Search

Background. Long-term survival with extensive stage small cell lung cancer is rare. There have been no major advances in the treatment of this stage of disease in the last 15--20 years. New agents with activity against this malignancy are needed. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of edatrexate against small cell lung cancer in a Phase II trial. Methods. This was a multicenter cooperative oncology group trial. Patients were either previously untreated or had failed only one prior chemotherapy regimen. All previously untreated patients had extensive stage disease. Patients in whom prior therapy had been unsuccessful had either limited or extensive stage disease. All cases had histologic documentation. Patients received edatrexate (80 mg/[m.sup.2]) intravenously over 20--30 minutes every 7 days. Previously untreated patients with disease progression at any time or stable disease after 6 weeks of treatment were crossed over to treatment with cisplatin and etoposide. The primary end points of the study were clinical response and toxicity to edatrexate. All patients were observed for survival. Results. Eleven previously untreated and 22 previously treated patients were enrolled. A median of five doses of chemotherapy was given to each group. No major clinical response was observed in either group. The median survival time for the 11 previously untreated patients was 9.8 months versus 3.7 months for individuals who had received prior therapy. Myelosuppression and stomatitis were the primary toxicities, and both were infrequent. Conclusions. Edatrexate is inactive against small cell lung cancer. Cancer 1994; 73:1189--93. Key words: edatrexate, 10-EDAM, small cell lung cancer.

Background. In an effort to identify new active chemotherapeutic agents against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the authors conducted a randomized Phase Il trial to evaluate the efficacy of amonafide or trimetrexate in patients with Stage IV disease. Methods. This was a multicenter Cooperative Oncology Group trial. All patients had advanced NSCLC and were previously untreated with chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to treatment after enrollment. Amonafide was administered as a 24-hour continuous infusion (1600 mg/[m.sup.2]) every 21 days. Trimetrexate (150 mg/[m.sup.2]) was administered intravenously over 30 minutes every 2 weeks. The primary endpoints of the study were clinical response and toxic effects. All patients were observed for survival. Results. Thirty-five patients received amonafide and were assessable. There were no complete responses and two partial responses (6%). Thirty-seven patients were treated with trimetrexate. There were no complete responses and five (14%) partial responses. Myelosuppression was the primary toxic effect observed with amonafide treatment. Trimetrexate was associated infrequently with clinically significant side effects. Conclusions. Amonafide is inactive against NSCLC, and no additional studies with this agent are planned. Trimetrexate has some activity against NSCLC, but its role in the future therapy of this disease is questionable. Cancer 1993; 71:2723-6.

Background. In an effort to confirm the efficacy of mitomycin C against metastatic squamous cell lung carcinoma and to compare the efficacy of single-agent therapy with a combination containing cisplatin, the authors conducted a randomized Phase III trial of mitomycin C alone versus mitomycin C, vinblastine, and cisplatin (MVP). Methods. All patients had advanced squamous cell lung carcinoma, and survival was the primary end point. There were 133 eligible patients who received either mitomycin C alone (n = 64) or MVP (n = 69). The two groups were similar with respect to performance score, disease status, age, sex, and stage. Results. The major objective response rates were 30% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18-41%) and 43% (95% CI, 32-55%) for mitomycin C alone and MVP, respectively (P = 0.1). The median time to progression was 83 days for mitomycin C alone, compared with 119 days for MVP (P 0.026). The median survival time was 114 days for mitomycin C and 163 days for MVP (P = 0.09). The 1-year survival rates were equivalent. Myelosuppression was the major toxicity, and there were significantly greater leukocyte nadirs with MVP therapy (P < 0.001). Conclusion. Mitomycin C has antitumor activity against squamous cell lung carcinoma when used alone or in combination with MVP. The regimen containing cisplatin had marginally increased activity that did not translate into a clinically significant survival advantage. Cancer 1992; 70:2281-2287.