Search

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS) accounts for approximately 15% of all uterine sarcomas. Median age of patients is around 50 years and half of the patients are premenopausal. In all, 60% of cases present with FIGO stage I disease. Preoperatively radiologic findings of ESS are not specific. Pathological diagnosis remains essential. This review aimed to present the French guidelines for low grade ESS treatment within the Groupe sarcome français - Groupe d'étude des tumeurs osseuse (GSF-GETO)/NETSARC+ and tumeur maligne rare gynécologique (TMRG) networks. Treatments should be validated in multidisciplinary team involved in sarcomas or rare gynecologic tumors. Hysterectomy is the cornerstone of treatment for localized ESS, and morcellation should be avoided. Systematic lymphadenectomy in ESS does not improve the outcome and is not recommended. Leaving the ovaries in situ in stage I tumors could be discussed for young women. Adjuvant hormonal treatment could be considered, for two years for stage I with morcellation or stage II and livelong for stages III or IV. Nevertheless, several questions remain, such as optimal doses, regimens (progestins or aromatase inhibitors) and duration of therapy. Tamoxifen is contraindicated. Secondary cytoreductive surgery if feasible for recurrent disease, appears to be an acceptable approach. Systemic treatment for recurrent or metastatic disease is mainly hormonal, with or without surgery., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Recommendations for clinical practice Nice/Saint-Paul-de-Vence 2022-2023 : Management of advanced/relapsing endometrial cancer Since the first recommendations in 2020 concerning metastatic and/or relapsed endometrial cancer, new treatment options have shown a benefit on patients' life expectancy, justifying their update. In first line, the choice will be made between chemotherapy with carboplatin/paclitaxel or hormone therapy with progestin, depending on tumor characteristics (histological type, grade, expression of hormone receptors, rate of progression). In case of a dMMR tumors, the use of immunotherapy within the framework of a therapeutic trial is an option. Beyond first-line chemotherapy, current standard treatment consists of the combination of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib, regardless of MMR status. Close clinical and biological monitoring is however necessary given the potential toxicity. Chemotherapy retains its place either as monotherapy (paclitaxel or doxorubicin) in the event of failure or contraindication to pembrolizumab-lenvatinib, or in combination with carboplatin in the event of a long free interval and pMMR tumor. The numerous ongoing clinical trials evaluating new therapeutic targets or strategies adapted to molecular or histological types should allow further improvements the prognosis of patients with metastatic endometrial cancer., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés. All rights reserved.)

Management of high grade, serous and/or endometrioid, advanced (stages III-IV) ovarian carcinomas and HRD-BRCA testing in 2023: update according to data published/presented in 2022 Molecular analysis of ovarian carcinomas must be now systematically performed to determine BRCA1 and BRCA2 status as well as genomic instability score. Several types of tests are available. From a clinical perspective, new data from phase III clinical trials presented in 2022 confirm the key role of PARP inhibitors in first-line medical treatment of high-grade serous ovarian cancers. A new algorithm that includes all new evidence is proposed for selection of first-line therapy., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés. All rights reserved.)

French recommendations for clinical practice Nice-Saint-Paul de Vence 2022-2023: histomolecular diagnosis of endometrial carcinomas The characterisation of endometrial carcinomas has been recently modified and enriched by molecular classification, the integration of which now impacts therapeutic decisions on whether adjuvant therapy should be administered or not in localized tumors, and influences treatment selection in advanced disease. Mandatory information includes histological type according to WHO 2020 classification, histological grade, hormone receptors status and molecular classification, the main new elements to provide being analysis of MMR proteins, p53 status and POLE status in selected cases. Sampling and preparation of material must be performed adequately to allow complete analysis. Numerous markers can be used to better define histological type, distinguish between primary lesion or metastases, or provide prognostic information. Determination of MMR/MSI profile is complex but well defined by guidelines that precisely describe techniques to be used and interpretation rules. Knowledge of POLE status is useful to guide therapeutic strategy, especially to consider de-escalation in stages I and II, in particular in case of high grade and/or p53 mutated tumors. This is why indications of POLE determination must be well defined. Finally, oncogenetics consultation is recommended in dMMR tumors (except in case or MLH1 promoter methylation) and in patients with evocative familial history., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés. All rights reserved.)

This French study aimed to evaluate oncologists' and patients' perception of physical activity, particularly adapted physical activity, in order to identify the obstacles and levers to its practice in patients with metastatic cancer., Method: Between October 2019 and March 2020, 60 medical oncologists and 305 patients with metastatic cancer were asked to fill in a self-completed questionnaire., Results: The benefits of physical activity are recognised by most oncologists and patients. These benefits were perceived more by oncologists in prevention (78%) or in the early stage (72%) of the disease than in the metastatic stage (55%) (P=0.01). Patient's physical condition (45%) and age (37%) but also the lack of time during the consultation to explain supportive care (35%) are the main obstacles identified by the oncologist to the integration of physical activity into patient care. Furthermore, lack of knowledge of adapted programmes is the main reason given by the physicians who have never prescribed physical activity (51%). On the patient side, while 88% of them had heard of the benefits of physical activity, only 11% had received a prescription. Most oncologists and patients were very interested in receiving information on where and what types of activities to practice, as well as what to avoid., Conclusion: Efforts in terms of information for both oncologists and patients seem necessary to increase the level of physical activity prescription and practice for patients followed for metastatic cancer., (Copyright © 2022 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Despite an increasing number of therapeutic indications, there are no specific recommendations regarding the management of PARP inhibitors other than what is specified in the SmPC of each substance. A Delphi French consensus was conducted to establish practical guidelines to meet the needs identified by healthcare professionals and patients., Method: Following the Delphi method, statements to optimize PARP inhibitor management were drafted by a multidisciplinary Steering Committee made up of 17 experts. These statements were submitted to the independent and anonymous vote of clinicians involved in treating patients on PARP inhibitors., Results: This article presents 52 statements on the following topics: initiation and treatment; management of adverse events (hematological effects, gastrointestinal effects, renal effects, pulmonary effects, cutaneous effects, hypertension, insomnia, fatigue, dizziness); special populations and situations; communication with the patient; adherence. Forty-nine statements obtained voter consensus after 3 voting rounds. A hematologist and a nephrologist supplemented this task by drafting an expert opinion on the risk of occurrence of secondary leukemia and nephrological toxicity., Conclusions: This paper is the first Delphi consensus on the practical management of PARP inhibitors. The pragmatic recommendations resulting from this paper should make it possible to manage the side effects of PARP inhibitors better and thus prevent early treatment discontinuation and improve patient adherence by preserving quality of life., (Copyright © 2022 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

New combinations of antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) or dual ICI have been shown to be effective in phase III trials compared to sunitinib in the first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell cancer. While ICI doublet is already used in other indications, TKI/ICI combinations are more recent and the management of their adverse effects (AEs) are less well known, particularly with regard to the accountability of each therapeutic class. The objective of this article is to analyze the safety data from the main phase III studies to provide clinicians with practical advice for managing the AEs from these combinations. Their management depends largely on the type of combination and their grade. In the case of a TKI/ICI combination, discontinuation of the 2 molecules is considered from grade 2. Rapid improvement in symptoms suggests that the AE is related to the TKI. It is then possible, after resolution, to reintroduce the TKI, if needed by reducing the dose, and to continue the ICI. Otherwise, the blame falls on the ICI and treatment usually involves corticosteroids. Management also depends on the type of AE and its severity. In some cases (dysthyroidism), treatment with TKI/ICI may be continued. In other situations (cardiac or neurological toxicity), it should be discontinued from grade 1 and hospitalization and corticosteroid therapy should be considered immediately. In all cases, information and education are integral parts of the prevention and proper management of potential AEs., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Based on recently published data, these recommendations present some evolutions in the surgical management of high grade epithelial ovarian cancers. In apparently early stages (FIGO I and II), surgical staging must be undertaken to confirm the absence of both peritoneal lesions and lymph node involvement (that might change stage and management). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not indicated, surgical exploration should be performed upfront, by laparotomy, to reduce the risk of rupture of the primary tumor. In advanced stages, the first step is to evaluate the feasibility of primary surgery with complete tumor cytoreduction. If it appears unfeasible, 3 or 4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy are administered before interval surgey. Whether it is implemented in the primary or interval setting, surgery must be performed by experimented teams, in an approved facility, having developed a rehabilitation program. Lymph node dissection is not mandatory if no adenopathies have been identified by imaging and by peroperative palpation. At first relapse, the surgical decision must be made by a multidisciplinary team, using scores predictive of complete cytoreduction (AGO or iMODEL criteria). Similarly as in first line, the objective is to achieve resection without any residual disease. Surveillance after first-line treatment must be adapted, according to the probability of another complete cytoreduction in case of late relapse, especially in patients who benefited from primary complete surgery and maintained good performance status., (Copyright © 2021 Société FranÇaise du Cancer. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.)

Since the previous 2013 and 2016 recommendations for clinical practice (RPC) Nice/Saint-Paul-de-Vence for gynecological cancers, the management of ovarian cancer has become more complex with the evolution of the quality criteria recommended for surgery and the integration of molecular biology for the decision of medical treatments, especially for high grade epithelial ovarian cancers. Surgical indications have become more precise both in the first line and in the context of relapse. Treatments with PARP inhibitors is a major advance in medical management with significant efficacy in maintenance after response to platinum-based chemotherapy. The benefit already known in the case of late relapse has also been demonstrated in first-line treatment with progression-free survival never observed in this pathology with patients with very long responses, especially in the case of BRCA gene abnormalities (somatic or constitutional). In 2021, medical and surgical strategies in front line including PARP inhibitors associated or not with bevacizumab as a maintenance complement after platinum chemotherapy are guided by both response to platinum agents and molecular profiling including BRCA (somatic or constitutional) genetic status and homologous recombination pathway (HRD) abnormalities, that should be early tested. On behalf of the GINECO national oncologist group, we have updated the guidelines for high grade ovarian epithelial cancer (excepted rare tumors) in order to allow rapid dissemination of the latest advances to the medical community and improve daily practice., (Copyright © 2021 Société FranÇaise du Cancer. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.)

Introduction: Swallowing difficulties in patients with advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) represent an obstacle to adequate antiemetic prophylaxis before chemotherapy. We aim to assess chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) risk in HNC patients in our center, with a specific focus among patients who could not receive appropriate NK1 receptor antagonist (NK1-RA) prophylaxis., Materials and Methods: Prospective observational monocentric study. CINV were evaluated with the MASCC Antiemesis Tool self-questionnaire (MAT) for all patients treated by platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced HNC (January-April 2019), thereafter, only for patients without NK1-RA prophylaxis due to swallowing difficulties were included (May-October 2019)., Results: Sixty-one patients were included (82% male, 49.2% reccurent/metastatic disease), 18 did not received NK1-RA prophylaxis due to swallowing difficulties. Among 52 patients included from January to April 2019, 17.3% reported swallowing difficulties. The chemotherapy regimen was highly and moderately emetic for 40 (65.6%) and 21 patients (34.4%), respectively. CINV was associated with both cisplatin-based chemotherapy (OR 10.66, 95% CI [2.17-52.08]) and exclusive chemotherapy (OR 7.76, 95% CI [1.79-33.78]). Patients who did not receive anti-NK1 prophylaxis had no more CINV than patients with adequate CINV prophylaxis., Discussion: CINV remains frequent in patients treated by platinum-based chemotherapy for HNC. Oral NK1-RA prophylaxis can be unavailable because of swallowing difficulties, without an increased risk of CINV., (Copyright © 2021 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Endometrial cancer is a common cancer in older women and is often associated with comorbidities. Management of metastatic disease and/or relapse requires a multidisciplinary approach. Recent advances in the understanding of oncogenesis and molecular classification of endometrial cancers offer new therapeutic perspectives. These first recommendations, established following the methodology of Nice-Saint-Paul recommendations for clinical practice (RPC), aims to integrate molecular advances in diagnostic and therapeutic management. In 2020, the histological diagnosis of endometrial cancer is based on morphology and immunohistochemistry, including at least p53, oestrogen and progesterone receptors. Deficiency in the DNA mismatch repair system (MMR) must be assessed in all advanced endometrial tumors for oncogenetic and theranostic purposes. It can be sought initially by an analysis in immunohistochemistry with the 4 markers (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2). Medical treatment depends on histological type, presence of hormone receptors and patient's profile to refer to chemotherapy (carboplatin-paclitaxel) or hormone therapy (for example of the progestogen type); in the event of MMR-deficiency, immunotherapy trial is the best option. As part of overall management of advanced endometrial cancer, radiotherapy (and surgery in rare cases) must be discussed, in particular in the event of loco-regional only relapse or oligometastatic disease., (Copyright © 2020 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Few studies have explored the long-term occupational situation after cancer. The aim of our study were to study the employment status among long-term cancer survivors and to compare it to cancer-free controls from the general population at 5, 10 or 15 years after cancer diagnosis., Methods: From data of a registry-based study, long-term survivors from breast,cervical and colorectal cancer, randomly selected from three tumor registries in France, were compared to cancer-free controls randomly selected from electoral lists. We selected active cancer survivors and cancer-free controls aged less than 60 at the time of the survey. We have studied the employment status of cases vs. controls and the factors associated with employment status., Results: At 5, 10 or 15 years after diagnosis, we did not observe any significant difference in employment status between cases and controls. Among cases, 17% had lost their jobs. Older age, lower incomes, lower education, a short-term employment contract, the presence of co-morbidities, fatigue and a worse quality of life were associated with job loss., Discussion: Although the employment status of the cases was comparable to that of the controls, efforts should be intensified to make it easier for patients diagnosed with cancer to return to work., (Copyright © 2020 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized oncological management in several tumor types, allowing prolonged tumoral responses. Thus, they are administered over long periods of time and can give specific autoimmune adverse reactions that may have a potential impact on quality of life (QoL). Most of phase III trials with ICI have included an assessment of QoL. In metastatic setting, in comparison with chemotherapy or targeted therapies, they indicate an absence of degradation of the QoL scores or even an improvement of these scores. In adjuvant setting, the deterioration of QoL scores is not clinically significant, regardless of the ICI used. In addition, there is no impairment of quality of life in patients with prolonged treatment duration. However, the measurement of QoL under ICI remains a challenge because of the specificities of these treatments and adapted measurement scales are being developed to improve the assessment of the impact of these treatments on patients' QoL., (Copyright © 2020 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Treatment in locally advanced ovarian cancer is optimal surgery followed by chemotherapy. Patients with significant tumor spread, OMS>2, age>75 years old are poor candidates for aggressive primary surgery. Interval surgery, after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, aims to achieve more complete surgery, increase survival, and reduce surgical morbidity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary outcomes were overall survival and postoperative morbidity and mortality., Method: This is a retrospective study conducted in 2 French referral centers between January 2000 and December 2015. Patients who could not benefit from a complete initial surgery were operated after 3 cures of chemotherapy at the François Baclesse center and after least 5 cures at the center René Gauducheau., Results: The population analyzed included 104 patients, 43 (41.0%) patients treated at the René Gauducheau center (group 1) and 61 (59.0%) patients treated at the François Baclesse center (group 2). Progression-free and overall survival were similar between the 2 groups, they were, respectively, 15.9 months and 34 months in group 1 vs. 15.4 months and 37.6 months in group 2 (P=0.72; P=0.65). Mean hospital stay and postoperative morbidity were similar in both groups., Conclusion: For weak patients, to limit invasive surgery, doing more than 5 courses of chemotherapy may be a reasonable option., (Copyright © 2019 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Germ-cell tumors are the most common solid tumors in young men. The follow-up of these patients is very important in their management. In stage I testicular cancer, surveillance is the standard for low-risk disease. In addition to the early detection of relapse, follow-up should be directed towards prevention, detection and treatment of late toxicity, and secondary malignancies. Follow up consists in physical examination, laboratory analysis and radiological imaging. Recently, guidelines recommend risk-adapted surveillance strategy, with a reduction of CT scans numbers, due to the recognition of the risk of ionizing radiation exposure. However, efforts to maintain adequate compliance with follow up are required., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Testicular cancers are the most frequent and the most curable cancers in young men. Treatments of these cancers represent a great success with cure rate over to 95 %. However, chemotherapy side effects may occur during or after several years post-treatment. This review aimed to highlight complications and physical and psychological side effects occurring mainly after chemotherapy treatment for testicular cancer, and to propose a personalized post-cancer plan specific for patients treated for testicular cancer. Treatments of these cancers can cause short-term complications (asthenia, nausea, vomiting, alopecia..). These side effects disappear within a few months after the end of the treatments. Late complications may occur several years post-treatment. Cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome and secondary neoplasia represent the most severe late effects among patients treated for testicular cancer. Given the increased incidence of these chemotherapy-induced side effects, it is indispensable to establish a specific follow up which must include a particular vigilance on the risk of occurrence of second cancer, a follow-up of the cardio-vascular risk factors, pulmonary and auditory follow-up, and early detection of psychosocial disorders., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

The emergence of oral cancer treatment in oncology has shifted patient follow-up from the hospital to the home. This trend has resulted in an increase in phone and e-mail interactions initiated by patients, but also by pharmacists, by liberal nurses, by general practitioners, and an increase in calls to the emergency response services (SAMU) both for real or perceived emergencies. This increased volume of patient and pharmacist communication has caused significant disruption in the daily activity of affected oncology departments and in particular of the secretariats. The procedures for formulating and securing appropriate responses within a short time frame are generally not established, and as a result, there is a risk that decisions made could be inappropriate for the patient's situation, especially in the case of complications.. Tracking responses to phone calls is necessary and answers should be noted in the medical file, including side effects, in particular the serious AEs for a good quality of care. This guideline describes best practices for oncologists who manage "incoming" calls from patients or professionals involved in the care pathway., (Copyright © 2019 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Antineoplastic drug induced nausea and vomiting (ANDINV) (previously named: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting [CINV]) are one of the most feared adverse effect for patients who begin treatment with anti-cancer treatments and their bad control have a negative impact in the management of these patients. In this review article, it is proposed an update of French-speaking Association for oncologic supportive care (AFSOS) clinical practice of CINV guidelines. This update became necessary for several reasons: newly available anti-emetic drugs; new data published about individual risk factors of CINV; new antineoplastic agents available; changing in emetic risk levels for some molecules in the international guidelines. To address these guidelines, the various clinical presentations of ANDINV and their intensity classification are discussed. Then, the different therapeutic solutions are presented: classes of conventional drug therapies, complementary therapies and advice to patients. Then, the implementation of primary prophylaxis are presented in four steps: (1) to evaluate the emetic risk level of antineoplastic agent; (2) to set the emetic risk level of antineoplastic protocols; (3) to set types of antiemetic drugs to implement; (4) "Outperform" prophylaxis in case of individual risk factors. Finally, implementation of secondary prophylaxis and rescue treatments are adressed., (Copyright © 2019 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Rare ovarian tumors include complex borderline ovarian tumors, sex-cord tumors, germ cell tumors, and rare epithelial tumors. Indications and modalities of fertility preservation, infertility management and contraindications for hormonal contraception or menopause hormone therapy are frequent issues in clinical practice. A panel of experts from the French national network dedicated to rare gynaecological cancers, and of experts in reproductive medicine and gynaecology have worked on guidelines about fertility preservation, contraception and menopause hormone therapy in women treated for ovarian rare tumors., Methods: A panel of 39 experts from different specialties contributed to the preparation of the guidelines, following the DELPHI method (formal consensus method). Statements were drafted after a systematic literature review, and then rated through two successive rounds., Results: Thirty-five recommendations were selected, and concerned indications for fertility preservation, contraindications for ovarian stimulation (in the context of fertility preservation or for infertility management), contraceptive options (especially hormonal ones), and menopause hormone therapy for each tumor type. Overall, prudence has been recommended in the case of potentially hormone-sensitive tumors such as sex cord tumors, serous and endometrioid low-grade adenocarcinomas, as well as for high-risk serous borderline ovarian tumors., Discussion: In the context of a scarce literature, a formal consensus method allowed the elaboration of guidelines, which will help clinicians in the management of these patients., (Copyright © 2017 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Oral therapies have shifted the follow-up of patients with cancer from hospital to home. As a consequence, the number of incoming calls has increased. To understand the source, reasons, management and burden of calls, we underwent a French national survey. The objective was to describe the way calls are managed in oncology departments., Methods: The study was a prospective survey in a representative sample of French oncology specialists using oral therapies., Results: Among 51 participating onco/radiotherapy departments, 86 % of specialists were oncologists or hematologists and 14 % radiation oncologists. Eighty percent were from public centers and 20 % from private ones. The median number of calls/week was 110. Sixty-six percent of calls were from patients and families and 23 % from general practitioners. Upon calls reception by the secretaries, half of them corresponded to a medical question. Sixty-five percent of centers did not have an established specific procedure and 70 % of responders did not specifically train their teams to address the management of calls. Sixty-five percent of the specialists spent more than 30min/day. Most of them considered it disturbing medical activities. Sixty-six percent of patients calls were related to adverse effects of treatments. Twenty-two percent of specialists declared at least one severe adverse effect linked to misinterpretation of a call., Discussion: With the increase of oral therapies, incoming phone calls represent an important burden of work. To improve calls management, adaptations of organizations are needed., (Copyright © 2017 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Ovarian Cancer, First Line, Multidisciplinarity: Recommendations for the clinical practice of Nice-Saint-Paul de Vence The treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer is multidisciplinary involving surgical teams and surgery and medical oncology, experienced in the management of this disease, following published quality criteria. The strategy must be validated in multidisciplinary consultation meeting (RCP) before any treatment. The pre-therapeutic assessment includes the histological diagnosis, evaluation of the tumor extension (biological assessment, markers, imaging, laparoscopy), assessment of the general state (operability), in order to answer the question of feasibility of an initial optimal surgery. The standard treatment involves complete surgical resections of the lesions by median laparotomy, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy based on carboplatin and paclitaxel, six cycles with the possibility of treatment with bevacizumab during adjuvant treatment and in maintenance. If complete surgery is not feasible as a result of the initial assessment, interval debulking surgery is considered after 3 to 4 courses of induction chemotherapy., (© 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.)

UPDATED 2016 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE CLINICAL PRACTICE OF NICE/SAINT-PAUL-DE-VENCE IN OVARIAN CANCER AND ADVANCED CERVICAL CANCER: Since the first edition of the 2012-2013 Clinical Practice Recommendations Nice-Saint-Paul for gynecological cancers, the management of ovarian cancer has become more complex with a better definition of histological subtypes of ovarian cancers, the update of the anatomo-clinical classifications, the evolution of the recommended quality criteria for surgery. In addition, the integration of new medical options, such as PARP inhibitors, requires us to review our management of ovarian cnacer patients (including early systematic oncogenetic research of homologous recombination pathway deficiency). Similarly, medical treatment has evolved in advanced cervical cancer with the new option of bévacizumab therapy. On behalf of the GINECO group, we have updated the guidelines for ovarian epithelial cancer (excepted rare tumors) and advanced cervical cancer in order to allow rapid dissemination of the latest advances to the medical community in order to adjust the daily practice., (© 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.)

EXPRESSION III was designed to evaluate the information, needs and expectations of patients with ovarian cancer in different European countries. This abstract focuses on specific results from French OC patients. Two hundred and fifty-seven patients filled a 27-item questionnaire during a medical visit. Median age range was 63 years (26-89). Nearly all the patients (94 %) had primary surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (95 %), 50 % had recurrent disease. At the time of the survey, 85 % reported symptoms: fatigue: 88 %, neuropathy: 55 %, nausea/vomiting: 40 %, pain: 39 %. Patients wished for non-alopeciant treatment (52 %) and a better management of fatigue (42 %). Eighty percent of the patients knew their chemotherapy but 60 % ignored their initial disease stage and how to find more information for treatment choice (91 %). Most patients (92 %) preferred to get it directly from their physician. Sixty-six percent expressed the need for clear information about their life expectancy. Still 21 % patients did not want to get negative information. French patients need for more support and clearer information on their disease. Direct information from their physician remains the mainstay of communication., (Copyright © 2015 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

The evaluation of quality of life has become essential in gynecological oncology. Recent guidelines have been published to improve the collection, analysis and publication of the data quality of life that will make them more reliable, reproducible and integrate them into the final treatment decision. This year at ASCO, in breast cancer, the benefit of sentinel lymph node dissection compared to the quality of life has been demonstrated. New data on cognitive function in patients treated for breast cancer show the importance of the evaluation of these disorders especially among elderly patients who are at-risk populations. Medical strategies including targeted therapies can improve survival without impairing the quality of life, also with improved gastrointestinal symptoms in case of combination chemotherapy with bevacizumab in patients with ovarian cancer in a situation early recurrence. Similarly, the addition of a pathway inhibitor M- Tor (everolimus) with hormonal therapy does not induce degradation of the quality of life in women with metastatic breast cancer.

Introduction: Cancer and chemotherapy can have adverse effects on cognitive functions and quality of life of patients. We wanted to know the patients' view on these disorders, but also their expectations in terms of assessment and support., Methods and Results: A survey was conducted in day care hospital among 551 patients from three cancer centers. Most of the patients were between 40 and 74 years and suffered from breast cancer. Eighty-four percent were treated with chemotherapy. Forty-one percent of patients report memory problems, 26% were affected by specific concentration disorders, and 19% of the attention. On the whole, 52% of patients report at least one of the previous cognitive impairment. Among these patients, 80% evoked that the support of these problems was essential and 70% were willing to participate in "workshops" to deal with these disorders., Conclusion: The cognitive impairment occurrence is a real problem for patients receiving chemotherapy and becomes a priority in the global management of their disease. Studies assessing a specific support of theses symptoms should be encouraged to help patients.

The management of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer is a real challenge. Indeed, after a first line chemotherapy with docetaxel, there was no standard because the treatments were ineffective. Today, several therapeutic options are available with the development of new therapies. Among them, cabazitaxel, semi-synthetic derivative of a natural taxoid, has been developed to its low recognition by the MDR system and power distribution including brain. This new chemotherapy was assessed in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer whose disease has progressed during or after docetaxel-based therapy. Treatment with cabazitaxel plus prednisone has improved overall survival of 2.4 months compared to mitoxantrone in the TROPIC phase III. However, hematologic toxicity may be limiting with a risk of febrile neutropenia; hematopoietic growth factors are advised in case of significant neutropenia. The cabazitaxel, Jevtana(®), has been approved in second line after docetaxel. Its position in relation to new types of hormone therapy, as abiraterone acetate, in the same indication requires further investigations, including predictive factors of response. Studies are on going in first line indication (compared to docetaxel) and associated to other new hormone therapies.

Each year, 13,000 newly gynecologic cancers are diagnosed in France. Gynecologic cancers were specifically heterogeneous (localisations, histologic subgroups, age class, etc). This work was delineated for a national call dedicated to gynecologic cancers. This review reports the major needs in terms of scientific research dedicated to gynecologic cancers in the biologic, epidemiology, human and sociologic fields. For example, medico-economic strategies adapted to ethnosociologic context, specifically for cervix cancer, took important part of the epidemiologic research. Impact of gynecologic cancer in terms of symptoms and late effects, quality of life after treatments and fertility needs to be specifically explored. For fundamental research, molecular characterisation, biologic markers, impact of immunology and genetics represent the major part of the field need to be explored. Finally, therapeutic and diagnosis innovations, optimization of treatments strategies and development of predictive models in order to perform individual prediction taking into account several risk factors (clinical and molecular) to offer help in management of gynecologic cancers are required.

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynaecological cancer in western countries. Radiotherapy remains the mainstay of postoperative management, but accumulating data show that adjuvant chemotherapy may display promising results after surgery. Characteristic features of the patients and disease, type of treatment including modality of surgery, radiation and chemotherapy are different from studies reported. The results from these trials are inconsistent but certain groups of patients with high-risk features could have advantage to adjuvant chemotherapy. The indication of adjuvant chemotherapy must be discussed in this situation taking into account the patient's profile with potential comorbidities and risk of toxicities.

The perspectives of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treatment have improved with the development of targeted molecular therapies against VEGFR/VEGF-mediated angiogenesis and mTOR. Antiangiogenic drugs, including bevacizumab (in association with IFN-α), sorafenib, sunitinib and pazopanib have demonstrated benefits for patients in terms of life expectancy, with progression free survival and overall survival exceeding 10 and 24 months, respectively. Long-term administration of these drugs, over several months or several years, requires the compliance of patients. Phase II/III studies on antiangiogenic-based therapy in RCC showed a high prevalence of fatigue (20 to 56%), whatever the drug assessed, but with the lowest rates observed with sorafenib or pazopanib. Fatigue is considered by cancer patients as the most important secondary effect regarding the impact on their quality of life and, consequently, is expected to compromise the protocol and the efficacy of the treatment. Management of fatigue induced by therapy or the disease is based on patient information, identification and treatment of causal aetiologies, anti-inflammatory therapy when needed and education and psychological support. Anticipating the risk and level of fatigue expected to be associated with cancer therapy by using both reliable and simple tools remains a challenge in oncology practice. The expected overall benefits of these targeted therapies, coupled with daily assessment and management of fatigue induced by the disease or the treatment, will offer new perspectives for patients with RCC. In this purpose, studies in oncology on the reliability of simple tools based on patient reporting and adapted to clinical practice, as well as interventional studies on fatigue management are needed.

Antiangiogenic therapies have led to substantial progress in the management of kidney cancer, highly vascular tumor, and chemoresistant. These molecules have improved the prognosis of metastatic renal cancer. However, only a few isolated cases of complete response have been described and the evolution of these patients after treatment discontinuation remains unclear. From a series of patients treated for kidney cancer with antiangiogenic in first line, the purpose of this study was to identify patients in complete response in whom treatment had been interrupted. Complete response was defined according to RECIST criteria and data were collected retrospectively at the Centre François Baclesse - Caen. Five patients were identified in complete response with a treatment discontinuation among sixty-seven patients. These five patients of good or intermediate prognosis received an initial nephrectomy followed by a first-line treatment by Sunitinib (ten cycles on average). After one year of stopping treatment, two patients are still in complete response and three patients relapsed at three, 12 and 15 months. The treatment of relapsing disease was surgical followed by monitoring or resumption of sunitinib resulting in new complete response for the all three patients. The interruption of antiangiogenic treatment seems acceptable after a complete response.

Since sexual disorders were not specifically studied in the principal series, epidemiological data is scarce. Nevertheless, in practice, when sexuality is dealt with during the monitoring of patients undergoing targeted therapies, more than half of the patients questioned say that they attach importance to their quality of sex life, despite the severity of their metastatic renal cancer. At the start of treatment, it is therefore important to inform patients of the possible occurrence of problems and to encourage them to report them. During treatment, screening for sexual disorders by questioning is desirable: desire, lubrication, dyspareunia, erectile dysfunction. In the event of the onset of a sexual disorder during treatment, it is not usually necessary to stop or modify the treatment. Therapeutic measures depend on the discomfort felt and are under the control of the specialist: erectile dysfunction, male libido disorders, vaginal dryness and vulvovaginitis. A consultation with an oncology psychologist and/or sex therapist is useful, if possible with the partner, based on the impact of the sexual problems., (Copyright © 2011 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is associated with a poor prognosis and is refractory to standard chemotherapy. Recent progress in the understanding of molecular biology and pathogenesis of renal cell cancer has been translated into the development of new therapeutic strategies. The management of metastatic RCC has been revolutionized with the development of targeted molecular therapies against VEGF-VEGFR and mTOR. Randomized phase III clinical trials demonstrated clinical benefit for patients with advanced RCC in overall survival and progression free survival. Guidelines for the management of side effects induced by these targeted therapies seem to be warranted., (Copyright © 2011 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Context: Ovarian cancers represent the 4th cause of mortality by cancer for women in France and were responsible of more than 3,000 deaths in 2005. The Standards, Options: Recommendations (SOR) project has been undertaken by the French National Federation of Cancers Centers is now part of the French National Cancer Institute since the 1st of may 2008. The project involves the development and updating of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPG) in oncology. Following the monitoring process, we identified new data conferring sufficient elements to justify an updating of the CPG concerning the surgical, the medical fi rst-line and consolidation treatments of epithelial ovarian cancers., Objectives: To update the CPG according to the methodology SOR.

In prostate cancer, whatever the stage of the disease, the selection of a treatment strategy is based on prognostic factors. Clinical stage, serum PSA concentration and Gleason score are among the most recognised factors. A combination of these three parameters leads to a score used to define prognostic groups that are routinely used in daily practice. More recently, predictive statistical models have been developed that were associated with nomograms. The objective of nomograms is, for a given patient, to calculate his probability to develop disease extension or relapse based on clinical, biological, histological and therapeutic (radiotherapy, hormonotherapy) data. Such nomograms are not all validated and their application in daily practice is more difficult than that of classical prognostic classifications. Nowadays, the progress and accessibility to novel technologies applied to biology will make possible in the near future the assessment of new prognostic profiles based on genetic and/or proteomic tumour characteristics.

The authors report a case of transformation of a low grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (LGL) to an agressive lymphoma in a 55 year-old woman who was treated by fludarabine phosphate. The only sign of transformation was the supervention of an hypercalcemia. This complication is rare in the evolution of the LGL and the mechanism is original.