4 results on '"Casarett DJ"'
Search Results
2. Race, treatment preferences, and hospice enrollment: eligibility criteria may exclude patients with the greatest needs for care.
- Author
-
Fishman J, O'Dwyer P, Lu HL, Henderson HR, Asch DA, and Casarett DJ
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms psychology, Patient Participation, Socioeconomic Factors, White People, Black or African American psychology, Eligibility Determination, Health Services Needs and Demand, Healthcare Disparities, Hospice Care psychology, Hospice Care statistics & numerical data, Neoplasms therapy, Patient Satisfaction
- Abstract
Background: The requirement that patients give up curative treatment makes hospice enrollment unappealing for some patients and may particularly limit use among African-American patients. The current study was conducted to determine whether African-American patients with cancer are more likely than white patients to have preferences for cancer treatment that exclude them from hospice and whether they are less likely to want specific hospice services., Methods: Two hundred eighty-three patients who were receiving treatment for cancer at 6 oncology clinics within the University of Pennsylvania Cancer Network completed conjoint interviews measuring their perceived need for 5 hospice services and their preferences for continuing cancer treatment. Patients were followed for 6 months or until death., Results: African-American patients had stronger preferences for continuing their cancer treatments on a 7-point scale even after adjusting for age, sex, finances, education, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, quality of life, and physical and psychologic symptom burden (adjusted mean score, 4.75 vs 3.96; beta coefficient, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-1.41 [P = .007]). African-American patients also had greater perceived needs for hospice services after adjusting for these characteristics (adjusted mean score, 2.31 vs 1.83; beta coefficient, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.92 [P = .01]). However, this effect disappeared after adjusting for household finances., Conclusions: Hospice eligibility criteria may exclude African-American patients disproportionately despite greater perceived needs for hospice services in this population. The mechanisms driving this health disparity likely include both cultural differences and economic characteristics, and consideration should be given to redesigning hospice eligibility criteria., ((c) 2008 American Cancer Society.)
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Do phase 1 patients have greater needs for palliative care compared with other cancer patients?
- Author
-
Finlay E, Lu HL, Henderson HR, O'Dwyer PJ, and Casarett DJ
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chaplaincy Service, Hospital, Community Health Nursing, Counseling, Female, Home Care Services, Hospice Care, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic, Health Services Needs and Demand, Neoplasms therapy, Palliative Care, Patient Participation
- Abstract
Background: Phase 1 oncology trial participants often are excluded from hospice. However, it is not known whether they would benefit from hospice services. The objectives of the current study were to define the palliative care needs of these patients and to determine whether their needs are greater than those of other cancer patients., Methods: Two hundred ninety-seven patients who were undergoing cancer therapy and 69 patients who were enrolled in phase 1 trials at 7 oncology clinics in an urban cancer network were recruited and consented to participate in interviews. Interviewers assessed the prevalence and severity of 10 symptoms using the Global Distress Index of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale and patients' perceived need for 4 services typically provided through hospice: a chaplain, counselor, home health aide, and visiting nurse., Results: Patients in the 2 groups had a similar symptom burden. However, after adjusting for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status scores, phase 1 patients were more likely to have 5 of the 10 symptoms and reported greater severity for 6 of the 10 symptoms. Compared with other patients, phase 1 patients were less likely to say they needed a home health aide (4 of 69 patients [6%] vs 198 of 297 patients [67%]), a chaplain (7 of 69 patients [10%] vs 134 of 297 patients [45%]), or a counselor (11 of 69 patients [16%] vs 160 of 297 patients [54%]; chi-square test: P<.001 for all). They were equally likely to say they needed a visiting nurse (30 of 69 patients [44%] vs 142 of 297 patients [48%]; chi-square test: P=.516)., Conclusions: Compared with other patients who had cancer, patients who were participating in phase 1 trials were less likely to want several home care services, although they experienced a greater symptom burden. Further research will be needed to define the palliative care needs of this population., (Copyright (c) 2009 American Cancer Society.)
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Must patients with advanced cancer choose between a Phase I trial and hospice?
- Author
-
Casarett DJ, Karlawish JH, Henry MI, and Hirschman KB
- Subjects
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Databases, Factual, Decision Making, Eligibility Determination, Ethics, Medical, Health Care Surveys, Humans, Informed Consent, Neoplasms therapy, Palliative Care, Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic, Hospice Care, Neoplasms pathology, Patient Participation
- Abstract
Background: Phase I oncology trials offer no meaningful chance for direct medical benefit and they may prevent patients with advanced cancer from receiving palliative care in a hospice program. However, it is not known whether dual enrollment in a Phase I trial and hospice is feasible., Methods: Five hundred thirty-four Phase I trials were identified in a national online database, of which 179 (34%) accepted patients with a life expectancy of less than 6 months. Of these, 50 were selected randomly. Their principal investigators were surveyed by fax, with follow-up telephone calls and e-mails. Ninety-two hospices were selected randomly from a national database. Surveys were conducted by telephone with intake coordinators. Principal investigators were asked whether patients enrolled in hospice could also enroll in their trials if they were eligible in all other respects. Hospice intake coordinators were asked whether a patient with advanced cancer who met hospice eligibility criteria could also enroll in a Phase I trial., Results: Surveys were completed by 45 of 50 principal investigators (90%) and by 89 of 92 hospices (97%). Although both groups were in favor of dual enrollment, principal investigators (41 of 45; 91%) were more likely to support dual enrollment than hospices (60 of 89; 67%; chi-square test, P = 0.004). Most hospices that did not support dual enrollment cited reasons that were based on concerns about payment or misunderstandings about the nature of Phase I trials., Conclusions: Most hospices and Phase I principal investigators believe that eligible patients should be allowed to enroll simultaneously in hospice and Phase I trials. These results suggest that the choice between hospice and a Phase I trial is a false dilemma and that greater collaboration in this area is needed., (Copyright 2002 American Cancer Society.DOI 10.1002/cncr.10820)
- Published
- 2002
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.