Search

Vegetation-management practices are applied in temperate-zone forests on the assumption that changing the competitive environment between conifers and unwanted vegetation will improve conifer productivity. We review this assumption using research examining interactions between paper birch (Betula papyrifera Marsh.) and conifers in the highly productive Interior Cedar Hemlock zone of British Columbia. We have found that both competition and facilitation are important in young plantations, where paper birch competes for light, reducing growth of shade-intolerant conifers, but having a facilitative effect on shade-tolerant conifers. This facilitative effect may result from greater ectomycorrhizal diversity, population sizes of Armillaria ostoyae (Romagn.) Herink antagonistic bacteria, and associative nitrogen fixation in plantations where interior Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca (Beissn.) Franco) is mixed with paper birch. Where paper birch is manually cut or girdled, conifers grow faster in diameter, but more die as a result of A. ostoyae root disease, and these responses increase with increasing weeding intensity. The weeding treatments do not affect plant community species richness but reduce paper birch dominants and increase understory structural diversity. British Columbia forest policy has been slow to respond to these findings, and we suggest that as a result, the forested landscape incurs substantial risk. We propose additional pathways for managing Interior Cedar Hemlock mixtures to ensure that the natural mix of forest types in the landscape is maintained. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Treatments that reduce neighbour density are widely applied in the belief they will improve conifer growth in mixed forests. However, our understanding of stand composition and age effects on competition is poor. We used neighbourhood analysis for 748 target conifer trees to examine interspecific competition within 11-, 25-, and 50-year-old mixed, even-aged stands of paper birch (Betula papyrifera Marsh.), Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca (Beissn.) Franco), western redcedar (Thuja plicata Donn ex D. Don), and western larch (Larix occidentalis Nutt.) in southern interior British Columbia. Critical neighbourhood height and distance were identified where competition accounted for the greatest variation in target conifer diameter. Competition processes were emperically examined using relative height indices. We found that critical neighbourhood distance increased with stand age and was greater for larch than for cedar. Critical neighbourhood height was higher for cedar than for Douglas-fir or larch in the 11-year-old stands but lower in the older stands. The most important competitors in the 11-year-old stands were tall neighbours, whereas those in the older stands were short neighbours. We found asymmetrical relationships between target conifers and neighbours for all species and age-classes, indicating a resource preemption mode of competition. To be useful in developing prescriptions for competition management in mixed species stands, competition indices should consider neighbour identity and critical height for each target species. Assessment radius must also be sufficiently large to adequately characterize competition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]