Search

This study investigated the prevalence of inherited thrombophilia, risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and benefit of low molecular weight heparin prophylaxis in 476 Israeli children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) treated between 2004 and 2016. Thrombophilia was found in 15·5%. Arab children had a higher prevalence of F5 R506Q (factor V Leiden) than Jewish children (19·4% vs. 2·9%, P < 0·01). Patients with thrombophilia had higher VTE rates VTE (26·5% vs. 5·6%, P < 0·001). None of the thrombophilic children given prophylaxis had severe VTE. Routine evaluation for inherited thrombophilia followed by thromboprophylaxis when findings are positive may benefit at-risk patients with ALL.

Thrombotic events in children have become an increasingly common problem, particularly in paediatric tertiary care hospitals. The prevalence of inherited thrombophilia in children who develop thrombosis varies substantially depending on the population. Children who develop thrombosis, as well as those who have not but have a positive family history, are frequently tested for inherited thrombophilia. The clinical utility of performing such tests has been questioned, in both adults and children. This review will examine the practise of testing for inherited thrombophilia in children, focusing on the rationale for testing and highlighting areas in which more evidence is needed prior to making strong recommendations. Future studies, many of which are currently being performed or proposed, are necessary to address many of the unanswered questions.

Hereditary protein S (PS) deficiency type I is an established risk factor for venous thromboembolism. Contradictionary data on type III deficiency suggests a difference in risk between both types. We studied 156 first degree relatives (90% of eligible relatives) from type I deficient probands (cohort 1) and 268 (88%) from type III deficient probands (cohort 2) to determine the absolute risk of venous and arterial thromboembolism. Annual incidences of venous thromboembolism were 1.47 and 0.17 per 100 person-years in deficient and non-deficient relatives in cohort 1 [relative risk (RR) 8.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.6-30.0], and 0.27 vs. 0.24 in cohort 2 (RR 0.9; 95% CI 0.4-2.2). Type III deficiency was demonstrated in 20% of non-deficient relatives in cohort 1 and the annual incidence in this subgroup was 0.70 (RR 4.3;0.95-19.0). The cut-off level of free PS to identify subjects at risk was 30%, the lower limit of its normal range (65%). PS deficiency was not a risk factor for arterial thromboembolism. In conclusion, type I deficiency was found to be a strong risk factor for venous thromboembolism, in contrast with type III deficiency. This was because of lower free PS levels in type I deficient subjects and a free PS cut-off level far below the lower limit of its normal range.

Hereditary protein S (PS) deficiency type I is an established risk factor for venous thromboembolism. Contradictionary data on type III deficiency suggests a difference in risk between both types. We studied 156 first degree relatives (90% of eligible relatives) from type I deficient probands (cohort 1) and 268 (88%) from type III deficient probands (cohort 2) to determine the absolute risk of venous and arterial thromboembolism. Annual incidences of venous thromboembolism were 1.47 and 0.17 per 100 person-years in deficient and non-deficient relatives in cohort 1 [relative risk (RR) 8.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.6-30.0], and 0.27 vs. 0.24 in cohort 2 (RR 0.9; 95% CI 0.4-2.2). Type III deficiency was demonstrated in 20% of non-deficient relatives in cohort 1 and the annual incidence in this subgroup was 0.70 (RR 4.3;0.95-19.0). The cut-off level of free PS to identify subjects at risk was 30%, the lower limit of its normal range (65%). PS deficiency was not a risk factor for arterial thromboembolism. In conclusion, type I deficiency was found to be a strong risk factor for venous thromboembolism, in contrast with type III deficiency. This was because of lower free PS levels in type I deficient subjects and a free PS cut-off level far below the lower limit of its normal range.

Two patients from two unrelated families with a history of thrombosis showed severe plasma activated protein C (APC) resistance. However, genotypic analysis demonstrated that the patients were heterozygous for factor V (FV) Leiden mutation. Coagulation studies revealed that FV clotting activity and antigen were similarly reduced at about 50% of normal in the patients. One brother of propositus A also showed the same abnormalities. Genetic analysis showed that, in addition to FV Leiden mutation in exon 10 of the FV gene (G1691A), these patients had a transition in exon 13 of the FV gene (A4070G; R2 allele) predicting His1299Arg substitution in the mature FV. Study by RT-PCR of platelet FV mRNA indicated that the mRNA produced by the FV gene, marked by the R2 allele, was reduced in amount in both pseudohomozygous patients of family A. The R2 allele has previously been demonstrated to be significantly associated with plasma FV deficiency in the Italian population. The presence of FV deficiency did not protect the propositi from thrombosis. These data confirm that genotypic analysis is mandatory in patients with phenotypic severe APC resistance before these patients are definitely classified as homozygotes for FV Leiden and that further genotypic analysis is advisable.

The role of the family history as a tool for the diagnosis of inherited thrombophilia has not been established. Several authors have indicated that a positive family history is not a good predictor of inherited abnormalities such as antithrombin III deficiency, or deficiencies of protein C or protein S. We have tried to approach the family history in a quantitative way. To this end we used the cumulative incidence data of thrombosis in the general population and also in a population of protein C deficient families to estimate the expected number of symptomatic subjects in a family under both the hypothesis of inherited thrombophilia and the null-hypothesis. Although a number of assumptions underlying our calculations need to be verified and probably adjusted before any truly quantitative meaning can be assigned to this approach, we feel that the family history is a useful diagnostic test for inherited thrombophilia if it is used in a critical way.