Search

Summary In the Medical Research Council (MRC) Myeloma IX trial (ISRCTN684564111) patients were randomised to sodium clodronate or zoledronic acid and induction treatment: cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (CVAD) or cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone (CTD) followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in the intensive pathway; attenuated CTD or melphalan and prednisolone (MP) in the non‐intensive pathway. Subsequent randomisation allocated patients to either thalidomide or observation. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life (QoL) questionnaires, QLQ‐C30 and QLQ‐MY24, were administered at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months and annually thereafter, enabling the effect of sequential treatment on patient‐reported health‐related QoL (HR‐QoL) to be investigated. The protocol specified four subscales of interest: Pain, Fatigue, Global Health Status/Quality of Life and Physical Functioning at 3, 6 and 12 months that were compared using linear models. The intensive pathway showed significant differences in favour of CTD for Fatigue at 3 months and Physical Functioning at 12 months. The non‐intensive pathway and maintenance phase reported significant differences at 3 months; Pain (improved with attenuated CTD) and Global Health status/Quality of Life (improved with observation). The improved outcomes in MRC Myeloma IX were accompanied by some beneficial and few detrimental effects on HR‐QoL.

Analysis of outcome following allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation for myeloma using myeloablative conditioning - evidence for a superior outcome using melphalan combined with total body irradiation We have undertaken a retrospective multicentre analysis of 139 patients (median age 44.4 years) undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for multiple myeloma using myeloablative conditioning. The majority of patients received total body irradiation (TBI) combined with either melphalan (56.9%) or cyclophosphamide (28.5%). Overall, transplant-related mortality (TRM) was 37.9% at 1 year and was not significantly different for patients receiving melphalan/TBI compared with cyclophosphamide/TBI. The overall complete remission (CR) rate, including patients in CR at the time of transplant, was greater for patients receiving melphalan/TBI (64.7%) compared with cyclophosphamide/TBI (47.2%)(P = 0.085). A significantly higher proportion of patients with continuing disease at the time of transplant achieved CR post-transplant following melphalan/TBI conditioning compared with cyclophosphamide/TBI (52.9% and 33.4% respectively, P = 0.009). Relapse/progression rates at 5 years were significantly lower for melphalan/TBI (36.7%) compared with cyclophosphamide/TBI (80.8%, P < 0.0001) and remained significant in multivariate analysis. This resulted in an overall survival at 5 years of 44.1% and 28.1% for melphalan/TBI and cyclophosphamide/TBI, respectively (P = 0.059). These results demonstrate that the type of conditioning for sibling allogeneic HSCT for myeloma has a major effect on transplant outcome.