Search

BackgroundExercise may improve clinical and quality of life outcomes for men with prostate cancer. No randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have examined the feasibility, safety, and acceptability of remote exercise training in men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).MethodsWe conducted a pilot RCT (1:1:1 aerobic or resistance exercise 3x/week or usual care) to determine the feasibility, safety, and acceptability of remotely monitored exercise over 12 weeks in 25 men with mCRPC. A prescribed exercise program was based on baseline testing including high- and moderate-intensity aerobic exercise or resistance exercise completed at a local exercise facility. Feasibility was based on attendance, adherence, and tolerance; safety on adverse events; and acceptability on participant interviews.ResultsBetween March 2016 and March 2020, 25 patients were randomized (8 aerobic, 7 resistance, and 10 control). Twenty-three men (82%) completed the 12-week study. Men who completed the remote intervention attempted 90% and 96% of prescribed aerobic and resistance training sessions, respectively, and 86% and 88% of attempted sessions were completed as or more than prescribed. We observed changes in performance tests that corresponded with the exercise prescription. No safety concerns were identified. Ninety percent of participants interviewed were satisfied with the program and would recommend it to others.ConclusionsRemotely monitored exercise training is feasible, safe, and acceptable in men with mCRPC; there was no difference in these outcomes by mode of exercise. Through this research, we provide direction and rationale for future studies of exercise and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

Introduction: Consultation audio recordings improve patient decision‐making but are underutilized. Patient‐administered recording apps on mobile devices may increase access, but implementation has not been evaluated. Methods: We conducted a single‐arm study delivering education, coaching, and reminders for patients to record their appointment using a mobile recording app. Patients had progressive, advanced prostate cancer and an upcoming appointment where the option of docetaxel would be discussed. We used the RE‐AIM framework for evaluation. Reach was the proportion of patients who participated. Effectiveness was change in informed decision‐making pre‐ vs. post‐appointment. We used a questionnaire evaluating patient knowledge about docetaxel (0%–100% correct) and the decisional conflict scale‐informed subscale (0 = feels extremely uninformed to 100 = extremely informed) to compare means using the paired t‐test. Adoption was the proportion of providers agreeing to be recorded. Implementation was coordinator adherence to intervention delivery. We conducted semistructured interviews with patients, caregivers, and providers to assess barriers, facilitators, and suggestions for recording implementation. Results: Of 102 patients approached, 50 (49%) patients participated. Mean age was 75 years, 38 (76%) were Non‐Hispanic White, and 43 (86%) had telehealth appointments. Knowledge increased from 44.7% to 49.5% (p = 0.019), particularly about palliative care (42% answering correctly to 60%, p = 0.035). Decisional conflict‐informed subscale increased from 48.9 to 70.9 (p < 0.001). Forty‐three patients (85%) made a recording, of whom 33 (77%) reported the recording helped treatment decision‐making. All 17 providers agreed to be recorded. Coordinator adherence was high. Multi‐level barriers, suggestions, and facilitators mostly related to intervention complexity and stakeholder compatibility. Conclusion: Patient‐administered audio recordings had a positive effect on decision‐making, particularly for palliative care awareness. For broader implementation, efforts should focus on revising institutional policies; teaching patients or caregivers to use existing recording functions on their devices; leveraging artificial intelligence for transcription and summarization; and integrating recording into telehealth technology and electronic patient portals. Trial Registration:https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05127850 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]