in vivo glioma xenograft growth. Together, these findings represent the first comprehensive analysis of the role of miR-34a in gliomas. They show that miR-34a suppresses brain tumor growth by targeting c-Met and Notch. The results also suggest that miR-34a could serve as a potential therapeutic agent for brain tumors. [Cancer Res 2009;69(19):7569–76]

Objectives: The aim of this study is to investigate quiescence-related resistance to proteasome-inhibition mediated proteotoxicity, and its regulatory mechanisms. Introduction: Quiescence, the reversible arrest of cellular proliferation, is critical for normal cellular development and tissue maintenance. Moreover, while proteasome inhibitors (PIs) are used to treat specific cancers, it has been shown that subsets of cells within a tumor, through quiescence, avoid PI-induced apoptosis and survive. Thus, deciphering the mechanisms through which quiescent cells resist proteasome inhibition is of basic and clinical relevance. Methods: Proliferating and quiescent primary human fibroblasts were used as a model system to study the effects of PIs (MG132, epoxomycin and Bortezomib). Flow cytometry, Western blots, microscopy and microarrays were used to identify specific pathways activated by proliferating and quiescent fibroblasts in response to proteasome inhibition. Results: We found that the proteasome-inhibited quiescent fibroblasts maintain viability while proliferating fibroblasts rapidly undergo apoptosis. We further found that proteasome-inhibited proliferating and quiescent fibroblasts up-regulate multiple protective pathways, including authophagy, chaperones and antioxidants, and evidence no observable difference in proteasome-mediated degradation pathway activity. However, we found that in proliferating fibroblasts, proteasome inhibition leads to increased reactive oxygen species (ROS), peri-nuclear protein aggresomes, and apoptotic cell death. By comparison, proteasome-inhibited quiescent cells display selective up-regulation of MnSOD (a ROS detoxifying enzyme), dispersed protein aggregates, and less apoptotic cell death. Knockdown of p62/SQSTM1 (a protein important for aggresome formation) or treatment with an antioxidant N-acetylcysteine results in reduced aggresome formation and decreased apoptosis in response to proteasome inhibition. Moreover, inhibition of autophagy sensitizes serum-starved quiescent cells to proteasome inhibition induced apoptosis. This suggests that multiple mechanisms, including autophagy, ROS detoxification and differential subcellular trafficking of ubiquitinated proteins are implicated in quiescence-related resistance to PI-induced apoptosis. These results point to possible strategies for improving the effectiveness of PIs in cancer treatment. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2033. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-2033