Search

Between 1981 and 1994, 13 patients were referred to the Orleans neutrontherapy department with inoperable or recurrent pelvic chordomas. One patient who had already been irradiated refused the treatment, fearing complications. Among the 12 patients suitable for evaluation, ten had undergone one to five previous surgical operations. The time lapse between the last surgical operation and neutrontherapy was 13 months. Neutrons were used alone or as a boost depending on the tumor volume or treatment purpose. At four years, crude survival and local control probability (Kaplan-Meier) were 61 and 54% respectively. This small series suggests that fast neutrontherapy can provide a good alternative for the treatment of inoperable sacral chordomas.

The degree of accuracy and reliability required in proton therapy can only be guaranteed if a comprehensive quality assurance (QA) programme is established. Such a programme obviously has common features with general QA in radiotherapy, but some aspects are specific to the use of protons and particularly to the characteristics of each facility. A study is in progress at Orsay to convert a series of quality controls into a systematic quality assurance programme. It includes some basic steps on organisation, setting up a QA committee and QA task groups, organising meetings, policies, procedures, records, qualifications, and determining some examples of tolerance in controls. Among some critical and specific points identified in this process are the combined treatment with photons at different institutions, the specificity of a non-hospital-based and complex facility, the high degree of precision required for the patient setup, and the need to develop in-house basic tools such as the treatment planning system. The inclusion of all the patients in prospective well-defined clinical trials, the comparison with alternative techniques and the radiobiological studies are considered as fundamentals for the QA programme. Present dosimetric and radiobiological intercomparisons between protontherapy centres are considered as partial audits. A study is in progress to establish common dosimetric and clinical protocols, radiobiological models and dose and volume specifications. In spite of the differences between the existing facilities, it should also be possible to obtain international consensus on general guidelines for a QA programme in proton therapy.

In Europe to date, 501 patients with salivary gland tumors have been treated with neutrons alone or with combined modalities. The most common histological types are adenoid cystic carcinomas, mucoepidermoid carcinomas and malignant mixed tumors. The results of conventional radiotherapy are suboptimal in inoperable or incompletely resected salivary gland tumors and in recurrent disease. The pooled data of some international series for low linear energy transfer radiation show a local control of 28%. Especially in advanced tumors neutron therapy can improve local control and should be the treatment of choice. The clinical data from different therapy centers in Europe show local control of 67% in gross disease.

Neutron capture irradiation aims to selectively destroy tumor cells using 10B(n,alpha)7Li nuclear reactions produced within themselves. Following the capture reaction, an alpha particle and a, 7Li ion are emitted. Carrying an energy of 2.79 MeV, they destroy all molecular structures along their path close to 10 microns. These captures, used exclusively with a 'slow' neutron irradiation, provide a neutron capture therapy (BNCT). If they are used in addition to a fast neutron beam irradiation, they provide a neutron capture potentiation (NCP). The Centre Antoine-Lacassagne in Nice is actively involved in the European Demonstration Project for BNCT of grade IV glioblastomas (GBM) after surgical excision and BSH administration. Taking into account the preliminary results obtained in Japan, work on an 'epithermal' neutron target compatible with various cyclotron beams is in progress to facilitate further developments of this technique. For NCP, thermalized neutron yield has been measured in phantoms irradiated in the fast neutron beam of the biomedical cyclotron in Nice. A thermal peak appears after 5 cm depth in the tissues, delayed after the fast neutron peak at 1.8 cm depth. Thus, a physical overdosage of 10% may be obtained if 100 ppm of 10B are assumed in the tissues. Our results using CAL 58 GBM cell line demonstrate a dose modification factor (DMF) of 1.19 when 100 ppm of boric acid are added to the growth medium. Thus for the particles, issued from neutron capture, a biological efficiency at least twice that of fast neutrons can be derived. These results, compared with historical data on fast neutron irradiation of glioblastoma, suggest that a therapeutic window may be obtained for GBM.

In fast neutron therapy, the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of a given beam varies to a large extent with the neutron energy spectrum. This spectrum depends primarily on the energy of the incident particles and on the nuclear reaction used for neutron production. However, it also depends on other factors which are specific to the local facility, eg, target, collimation system, etc. Therefore direct radiobiological intercomparisons are justified. The present paper reports the results of an intercomparison performed at seven neutrontherapy centres: Orléans, France (p(34)+Be), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (p(26)+Be), Ghent, Belgium (d(14.5)+Be), Faure, South Africa (p(66)+Be), Detroit, USA (d(48)+Be), Nice, France (p(65)+Be) and Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium (p(65)+Be). The selected radiobiological system was intestinal crypt regeneration in mice after single fraction irradiation. The observed RBE values (ref cobalt-60 gamma-rays) were 1.79 +/- 0.10, 1.84 +/- 0.07, 2.24 +/- 0.11, 1.55 +/- 0.04, 1.51 +/- 0.03, 1.50 +/- 0.04 and 1.52 +/- 0.04, respectively. When machine availability permitted, additional factors were studied: two vs one fraction (Ghent, Louvain-la-Neuve), dose rate (Detroit), influence of depth in phantom (Faure, Detroit, Nice, Louvain-la-Neuve). In addition, at Orléans and Ghent, RBEs were also determined for LD50 at 6 days after selective abdominal irradiation and were found to be equal to the RBEs for crypt regeneration. The radiobiological intercomparisons were always combined with direct dosimetric intercomparisons and, when possible in some centres, with microdosimetric investigations.

The purpose of this publication is to review the data on European neutrontherapy facilities in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma. Data on 1171 patients treated at 11 centers were analyzed. Neutrontherapy was of advantage especially for patients with primary radiotherapy of inoperable tumors, and those with macroscopic disease after surgery. Local control was about 50% in these groups. Results for postoperative neutrontherapy after R0 and R1 resection were similar to those for photon therapy. The incidence of late side effects was considerable. This was influenced by the fact that most patients were treated with first-generation machines.

In 1981, the Hôpital Tenon group and the Orléans neutron therapy team initiated a collaborative study for the treatment of grade IV astrocytomas using a combination of photons and neutrons. Neutrons were used as boost in a reduced volume. Doses were progressively increased from 6 to 7 Gy and later up to 8 Gy. Since October 1994, a neutron boost of 7.5 Gy has been delivered. At the time of evaluation, 294 patients had a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Univariate analysis indicated that clinical status, tumor location and photon fractionation scheme had no significant influence on survival. In contrast, age, surgical procedure and neutron dose were found to be prognostic factors. In a multivariate analysis, the prognostic value of the surgical procedure disappeared and the only remaining independent prognostic factors up to 11 months after treatment (P = 0.001) were age and the neutron dose. As far as neutron dose was concerned, survival increased with dose from 6 to 7 Gy up to 15 months. However, after 15 months, there was no longer any benefit in survival for the patients treated with 8 Gy, and complications related to overdosage began to appear. There was a long-term survival group: 55 patients were alive 18 months after treatment (18%). The median survival was 26.7 months. The best survival was observed for patients treated with a neutron boost of 7 Gy in eight fractions over 11 days (25 vs 18%). The present study demonstrates the feasibility of a combination of photons (30 Gy total brain) followed by a neutron boost (7 Gy) in the treatment of high-grade astrocytomas. The results are in good agreement with the published data. In the literature, age and surgical procedure are currently considered as the most important prognostic factors. The prevalence of neutron dose over these two other prognostic factors, as shown in this study, is an important additional argument in favor of the use of neutrontherapy in the management of these tumors. A possible benefit when combining external fast neutrontherapy with boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) could reasonably be expected.