Search

Introduction: Microinvasive in situ ductal carcinomas of the breast are rare and of good prognosis. They are grouped with early stage invasive carcinomas in the TNM 2017 classification. This study assessed practitioners' treatment decisions and their justifications in comparison to the literature., Materials and Methods: Three clinical cases were evaluated by anonymous forms regarding sentinel node decisions, tumour bed boost irradiation and hormone therapy., Results: Sentinel lymph node was performed by 93.1%, 100% and 44.4% of the practitioners respectively. Radiation boost was a treatment option chosen by 62.1% and 61.1% of practitioners in both clinical cases. Hormone therapy was advocated for 65.5%, 94.7% and 50.0% patients depending on the clinical case., Conclusion: The therapeutic attitude proposed in microinvasive breast carcinomas was heterogeneous in this study, reflecting the absence of specific recommendations. In view of the existing literature, it is not currently possible to propose recommendations for these three therapeutic options. Prospective cohorts and meta-analyses of the microinvasive subgroup could provide answers., (Copyright © 2019 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Adjuvant radiation therapy in breast cancer is a standard of care, either post-lumpectomy or in case of lymph node involvement. Internal mammary chain (IMC) is more and more included in the clinical target volume, because it increases overall survival. This increase must be weighed against cardiac complications in left breast cancer. Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is used in this indication in order to better cover target volumes, but tends to increase irradiated healthy volumes, including the heart. The average cardiac dose is higher with IMRT, while it is also predictive of cardiovascular events in patients treated in 3D. This article aims to make an inventory of the IMC irradiations, as well as a review of the mechanisms of radiation-induced cardiac toxicity and ways to diagnose it early. Cooperation between medical oncologists, radiotherapy oncologists and cardiologists is needed to better support patients., (Copyright © 2019 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Inflammatory breast cancer accounts for 1-5% of all breast cancers. It is associated with a poor prognosis, because of an increased risk to develop metastases in comparison with all breast malignancies. The treatment is multimodal. We have evaluated the role of radiotherapy: indications, techniques and impact for local control and overall survival., Method: The series of the literature with more than 40 patients irradiated for inflammatory breast cancer published since 1995 were analyzed., Results: Chemotherapy was always delivered first. Adjuvant radiotherapy was associated with local control and overall survival at 10 years of 63-92% and 51-64 respectively. Without surgery, local control was 65% and overal survival 38% at 10years. Results of concomitant radiochemotherapy were reported: the studies were heterogenous. Modalities of radiotherapy were detailed with respect to dose and fractionation, target-volumes and technical considerations (including bolus)., Conclusion: The multimodal strategy comprises systematically radiotherapy with an evaluation of tumor response to maximise resecability., (Copyright © 2018 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Radiation therapy is the elective treatment of inoperable non small cell lung cancer, but is potentially curative only for a few of them: failures result from distant metastases and/or from progressive local disease. During the last years, following the progress in chemotherapy, combining radiation and drugs is becoming a more common approach. Nevertheless, one of the main concerns remains the potential interference between both modalities leading to an increased toxicity, which may outweigh all potential benefit. Several organs can be a target for acute or late toxicity: lung (pneumonitis and fibrosis), esophagus (acute esophagitis, stenosis), heart (pericarditis, impaired ventricular functions, heart failure, coronary stenosis), spinal cord (transient myelopathy, radiation myelitis), skin (moist desquamation, fibrosis, telangiectasia). The current published trials combining drug and radiation appear to be a rather safe approach especially when avoiding concomitant treatment. However, several points remain unsolved: the optimal combination scheme, the real risk of late damage observation including the second cancer occurrence risk. This risk is uneasy to evaluate due to the long latency period. The way of describing the late damage is crucial, seeking for a more precise system of evaluating, recording and reporting late effects, taking into account objective damage as well as the patient's symptoms. Therefore, combining drug and radiation should preferentially be performed within prospective studies, with precise evaluation procedures.