Search

The authors introduce a functional communication framework that can be used for global pediatric cancer research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) disrupted pediatric oncology care globally, increasing demands on health care providers (HCPs) who adapted to continue care. This study sought to characterize the pandemic's impact on pediatric oncology HCPs worldwide. Methods: A 60‐item survey focused on changes to clinical care, resources, and effects on clinicians. A diverse subgroup of institutions was purposefully selected for focus groups that explored teamwork, communication, and changes to care delivery. Results: The survey included 311 responses from 213 institutions representing 79 countries. Sixteen institutions participated in 19 multidisciplinary focus groups in 8 languages. Decreased clinical staff availability was cited by 51% of institutions as a major impact. Staffing modifications included decreased provider availability (66% of institutions), roles or responsibility changes, and transfer outside the specialty. Physical effects included frequent COVID‐19 illness; 8% of respondents reported HCP deaths. Fifty percent of providers did not have the necessary personal protective equipment. HCPs also experienced psychological distress and financial concerns. Findings indicated more frequent impact on nurses than other providers. Impacts were described across all hospital resource levels, with staffing modifications more frequent in countries with higher COVID‐19 incidence (P <.001) and mortality rate (P =.004). Focus groups revealed negative impacts were stabilized by increased teamwork, communication, contributions outside usual roles, policies aimed at optimizing safety, and feeling that they were contributing. Conclusions: COVID‐19 had a profound impact on the pediatric oncology workforce, creating challenging modifications to staffing and resulting in physical, psychological, and financial distress. Despite these challenges, HCPs caring for children with cancer came together to continue to provide high‐quality care. This mixed‐methods study reveals the impact that the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic has had on pediatric oncology providers globally, and it highlights the importance of implementing strategies to protect the health care workforce during challenging situations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In the face of unprecedented challenges because of coronavirus disease 2019, interdisciplinary pediatric oncology teams have developed strategies to continue providing high‐quality cancer care. This study explored factors contributing to health care resilience as perceived by childhood cancer providers in all resource level settings. Methods: This qualitative study consisted of 19 focus groups conducted in 16 countries in 8 languages. Seven factors have been previously defined as important for resilient health care including: 1) in situ practical experience, 2) system design, 3) exposure to diverse views on the patient's situation, 4) protocols and checklists, 5) teamwork, 6) workarounds, and 7) trade‐offs. Rapid turn‐around analysis focused on these factors. Results: All factors of health care resilience were relevant to groups representing all resource settings. Focus group participants emphasized the importance of teamwork and a flexible and coordinated approach to care. Participants described collaboration within and among institutions, as well as partnerships with governmental, private, and nonprofit organizations. Hierarchies were advantageous to decision‐making and information dissemination. Clinicians were inspired by their patients and explained creative trade‐offs and workarounds used to maintain high‐quality care. Conclusions: Factors previously described as contributing to resilient health care manifested differently in each institution but were described in all resource settings. These insights can guide pediatric oncology teams worldwide as they provide cancer care during the next phases of the pandemic. Understanding these elements of resilience will also help providers respond to inevitable future stressors on health care systems. This multinational, multicenter, qualitative study illustrates how pediatric oncology providers used resilient health care strategies, illuminating creative solutions to mitigate impact, many of which may outlast the pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Interdisciplinary teamwork supports high‐quality cancer care and effective utilization of limited resources. This study purposed to examine the value, structure, process, and effectiveness of interdisciplinary care (IDC) among pediatric oncology providers in low‐income and middle‐income countries in Central America and the Caribbean. Methods: A cross‐sectional survey was disseminated to pediatric oncology providers at 5 centers participating in the Pediatric Hematology‐Oncology Association of Central America. The survey included previously validated items and novel questions assessing the value (importance), structure (multidisciplinary meeting attendance), process (team climate), and effectiveness (job satisfaction, quality of care and communication) of IDC. Results: The survey was completed by 174 providers, including 22 oncologists, 9 pathologists, 9 radiologists, 5 radiation oncologists, 12 surgeons, 35 subspecialists, 60 nurses, 20 psychosocial providers, and 2 other staff. Participants agreed that IDC benefits team members (95%) and patients (96%). IDC structure and processes varied across the region. Multidisciplinary meeting attendance differed by center (P =.005) and discipline (P <.0001). Participants who frequently attended multidisciplinary meetings reported a more positive team climate (P =.0003). Team climate was positively associated with job satisfaction (P <.001). In multivariable analyses, team climate was predictive of an improved perception of communication between professionals (P <.0001), with families (P <.0001), and with patients (P =.0005), as well as with quality of the care environment (P =.006) and overall care quality (P <.0001). Conclusions: Nearly all surveyed participants valued IDC, and the structure and processes supporting IDC varied by center. Associations between a collaborative professional climate, job satisfaction, and the perception of quality care encourage continued investigation and prioritization of IDC in these settings. Structures and processes supporting interdisciplinary care for pediatric oncology patients in Central America and the Caribbean vary. Associations between a collaborative professional climate, job satisfaction, and perception of quality care support the continued investigation and prioritization of interdisciplinary care in these settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Provider implicit bias can negatively affect clinician‐patient communication. In the current study, the authors measured implicit bias training among pediatric oncology providers and exposure to implicit association tests (IATs). They then assessed associations between IATs for race and socioeconomic status (SES) and recommendations for clinical trial enrollment. Methods: A prospective multisite study was performed to measure implicit bias among oncology providers at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital and affiliate clinics. An IAT was used to assess bias in the domains of race and SES. Case vignettes were used to determine an association between bias and provider recommendation for trial enrollment. Data were analyzed using Student t tests or Wilcoxon tests for comparisons and Jonckheere‐Terpstra tests were used for association. Results: Of the 105 total participants, 95 (90%) had not taken an IAT and 97 (92%) had no prior implicit bias training. A large effect was found for (bias toward) high SES (Cohen d, 1.93) and European American race (Cohen d, 0.96). The majority of participants (90%) had a vignette score of 3 or 4, indicating recommendation for trial enrollment for most or all vignettes. IAT and vignette scores did not significantly differ between providers at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital or affiliate clinics. No association was found between IAT and vignette scores for race (P =.58) or SES (P =.82). Conclusions: The authors noted a paucity of prior exposure to implicit bias self‐assessments and training. Although these providers demonstrated preferences for high SES and European American race, this did not appear to affect recommendations for clinical trial enrollment as assessed by vignettes. The current multisite study measures implicit bias in the domains of race and socioeconomic status among pediatric oncology providers in an academic center and community‐based practices. The impact of implicit bias in clinical trial enrollment is assessed using case vignettes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The burden of global childhood cancer lies in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs). Communication is essential to pediatric cancer care, and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) has defined 6 functions of communication between patients, family members, and providers, including 1) fostering healing relationships, 2) responding to emotions, 3) exchanging information, 4) making decisions, 5) managing uncertainty, and 6) enabling self‐management. Nevertheless, communication needs and practices in LMICs remain incompletely understood. For this review, the Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Turning Research Into Practice databases were searched according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews. Searching identified 2988 articles, with 11 added through snowballing. Forty articles met the inclusion criteria. Two reviewers extracted data on study characteristics, communication functions, enablers, barriers, and additional major themes. This review included work from 17 countries. Most studies (85%) used qualitative methodology; the number of participants ranged from 7 to 304. All 6 of the NCI‐defined communication functions were identified in included studies, with rates ranging from 100% of studies for information exchange to 28% of studies for decision making. Communication barriers included cancer misconceptions, stigma, and hierarchy between parents and providers. Provider training and community education facilitated communication. Additional themes included disclosure to children, family dynamics, and the multidisciplinary health care team. In conclusion, all 6 of the communication functions defined by the NCI were applied by pediatric cancer researchers in LMICs. Additional barriers, enablers, and communication themes noted in LMICs deserve further exploration, and a relative paucity of research in comparison with high‐income countries highlights the need for further work. This is a scoping review of pediatric cancer communication in low‐ and middle‐income countries. It includes communication functions, barriers, and enablers and highlights the need for further research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The early integration of palliative care significantly improves quality of life for children with cancer. However, cultural, structural, and socioeconomic barriers can delay the integration of palliative care into cancer care, particularly in low‐income and middle‐income countries. To date, little is known regarding the timing of and barriers to palliative care integration in Eurasia. Methods: The Assessing Doctors' Attitudes on Palliative Treatment (ADAPT) survey evaluates physician perceptions regarding palliative care integration into pediatric oncology in Eurasia. This evidence‐based survey was adapted to the regional context; iteratively reviewed by US and regional panelists; and piloted in English, Russian, and Mongolian. After distribution to physicians caring for children with cancer, statistical analysis was complemented by qualitative analysis of open‐ended responses. Results: A total of 424 physician responses were received from 11 countries in the Eurasian region. Study findings demonstrated wide variability in access to palliative care experts across countries (18%‐96%), with the majority of providers (64%) reporting that the initial palliative care consultation typically occurs when curative options are no longer available. Providers desired an earlier initial palliative care consultation than what currently occurs in their setting (P <.001). Primary barriers to timely consultation included limited access to palliative care services and specialists, lack of physician education, and perceived family resistance. Conclusions: The current study is the first to identify physician perceptions of the delayed timing of palliative care integration into childhood cancer care and associated barriers in Eurasia. These findings will inform the development of targeted interventions to mitigate local structural and cultural barriers to access and facilitate earlier palliative care integration in the region. The current study is the first to identify physician perceptions of the delayed timing of palliative care integration into childhood cancer care in Eurasia. Primary barriers to timely consultation included limited access to palliative care services and specialists, a lack of physician education, and perceived family resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) advocates for early integration of palliative care for all children with life-threatening illness. Provider awareness and misperceptions, however, can impede this imperative. In the Eurasian region, little is known about physician knowledge and perspectives on palliative care.Methods: The Assessing Doctors' Attitudes on Palliative Treatment survey was developed as an evidence-based and culturally relevant assessment of physician perceptions on palliative care integration into childhood cancer care in Eurasia. Iteratively tested by American and Eurasian palliative care experts, the survey was culturally adapted, translated, and piloted in English, Russian, and Mongolian. The survey was distributed to physicians caring for children with cancer. Fifteen statements were scored in accordance with WHO guidelines to evaluate provider knowledge. The statistical analysis was complemented by a qualitative analysis of open-ended responses.Results: This study received 424 responses from 11 countries in Eurasia. The mean alignment between provider perspectives and WHO recommendations was 70% (range, 7%-100%). Significant independent predictors of higher alignment included country, prior palliative care education, and greater experience with patient death. Respondents primarily described palliative care as end-of-life care and symptom management. Two-thirds of respondents (67%) reported not feeling confident about delivering at least 1 component of palliative care.Conclusions: This is the first study assessing physician perspectives and knowledge of palliative care in Eurasia and reveals wide variability in alignment with WHO guidelines and limited confidence in providing palliative care. Study findings will inform targeted educational interventions, which must be tailored to the local political, economic, and cultural context. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]