Search

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Forest Research is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Forest Research is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This paper examines the impact that climatic change over the last millennium has had on aggradation and degradation of permafrost peatlands and the associated change in organic matter accumulation. Permafrost reached its southernmost Holocene extent in boreal continental western Canada during the Little Ice Age with 28 800 km2 of permafrost peatland present within a sensitive zone demarcated by permafrost degradation. Subsequent degradation of permafrost has occurredin response to warming, with forested bogs changing to nonforested poor fens, associated with rising water levels. In conjunction with this ecosystem change, long-term net organic matter accumulation increases. As permafrost is in disequilibrium with climate, much of the permafrost that remains is in a relict state. Mapping of past and present permafrost distribution from peatland landforms indicates only 9% has degraded since the Little Ice Age, resulting in a 5% increase in long-term net organic matter accumulation. Of the permafrost that remains, 22% is in disequilibrium, located largely in the northern part of the sensitive zone. Additional loss of forested lands will occur inthe future in boreal continental western Canada under present-day climatic conditions as permafrost approaches equilibrium, with a further 11% increase in long-term net organic matter accumulation predicted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We studied the short-term impact of cutting with the protection of regeneration (CPR) on ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbellus) and its habitat.Drumming males were surveyed in the boreal forest of western Quebec between 1990 and 1994 in 5 control stands and 10 stands that were cutin 1992. Cutting caused a 50% decline in total density and basal area of trees. In harvested stands, shrubs were less abundant than in control stands. Lateral cover between 1 and 2 m and canopy closure werealso lower in cut stands. In the harvested stands, the density varied between 14.1 and 22.6 drummers/km2 between 1990 and 1992before the CPR. In 1993, density declined to 10.1 but was reestablished at 21.5 in 1994. Densities did not differ significantly before orafter the CPR nor between cut and uncut stands (p > 0.05). After theCPR, the grouse generally established their drumming sites in the periphery of cut areas. There they found lateral cover and canopy closure similar to those measured in control stands by choosing sites where deciduous shrubs were more abundant than in the remainder of the stand. However, the characteristics of the tree stratum were not optimal; their overall density, that of Betulaceae, and that of Salicaceae were higher near drumming sites located in control stands than those in harvested stands. In harvested stands, drumming sites had a lower total basal area of trees, and namely that of deciduous trees, than in control sites. To maintain ruffed grouse populations immediately after cutting in mixed and deciduous stands of public lands, we suggestthat CPRs be in 15-ha blocks while maintaining a basal area of at least 7.5 m2/ha, half of which should be in trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) and paper birch (Betula papyrifera Marsh.). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]