Search

In this paper we prove that Neutrosophic Statistics is an extension of the Interval Statistics, since it may deal with all types of indeterminacies (with respect to the data, inferential procedures, probability distributions, graphical representations, etc.), it allows the reduction of indeterminacy, and it uses the neutrosophic probability that is more general than imprecise and classical probabilities, andhas more detailed corresponding probability density functions. While Interval Statistics only deals with indeterminacy that can be represented by intervals. And we respond to the arguments by Woodall et al. [1]. We show that not all indeterminacies (uncertainties) may be represented by intervals. Also, in some applications, we should better use hesitant sets (that have less indeterminacy) instead of intervals. We redirect the authors to the Plithogenic Probability and Plithogenic Statistics that are the most general forms of MultiVariate Probability and MultiVariate Statistics respectively (including, of course, the Imprecise Probability and Interval Statistics as subclasses). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

On the third version of this response-paper to Imamura's criticism, we recall that Non Standard Neutrosophic Logic was never used by neutrosophic community in no application, that the quarter of century oldneutrosophic operators (1995-1998) criticized by Imamura were never utilized since they were improved shortly after but he omits to tell their development, and that in real world applications we need to convert/approximate the Non Standard Analysis hyperreals, monads and binads to tiny intervals with the desired accuracy - otherwise they would be inapplicable. We point out several errors and false statements by Imamura [21] with respect to the inf/sup of nonstandard subsets, also Imamura's "rigorous definition of neutrosophic logic" is wrong and the same for his definition of nonstandard unit interval, and we prove that there is not a total order on the set of hyperreals (because of the newly introduced Neutrosophic Hyperreals that are indeterminate), whence the transfer principle is questionable. After his criticism, several response publications on theoretical nonstandard neutrosophics followed in the period 2018-2022. As such, Iextended the Non Standard Analysis by adding the left monad closed to the right, right monad closed to the left, pierced binad (we introduced in 1998), and unpierced binad-all these in order to close the newly extended nonstandard space (R) under nonstandard addition, nonstandard subtraction, nonstandard multiplication, nonstandard division, and nonstandard power operations [23, 24]. Improved definitions of Non Standard Unit Interval and Non Standard Neutrosophic Logic are presented. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This short article pairs the realms of "Mathematics", "Philosophy", and "Poetry", presenting some comers of intersection of this type of scientocreativity. Poetry have long been following mathematical patterns expressed by stern formal restrictions, as the strong metrical structure of ancient Greekheroic epic, or the consistent meter with standardized rhyme scheme and a "volta" of Italian sonnets. Poetry was always connected to Philosophy, and further on, notable mathematicians, like the inventor of quaternions, William Rowan Hamilton, or Ion Barbu, the creator of the Barbilian spaces, have written appreciated poems. We will focus here on an avant-garde movement in literature, art, philosophy, and science, called Paradoxism, founded in Romania in 1980 by a mathematician, philosopher and poet, and on the laboured writing exercises of the Oulipo group, founded in Paris in 1960 by mathematicians and poets, both of them still in act. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this short paper we recall the (Garfield) Impact Factor of a journal, we improve and extend it, and eventually present the Total Impact Factor that reflects the most accurate impact factor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper we explain how a person can celebrate 24 New Year Eves in a single year. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this short note we prove that the Kurepa (K) function is different from the Smarandache-Kurepa (SK) function, therefore, these functions are not the same, as Mijajlović has unfoundedly accused the prestigious Encyclopedia of Mathematics and this author. This note is an answer to Mijajlović's paper (Žarko Mijajlović, Fifty years of Kurepa's !n hypothesis, Bulletin T.CLIV de l'Académie serbe des sciences et des arts - 2021 Classe des Sciences mathématiques et naturelles Sciences mathématiques, No. 46, 169-181 (2021). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We have defined Neutrosophic Over-/Under-/Off-Set and Logic for the first time in 1995 and published in 2007. During 1995-2016 we presented them to various national and international conferences and seminars. These new notions are totally different from other sets/logics/probabilities. We extended the neutrosophic set respectively to Neutrosophic Overset {when some neutrosophic component is > 1}, to Neutrosophic Underset {when some neutrosophic component is < 0}, and to Neutrosophic Offset {when some neutrosophic components are off the interval [0, 1], i.e. some neutrosophic component > 1 and other neutrosophic component < 0}. This is no surprise since our real-world has numerous examples and applications of over-/under-/off-neutrosophic components. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multi-attribute decision making (MADM). Play an important role in many applications, due to the efficiency to handle indeterminate and inconsistent information, single valued neutrosophic sets is widely used to model indeterminate information. In this paper, a new MADM method based on neutrosophic trapezoid linguistic weighted arithmetic averaging aggregation SVNTrLWAA operator and neutrosophic trapezoid linguistic weighted geometric aggregation SVNTrLWGA operator is presented. A numerical example is presented to demonstrate the application and efficiency of the proposed method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this note we want to show that the PCR6 fusion rule works and redistributes the conflicting mass properly, contrarily to the authors' assertion that "he focal element {v3} absorbs almost all of the conflicting mass (the majority)."We also question the validity of the new CREC rule of combination presented by the authors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]