Search

Isopachs of Huronian strata of the Elliot and Hough Lake groups in the southern part of the Cobalt Basin can be used to define the geometry of a 4 km wide valley system that directly influenced the location of gravel-bed rivers bearing detrital gold and auriferous pyrite in the Mississagi Formation. Distribution and thickness of these and underlying formations can be directly linked to initial valley formation parallel to existing north-south-oriented faults in the Archean basement. Thickness distributions were directly influenced by active subsidence associated with transverse, east-south-east (ESE)-oriented, normal faults, related to extension along the Huronian transform-rift margin further south. Strata underlying the Mississagi Formation were largely removed by erosion in the northern part of the paleovalley system, but thickened and then thinned south of the ESE faults. Pyrite and detrital gold in the Mississagi Formation may have been concentrated from reworking of coarse clastic rocks of the Matinenda and Ramsay Lake formations, along with significant contributions from erosion of proximal Archean basement within 3–5 km of the preserved basin margins. There is strong evidence to suggest that stream flow was initially concentrated in three main structurally influenced valley systems in the north, with one lateral tributary in the south-eastern part of the basin. The fluvial systems merged, and thickened, south of the Tee Lake fault, possibly reflecting trans-tensional influences on the basin margin faults. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Mesoproterozoic Frontenac terrane in the southern Grenville Province of Ontario is separated by shear zones from the Composite Arc Belt to the west and the Adirondack Lowlands to the east. The majority of the terrane is made up of granulite-facies metasedimentary rocks that are the oldest lithologies recognized in the terrane. Five samples were selected for U–Pb geochronology to constrain (1) metamorphic age, (2) depositional age of sedimentary protoliths, and (3) source regions of detrital zircon. Two pelitic gneisses and a marble are dominated by metamorphic zircon, whereas two quartzites contain a diverse population of detrital zircon that are surrounded by metamorphic overgrowths. Metamorphic zircon have 206Pb/207Pb ages of 1.19–1.16 Ga, and a small population is 1.22 Ga. These ages correspond to the Shawinigan and Elzevirian orogenies and provide minimum ages for deposition. The youngest detrital grains with ages of 1.25–1.24 Ga provide maximum depositional ages. Quartzites (and pelitic gneisses) have a wide range of detrital zircon ages that reflect local Mesoproterozoic Grenville sources and Paleoproterzoic and Archean sources in the northern Grenville Province and elsewhere in Laurentia. Most notable is a large population of 1.9–1.8 Ga zircon, which points towards derivation from the Penokean orogen in the midcontinent or Makkovikian–Ketilidian orogen of Labrador and Greenland, indicating long sedimentary transport distances. The similarities in depositional ages and detrital zircon ages between Frontenac terrane and Adirondack metasedimentary rocks suggest a shared sedimentary history, which we interpret as deposition in the same Trans-Adirondack backarc basin at ca. 1.25 Ga. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Several unconformities have been previously recognized in the Late Ordovician and early Silurian strata of southern Ontario. We examined the Georgian Bay, Queenston, Whirlpool, Manitoulin, Power Glen, and Cabot Head formations and associated unconformities. Detailed sequence stratigraphic and chemostratigraphic analysis of Late Ordovician and early Silurian outcrops between Niagara, New York, and Manitoulin Island, Ontario, reveals new insights on the timing of the erosional unconformities and the Ordovician–Silurian boundary. We recognize three significant lowstand unconformities in this interval, which are referred to as the Cherokee, S1B, and S2 unconformities. Additional small-scale surfaces are present but do not reflect any major change in sea level or pause in sedimentation. Using δ13Ccarb chemostratigraphy, biostratigraphy, and sequence stratigraphy, we tentatively correlate units and the mentioned unconformities from southern Ontario to other eastern North American sections of comparable age, showing how glacioeustasy had a widespread effect on the deposition and removal of strata in far-field, subtropical basins. The Cherokee unconformity appears to be a composite erosion surface found across eastern North America that formed during the two or more episodes of glacioeustatic sea level fall in the early to middle Hirnantian. The overlying S1B and S2 unconformities can also be found across eastern North America and appear to be the result of glacioeustatic sea level falls occurring during the early Silurian. These new insights on the timing of erosional unconformities help better constrain the placement of the Ordovician/Silurian boundary in Ontario. It appears that the boundary does not correspond to a lowstand-related disconformity as previously suggested but can be tentatively placed within the Power Glen or lower Cabot Head formations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Sandy Lake basin in northwestern Ontario is a potentially important area for insights into the late history of glacial Lake Agassiz because of its extensive glaciolacustrine deposits and well-preserved shoreline features of this geological episode. However, little information is available on its deglaciation history. Recent mapping shows the withdrawal of the ice from the basin center and subsequent deposition of extensive varved clay in the lake with an optically stimulated luminescence-dated maximum age at 11.4 ± 0.9 ka. With its further recession, the ice constructed the Opasquia moraine on the northern rim of the basin sometime before the development on the moraine of the first major shoreline of the lake (the The Pas, inferred at 10.1 ka). Lowering of the lake level formed many strandlines on the moraine and elsewhere in the basin, which can be correlated with those in the main Agassiz basin based on projected water planes (the The Pas to Ponton). Radiocarbon dating on basal wood remains of surface peat in a former strait defined by the Ponton shoreline and a nearby site on the former lake floor indicates the abandonment of this shoreline and hence the withdrawal of Lake Agassiz from the Sandy Lake basin by 8.3 ± 0.1 cal ka (UOC-7883). The date, although a minimum-limiting age, provides the hitherto best possible age constraint for the Ponton–Kinojévis shorelines, which many hypothesize represent one of the major lake levels during the final drainage of Lake Agassiz into Hudson Bay but have never been adequately dated before. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Gordon Lake Formation (GLF) of the Paleoproterozoic Huronian Supergroup is a siliciclastic-dominated succession ranging from 300 to 1100 m in thickness. Lithostratigraphic and sedimentological analyses of the formation in the Bruce Mines and Flack Lake areas, and Killarney and Lady Evelyn-Smoothwater provincial parks, Ontario, Canada, revealed seven lithofacies, which comprise three distinct lithofacies associations. The lithofacies associations are subtidal nearshore, subtidal to shallow shelf, and mixed intertidal flat. A variety of structures interpreted to be biogenic in nature, including microbially induced sedimentary structures (MISSs) and stromatolites, are preserved, which support local microbial colonization in a tidally influenced marine environment. Wave, current, and tide-generated sedimentary structures, including symmetrical ripples, trough cross-beds, flaser and lenticular bedding, and mudstone drapes, are abundant in all study areas. Storm influence is suggested by normally graded deposits, mudstone rip-up clasts, and soft-sediment deformation structures (SSDSs), including load casts, ball-and-pillow structures, convolute bedding, and pseudonodules. Interbedding and interlamination of sandstone and mudstone units are present throughout the GLF and represent fluctuations in water level and energy, related to tidal and storm processes. A lowermost carbonate-rich unit may represent a period of low clastic influx. The contacts with the underlying Lorrain and overlying Bar River formations appear gradational. The depositional environment can be visualized as an open coast, shallow marine shelf that was influenced by microbial mats, tides, and storms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rounded argillite clasts within the lower Gowganda Formation of the Huronian Supergroup near Whitefish Falls, Ontario, have been historically mapped as Sudbury Breccia, implying that their formation was initiated by the Sudbury meteorite impact event. Alternative genetic models proposed to explain the breccia at Whitefish Falls include formation through intrusion of diabase into wet sediment accompanied by soft-sediment deformation events. Outcrops in the Whitefish Falls area contain clear evidence for early post-depositional fracturing: flow of argillites into brittle fractured sandstones. Linking these geological processes suggests that the formation of the breccia at Whitefish Falls was generated by faulting of the Huronian sedimentary basin during the sedimentation of the Gowganda argillites. Using a GIS approach to compare the distribution of known breccia bodies with mapped lithology and structure, it is apparent that the term Sudbury Breccia has been applied to two types of breccias. First, true Sudbury Breccia, which is characterised by rounded heterogeneous clasts in an aphanitic matrix, is only found in proximity to the Sudbury Impact crater. The distribution of the second, primarily sediment derived, type of breccia, as seen at Whitefish Falls, is strongly associated with mapped faults and regional-scale basement discontinuities, as defined by gravity and magnetic data. Since this type of breccia is present throughout the entire Huronian sedimentary sequence, the term "Huronian Breccia" is more appropriate. This breccia is not the result of a single geological event but rather episodes of fault activity, as the geometry of the Huronian basin evolved over time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)