Search

Background: The selection of later-line treatment for older patients with AJCC (version 7) stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. Nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel is approved with carboplatin for the first-line treatment of patients with NSCLC and subgroup analysis of phase 3 data has suggested superior survival in older patients., Methods: The authors conducted a phase 2 study of nab-paclitaxel in 42 patients aged ≥70 years who had been treated previously with a platinum doublet regimen; patients also could have received a PD-1 inhibitor. The primary endpoint of the current study was grade 3 to 5 toxicity (according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 4.0]). In addition to response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), geriatric assessments also were performed before and during treatment, associations between baseline sarcopenia and outcomes were explored, and changes in T lymphocyte p16 before and during treatment were measured. The authors also performed a retrospective subgroup analysis of 19 older patients who were treated with nab-paclitaxel as part of a larger, randomized, phase 2 study; data were not combined., Results: The rate of grade 3 to 5 toxicities was 33.7%. The most common grade 3 to 5 toxicities were decreased white blood cell count (11.9%), neutropenia (9.5%), and fatigue (11.9%). The response rate was 34.2% (2.6% complete response rate and 31.6% partial response rate). The median PFS was 5.2 months and the median OS was 9.3 months. Adverse prognostic factors were common: 42% of patients were frail and 39% of patients were prefrail, whereas 21% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 and 27% were sarcopenic. Only frailty was found to be predictive of inferior survival. A subgroup analysis of 19 older patients treated with nab-paclitaxel alone in a prior trial demonstrated a response rate of 15.8%, a PFS of 4.2 months, and an OS of 13.6 months., Conclusions: Fit and prefrail older patients with stage IV NSCLC should be considered for treatment with nab-paclitaxel after disease progression with doublet chemotherapy., (© 2020 American Cancer Society.)

Background: The authors performed a phase 2 study of bevacizumab plus pemetrexed and carboplatin followed by maintenance bevacizumab in patients with advanced, nonsquamous nonsmall cell lung cancer., Methods: Previously untreated patients with advanced, nonsquamous nonsmall cell lung cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg, pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) and carboplatin at an area under the concentration-time curve of 6 intravenously on day 1 every 21 days. Responding or stable patients who completed 6 cycles then received bevacizumab maintenance every 21 days until disease progression., Results: In total, 43 patients (40 who were evaluable for response) were entered on the study. Treatment-related grade 3/4 toxicities were low and included febrile neutropenia (2%), neutropenia (28%), anemia (18%), thrombocytopenia (11%), hypertension (7%), epistaxis (5%), venous thrombosis (8%), dyspnea (7%), rectovaginal fistula (2.3%), infusion reaction (2%), and cerebrovascular event (2%). One patient died from complications of venous thromboembolism and cerebrovascular accident after Cycle 2. Minimal clinically significant toxicity occurred during maintenance bevacizumab. Two complete responses (5%) were observed, and 17 patients (42%) had a partial response. Fifteen patients (38%) displayed disease stability. The overall disease control rate was 85%. At a median follow-up of 15.8 months, the median progression-free survival was 7.1 months (95% confidence interval, 5.9-8.3 months), and the median overall survival was 17.1 months (95% confidence interval, 8.8-25.5 months)., Conclusions: Combined bevacizumab, pemetrexed, and carboplatin followed by maintenance bevacizumab was well tolerated and displayed remarkable activity in patients with previously untreated, advanced, nonsquamous nonsmall cell lung cancer., (Copyright © 2012 American Cancer Society.)

Background: The clinical benefit of postoperative mediastinal radiation for completely resected Masaoka stage 2 thymoma remains controversial. Due to its indolent nature and infrequent recurrences, no study has definitively determined the optimal approach., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 175 consecutive patients who underwent thymic resection from January 1990 to July 2008 at the University of Pennsylvania. The primary endpoint was local recurrence, defined as recurrence within the surgical bed, treated by resection alone versus resection plus radiation. Patients with high recurrence risk were referred for adjuvant radiotherapy., Results: Seventy-four Masaoka stage 2 patients were resected; 62 underwent complete resections with adequate postsurgical follow-up. Thirty-seven patients received adjuvant radiotherapy and 25 patients were observed. The median radiation dose was 5040 cGy. The median follow-up for all patients was 52 months. The local recurrence rate was 3.2%. The proportion of recurrences in patients observed after surgery was 8% versus 0% in those who received adjuvant radiotherapy (P = .15). Size was not an independent predictor of recurrence (P = .81). The tumor-related death rate was 0%, and overall death rate was 3.2%. One death occurred in each group, observation, and radiation. There were no grade 3 or 4 complications with radiation., Conclusions: Recurrence rates were low following resection of stage 2 thymoma either with or without adjuvant radiotherapy. Adjuvant radiotherapy, although well-tolerated, did not significantly decrease the local relapse rate. Differences may be observed in future studies of patients who are at higher risk for local recurrence, based on completeness of resection, World Health Organization histology, and tumor size., (Copyright © 2011 American Cancer Society.)

Background: The authors performed a dose escalation study of cisplatin and the novel deoxycytidine analog, tezacitabine, to determine the maximum tolerated dose of the combination., Methods: Twenty-three patients with advanced cancer and good performance status were accrued to 3 dose levels of tezacitabine (150-270 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (50 mg/m(2)). Using a 28-day treatment cycle, both drugs were administered on Days 1 and 15., Results: Hematologic toxicity was the most frequently observed side effect and was dose limiting. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia complicated 75% and 31% of all cycles, respectively. Nonhematologic toxicities were mild. Among 18 evaluable patients, 2 with upper gastrointestinal tract tumors achieved partial responses and 4 had stable disease., Conclusions: Based on dose-limiting neutropenia and thrombocytopenia at the highest dose level, the recommended Phase II doses are 200 mg/m(2) of tezacitabine and 50 mg/m(2) of cisplatin., (Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.)

Background: The complementary action of gemcitabine and topotecan on DNA metabolism suggested the potential for their use in combination chemotherapy. Gemcitabine, a synthetic cytidine analogue chain terminator, and topotecan, a topoisomerase-1 inhibitor, have been reported to have broad antitumor activity and are approved for clinical use., Methods: The cytotoxicity of the combination in various models in vitro was additive. In the current study, the authors conducted a Phase I study to determine the recommended Phase II doses and toxicity profile of gemcitabine and topotecan when administered weekly in combination. Gemcitabine (400--1000 mg/m(2)) was given intravenously over 30 minutes followed by a 15-minute infusion of topotecan (0.75--2.5 mg/m(2)) weekly for 3 consecutive weeks in a 4-week treatment cycle. Thirty-eight patients with advanced refractory solid tumors and good performance status were treated., Results: Myelosuppression in the form of granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia were the major dose-limiting toxicities. Other toxic effects included anemia, nausea, and elevated hepatic transaminases. Partial responses were observed in two patients (one with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma and one with pancreatic carcinoma). Disease stabilization occurred in five patients (three with pancreatic carcinoma, one with rectal carcinoma, and one with metastatic carcinoma of an unknown primary site). Gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m(2), and topotecan, 2.5 mg/m(2), were the maximum tolerated doses for this combination., Conclusions: The results of the current study showed that the combination of weekly gemcitabine and topotecan for 3 weeks in a 4-week cycle schedule appeared to be well tolerated and was associated with clinical activity. Therefore, this combination is recommended for a further Phase II evaluation., (Copyright 2001 American Cancer Society.)