5 results on '"Caponigro F"'
Search Results
2. Phase I dose-escalation study of brostallicin, a minor groove binder, in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors
- Author
-
Caponigro, F., primary, Lorusso, D., additional, Fornari, G., additional, Barone, C., additional, Merlano, M., additional, Airoldi, M., additional, Schena, M., additional, MacArthur, R., additional, Weitman, S., additional, Jannuzzo, M. G., additional, Crippa, S., additional, Fiorentini, F., additional, Petroccione, A., additional, and Comis, S., additional
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Phase II study of rubitecan in recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer.
- Author
-
Caponigro F, Cartenì G, Droz JP, Milano A, Davis WB, and Pollard P
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Agents administration & dosage, Antineoplastic Agents adverse effects, Camptothecin administration & dosage, Camptothecin adverse effects, Camptothecin therapeutic use, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell mortality, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell pathology, Disease-Free Survival, Female, Head and Neck Neoplasms mortality, Head and Neck Neoplasms pathology, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Metastasis, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local mortality, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local pathology, Antineoplastic Agents therapeutic use, Camptothecin analogs & derivatives, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell drug therapy, Head and Neck Neoplasms drug therapy, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local drug therapy
- Abstract
Purpose: Rubitecan is an oral camptothecin analogue that has shown activity against a broad spectrum of human tumor xenografts and has been tested in several diseases., Patients and Methods: In the present study, 19 patients with incurable, recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer were treated with rubitecan at the initial dose of 1.5 mg/m(2) x 5 days per week. An appropriate dose modification program was set up according to the observed toxicities., Results: Thirteen out of the 19 treated patients were formally evaluable for tumor response. Ten patients had a disease progression and three patients had a stabilization of disease as their best response. The mean duration of stable disease was 141 days. Median survival was 16 weeks (range 2-22 weeks). Three patients died during the study or less than a month after their last dose of study medication. Hematologic toxicity was serious in this study since four patients discontinued their participation because of severe anemia. The drug was also associated with grade 1-4 neutropenia, and with 1-3 thrombocytopenia., Conclusion: We conclude that rubitecan is not effective as a single-agent in recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer with the doses and schedule used in this study.
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Phase I study of mitoxantrone, raltitrexed, levofolinic acid and 5-fluorouracil in advanced solid tumours.
- Author
-
Caponigro F, Avallone A, Rivellini F, Comella P, Ionna F, De Rosa V, and Comella G
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects, Colorectal Neoplasms drug therapy, Female, Fluorouracil administration & dosage, Head and Neck Neoplasms drug therapy, Humans, Leucovorin administration & dosage, Male, Middle Aged, Mitoxantrone administration & dosage, Quinazolines administration & dosage, Thiophenes administration & dosage, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Neoplasms drug therapy
- Abstract
Purpose: We have recently evaluated the combination of raltitrexed, levofolinic acid (LFA) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in advanced head and neck and colorectal cancer, and we have shown that this combination is well tolerated and has clinical activity. Clinical combination studies have shown that raltitrexed and anthracyclines can be combined at full doses without unexpected toxicities. Based on these observations, we started a phase I study of mitoxantrone plus raltitrexed administered on day 1, followed by LFA and 5-FU on day 2 in patients with advanced solid tumors., Patients and Methods: Mitoxantrone was given at a starting dose of 6 mg/m2, raltitrexed at a fixed dose of 3 mg/m2, LFA at a fixed dose of 250 mg/m2, and 5-FU at a starting dose of 750 mg/m2. Mitoxantrone and 5-FU doses were subsequently escalated alternately up to dose-limiting toxicity. Treatment was repeated every 14 days., Results: Four dose levels were tested in 18 patients. All three patients treated at the fourth dose level had grade 4 neutropenia after the first cycle. Therefore, this level was defined as the maximum tolerated dose and the dose level immediately below (mitoxantrone 7 mg/m2 and 5-FU 900 mg/m2) was selected for further evaluation. Neutropenia was the main toxic effect. Nonhaematologic side effects were mild. One complete response and five partial responses (all but one in patients with head and neck cancer) were observed, for an overall response rate of 33% (95% confidence interval, 13% to 59%)., Conclusions: Mitoxantrone, raltitrexed and 5-FU can be combined at doses which are close to those used in monotherapy. The observed activity is encouraging, especially in the subset of patients with head and neck cancer.
- Published
- 2001
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Phase I study of vinorelbine and paclitaxel in small-cell lung cancer.
- Author
-
Iaffaioli RV, Facchini G, Tortoriello A, Caponigro F, Illiano A, Gentile M, Gravina A, and Muto P
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Infusions, Intravenous, Male, Middle Aged, Nervous System drug effects, Neutropenia chemically induced, Paclitaxel administration & dosage, Paclitaxel adverse effects, Thrombocytopenia chemically induced, Vinblastine administration & dosage, Vinblastine adverse effects, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Carcinoma, Small Cell drug therapy, Lung Neoplasms drug therapy
- Abstract
Background: Vinorelbine and paclitaxel interfere with mitotic spindle function through different mechanisms of action. Both of the drugs show antitumor activity in small-cell lung cancer when used as single agents; furthermore, in vitro and in vivo studies have shown a synergistic activity between the two drugs., Patients and Methods: Patients with small-cell lung cancer no longer amenable to conventional treatment were entered into a phase I study in which vinorelbine was given at a fixed dose of 30 mg/m2 by 15-min intravenous infusion, whereas paclitaxel was given by 3-h infusion starting 1 h after vinorelbine at an initial dose of 90 mg/m2, which was subsequently escalated by 30-mg/m2 steps. Cycles were repeated every 21 days., Results: Grade 3 neutropenia was observed only in three patients treated at the fifty dose level. Thrombocytopenia never reached grade 3. Neurotoxicity was considered dose-limiting, since grade 3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in three of five patients treated at the fifth dose level (paclitaxel 210 mg/m2). Other side effects were generally mild. The overall response rate in 22 evaluable patients was 32% (95% CI 13-51%); in particular, 1 complete response (4.5%) and 6 partial responses (27.3%) were observed. The maximally tolerated doses recommended for phase II studies are 180 mg/m2 for paclitaxel and 30 mg/m2 for vinorelbine. The observed myelosuppression was less severe than anticipated on the basis of the effects of each drug alone., Conclusions: The promising activity of this drug combination warrants a phase II study in untreated patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.
- Published
- 1997
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.