Search

The paper describes load and resistance factor design (LRFD) calibration for the resistance factor used in the Stiffness Method internal stability soil failure limit state for geogrid mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls. The Stiffness Method was recently adopted in the current American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials LRFD Bridge Design Specifications in the US, and will appear in the next edition of the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code. The paper describes the details of the calibration of the soil failure limit state which is unique to the Stiffness Method. Calibration outcomes include consideration of the concept of level of understanding in the selection of nominal load and resistance values which is unique to LRFD foundation engineering practice in Canada. A practical conclusion from these calculations is that if product line-specific creep test data are available to estimate the reinforcement secant creep stiffness used for design, then a resistance factor of 1.0 is reasonable for US practice. If only minimum average roll value tensile strength data are available, then a value of 0.95 is recommended for US practice. For Canadian practice, the corresponding values for typical level of understanding are 0.90 and 0.85, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper aims to analyze and describe the geotechnical behavior of a piled raft foundation of a tall building (53 floors, 172.4 m high) through the monitoring of strains in the building's columns and piles, the stresses at the raft–soil interface, and the foundation settlements. Field and laboratory tests were performed, and associated with axisymmetric and three-dimensional finite element analysis to the assessment of the measured data. The monitoring of the pile strains suggests the occurrence of soil expansion, caused by the raft excavation process, up to approximately 6 months after the excavation was completed. The presence of different soil profiles under the raft, with different mechanical properties, affected the distribution of the foundation settlements and the pile loads. Initially, the average pile loads were concentrated in the perimeter elements, but, as the construction of the building evolved, they tended to become more uniform. The effect of the superstructure stiffness caused successive load redistributions in the columns, which contributed to the maintenance of the maximum angular distortion of the building within the allowable values and reduced the load difference between the piles positioned in opposite soil profiles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tracked vehicles are widely deployed for heavy lifting and transportation on inaccessible terrains such as swamps, bogs, and peatlands. The stability of a tracked vehicle is traditionally assessed only under uniaxial loading conditions and the impact of combined loading from different directions is ignored. This makes the conventional design framework somewhat unreliable. The failure envelope approach has been widely employed to assess the load-carrying capacity of shallow foundations. However, the failure envelopes available in public domain mainly focused on single isolated foundations, ignoring the interference effect between the tracks due to the rigid connection of the vehicle. This paper aims to develop an integrated framework to assess the stability of a tracked vehicle on a soft soil under fully three-dimensional loading conditions. The finite element method is adopted to simulate the soil–vehicle interactions, with the tracks idealised as two shallow foundations in parallel. The stability of the foundation system is described in terms of failure envelopes considering various track configurations and load combinations. Failure envelopes are represented by expressions and ultimately integrated into a multiple-nested function to determine the overall stability factor. The framework is demonstrated by a case study of designing a tracked vehicle under combined loading conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Load–displacement analysis of a single deep foundation element can be accomplished by utilizing a soil–structure interaction model, such as the “t–z” model. By combining the soil–structure interaction model with a probabilistic analysis technique, such as Monte Carlo simulation, methods to rationally incorporate variability in the model parameters can be developed. As a result, the service limit state load capacity of a single deep foundation element can be computed for an allowable total head displacement. However, in design, differential settlement between individual foundation elements is often the event of interest. This paper develops a reliability-based design methodology for deep foundations based on a differential settlement design criterion. The design methodology is developed for various levels of uncertainty in the model parameters. The results are presented in the form of cumulative distribution functions that, combined with the calculated service limit state load capacity, form the basis for serviceability design of deep foundations based on a differential settlement criterion. L’analyse de charge – déplacement d’un élément unique d’une fondation profonde peut être accomplie en utilisant un modèle d’interaction sol – structure tel que le modèle « t– z ». En combinant un modèle d’interaction sol – structure et une analyse probabiliste, comme la simulation Monte Carlo, des méthodes peuvent être développées qui intègrent la variabilité des paramètres du modèle. L’état-limite à l’utilisation en capacité portante pour un élément de fondation profonde peut être calculée pour un déplacement total alloué de la tête. Cependant, durant la conception, la consolidation différentielle entre les éléments individuels est souvent un aspect d’intérêt. Cet article développe une méthodologie de conception basée sur la fiabilité pour des fondations profondes à partir d’un critère de consolidation différentielle. La méthodologie de conception est développée pour différents niveaux d’incertitude des paramètres du modèle. Les résultats sont présentés sous forme de fonctions de distribution cumulatives qui, lorsque combinées avec l’état-limite à l’utilisation en capacité portante, constituent la base de la conception de fondations profondes selon un critère de consolidation différentielle. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The planning of foundations for equipment that is sensitive to vibrations requires a thorough dynamic investigation of the proposed location of the foundation with regard to the effect of already existing or additional vibration sources. This paper discusses the analyses performed for a number of foundations supporting vibration-sensitive equipment that has been subjected to ground-transmitted excitations. These analyses considered the dynamic response of the foundations resulting from the normal operation of the supported equipment or the ground-transmitted excitations. In one case, the foundation of the Canadian Light Source, a third generation synchrotron that will be capable of generating electromagnetic radiation used in the study of the atomic and subatomic structure of materials, is examined. Another case involves the vibration analysis of a magnetic resonance imaging unit affected by traffic excitation. In the third case, a power plant facility that is subjected to blast-induced vibration from an adjacent quarry is investigated. The last case involves the response analysis of a compressor foundation affected by the ground-transmitted vibration from another compressor situated on a different foundation within the same facility. To assess the level of seismic excitation at the site due to traffic on an adjacent roadway in the first two cases and to blasting activity in the third case, extensive "green field" ground vibration-monitoring programs were carried out. The ground accelerations due to traffic and blasting were measured and recorded for three directions simultaneously: a vertical and two orthogonal horizontal directions. The measurements with the most intense ground accelerations taken at the ground surface in the location of the future equipment foundation... [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper presents a simple method for predicting the settlement of spread foundations on sand operating under typical working loads. The method accounts for the well known effects on soil stiffness of strain, stress level, and density dependence, but adopts the simplifying assumption that the stress distribution beneath a loaded foundation can be obtained from Boussinesq's equations for an elastic half space. Despite this simplification, the method is shown to predict foundation responses that closely match those computed using more sophisticated finite element (FE) analyses and those measured in laboratory footing tests, where the stiffness characteristics in triaxial compression were well defined. The method is also seen to predict general variations of foundation settlement with bearing pressure, foundation width, and degree of preloading that are entirely consistent with empirically observed trends. It is concluded that satisfactory settlement predictions for shallow foundations on cohesionless soil may be obtained using Boussinesq's equations if the soil's vertical stiffness characteristics, as inferred from triaxial compression data, can be specified with some degree of precision.Key words: stiffness, settlement, cohesionless soil.L'article présente une méthode simple de prédire le tassement de fondations superficielles sur le sable soumises à des charges de travail typiques. La méthode tient compte des effets bien connus sur le rigidité de la déformation, du niveau de contrainte et de la dépendance sur la densité, mais adopte l'hypothèse simplificatrice que la distribution des contraintes sous la fondation avec chargement peut être obtenue par les équations de Boussinesq pour un demi espace élastique. On montre qu'en dépit de cette simplification, la méthode prédit les réactions des fondations qui s'apparentent de près à celles calculées au moyen des analyses en éléments finis sophistiquées et celles mesurées dans des essais sur des semelles en laboratoire dans lesquels les caractéristiques de rigidité en compression triaxiale étaient bien définies. On voit également que la méthode prédit les variations générales du tassement de la fondation avec la pression portante, la largeur de la fondation et le degré de pré-chargement qui sont entièrement consistantes avec les tendances observées empiriquement. On conclut que des prédictions satisfaisantes du tassement pour les fondations superficielles sur du sol pulvérulent peuvent être obtenues au moyen des équations de Boussinesq si les caractéristiques de la rigidité verticale du sol telles que déduites des données de compression triaxiale peuvent être spécifiées avec un certain degré de précision.Mots clés : rigidité, tassement, sol pulvérulent.[Traduit par la Rédaction] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The paper deals with the reconstructions that were undertaken to correct multiple ballasted track foundation failures for a heavy gantry crane initially constructed in 1985. A satisfactory design was obtained in 1988 that incorporated geosynthetics.Key words: gantry crane, ballasted track, failure, reconstruction, geosynthetics, soil mechanics, foundation.Cet article traite des reconstructions qui furent entreprises pour corriger plusieurs ruptures dans les fondations d'une voie ballastée construite initialement en 1985 pour supporter une lourde grue à portique. En 1988, une conception satisfaisante incorporant des géosynthétiques a été finalement adoptée.Mots clés : grue à portique, voie ballastée, rupture, reconstruction, géosynthétiques, mécanique des sols, fondation.[Traduit par la Rédaction] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

During the installation of the Short Range Radar (SRR) facilities at 35 sites across the Canadian Arctic, in excess of 7 000 piles were installed for the SRR foundations. A total of 137 pile load tests were performed during the SRR construction. Only a small number of these were installed external to the foundations and were loaded well in excess of design loads to attempt to determine their ultimate load carrying capacity. Only eight of these piles were loaded for extended durations (>12 h). This paper presents the results of these long-term load tests and compares the results with design guidelines based on allowable pile deformations and creep in ice-rich, saline permafrost. In nonsaline permafrost, at high normalized displacement rates (>30 year[sup –1] ) the stresses on the piles at failure were less than those predicted by design guidelines for piles in ice-rich soil. At lower normalized displacement rates (<15 year[sup –1] ) the failure stresses on the piles were reasonably well predicted by the design guidelines. Significant reductions in pile capacity were observed in ice-rich, saline permafrost. Without detailed knowledge of the unfrozen water content in the soil, however, prediction of the behaviour of the piles could only be bounded by current design guidelines.Key Words: permafrost, field pile testing, cold-temperature grout, long-term creep.Durant l'installation des équipements du Short Range Radar (SRR) sur 35 sites à travers l'Arctique canadien, plus de 7 000 pieux ont été installés pour les fondations du SRR. Un total de 137 chargements de pieux ont été réalisés durant la construction du SRR. Seulement un petit nombre de ces pieux ont été installés en dehors des fondations et ont été chargés bien au delà des charges de conception pour tenter de déterminer leur capacité portante ultime. Seulement huit de ces pieux ont été chargés pour des périodes prolongées (>12 h). Cet article présente les résultats de ces essais de chargement de longue durée et compare les résultats aux guides de calcul basés sur les déformations permises des pieux, et sur le fluage dans le pergélisol salin et riche en glace. Dans le pergélisol non-salin, à des vitesses de déplacement normalisées élevées (>30 an[sup –1] ), les contraintes à la rupture sur les pieux étaient inférieures à celles prédites par les guides de calcul pour les pieux dans les sols riches en glace. À des vitesses de déplacement normalisées plus faibles (<15 an[sup –1] ), les guides de calcul ont prédit relativement bien les contraintes de rupture dans les pieux. Des réductions significatives de la capacité du pieu ont été observées dans le pergélisol salin riche en glace. Cependant, sans une connaissance détaillée de la teneur en eau non-gelée dans le sol, la prédiction de leur comportement ne pourrait être reliée qu'aux guides de calcul actuels. Mots clés : pergélisol, essai sur pieu en nature, injection à basse température, fluage à long terme.[Traduit par la Rédaction] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The present study proposes a new finite element methodology to analyse the behaviour of flexible combined pile–raft foundation (CPRF) situated in layered soil, in a displacement-based framework. The soil medium is idealised as an advanced elastic Pasternak medium and the piles and raft are modelled as bar and plate element, respectively. The two components of CPRF are analysed simultaneously and displacement compatibility is satisfied at the pile–raft junctions. A number of soil–structure interaction factors, which govern the behaviour of CPRF, are suitably subsumed in the analysis scheme. The proposed method is validated with available analytical and experimental studies. Further parametric studies, investigating the effects of soil layering and raft flexibility on the behaviour of CPRF, are explored. It is observed that the load sharing proportion between the components and the raft deformation pattern depend upon the thickness and position of the soft soil layer in a multilayered soil system. The thickness of the flexible raft plays a pivotal role in determining the behaviour of CPRF, founded in a multilayered soil profile. Thus, this research manifests notable advancement in understanding the behaviour of flexible CPRF in layered soil. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Presents a procedure for the calculation of bearing capacity of shallow foundations without using superposition approximation. Background on the Terzaghi equation; Failure mechanisms considered in determining the bearing capacity; Evaluation of error margins of the superposition assumption.