Search

BACKGROUND Prospective quality metrics for neck dissection have not been established for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between lymph node counts from neck dissection, local-regional recurrence, and overall survival. METHODS The number of lymph nodes counted from neck dissection in patients treated in 2 NRG Oncology trials (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group [RTOG] 9501 and RTOG 0234) was evaluated for its prognostic impact on overall survival with a multivariate Cox model adjusted for demographic, tumor, and lymph node data and stratified by the postoperative treatment group. RESULTS Five hundred seventy-two patients were analyzed at a median follow-up of 8 years. Ninety-eight percent of the patients were pathologically N+. The median numbers of lymph nodes recorded on the left and right sides were 24 and 25, respectively. The identification of fewer than 18 nodes was associated with worse overall survival in comparison with 18 or more nodes (hazard ratio [HR], 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.74; P = .007). The difference appeared to be driven by local-regional failure (HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.02-2.08; P = .04) but not by distant metastases (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.77-1.53; P = .65). When the analysis was limited to NRG Oncology RTOG 0234 patients, adding the p16 status to the model did not affect the HR for dissected nodes, and the effect of nodes did not differ with the p16 status. CONCLUSIONS The removal and identification of 18 or more lymph nodes was associated with improved overall survival and lower rates of local-regional failure, and this should be further evaluated as a measure of quality in neck dissections for mucosal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 2016;122:3464–71. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

BACKGROUND. Patients with recurrent or metastatic HNC have a poor response and survival with currently available chemotherapy agents. Thus, new agents are needed. The authors report the results of a phase II trial of irinotecan and cisplatin in patients with metastatic or recurrent HNC. METHODS. Patients were treated with irinotecan 65 mg/m2 IV over 90 minutes and cisplatin 30 mg/m2 were administered intravenously weekly for four weeks, followed by a two week rest. However, after 17 patients were treated with weekly irinotecan at a dose of 65 mg/m2, toxicity analysis demonstrated the poor tolerance of that dose in this patient population. Thus, the protocol was amended, and irinotecan was dose reduced to a starting dose of 50 mg/m2. Twenty-three additional patients were treated with this dose. RESULTS. Forty patients were enrolled on study between February 2002 and April 2006, 17 patients at the first dose level and 23 patients at the amended dose level. Overall, 12 of 17 patients (71%) treated with irinotecan 65 mg/m2 experienced clinically significant grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Twelve patients required dose reductions. Toxicity was reduced but 17% of patients still experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicity on the lower irinotecan dose. The response rate was 35% for patients treated at irinotecan 65 mg/m2 and 22% for patients treated at 50 mg/m2. No complete responses were noted. CONCLUSIONS. The combination of irinotecan and cisplatin is efficacious in a poor prognosis group of patients but toxicity is substantial. Cancer 2008. © 2008 American Cancer Society.

BACKGROUND Nonsmall cell lung carcinoma comprises approximately 75% of all lung carcinoma cases in the U.S. Newly evolving strategies have created considerable controversy regarding the optimal treatment for patients diagnosed with this disease. METHODS A 17-item survey was designed to collect demographic data and information regarding practice patterns for nonsmall cell lung carcinoma, including patient assessment, treatment approaches, and roles of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Surveys were mailed in the summer of 1997 to approximately 9200 oncologists of all types throughout the U.S. Practice settings included private office, private hospital, academic, university-affiliated office, government, and Veterans Administration institutions. RESULTS Approximately 10% of the oncologists responded (n = 979), including 499 medical oncologists (51%), 464 radiation oncologists (47%), and 16 others (2%). For the adjuvant treatment of surgically resected N1-2 disease, combined modality treatment was preferred over radiation therapy alone by medical oncologists (48% vs. 16%; P < 0.001) and radiation therapy alone was preferred over combined modality treatment by radiation oncologists (55% vs. 38%; P < 0.001). The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin was the preferred first-line regimen for all stages of nonsmall cell lung carcinoma by the majority of medical oncologists (55%), whereas the majority of radiation oncologists (58%) chose the combination of etoposide and platinum. With regard to the optimal combined modality approach, respondents were divided evenly between concurrent chemoradiotherapy (34%) and sequential chemoradiotherapy (31%). Overall, respondents reported basing treatment decisions largely on published literature (55%) compared with personal experience (19%), seminars and colleagues (16%), and clinical trial availability (10%) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS This survey confirms many differences in practice patterns among medical oncologists and radiation oncologists in the treatment of patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma and suggests the need for the multidisciplinary management of this entity. In addition, the current study demonstrates that reliance on the medical literature as a basis for treatment steadily declines the longer the physician has been in practice. Cancer 2000;88:1336–1346. © 2000 American Cancer Society.