Search

Currently, no systematic approach exists for damage evaluation of light-frame wood structures subjected to blast loading. This paper presents a detailed assessment of the behaviour of 33 full-scale light-frame wood stud walls subjected to a total of 48 shots of simulated blast loading. Detailed documentation of the observed damage allowed for the development of an accurate evaluation strategy of the response limits. The observed response limits are compared to limits derived from single-degree-of-freedom modelling using scaled pressure-impulse diagrams and to current code performance levels. It was concluded that the assumption made in contemporary blast design codes overestimates the ductility ratios for light-frame wood stud walls, and that using a maximum ductility of 2 is more appropriate and safer for blast design. Based on the observed damage levels obtained from the experimental study, the authors propose new ductility ratios corresponding to four damage regions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Structural retrofits to buildings can be implemented to increase the protection level to occupants from potential terrorist bombing attacks. Retrofit strategies discussed in this paper can be categorized into three groups: (i) strengthening concepts, (ii) shielding concepts, and (iii) concepts to control hazardous debris. Strengthening concepts such as span reduction and increasing member sections are considered in this paper for three common construction systems including steel, concrete, and masonry. Shielding concepts are intended to prevent structural members from being fully loaded by blast forces and range from local area applications to entire building coverage. Examples of shielding concepts include a new section of wall that shields a vulnerable portion of the building or a new structure built over an entire building. Examples of concepts to control hazardous debris include arresting or deflecting failed cladding away from critical areas with “catch systems” or internal shield systems. This paper is intended to discuss typical building retrofit strategies for primary structural members (load bearing) and secondary structural members (nonload bearing) through strengthening, shielding, or controlling hazardous debris. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Because of changes in functional or security requirements, many new or existing buildings are now required to resist blast loads. New buildings can be designed and constructed to resist defined blast loads. Existing buildings, on the other hand, would have to rely on a risk assessment to determine both its vulnerability to blast effects and the necessary measures to mitigate the unacceptable blast effects. A rapid screening methodology has been developed for conducting a preliminary assessment of buildings against external blast effects. The methodology accounts for the threat, the vulnerability of the building, the consequence of an event and the risk, which is the product of the threat and the consequence. The rapid screening methodology has been applied to several buildings and the results are reasonable. This paper presents the rapid screening methodology and its application to two federal buildings in Canada. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]