1. A qualitative study of stakeholders' experiences with and acceptability of a technology‐supported health coaching intervention (SHARE‐S) delivered in coordination with cancer survivorship care.
- Author
-
Price, Sarah N., Houston, Thomas K., Sadasivam, Rajani S., Wentworth, Stacy, Chandler, Allison, Strahley, Ashley, Kittel, Carol, Balakrishnan, Kavitha, Weaver, Kathryn E., Dellinger, Rebecca, Puccinelli‐Ortega, Nicole, Kong, Jinhee, Cutrona, Sarah L., Foley, Kristie L., and Sohl, Stephanie J.
- Subjects
HEALTH coaches ,CANCER treatment ,HEALTH care teams ,HEALTH behavior ,TEXT messages ,MEDICAL care accountability - Abstract
Purpose: Healthy cancer survivorship involves patients' active engagement with preventative health behaviors and follow‐up care. While clinicians and patients have typically held dual responsibility for activating these behaviors, transitioning some clinician effort to technology and health coaches may enhance guideline implementation. This paper reports on the acceptability of the Shared Healthcare Actions & Reflections Electronic systems in survivorship (SHARE‐S) program, an entirely virtual multicomponent intervention incorporating e‐referrals, remotely‐delivered health coaching, and automated text messages to enhance patient self‐management and promote healthy survivorship. Methods: SHARE‐S was evaluated in single group hybrid implementation‐effectiveness pilot study. Patients were e‐referred from the clinical team to health coaches for three health self‐management coaching calls and received text messages to enhance coaching. Semi‐structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 21 patient participants, 2 referring clinicians, and 2 health coaches to determine intervention acceptability (attitudes, appropriateness, suitability, convenience, and perceived effectiveness) and to identify important elements of the program and potential mechanisms of action to guide future implementation. Results: SHARE‐S was described as impactful and convenient. The nondirective, patient‐centered health coaching and mindfulness exercises were deemed most acceptable; text messages were less acceptable. Stakeholders suggested increased flexibility in format, frequency, timing, and length of participation, and additional tailored educational materials. Patients reported tangible health behavior changes, improved mood, and increased accountability and self‐efficacy. Conclusions: SHARE‐S is overall an acceptable and potentially effective intervention that may enhance survivors' self‐management and well‐being. Alterations to tailored content, timing, and dose should be tested to determine impact on acceptability and outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF