Search

The paper presents the results of laboratory triaxial compression tests to study the stiffness of very loose Fraser River sands. The stiffness has been shown to be very dependent on the time of confinement prior to shearing and the stress ratio at which the sample is aged. Higher stress ratios resulted in very low initial moduli with no ageing, but the moduli increased by several hundred percent during the first 1000 min of ageing. For ageing at a stress ratio of 1.0 (i.e., isotropic ageing), the initial moduli were higher than those for ageing at high stress ratios, but the stiffness increased by only about 60% during the first 1000 min of ageing. The rate of stiffness increase was approximately linear with the logarithm of time up to ageing times of 10 000 min (>1 week). Ageing at any stress ratio resulted in reduced contractive volumetric strain during subsequent shearing, reflecting a change in soil structure during ageing. The dℇ[sub v] /dℇ[sub a] ratio under triaxial compression loading decreased as the ageing stress ratio increased. The results suggest that close attention must be paid to the age of laboratory samples prepared to study the stress–strain response of sands at strains up to about 0.1%, particularly in studies on loose sand.Key words: sands, ageing, creep, modulus.Cet article présente les résultats d'un programme d'essais en laboratoire pour étudier la rigidité de sables très lâches du fleuve Fraser au moyen d'essais de compression triaxiale. On a montré que la rigidité était très dépendante du temps de confinement antérieur au cisaillement et du rapport des contraintes sous lequel l'échantillon a vieilli. Des rapports de contraintes plus élevés ont donné des modules initiaux très faibles sans vieillissement, mais les modules ont augmenté de plusieurs 100 % au cours des mille premières minutes de vieillissement. Sous un vieillissement isotrope, les modules initiaux étaient plus élevés que pour des rapports de contraintes plus élevés mais la rigidité a augmenté de seulement environ 60 % durant les 1000 premières minutes de vieillissement. La vitesse d'augmentation de la rigidité était approximativement linéaire en fonction du logarithme du temps jusqu'à des temps de vieillissement de 10 000 minutes (>1 semaine). Le vieillissement sous n'importe quel rapport de contraintes a donné des déformations volumétriques de contraction réduites durant le cisaillement subséquent, ce qui indiquait un changement dans la structure du sol durant le vieillissement. Le rapport dℇ[sub v] /dℇ[sub a] sous chargement triaxial en compression a diminué lorsque le rapport de contraintes de vieillissement augmentait. Les résultats suggèrent que l'on doit porter un attention particulière à l'âge des échantillons préparés en laboratoire pour étudier la réponse contrainte-déformation des sables jusqu'à des déformations de 0,1 %, particulièrement dans les études sur le sable lâche.Mots clés : sables, vieillissement, fluage, module.[Traduit par la Rédaction] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An unusually intense atmospheric river affected the southern coastal region of British Columbia in mid-November 2021. Flooding and several ground failures such as landslides and riverbank erosion caused significant damage and interrupted the main transportation corridors, including major highways and railroads, severing land connectivity between Metro Vancouver and the rest of Canada. In this short note, we summarize and describe slope and riverbank ground failures in the Lower Mainland and connecting corridors to the interior such as the Fraser Canyon and the Coquihalla Valley, with focus on those that produced damage on highways. Field observations are discussed in the context of potential future similar disasters in the region due to more frequent extreme climatic events associated with climate change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Presents the results of the computer modelling component of the cover instrumentation research program initiated by Placer Dome Canada in British Columbia. Objectives of the computer modelling; Functions of a vegetated soil cover; Processes which are controlling water fluxes.

Two large landslides in overconsolidated glaciolacustrine clay and silt, located in river valleys in British Columbia, were found to be quite similar in their main aspects. However, their failure behaviour was very different. One continues to exhibit intermittent, mainly ductile deformations with limited mobility which are typical of compound landslides in stiff clay. The other suddenly developed into an extremely rapid flow slide of 6.4 Mm[sup 3] , damming a large river in the course of a few minutes and projecting a wave onto the opposite bank. The flow slide followed a period of strong infiltration. A comparison of the two cases explains the difference in their failure behaviour. Three possible mechanisms for brittle flow slide formation are proposed, the first based on the undrained brittleness of soil at the rupture surface, the second on the high internal strength of the sliding body, and the third on macroscopic brittleness developed by pre-failure ductile deformation and softening. Both latter mechanisms are facilitated by the presence of nonplastic units in the sliding mass.Key words: overconsolidated clay, silt, landslide, flow slide, brittleness, glaciolacustrine deposits.On a observé que deux grands glissements dans les argiles et silts glacio-marins surconsolidés situés dans des vallées de rivières en Colombie-Britannique étaient tout à fait semblables sous leurs principaux aspects. Cependant, leurs comportements en rupture ont été très différents. L'un continue de montrer des déformations intermittentes principalement ductiles avec une mobilité limitée, ce qui est typique des glissements composés dans les argiles raides. L'autre a soudainement développé une coulée extrêmement rapide de 6,4 Mm[sup 3] , damant une rivière importante en l'espace de quelques minutes et projetant une vague sur la berge opposée. La coulée s'est produite après une période de forte infiltration. Une comparaison des deux cas explique la différence dans leur comportement en rupture. On propose trois mécanismes possibles de formation de coulée: le premier basé sur la fragilité non drainée du sol le long de la surface de rupture, le second sur la forte résistance interne de la masse en mouvement, et le troisième sur la fragilité macroscopique développée par une déformation ductile et un ramollissement avant la rupture. Le deux derniers mécanismes sont facilités par la présence d'unités non plastiques dans la masse en mouvement. Mots clés : argile surconsolidée, silt, glissement, coulée, fragilité, dépôts glacio-marins.[Traduit par la Rédaction] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]