Search

1. Agkistin, purified from the snake venom of Formosan Agkistrodon acutus, belongs to the family of C-type lectin GPIb binding proteins. It is a heterodimeric molecule, consisting of alpha- (16.5 kDa) and beta- (15.5 kDa) subunits with a molecular mass of 32,512 Daltons examined by SDS - PAGE and mass spectrometry. 2. In vitro, agkistin concentration-dependently inhibited ristocetin-induced human platelet agglutination and aggregation in the presence of vWF. It also inhibited TXA2 formation and prolonged the latent period in triggering aggregation by a low concentration of thrombin (0.03 u x ml(-1)). 3. 125I-agkistin specifically bound to unactivated human platelets in a saturable manner with a KD value of 223+/-10.6 nM. This binding reaction was rapid and reversible. Monoclonal antibodies, AP1 and 6D1 raised against platelet GPIb, almost completely blocked 125I-agkistin binding to platelets. However, monoclonal antibody 7E3 raised against GPIIb/IIIa complex, trigramin, a GPIIb/IIIa antagonist, ADP and EDTA did not affect 125I-agkistin binding reaction. 4. Agkistin (250 microg x kg(-1)) significantly prolonged the bleeding time and induced transient thrombocytopenia of mice when given intravenously. Furthermore, it markedly inhibited platelet plug formation in irradiated mesenteric venules of fluorescein-treated mice in vivo. 5. In conclusion, agkistin inhibits ristocetin induced platelet aggregation mainly through its specific binding to platelet GPIb, thereby blocking the interaction between GPIb and vWF. In addition, agkistin exhibits antithrombotic activity in vivo.

1. To date, only two mammalian endothelin (ET) receptors, termed ETA and ETB, have been cloned, sequenced and characterized. However, several functional studies of isolated blood vessels suggest that ET-1-induced contractions may be mediated by multiple ETA receptors. In this study, the ETA receptors in renal arteries isolated from Wistar rats were characterized by isometric tension recording and radioligand binding techniques. 2. ET-1, sarafotoxin S6b (StxS6b) and ET-3 produced concentration-dependent contraction with similar response maxima in endothelium-denuded arteries, whereas the ETB receptor-selective agonist StxS6c was inactive. ET-1 and StxS6b were equipotent and 30 times more potent than ET-3. This agonist profile, together with the findings that the ETA receptor-selective antagonists, BQ-123 and FR-139317 caused concentration-dependent, rightward shifts of the concentration-effect curves to each agonist indicated that ET-1-induced contractions in rat renal artery were mediated via ETA receptors. 3. BQ-123 and FR-139317 were both significantly more potent inhibitors of contractions induced by StxS6b or ET-3 than of responses to ET-1, raising the possibility that a component of ET-1-induced contraction was mediated through atypical, BQ-123 (or FR-139317)-insensitive ETA receptors. However, in competition binding studies, specific [125I]-ET-1 and [125I]-StxS6b binding to rat renal artery sections was completely abolished by BQ-123 in a manner consistent with an action at a single site. Thus, competition binding studies did not provide any supportive evidence of the existence of a BQ-123-insensitive ETA receptor. 4. Additional studies revealed marked differences in the kinetics of [125I]-ET-1 and [125I]-StxS6b binding. Following a 3 h period of association of [125I]-ET-1 with its receptors, no significant dissociation of receptor-bound [125I]-ET-1 was observed during a 4 h washout period. In stark contrast, dissociation studies revealed that specific [125I]-StxS6b binding to ETA receptors was reversible (t0.5diss, 100 min). A series of association binding studies were also consistent with the specific binding of [125I]-ET-1 and [125I]-StxS6b being irreversible and reversible processes, respectively. 5. Thus, differences in BQ-123 potency against ET-1 and StxS6b-induced contractions in rat renal arteries might be due to differences in the kinetics of agonist binding, rather than due to the existence of atypical ETA receptors.

1. We determined competition binding characteristics of endothelin ETB receptor selective ligands in human left ventricle and compared these values to those obtained with rat left ventricle. Sarafotoxin S6c, ET-3, BQ788 and IRL2500 competed against [125I]-PD151242 (ETA selective radioligand) with low affinity in human left ventricle, confirming the ETB selectivity of these compounds. 2. ET-3 competed with moderate selectivity for ETB over ETA receptors in human left ventricle and with slightly higher selectivity in rat left ventricle (460 and 1,400 fold, respectively). There was a small difference in the affinity of ETA receptors for ET-3 (KD ETA in human left ventricle = 0.07 +/- 0.02 microM; KD ETA in rat left ventricle = 0.27 +/- 0.08 microM; P = 0.05) but no difference in the affinity of ETB receptors for this ligand (KD ETB in human left ventricle = 0.15 +/- 0.06 nM; KD ETB in rat left ventricle = 0.19 +/- 0.03 nM). 3. The selectivity of sarafotoxin S6c for ETB over ETA receptors in human left ventricle was 5,900 fold compared with 59,400 fold in rat left ventricle. The affinity of ETA receptors for sarafotoxin S6c was higher in human than in rat left ventricle (KD ETA = 2.00 +/- 0.20 microM and 3.50 +/- 0.26 microM, respectively; P = 0.03), while the affinity of ETB receptors for this ligand was higher in rat left ventricle (KD ETB = 0.06 +/- 0.02 nM) than in human left ventricle (KD ETB = 0.34 +/- 0.13 nM) (P = 0.02). The affinity of ETB receptors for sarafotoxin S6c in rat left ventricle determined in the absence or presence of GTP was the same indicating that differing affinity states of ETB receptors in human and rat left ventricle do not account for the variation observed between species. 4. There was no difference in the affinity of ETA receptors for BQ788 (KD ETA = 1.01 +/- 0.20 microM and KD ETA = 1.39 +/- 0.35 microM) or for the novel ETB selective antagonist. IRL2500 (KD ETA = 30.0 +/- 20.8 microM and KD ETA = 55.6 +/- 9.93 microM) in human and rat left ventricle, respectively. ETB receptors had a significantly higher affinity for BQ788 (KD ETB = 9.8 +/- 1.3 nM and KD ETB = 31.0 +/- 5.4 nM; P = 0.02) and IRL2500 (KD ETB = 78.2 +/- 9.7 nM and KD ETB = 300.0 +/- 75.1 nM; P = 0.03) in human and rat left ventricle, respectively. The synthetically synthesized ETB selective antagonist RES-701-1 (0.1 -3 microM) failed to inhibit [125I]-ET-1 binding in either tissue. 5. In conclusion, we have compared equilibrium dissociation constants for a number of ETB selective compounds in human and rat heart. The affinity of ETB receptors for sarafotoxin S6c, BQ788 and IRL2500 differed in human and rat left ventricle. No difference in affinity was detected for ET-3 binding at ETB receptors. Sarafotoxin S6c binding was unaffected by GTP indicating that the different receptor affinities in human and rat heart cannot be explained by differing ETB receptor affinity states. This study highlights the need to consider differences in binding characteristics that may arise from the use of tissues obtained from different species.

1. In homogenates of human saphenous vein, [125I]-ET-1 and [125I]-S6b each labelled a single population of high affinity binding sites with K(D) values of 0.64 +/- 0.11 nM and 0.55 +/- 0.08 nM respectively. Hill slopes were close to one. However, the density of receptors labelled by [125I]-ET-1 was significantly greater than that by [125I]-S6b (187.6 +/- 23.0 compared to 91.7 +/- 23.6 fmol mg-1 protein, P < 0.02). 2. BQ123, an ET(A-)selective antagonist, inhibited specific [125I]-ET-1 and [125I]-S6b binding with equal affinity. BQ123 competed in a biphasic manner for both [125I]-ET-1 (0.1 nM) and [125I]-S6b (0.1 nM) with ET(A) K(D) values of 0.55 +/- 0.17 nM and 0.52 +/- 0.02 nM and ET(B) K(D) values of 14.4 +/- 2.60 microM and 11.2 +/- 0.31 microM respectively. S6b monophasically inhibited 0.1 nM [125I]-ET-1 (K(D) 1.16 +/- 0.9 nM) but competed for 0.25 nM [125I]-ET-1 in a biphasic manner (K(D) high affinity site 1.99 +/- 0.84 nM, K(D) low affinity site 0.68 +/- 0.63 microM, ratio 67% : 33%). 3. BQ123 antagonized the vasoconstrictor responses of ET-1 with a pK(B) value of 6.47 whereas BQ123 exhibited 50 fold higher affinity against S6b-mediated vasoconstriction with a pK(B) value of 8.18. Regression slopes were 0.80 +/- 0.13 and 1.08 +/- 0.11 respectively. 4. In desensitization experiments, S6b (300 nM) did not contract preparations which were no longer responsive to ET-1 whereas a small contraction to ET-1 (300 nM) was obtained in preparations rendered unresponsive to S6b. 5. Medial sections of non-diseased human aorta, which express only ET(A) receptors, were used to compare dissociation rates of the two agonists. The time course for the dissociation of [125I]-ET-1 and [125I]-S6b was similar with 20-30% of each ligand dissociating at 4 h. 6. These data suggest that whilst BQ123, in common with other endothelin antagonists, is a much more potent blocker of S6b contractile responses than of ET-1 contractile responses, this is not reflected by the equal affinity of BQ123 determined in competition binding experiments against both [125I]-ET-1 and [125I]-S6b. This discrepancy in antagonist potency is probably not due to a marked difference in the rate of dissociation of [125I]-ET-1 and [125I]-S6b from endothelin receptors. One possible explanation is that ET-1 is activating an additional population of receptors which may have lower affinity for BQ123. This is suggested by the discrepancy in receptor density identified by [125I]-ET-1 and [125I]-S6b.

1. ETA and ETB-selective and non-selective ligands were used to define the endothelin receptors in the media (vascular smooth muscle layer) of human aorta and coronary artery. Saturation experiments with iodinated endothelin-1 (ET-1), endothelin-2 and sarafotoxin 6b (S6b) identified high affinity binding sites in aorta (KD [125I]-ET-1 0.33 +/- 0.02 nM (n = 9), KD [125I]-ET-2 1.04 +/- 0.23 nM (n = 5), KD [125I]-S6b 0.15 +/- 0.01 nM (n = 9 +/- s.e.mean)) and coronary artery (KD [125I]-ET-1 0.43 +/- 0.10 nM, KD [125I]-ET-2 0.71 +/- 0.17 nM, KD [125I]-S6b 0.27 +/- 0.03 nM (n = 3 +/- s.e.mean)). Hill coefficients (nH) approached unity in each case. 2. No specific binding was detectable with [125I]-ET-3 (4 pM-4 nM) in aorta. Unlabelled ET-3 competed monophasically with [125I]-ET-1 in aorta (KD, 8.21 +/- 1.62 nM, compared to unlabelled ET-1 KD, 0.60 +/- 0.20 nM) (n = 3 +/- s.e.mean). In coronary artery, the KD and Bmax values calculated from [125I]-ET-3 saturation experiments were 2.13 +/- 1.39 nM and 20.6 +/- 12.9 fmol mg-1 protein, respectively (n = 3 +/- s.e.mean). 3. ETA antagonists competed monophasically for [125I]-ET-1 (100 pM) binding sites with nanomolar or subnanomolar affinity in the aorta (KD BQ123, 0.47 +/- 0.13 nM; KD FR139317, 0.40 +/- 0.10 nM; KD PD151242, 2.09 +/- 0.48 nM) and coronary artery (KD FR139317, 0.41 +/- 0.13 nM; KD PD151242, 3.60 +/- 0.74 nM) (n = 3 +/- s.e.mean). However, two site fits were preferred on analysis of competition experiments with ETB-selective agonists versus [125I]-ET-1 in coronary artery (BQ3020: KDETA 0.96 +/- 0.14 microM, KD ETB 1.34 +/- 1.08 nM and sarafotoxin 6c: KD ETA 1.15 +/- 0.14 microM, KD ETB 1.77 +/- 0.72 nM) (n = 3 +/- s.e.mean). The selectivity of the agonists for ETB receptors (700 fold) was lower than reported in other species. 4. Sarafotoxin 6b (2 pM-2 microM) completely inhibited [125I]-ET-1 (100 pM) binding in aorta (KD 1.36 +/- 0.22 nM) (n = 3 +/- s.e.mean). The non-peptide compounds Ro462005 and bosentan, competed with [125I]-ET-1 binding in coronary artery with KD values of 0.19 +/- 0.04 microM and 2.94 +/- 0.95 nM, respectively (n = 3 +/- s.e.mean). 5. Inhibition of [125I]-ET-2 and [125I]-S6b binding by FR139317 was similar to the inhibition of [125I]-ET-1 binding in both arteries, being monophasic with KD values in the same range. 6. ETA receptors in coronary artery media were detected by [125I]-PD151242 (KD 0.23 +/- 0.04 nM, Bmax 10.1 +/- 1.2 fmol mg-1 protein) (n = 3 +/- s.e.mean). [125I]-BQ3020, an ETB-selective radioligand, indicated the presence of a smaller population of ETB receptors in this tissue (KD 0.60 +/- 0.31 nM, Bmax 4.5 +/- 2.1 fmol mg-1 protein) (n = 3 +/- s.e.mean). 7. Autoradiography with [125I]-PD151242 and [125I]-BQ3020 confirmed the predominance of ETA receptors in the media of both arteries. 8. The results of this study indicate that ETA receptors predominate in the vascular smooth muscle of human cardiac arteries, with a small and variable population of ETB receptors detectable in the coronary artery.

1. The localization and differential distribution of endothelin (ET) receptor subtypes (ETA and ETB) was investigated in sections of human placenta by use of quantitative in vitro autoradiography and receptor selective ligands. 2. Specific, high density [125I]-ET-1 binding sites were localized to the decidua and foetal membranes as well as to arteries and veins in the chorionic plate and throughout the villous tree. Moderate to low density binding was found in the extravillous and villous trophoblast respectively. 3. [125I]-ET-1 binding sites exhibited a rank order of inhibition by unlabelled peptide sequences (ET-1 > ET-3 > [Ala3,11,18Nle7]-ET-1 > BQ123 > or = sarafotoxin 6c). However, in contrast to the monophasic inhibition curve of ET-1, the other sequences produced a significantly better fit to a two component inhibition curve suggesting the presence of a heterogeneous population of ET binding sites. 4. ETA and ETB receptors were distinguished by competitive inhibition of [125]-ET-1 binding with increasing concentrations of unlabelled ET-3, [Ala3,11,18Nle7]-ET-1, sarafotoxin 6c and BQ123 and by incubating sections with the ETB agonist, [125I]-BQ3020. ET receptor subtypes exhibited a differential distribution in the placenta. ETA type binding sites predominated (approximately 80% of the total) on veins and arteries in the chorionic plate. Veins in stem villi, blood vessels in distal regions of the villous tree and decidual cells displayed a high density (approximately 60-70% of the total) of the ETB receptor subtype. 5. No difference was detected in either the relative density of [125I]-ET-1 binding sites or the proportion of ETA to ETB sites in placentae from pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia compared with normal term controls.6. ET may have a local autocrine or paracrine role in the placenta, acting via specific receptors to influence foetoplacental blood flow and other aspects of placental function.