Search

Purpose: Everolimus (RAD001, Afinitor) is an mTORC1 pathway inhibitor, and vatalanib (PTK/ZK) is a pan VEGF-R tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). These two drugs have been shown to have overlapping but also distinct anti-angiogenic effects. Consequently, we investigated the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of their combination in vivo., Methods: Murine melanoma B16/BL6 cells were grown orthotopically in BL6/C57 mice by injection into the derma of both ears to create a primary tumour which metastasized rapidly to the cervical lymph nodes. Mice were treated daily p.o. with PTK/ZK (100 mg/kg) or everolimus (1 mg/kg) or their combination, and anti-tumour efficacy (PD) assessed. In the same model, plasma PK of everolimus was measured following single doses of the monotherapy or combination schedules., Results: Two independent experiments showed that combination of everolimus and PTK/ZK caused at least additive increases in anti-tumour activity compared to either monotherapy, without increases in toxicity. Pooling the data to improve the statistical power demonstrated the interactions to be synergistic. PK modelling showed that although PTK/ZK increased everolimus plasma concentrations by about twofold, this PK drug-drug interaction could not account for the increased anti-tumour effect of the combination. Modelling of the PTK/ZK dose-response curve in this model suggested that any effect of everolimus on the PK of PTK/ZK was unlikely to affect efficacy. Measurement of changes in tumour and plasma VEGF levels at the endpoint of therapy confirmed earlier observations of differential effects of these two agents., Conclusions: The combination of everolimus and PTK/ZK hold promise for the treatment of human cancers.

Purpose: Comparative pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of the mTOR inhibitor RAD001 (everolimus) in rats and mice., Methods: Blood cell partitioning, plasma protein binding and PK parameters of RAD001 in blood and tissues (including brain) of both mice and rats were determined. PK modeling predicted plasma/blood and tumor levels from a variety of regimens and these were compared with the known human PK profile. DCE-MRI was used to compare tumor vascularity between mice and rats. Estimation of IC50 values in vitro and ED50 values in vivo were used to provide an indication of anti-tumor activity., Results: The PK properties of RAD001 differed between mice and rats, including erythrocyte partitioning, plasma protein binding, plasma/blood t(1/2), oral bioavailability, volume of distribution, tissue/tumor penetration and elimination. Modeling of tumor and blood/plasma PK suggested that in mice, multiple daily administrations result in a 2-fold increase in tumor levels of RAD001 at steady state, whereas in rats, a 7.9-fold increase would occur. Weekly high-dose regimens were predicted not to facilitate tumor accumulation in either species. Total tumor levels of RAD001 were four- to eight-fold greater in rats than in mice. Rat tumors had a >2-fold greater plasma content and permeability compared to mouse tumors, which could contribute to differences in tumor drug uptake. Maximal antitumor effects (T/C of 0.04-0.35) were observed in both species after daily administration with similar C(max) and AUC values of unbound (free) RAD001. These free levels of RAD001 are exceeded in serum from cancer patients receiving clinically beneficial daily regimens. In rodents, brain penetration of RAD001 was poor, but was dose-dependent and showed over-proportional uptake in rats with a longer t(1/2) compared to the systemic circulation., Conclusions: The PK of RAD001 differed between mice and rats, with rats having a PK profile closer to that of humans. High intermittent doses of RAD001 may be more appropriate for treatment of brain tumors.

Introduction: Patupilone is a microtubule stabilizer (MTS) currently in clinical development. Here, we evaluate the anti-cancer activity in vitro and in vivo in comparison to paclitaxel and describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) of patupilone in tumor-bearing nude mice and rats., Methods: The potency in vitro of patupilone and two other MTS, paclitaxel and ixabepilone, was determined using human colon carcinoma cell lines with low (HCT-116, HT-29, RKO) and high (HCT-15) P-glycoprotein expression (P-gp), as well as two multi-drug resistance (MDR) model cell pairs, MCF7/ADR and KB-8511 cells and their respective drug-sensitive parental counterparts. The PK of patupilone was investigated in nude mice bearing HCT-15 or HT-29 xenografts and in rats bearing s.c. pancreatic CA20498 tumors or A15 glioma tumors. Anti-cancer activity in vivo was compared to that of paclitaxel using three different human tumor colon models. The retention and efficacy of patupilone was compared in small and large HT-29 xenografts whose vascularity was determined by non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging., Results: Patupilone was highly potent in vitro against four different colon carcinoma cell lines including those showing multi-drug-resistance. In contrast, paclitaxel and ixabepilone displayed significantly reduced activity with markedly increased resistance factors. In both rats and mice, a single i.v. bolus injection of patupilone (1.5-4 mg/kg) rapidly distributed from plasma to all tissues and was slowly eliminated from muscle, liver and small intestine, but showed longer retention in tumor and brain with no apparent elimination over 24 h. Patupilone showed significant activity against three human colon tumor models in vivo, unlike paclitaxel, which only had activity against low P-gp expressing tumors. In HT-29 tumors, patupilone activity and retention were independent of tumor size, blood volume and flow., Conclusions: The high potency of patupilone, which is not affected by P-gp expression either in vitro or in vivo, and favorable PK, independent of tumor vascularity, suggest that it should show significant activity in colorectal cancer and in other indications where high P-gp expression may compromise taxane activity.