Search

Purpose: Medically refractory reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS), a rare variant of RCVS, poses a significant therapeutic challenge. Herein we describe a case of medically refractory RCVS that required treatment with intra-arterial (IA) verapamil and subsequent nimodipine, resulting in both angiographic and clinical improvement after failing to respond to hemodynamic augmentation. We also supplement a description of our case with a review of other case studies and case series in which IA calcium channel blockers were used to treat RCVS. We propose that the case we outline below demonstrates that neurointerventional management with IA verapamil is appropriate and effective as an early intervention of medically refractory RCVS. Methods and Materials: Using PubMed and Google Scholar, we performed a search of the English language literature with several combinations of the keywords “intra-arterial”, “calcium channel blockers”, “reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome”, “RCVS”, “nimodipine”, “verapamil”, “milrinone”, and “nicardipine” to identify studies in which RCVS was treated with IA calcium channel blockers. Results: We identified eight case studies and case series that met our inclusion criteria. Eighteen patients are encompassed in these eight studies. Conclusions: IA administration of calcium channel blockers has been shown to return cerebral vessels to their normal caliber in patients with medically refractory RCVS. However, there are no randomized controlled trials of the treatment of RCVS, and further studies are needed to elucidate the optimal treatment protocol for medically refractory RCVS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Medically refractory reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS), a rare variant of RCVS, poses a significant therapeutic challenge. Herein we describe a case of medically refractory RCVS that required treatment with intra-arterial (IA) verapamil and subsequent nimodipine, resulting in both angiographic and clinical improvement after failing to respond to hemodynamic augmentation. We also supplement a description of our case with a review of other case studies and case series in which IA calcium channel blockers were used to treat RCVS. We propose that the case we outline below demonstrates that neurointerventional management with IA verapamil is appropriate and effective as an early intervention of medically refractory RCVS. Methods and Materials: Using PubMed and Google Scholar, we performed a search of the English language literature with several combinations of the keywords “intra-arterial”, “calcium channel blockers”, “reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome”, “RCVS”, “nimodipine”, “verapamil”, “milrinone”, and “nicardipine” to identify studies in which RCVS was treated with IA calcium channel blockers. Results: We identified eight case studies and case series that met our inclusion criteria. Eighteen patients are encompassed in these eight studies. Conclusions: IA administration of calcium channel blockers has been shown to return cerebral vessels to their normal caliber in patients with medically refractory RCVS. However, there are no randomized controlled trials of the treatment of RCVS, and further studies are needed to elucidate the optimal treatment protocol for medically refractory RCVS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]