Search

Purpose: Several cases have been reported in which central nervous system (CNS) metastases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) resistant to gefitinib were improved by erlotinib. However, there has been no study in which cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of gefitinib and erlotinib are directly compared. Thus, we aimed to compare them. Methods: We examined 15 Japanese patients with NSCLC and CNS metastases with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations who received CSF examinations during epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors treatment (250 mg daily gefitinib or 150 mg daily erlotinib). Plasma and CSF concentrations were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Results: The concentration and penetration rate of gefitinib (mean ± standard deviation) in the CSF were 3.7 ± 1.9 ng/mL (8.2 ± 4.3 nM) and 1.13 ± 0.36 %, respectively. The concentration and penetration rate of erlotinib in the CSF were 28.7 ± 16.8 ng/mL (66.9 ± 39.0 nM) and 2.77 ± 0.45 %, respectively. The CSF concentration and penetration rate of erlotinib were significantly higher than those of gefitinib ( P = 0.0008 and <0.0001, respectively). The CNS response rates of patients with erlotinib treatment were preferentially (but not significantly) higher than those with gefitinib treatment. (1/3 vs. 4/7, respectively). Leptomeningeal metastases in one patient, which were refractory to gefitinib, dramatically responded to erlotinib. Conclusions: This study suggested that higher CSF concentration could be achieved with erlotinib and that erlotinib could be more effective for the treatment for CNS metastases, especially leptomeningeal metastases, than gefitinib. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The objectives of this phase I trial were to evaluate the toxicity of the nedaplatin/gemcitabine regimen, determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) of these agents, and observe the anti-tumor effects of this regimen on advanced squamous cell lung cancer. Methods: Patients with previously untreated advanced squamous cell lung cancer were eligible if they had a performance status of 0 or 1 with adequate organ function. The doses of gemcitabine (days 1 and 8) and nedaplatin (day 8) studied were 800/70, 1,000/80, 1,000/90, and 1,000/100 (mg/m), repeated every 3 weeks. Results: Toxicity and response could be assessed in all 13 patients enrolled. The patients included 12 men and one woman with a median age of 69 years (range 57-81 years). Three patients had stage IIIB disease and 10 patients had stage IV disease. The MTDs were reached at 1,000 mg/m gemcitabine and 80 mg/m nedaplatin. The most frequent toxic effects were thrombocytopenia and neutropenia; grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia was observed in 23% of patients, and grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was seen in 46% of patients. Non-hematologic toxicities were mild. Grade 3 fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and appetite loss occurred in two patients. The overall response rate was 62%. Conclusions: We recommend doses of 800 mg/m gemcitabine and 70 mg/m nedaplatin for phase II study. This combination chemotherapeutic regimen is active and well tolerated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]