Search

This paper presents a synthesis of the design provisions of the second edition of the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code (CHBDC) for fibre-reinforced structures. New design provisions for applications not covered by the first edition of the CHBDC and the rationale for those that remain unchanged from the first edition are given. Among the new design provisions are those for glass-fibre-reinforced polymer as both primary reinforcement and tendons in concrete; and for the rehabilitation of concrete and timber structures with externally bonded fibre-reinforced-polymer (FRP) systems or near-surface-mounted reinforcement. The provisions for fibre-reinforced concrete deck slabs in the first edition have been reorganized in the second edition to explicitly include deck slabs of both cast-in-place and precast construction and are now referred to as externally restrained deck slabs, whereas deck slabs containing internal FRP reinforcement are referred to as internally restrained deck slabs. Resistance factors in the second edition have been recast from those in the first edition and depend on the condition of use, with a further distinction made between factory- and field-produced FRP. In the second edition, the deformability requirements for FRP-reinforced and FRP-prestressed concrete beams and slabs of the first edition have been split into three subclauses covering the design for deformability, minimum flexural resistance, and crack-control reinforcement. The effect of sustained loads on the strength of FRPs is accounted for in the second edition by limits on stresses in FRP at the serviceability limit state. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper describes results from a study of the dynamic performance of the Confederation Bridge during traffic load tests and a storm with high winds that occurred at the bridge site on 7 November 2001. The traffic load tests were conducted over a three-span segment of the bridge and consisted of single and double truck configurations at different speeds. The winds during the storm of 7 November 2001 were the strongest that have ever been measured at the bridge site since the opening of the bridge. The vibrations of the bridge during both the load tests and the storm were recorded by a network of 76 accelerometers. By processing the recorded vibrations, vertical deflections and dynamic amplification factors due to the traffic load tests and vertical and lateral deflections due to the wind during the storm were computed. The computed values were compared with those used in the design. It was found that both the deflections and the dynamic amplification factors were much smaller than the design values. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]