Search

BACKGROUND: Inhibition of mammalian target of rapamycin with everolimus may improve the efficacy of taxanes. Everolimus and docetaxel are both metabolized by CYP3A4, which could result in a pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction. METHODS: Fifteen patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated with docetaxel (doses of 40-75 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day cycle) in combination with everolimus (doses ranging from 20 to 50 mg orally on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle) in a phase 1 trial using the continuous reassessment method to determine maximum tolerated dose. The first 2 patients developed a dose-limiting toxicity (neutropenic infection), prompting a mandatory dose reduction and PK evaluation of both everolimus and docetaxel for patients enrolled in subsequent dosing cohorts. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were treated. Dose-limiting toxicity included grade 3 mucositis (n = 1), prolonged grade 4 neutropenia (n = 1), and grade 3 infection/febrile neutropenia (n = 3). Day 8 of everolimus was commonly held for neutropenia despite a dose reduction in docetaxel to 40 mg/m2. Eleven patients underwent complete PK evaluation for everolimus, and 9 patients underwent complete PK evaluation for both everolimus and docetaxel. Widely variable changes in clearance were seen for both drugs, and the study was terminated because of lack of efficacy and concerns regarding toxicity seen with the combination. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly everolimus in combination with docetaxel every 3 weeks was associated with excessive neutropenia and variable clearance of both drugs, making combination therapy unpredictable, even at low doses of both drugs. Cancer 2012. © 2011 American Cancer Society.

The purpose of the current study was to describe a population of young patients with breast carcinoma, their characteristics at the time of diagnosis, and the association of these characteristics with disease recurrence and survival.Four hundred fifty-two women ageor = 35 years with breast carcinoma were registered at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX) between 1990 and 2002. The relation between clinicopathologic factors and disease recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed. Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent survival predictors.The median age of the patients was 32 years. Most of the patients were white, and 20% were obese. Approximately 50% reported oral contraceptive use, 34% reported a family history of breast carcinoma, and 5% reported a family history of ovarian carcinoma. Sixty-nine percent of tumors were nuclear Grade 3 (using the modified Black's nuclear grading system), 52% had positive estrogen receptors, and 48% had positive progesterone receptors. HER-2/neu status was available in 60% of tumor specimens and 34% were HER-2/neu positive. The median follow-up was 36 months. There were 185 disease recurrences and 84 deaths. RFS was significantly shorter in patients who reported a family history of ovarian carcinoma (P0.0001) and in those who had hormone receptor-negative tumor specimens (P = 0.001). OS was significantly shorter in patients who reported a family history of ovarian carcinoma (P = 0.001), those who had hormone receptor-negative tumor specimens (P0.0001), or those withnuclear Grade 3 tumor specimens (P = 0.005).This young population with breast carcinoma was found to have more aggressive biologic features. Hormone receptor negativity and a family history of ovarian carcinoma were associated with shorter RFS and OS.

PURPOSE The authors conducted a single-institution Phase I clinical trial to determine the maximum tolerated doses and to define the toxic effects of oral eniluracil and oral 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combined with docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS. Patients with metastatic breast carcinoma were eligible if they had disease progression after anthracycline-based therapy and had never been exposed to taxanes. The starting doses of oral eniluracil and oral 5-FU were 11.5 mg/m2 and 1.15 mg/m2, respectively, twice daily on Days 1–14. Docetaxel was given intravenously at a starting dose of 50 mg/m2 on Day 1 only. The dose of docetaxel was escalated among cohorts until a maximum tolerated dose was reached. Courses were repeated every 21 days. RESULTS The authors treated 19 patients with Stage IV breast carcinoma, of whom 5 had received prior chemotherapy for their metastatic disease. Fifty-three percent had a performance status of 1, and 53% had bone or soft tissue involvement as the dominant site of disease. All patients had received prior therapy with doxorubicin. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenic fever. No episodes of sepsis were observed. Significant antitumor activity was observed with a total of two complete and nine partial responses. The recommended doses for Phase II studies are 72 mg/m2 docetaxel on Day 1 and 10.0/1.0 mg/m2 oral eniluracil/5-FU twice daily for a total of 14 days, with courses being repeated every 21 days. CONCLUSIONS The combination of oral eniluracil/5-FU and intravenous docetaxel is a safe and well tolerated regimen. Significant antitumor activity is associated with this combination. Cancer 2002;94:2321–6. © 2002 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.10488

BACKGROUND Inflammatory breast carcinoma (IBC) is a rare but aggressive form of breast carcinoma. Anthracycline-based regimens represent the standard of treatment for IBC. Reports of significant clinical activity of paclitaxel in metastatic breast carcinoma led the authors to investigate the role of this drug in the management of IBC. METHODS Forty-four patients with IBC were enrolled between February 1994 and January 1998. The treatment plan consisted of induction chemotherapy (IC), mastectomy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Forty-two patients received IC with four cycles of fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide. If the clinical response was less than partial, patients were “crossed over” to paclitaxel before mastectomy. All patients received adjuvant paclitaxel. Patients unresectable after paclitaxel were offered high-dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell support. RESULTS Thirty-four patients (81%) achieved an objective clinical remission; 3 patients (7%) achieved a clinical complete remission, 31 (74%) a partial remission. Six patients (14%) achieved pathologic complete remission. Sixteen patients were treated with paclitaxel, 7 of them (44%) were able to undergo mastectomy. Median time to progression (TTP) was 22 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 46 months. Concordance between clinical and pathologic response was documented in only 8 patients (24%). No differences in TTP and OS compared with a historical group of 178 IBC patients treated with anthracycline-based regimens. CONCLUSIONS Paclitaxel improves tumor resectability in anthracycline-refractory IBC. The impact of paclitaxel on the prognosis of IBC needs to be better evaluated in future trials using more dose-intensive schedules of administration. New imaging modalities may contribute to improve assessment of response to IC. Cancer 2001;92:1775–82. © 2001 American Cancer Society.

BACKGROUND The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the objective response rate and possibility of breast-conserving surgery using neoadjuvant tamoxifen in the multimodality treatment, including surgery and radiotherapy, of elderly or frail patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma. METHODS Forty-seven patients age > 75 years or age < 75 years with comorbid conditions and locally advanced breast carcinoma were treated with neoadjuvant tamoxifen (20 mg/day) for 3–6 months. This was followed by surgery and radiotherapy when feasible and adjuvant tamoxifen for 5 years or until disease recurrence. RESULTS The median age of the patients was 72 years (range, 48–86 years). Approximately 22% had T3 lesions, 57% had T4 lesions, 22% were Stage II (AJCC Manual for Staging Cancer, 3rd edition), and 78% were Stage III. Eighty percent were estrogen receptor positive. After 6 months of treatment with neoadjuvant tamoxifen, a response rate of 47% was observed, including a complete response rate of 6%. Twenty-nine patients (62%) were rendered free of disease by surgery, including 5 with breast-conserving procedures. After a median follow-up of 40 months, 23 patients (49%) remained disease free. The median survival time had not been reached at the time of last follow-up. No major toxicity was observed, with the exception of one patient who developed a possible tamoxifen-related Stage I endometrial carcinoma. The estimated 2-year and 5-year progression free and overall survival rates were 50% and 41%, and 83% and 59%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The results of the current study show that neoadjuvant tamoxifen was effective in the treatment of elderly or frail patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma with estrogen receptor positive tumors, and resulted in a reasonable response rate, including complete responses and good overall survival. Cancer 2000;88:2054–60. © 2000 American Cancer Society.

BACKGROUND The authors conducted a single institution Phase II clinical trial to determine whether paclitaxel had antitumor activity in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma that was refractory to standard chemotherapy. METHODS Patients with metastatic breast carcinoma were eligible for the study if they had disease progression after at least 2 prior chemotherapy regimens. Patients who had received three prior regimens were treated in a separate cohort. All patients were required to have received doxorubicin in the past and were not eligible if they had received prior therapy with paclitaxel. The starting dose of paclitaxel for low risk patients was 175 mg/m2, administered as a 24-hour continuous infusion; the starting dose of paclitaxel was 150 mg/m2 for patients who had received ≥ 3 prior regimens. Therapy was given every 3 weeks and continued for at least 2 courses unless there was evidence of rapidly progressing disease, for at least 3 courses if there was no change in disease and Grade 3 or 4 (based on National Cancer Institute toxicity criteria) toxicity was not noted, and for 6 courses beyond the maximum response in patients who demonstrated complete or partial responses and showed no evidence of disease progression. RESULTS Sixty-eight of 69 patients entered in the study were evaluable for response: 35 patients who had received 2 prior chemotherapy regimens for Stage IV disease and 33 patients who had received ≥ 3 prior regimens. A partial response was observed in 7 patients who had received 2 prior regimens, for an objective response rate of 20% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 14–26%). In the group who had received ≥ 3 prior regimens, a total of 6 partial responses were observed, for an objective response rate of 18% (95% CI, 12–23%). The median response duration was 8.2 months (range, 2.7–10.1 months) for the group who had received 2 prior regimens and 5.8 months (range, 2.1–9.5 months) for patients who received ≥ 3 prior regimens. Responses were noted in patients with anthracycline-resistant tumors. CONCLUSIONS Paclitaxel was active in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast carcinoma, including anthracycline-resistant breast carcinoma. Cancer 2000;89:2195–201. © 2000 American Cancer Society.

A combination of uracil and ftorafur (UFT) was developed to combine the cytotoxic effects of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with convenient oral dosing. Leucovorin was combined with UFT to further potentiate the effect of 5-FU on tumor cells. Orally administered UFT and leucovorin provided higher peak plasma concentrations of 5-FU and prolonged therapeutic 5-FU concentrations compared with continuous infusion of 5-FU.Ninety-one patients with metastatic breast cancer who had been previously treated with anthracyclines and/or taxanes were treated with UFT and leucovorin, given orally, for the first 28 days of a 35-day cycle. The total daily dose of UFT was 300 mg/m(2), administered in 3 doses of 100 mg/m(2) each every 8 hours. The primary endpoint was time to disease progression (TTP). Secondary objectives included overall tumor response rate (overall response equals complete response plus partial response) and overall survival.Of the 91 patients enrolled, 70 were evaluable for efficacy. Although no complete responses were observed, 7 patients had partial responses, for an overall response rate of 10% in the evaluable population. The median TTP for the evaluable population was 10 weeks, and the proportion of patients who were free of disease progression at 6 months was 23%. The median overall survival was 59.4 weeks for all patients enrolled. Common, drug-relatedor = grade 3 adverse events (graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, version 2) included diarrhea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and nausea.The combination of UFT and leucovorin administered orally in a 3-times-daily regimen was found to have modest activity. Grade 3 toxicities were manageable with appropriate dose adjustments in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines and/or taxanes.

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) who were treated with a multidisciplinary approach including primary systemic chemotherapy and noncross-resistant adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with LABC received 4 or 6 cycles of doxorubicin and docetaxel (DT) as primary systemic chemotherapy (PST) every 21 days. Patients with adequate response underwent surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy according to pathologic response: complete (pCR), 2 more cycles of DT; partial (pPR), 2 more cycles of DT followed by 6 cycles of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (CMF); and minor (pMR), 6 cycles of CMF. Patients then received radiation and tamoxifen (hormone receptor-positive patients only). RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were evaluable. Seventy-four patients had an adequate response to DT and were considered operable, and 72 underwent surgery. Ten patients (13.9%) achieved a pCR, 22 (30.5%) achieved a pPR, and 40 achieved a pMR (55.5%). Fourteen patients were considered nonoperable after DT and underwent salvage CMF therapy. Five of these patients underwent surgery and 1 had achieved a pCR. The estimated 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates for patients with pCR, pPR, and pMR were 80%, 77%, and 59%, respectively, and the estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 90%, 91%, and 74%, respectively. The 5-year OS rates were 82% for initially operable and 21% for initially inoperable patients (P ≤ .001) CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary therapy that includes PST with DT and adjuvant therapy with CMF administered according to the clinical and pathologic response is associated with high long-term RFS and OS rates in patients with LABC. Clinical or pathologic PR or CR to DT predicts improved RFS and OS. Cancer 2010. Published 2010 by the American Cancer Society.

Primary systemic therapy (PST) is the standard approach to the management of patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). The authors hypothesized that the intratumoral administration of a nonreplicating adenoviral vector (Ad5) that contains the human wild-type p53, AdCMV-p53, combined with chemotherapy, could increase the efficacy of PST as measured by pathologic complete response.: In a prospective, open-label, Phase II trial, 13 patients with LABC were treated with 6 3-week cycles of PST, which consisted of intratumoral injections of Ad5CMV-p53 for 2 consecutive days plus docetaxel and doxorubicin followed by surgery. p53 status was determined at baseline and was assessed immediately after the first injection (up to 48 hours). Clinical response was assessed by clinical and radiologic methods.: The trial was terminated early, because none of the patients achieved a pathologic complete response. The median age was 56 years (range, 39-71 years), and the median tumor size was 8 cm (range, 5-11 cm). Eight patients (73%) had a p53 mutation. Serial biopsies showed an increase in p53 messenger RNA (mRNA) and p21(WAF1/Cip1) mRNA. All 12 evaluable patients achieved an objective clinical response. The surgical specimens revealed scattered tumor cells with extensive tumor-infiltrate leukocytes (predominantly T-lymphocytes). At a median follow-up of 37 months (range, 30-41 months), 4 patients (30%) developed systemic recurrence, and 2 patients died. The estimate breast cancer-specific survival rate at 3 years was 84% (95% confidence interval, 65.7-100%). There was no increase in systemic toxicity.: Ad5CMV-p53 combined with PST is safe, active, and associated with local immunomodulatory effects. The promising clinical activity of this combination deserves further investigation in randomized studies.

BACKGROUND The authors previously reported results from a randomized trial of standard-dose chemotherapy with combined 5-fluorouracil (1000 mg/m2 per cycle), doxorubicin (50 mg/m2 per cycle), and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2 per cycle) (FAC) versus FAC followed by high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous stem cell support (ASCS) for patients with high-risk primary breast carcinoma. After a median follow-up of 6.5 years, no significant differences were observed in recurrence-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS) between the 2 arms. This report updates the survival analyses. METHODS Patients with ≥10 positive axillary lymph nodes after primary surgery or ≥4 positive lymph nodes at surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were eligible. All patients were to receive 8 cycles of FAC. Patients were assigned randomly to receive either no further chemotherapy or 2 cycles of combined high-dose cyclophosphamide (5250 mg/m2 per cycle), etoposide (1200 mg/m2 per cycle), and cisplatin (165 mg/m2 per cycle) with ASCS. Primary endpoints were RFS and OS. RFS and OS were calculated by using the Kaplan–Meier method. The log-rank statistic was used to compare treatment arms. RESULTS Between 1990 and 1997, 78 patients were registered, and 39 patients were assigned randomly to each arm. The median follow-up for all patients who were alive at last follow-up was 142.5 months (range, 45-169 months). An intention-to-treat analysis showed no significant difference between the 2 arms in terms of RFS (at 10 years: 40% with FAC vs. 26% with FAC plus HDCT; P = .11) or OS (at 10 years: 47% with FAC vs. 42% with FAC plus HDCT; P = .13). CONCLUSIONS With a median follow-up of nearly 12 years for patients who remained alive, this trial continued to demonstrate no RFS or OS advantage for patients with high-risk primary breast carcinoma treated with HDCT after standard-dose FAC chemotherapy. Cancer 2006. © 2006 American Cancer Society.

BACKGROUND The primary objective of this study was to determine whether addition of the selective P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitor tariquidar (XR9576) to chemotherapy could induce an objective tumor response in patients who previously were resistant to the same agents. The secondary objectives were to evaluate P-gp expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC), to determine functional activity of the P-gp transporter before and after administration of tariquidar with serial technetium-99m (99mTc)-sestamibi scans, and to correlate those parameters with clinical response. METHODS Seventeen women with Stage III–IV breast carcinoma were included in the study who progressed (n = 13 women) or had stable disease (n = 4 women) on doxorubicin-containing or taxane-containing chemotherapy regimens. During the study, the same chemotherapy was continued without dose modifications, but tariquidar (150 mg intravenously) was added to the treatment regimen. RESULTS Thirty-six percent of patients had P-gp-positive tumors by IHC, and 5 patients (29%) experienced increases ≥ 10% in sestamibi uptake (median increase, 40%; range, 10–63%) after the administration of tariquidar. There was one partial response in a patient who had the greatest increase in sestamibi uptake and who also showed inducible P-gp expression. There was one patient who experienced severe doxorubicin/docetaxel-related toxicity after tariquidar was added to her chemotherapy regimen. CONCLUSIONS Tariquidar showed limited clinical activity to restore sensitivity to anthracycline or taxane chemotherapy. Functional imaging of the tumor with 99mTc-sestamibi scans before and after administration of multidrug-resistance inhibitor may be useful to identify the small subset of patients who could benefit from multidrug-resistance modulation in future trials. Cancer 2005. © 2005 American Cancer Society.

BACKGROUND Accurate assessment of HER-2 status is necessary prior to anti-HER-2 antibody (trastuzumab) therapy for metastatic breast carcinoma. However, controversy exists regarding whether to assess HER-2 status in the primary tumor or in metastatic lesions. It is also unclear whether HER-2 status can change during disease progression or after chemotherapy. METHODS Breast carcinoma samples from 60 women with known HER-2 status in both primary tumors and paired metastases (locoregional disease, n = 43 patients; distant disease, n = 17 patients) were reviewed retrospectively. Thirty-two patients underwent chemotherapy before their metastatic lesions were sampled, including 18 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 14 patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. The HER-2 gene was examined by fluorescence in situ hybridization either in paraffin-embedded tissue samples (48 primary tumors and 9 metastatic tumors) or in fine-needle aspirates (12 primary tumors and 51 metastatic tumors). HER-2 gene amplification was defined as a HER-2:chromosome 17 signal ratio ≥ 2.0. RESULTS The HER-2 status of primary and metastatic tumors agreed in 58 of 60 patients (97%), including 18 (30%) amplified tumors and 40 (67%) nonamplified tumors. A discrepancy in HER-2 status was observed in specimens from two patients in which HER-2 amplification was detected in the primary tumor but not the metastatic tumors. In one patient, three foci of tumor nodules were found in the same breast; the HER-2 status was assessed in only one of them, which showed amplification; however, HER-2 amplification was not detected in the axillary lymph node metastasis. In another patient, the HER-2 gene was amplified in the primary tumor but not in the liver metastasis. No metastases showed HER-2 amplification without amplification in the primary tumor. Locoregional and distant metastases demonstrated similar concordance rates with their corresponding primary tumors (98% and 94%, respectively). Complete concordance of HER-2 status was found between primary tumors prior to chemotherapy and metastases that were sampled after chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS The HER-2 status in breast carcinoma generally was stable during metastasis, whether to locoregional or distant sites. Chemotherapy did not modify the HER-2 status in metastatic lesions. Therefore, HER-2 amplification can be evaluated reliably in material from either primary or metastatic tumors in most patients. Further study with larger series is warranted to elucidate the significance of discordant results. Cancer 2005. © 2005 American Cancer Society.

A prospective randomized study was done to determine the effect of different doxorubicin (Adriamycin [ADR], Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH) administration (schedules every week versus every 3 weeks) on the productivity of a cyclophosphamide, ADR, cisplatin (CAP) chemotherapy regimen for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Electrocardiograms, multigated cardiac scans, echocardiograms, and endomyocardial biopsies were done serially for cardiac monitoring. Of 102 patients, 47 ahd inoperable limited disease (LD), 47 had extensive disease (ED), and eight had no evidence of disease. In the last group chemotherapy was given adjuvantly. Fifty-one patients were entered into each treatment arm. The groups were formed according to extent of disease and were comparable in terms of patient characteristics. In these groups, the overall response rates using both schedules in LD patients were similar: in patients without chest irradiation previously, there was a response of 35% with ADR weekly, and 31% with ADR triweekly; in LD patients with chest irradiation previously, the response was 20% with ADR weekly, and 25% with ADR triweekly; and in ED patients, 16% with ADR weekly, and 11% with ADR triweekly. There was no significant difference in survival between the two treatment groups. However, results for all responders suggested a longer duration of response with weekly than with triweekly ADR (complete plus partial response: 35.8 versus 11.4 weeks, P = 0.06; minor response: 34 versus 11.5 weeks, P = 0.003, respectively). Results also suggested that weekly ADR was less cardiotoxic than triweekly ADR: 29% of patients in the former group had no changes or only minor changes in endomyocardial biopsy results, whereas all patients in the latter group had at least grade 0.5 changes at a similar dosage. The median doses of weekly ADR were higher at the same endomyocardial biopsy-defined toxicity levels. No correlation was found between toxic effects defined by endomyocardial biopsy results and those defined by noninvasive monitoring techniques, although the number of patients assessed was small. Weekly ADR produced less granulocytopenia and a lower incidence of fever (6% versus 16%, P less than 0.001) than did triweekly ADR. Alopecia, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were significantly less for weekly ADR than triweekly Adr (P less than 0.0005, less than 0.0005, and less than 0.005, respectively). These data suggest that weekly ADR can achieve the same therapeutic results as the standard triweekly regimen with less cardiotoxicity, myelotoxicity, alopecia, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting in patients with NSCLC.