Search

Your search keyword '"Alexandre Dias Lopes"' showing total 3 results
Start Over Author "Alexandre Dias Lopes" Journal cadernos de saude publica
3 results on '"Alexandre Dias Lopes"'

1. Reproducibility of the Portuguese version of the PEDro Scale

Author

Silvia Regina Shiwa, Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa, Luciola da Cunha Menezes Costa, Anne Moseley, Luiz Carlos Hespanhol Junior, Roberta Venâncio, Cintia Ruggero, Tatiana de Oliveira Sato, and Alexandre Dias Lopes

Subjects
Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências, Ensaio Clínico, Questionários, Medicine, Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270
Abstract

The objective of this study was to test the inter-rater reproducibility of the Portuguese version of the PEDro Scale. Seven physiotherapists rated the methodological quality of 50 reports of randomized controlled trials written in Portuguese indexed on the PEDro database. Each report was also rated using the English version of the PEDro Scale. Reproducibility was evaluated by comparing two separate ratings of reports written in Portuguese and comparing the Portuguese PEDro score with the English version of the scale. Kappa coefficients ranged from 0.53 to 1.00 for individual item and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.82 for the total PEDro score was observed. The standard error of the measurement of the scale was 0.58. The Portuguese version of the scale was comparable with the English version, with an ICC of 0.78. The inter-rater reproducibility of the Brazilian Portuguese PEDro Scale is adequate and similar to the original English version.

Published
2011

2. Reproducibility of the Portuguese version of the PEDro Scale

Author

Silvia Regina Shiwa, Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa, Luciola da Cunha Menezes Costa, Anne Moseley, Luiz Carlos Hespanhol Junior, Roberta Venâncio, Cintia Ruggero, Tatiana de Oliveira Sato, and Alexandre Dias Lopes

Subjects
evidence-based practice, clinical trials, questionnaires, Medicine, Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270
Abstract

The objective of this study was to test the inter-rater reproducibility of the Portuguese version of the PEDro Scale. Seven physiotherapists rated the methodological quality of 50 reports of randomized controlled trials written in Portuguese indexed on the PEDro database. Each report was also rated using the English version of the PEDro Scale. Reproducibility was evaluated by comparing two separate ratings of reports written in Portuguese and comparing the Portuguese PEDro score with the English version of the scale. Kappa coefficients ranged from 0.53 to 1.00 for individual item and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.82 for the total PEDro score was observed. The standard error of the measurement of the scale was 0.58. The Portuguese version of the scale was comparable with the English version, with an ICC of 0.78. The inter-rater reproducibility of the Brazilian Portuguese PEDro Scale is adequate and similar to the original English version.

3. Reproducibility of the Portuguese version of the PEDro Scale

Author

Anne M. Moseley, Silvia Regina Shiwa, Lucíola da Cunha Menezes Costa, Tatiana de Oliveira Sato, Roberta Venâncio, Cintia Ruggero, Luiz Carlos Hespanhol Junior, Alexandre Dias Lopes, and Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa

Subjects
Questionnaires, Gerontology, Scale (ratio), Intraclass correlation, evidence-based practice, lcsh:Medicine, Ensaio Clínico, Individual item, Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências, Brazilian Portuguese, Surveys and Questionnaires, Questionários, Statistics, Humans, Clinical Trials, Physical Therapy Modalities, Language, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, clinical trials, Reproducibility, lcsh:Public aspects of medicine, lcsh:R, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproducibility of Results, lcsh:RA1-1270, questionnaires, Translating, Databases, Bibliographic, language.human_language, Test (assessment), Evidence-Based Practice, English version, language, Portuguese, Psychology, Brazil
Abstract

The objective of this study was to test the inter-rater reproducibility of the Portuguese version of the PEDro Scale. Seven physiotherapists rated the methodological quality of 50 reports of randomized controlled trials written in Portuguese indexed on the PEDro database. Each report was also rated using the English version of the PEDro Scale. Reproducibility was evaluated by comparing two separate ratings of reports written in Portuguese and comparing the Portuguese PEDro score with the English version of the scale. Kappa coefficients ranged from 0.53 to 1.00 for individual item and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.82 for the total PEDro score was observed. The standard error of the measurement of the scale was 0.58. The Portuguese version of the scale was comparable with the English version, with an ICC of 0.78. The inter-rater reproducibility of the Brazilian Portuguese PEDro Scale is adequate and similar to the original English version.

Published
2011
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results