Search

Purpose: Accurate identification of tobacco use is critical to implement evidence-based cessation treatments in cancer patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of self-reported tobacco use in newly diagnosed cancer patients., Methods: Tobacco use questionnaires and blood samples were collected from 233 newly diagnosed cancer patients (77 lung, 77 breast, and 79 prostate cancer). Blood was analyzed for cotinine levels using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Patients with cotinine measurements exceeding 10 ng/mL were categorized as current smokers. Smoking status based upon cotinine levels was contrasted with self-report in current smokers, recent quitters (1 or less year since quit), non-recent quitters (>1 year since quit), and never smokers. Multivariate analyses were used to identify potential predictors of discordance between self-reported and biochemically confirmed smoking., Results: Cotinine confirmed 100 % accuracy in self-reporting of current and never smokers. Discordance in cotinine and smoking status was observed in 26 patients (15.0 %) reporting former tobacco use. Discordance in self-reported smoking was 12 times higher in recent (35.4 %) as compared with non-recent quitters (2.8 %). Combining disease site, pack-year history, and employment status predicted misrepresentation of tobacco use in 82.4 % of recent quitters., Conclusions: Self-reported tobacco use may not accurately assess smoking status in newly diagnosed cancer patients. Patients who claim to have recently stopped smoking within the year prior to a cancer diagnosis and lung cancer patients may have a higher propensity to misrepresent tobacco use and may benefit from biochemical confirmation.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of three different intervention conditions designed to increase use of the Medicaid smoking cessation pharmacotherapy benefit and promote smoking cessation among Medicaid clients., Methods: In 2002, 608 current smokers receiving Medicaid benefits were recruited from the reception areas at the Department of Social Services in Erie County, New York, USA. Participants were randomized to one of three interventions: Minimal (verbal information on the Medicaid pharmacotherapy benefit), Self Help (verbal information plus self-help information materials), or Case Management (verbal information, self-help information, plus case management assistance to facilitate access to the pharmacotherapy benefit). Outcomes included (a) use of a stop-smoking medication during the three month follow-up period, (b) self-reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence at three months and (c) bioverified non-smoking status at three months (bio-chemically validated by expired Carbon Monoxide (CO) < or =8 ppm)., Results: 14.6% reported using a stop-smoking medication and staying off cigarettes for 24 h, 4.6% self-reported being smoke-free at three months, and 1.8% were bioverified as smoke-free. There were no differences by intervention group for these outcomes., Conclusions: An intensive intervention designed to promote pharmacotherapy use and smoking cessation among Medicaid smokers was no more effective than less intensive interventions.