Search

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Src homology 3-domain growth factor receptor-bound 2-like endophilin interacting protein 1 (SGIP1) interacts with cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1R). SGIP1 is abundantly and principally expressed within the nervous system. SGIP1 and CB1R co-localize in axons and presynaptic boutons. SGIP1 interferes with the internalization of activated CB1R in transfected heterologous cells; as a consequence, the transient association of the CB1R with beta-arrestin2 is enhanced and prolonged, and CB1-mediated ERK1/2 signaling is decreased. Because of these actions, SGIP1 may modulate affect, anxiety, pain processing, and other physiological processes controlled by the endocannabinoid system (ECS). EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Using a battery of behavioral tests, we investigated the consequences of SGIP1 deletion in tasks regulated by the ECS in SGIP1 constitutive knock-out (SGIP1(−/−)) mice. KEY RESULTS: In SGIP1(−/−) mice, sensorimotor gating, exploratory levels and working memory are unaltered. SGIP1(−/−) mice have decreased anxiety-like behaviors. Fear extinction to tone, is facilitated in SGIP1(−/−) females. Several cannabinoid tetrad behaviors are altered in the absence of SGIP1. SGIP1(−/−) males exhibit abnormal THC withdrawal behaviors. SGIP1 deletion also reduces acute nociception, and SGIP1(−/−) mice are more sensitive to analgesics. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: SGIP1 was detected as a novel associated molecule with the CB1R. This relationship results in profound modification of CB1R signaling. Genetic deletion of SGIP1 has refined physiological consequences apparent in behavioral tests of mood-related assessment and the cannabinoid tetrad. SGIP1(−/−) mice have decreased nociception and augmented responses to CB1R agonists and morphine. These in vivo findings suggest SGIP1 is a novel modulator of CB1R-related behavior.

Background and Purpose Cannabinoid (CB) ligands have been demonstrated to have utility as novel therapeutic agents for the treatment of pain, metabolic conditions and gastrointestinal (GI) disorders. However, many of these ligands are centrally active, which limits their usefulness. Here, we examine a unique novel covalent CB receptor ligand, AM841, to assess its potential for use in physiological and pathophysiological in vivo studies.

Background and Purpose GPR18 is a recently deorphaned lipid receptor that is activated by the endogenous lipid N-arachidonoyl glycine (NAGly) as well the behaviourally inactive atypical cannabinoid, abnormal cannabidiol (Abn-CBD). The presence and/or function of any GPR18-based ocular signalling system remain essentially unstudied. The objectives of this research are: (i) to determine the disposition of GPR18 receptors and ligands in anterior murine eye, (ii) examine the effect of GPR18 activation on intraocular pressure (IOP) in a murine model, including knockout mice for CB1, CB2 and GPR55. Experimental Approach IOP was measured in mice following topical application of Abn-CBD, NAGly or the GPR55/GPR18 agonist O-1602, alone or with injection of the GPR18 antagonist, O-1918. GPR18 protein localization was assessed with immunohistochemistry. Endocannabinoids were measured using LC/MS-MS. Key Results GPR18 protein was expressed most prominently in the ciliary epithelium and the corneal epithelium and, interestingly, in the trabecular meshwork. The GPR18 ligand, NAGly, was also detected in mouse eye at a level comparable to that seen in the brain. Abn-CBD and NAGly, but not O-1602, significantly reduced IOP in all mice tested. The antagonist, O-1918, blocked the effects of Abn-CBD and NAGly. Conclusions and Implications We present evidence for a functional GPR18-based signalling system in the murine anterior eye, including receptors and ligands. GPR18 agonists, Abn-CBD and NAGly, reduce IOP independently of CB1, CB2 or GPR55. These findings suggest that GPR18 may serve as a desirable target for the development of novel ocular hypotensive medications. Linked Articles This article is part of a themed section on Cannabinoids. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2013.169.issue-4 & http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2012.167.issue-8

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The cannabinoid CB1 receptor is the chief mediator of the CNS effects of cannabinoids. In cell culture model systems, CB1 receptors both desensitize and internalize on activation. Previous work suggests that the extreme carboxy-terminus of this receptor regulates internalization via phosphorylation of residues clustered within this region. Mutational analysis of the carboxy-terminus of CB1 receptors has demonstrated that the last six serine/threonine residues are necessary for agonist-induced internalization. However, the structural determinants of CB1 receptor internalization are also dependent on the local cellular environment. The importance of cell context on CB1 receptor function calls for an investigation of the functional roles of these residues in neurones. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH To determine the structural requirements of CB1 internalization in neurones, we evaluated the signalling properties of carboxy-terminal mutated CB1 receptors expressed in cultured autaptic hippocampal neurones, using electrophysiological methods. KEY RESULTS CB1 receptors transfected into CB1 knockout neurones signalled and desensitized as did wild-type neurones, allowing us to test specific CB1 receptor mutations. Deletion of the last 13 residues yielded a CB1 receptor that inhibited excitatory postsynaptic currents but did not desensitize. Furthermore, mutation of the final six serine and threonine residues to alanines resulted in a non-desensitizing receptor. In contrast, CB1 receptors lacking residues 419–460, leaving the last 14 residues intact, did desensitize. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS The distal thirteen residues of CB1 receptors are crucial for their desensitization in cultured neurones. Furthermore, this desensitization is likely to follow phosphorylation of serines and threonines within this region. LINKED ARTICLES This article is part of a themed section on Cannabinoids in Biology and Medicine. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2012.165.issue-8. To view Part I of Cannabinoids in Biology and Medicine visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2011.163.issue-7

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Cannabinoids such as Δ9- tetrahydrocannabinol, the major psychoactive component of marijuana and hashish, primarily act via cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors to produce characteristic behavioural effects in humans. Due to the tractability of rodent models for electrophysiological and behavioural studies, most of the studies of cannabinoid receptor action have used rodent cannabinoid receptors. While CB1 receptors are relatively well-conserved among mammals, human CB1 (hCB1) differs from rCB1 and mCB1 receptors at 13 residues, which may result in differential signalling. In addition, two hCB1 splice variants (hCB1a and hCB1b) have been reported, diverging in their amino-termini relative to hCB1 receptors. In this study, we have examined hCB1 signalling in neurones. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH hCB1, hCB1a hCB1b or rCB1 receptors were expressed in autaptic cultured hippocampal neurones from CB1−/− mice. Such cells express a complete endogenous cannabinoid signalling system. Electrophysiological techniques were used to assess CB1 receptor-mediated signalling. KEY RESULTS Expressed in autaptic hippocampal neurones cultured from CB1−/− mice, hCB1, hCB1a and hCB1b signal differentially from one another and from rodent CB1 receptors. Specifically, hCB1 receptors inhibit synaptic transmission less effectively than rCB1 receptors. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS Our results suggest that cannabinoid receptor signalling in humans is quantitatively very different from that in rodents. As the problems of marijuana and hashish abuse occur in humans, our results highlight the importance of studying hCB1 receptors. They also suggest further study of the distribution and function of hCB1 receptor splice variants, given their differential signalling and potential impact on human health. LINKED ARTICLES This article is part of a themed section on Cannabinoids in Biology and Medicine. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2012.165.issue-8. To view Part I of Cannabinoids in Biology and Medicine visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2011.163.issue-7

Background and purpose: ‘Spice’ is an herbal blend primarily marketed in Europe as a mild hallucinogen with prominent cannabis-like effects and as a legal alternative to cannabis. However, a recent report identified a number of synthetic additives in samples of ‘Spice’. One of these, the indole derivative JWH018, is a ligand for the cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) cannabinoid receptor and inhibits cAMP production in CB1 receptor-expressing CHO cells. Other effects of JWH018 on CB1 receptor-mediated signalling are not known, particularly in neurons. Here we have evaluated the signalling pathways activated by JWH018 at CB1 receptors. Experimental approach: We investigated the effects of JWH018 on neurotransmission in cultured autaptic hippocampal neurons. We further analysed its activation of ERK1/2 mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) and internalization of CB1 receptors in HEK293 cells stably expressing this receptor. Key results: In cultured autaptic hippocampal neurons, JWH018 potently inhibited excitatory postsynaptic currents (IC50= 14.9 nM) in a concentration- and CB1 receptor-dependent manner. Furthermore, it increased ERK1/2 MAPK phosphorylation (EC50= 4.4 nM). We also found that JWH018 potently induced rapid and robust CB1 receptor internalization (EC50= 2.8 nM; t1/2= 17.3 min). Conclusions and implications: JWH018, a prominent component of several herbal preparations marketed for their psychoactivity, is a potent and effective CB1 receptor agonist that activates multiple CB1 receptor signalling pathways. Thus, it is likely that the subjective effects of ‘Spice’ are due to activation of cannabinoid CB1 receptors by JWH018, added to this herbal preparation.

GPR18 is a recently deorphaned lipid receptor that is activated by the endogenous lipid N-arachidonoyl glycine (NAGly) as well the behaviourally inactive atypical cannabinoid, abnormal cannabidiol (Abn-CBD). The presence and/or function of any GPR18-based ocular signalling system remain essentially unstudied. The objectives of this research are: (i) to determine the disposition of GPR18 receptors and ligands in anterior murine eye, (ii) examine the effect of GPR18 activation on intraocular pressure (IOP) in a murine model, including knockout mice for CB₁, CB₂ and GPR55.IOP was measured in mice following topical application of Abn-CBD, NAGly or the GPR55/GPR18 agonist O-1602, alone or with injection of the GPR18 antagonist, O-1918. GPR18 protein localization was assessed with immunohistochemistry. Endocannabinoids were measured using LC/MS-MS.GPR18 protein was expressed most prominently in the ciliary epithelium and the corneal epithelium and, interestingly, in the trabecular meshwork. The GPR18 ligand, NAGly, was also detected in mouse eye at a level comparable to that seen in the brain. Abn-CBD and NAGly, but not O-1602, significantly reduced IOP in all mice tested. The antagonist, O-1918, blocked the effects of Abn-CBD and NAGly.We present evidence for a functional GPR18-based signalling system in the murine anterior eye, including receptors and ligands. GPR18 agonists, Abn-CBD and NAGly, reduce IOP independently of CB₁, CB₂ or GPR55. These findings suggest that GPR18 may serve as a desirable target for the development of novel ocular hypotensive medications.

Cannabinoids such as Δ(9) - tetrahydrocannabinol, the major psychoactive component of marijuana and hashish, primarily act via cannabinoid CB(1) and CB(2) receptors to produce characteristic behavioural effects in humans. Due to the tractability of rodent models for electrophysiological and behavioural studies, most of the studies of cannabinoid receptor action have used rodent cannabinoid receptors. While CB(1) receptors are relatively well-conserved among mammals, human CB(1) (hCB(1) ) differs from rCB(1) and mCB(1) receptors at 13 residues, which may result in differential signalling. In addition, two hCB(1) splice variants (hCB(1a) and hCB(1b) ) have been reported, diverging in their amino-termini relative to hCB(1) receptors. In this study, we have examined hCB(1) signalling in neurones.hCB(1) , hCB(1a) hCB(1b) or rCB(1) receptors were expressed in autaptic cultured hippocampal neurones from CB(1) (-/-) mice. Such cells express a complete endogenous cannabinoid signalling system. Electrophysiological techniques were used to assess CB(1) receptor-mediated signalling. KEY RESULTS Expressed in autaptic hippocampal neurones cultured from CB(1) (-/-) mice, hCB(1) , hCB(1a) and hCB(1b) signal differentially from one another and from rodent CB(1) receptors. Specifically, hCB(1) receptors inhibit synaptic transmission less effectively than rCB(1) receptors.Our results suggest that cannabinoid receptor signalling in humans is quantitatively very different from that in rodents. As the problems of marijuana and hashish abuse occur in humans, our results highlight the importance of studying hCB(1) receptors. They also suggest further study of the distribution and function of hCB(1) receptor splice variants, given their differential signalling and potential impact on human health.This article is part of a themed section on Cannabinoids in Biology and Medicine. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2012.165.issue-8. To view Part I of Cannabinoids in Biology and Medicine visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2011.163.issue-7.