Search

Aims Using 3 different perpetrators the impact of voriconazole, cobicistat and rifampicin (single dose), we evaluated the suitability of a microdose cocktail of factor Xa inhibitors (FXaI; rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban; 100 μg in total) to study drug-drug interactions. Methods Three cohorts of 6 healthy volunteers received 2 treatments with microdoses of rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban alone and with coadministration of 1 of the perpetrators. Plasma and urine concentrations of microdosed apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban were quantified using a validated ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry with a lower limit of quantification of 2.5 pg/mL. Results Voriconazole caused only a minor interaction with apixaban and rivaroxaban, none with edoxaban. Cobicistat significantly increased exposure of all 3 FXaI with area under the plasma concentration-time curve ratios of 1.67 (apixaban), 1.74 (edoxaban) and 2.0 (rivaroxaban). A single dose of rifampicin decreased the volume of distribution and elimination half-life of all 3 FXaI. Conclusions The microdosed FXaI cocktail approach is able to generate drug interaction data and can help elucidating the mechanism involved in the clearance of the different victim drugs. This is a safe approach to concurrently study drug-drug interactions with a drug class. (EudraCT 2016-003024-23).

Aims Chlorzoxazone is the paradigm marker substrate for CYP2E1 phenotyping in vivo. Because at the commonly used milligram doses (250-750 mg) chlorzoxazone acts as an inhibitor of the CYP3A4/5 marker substrate midazolam, previous attempts failed to combine both drugs in a common phenotyping cocktail. Microdosing chlorzoxazone could circumvent this problem. Method We enrolled 12 healthy volunteers in a trial investigating the dose-exposure relationship of single ascending chlorzoxazone oral doses over a 10,000-fold range (0.05-500 mg) and assessed the effect of 0.1 and 500 mg of chlorzoxazone on oral midazolam pharmacokinetics (0.003 mg). Results Chlorzoxazone area under the concentration-time curve was dose-linear in the dose range between 0.05 and 5 mg. A nonlinear increase occurred with doses ≥50 mg, probably due to saturated presystemic metabolic elimination. While midazolam area under the concentration-time curve increased 2-fold when coadministered with 500 mg of chlorzoxazone, there was no pharmacokinetic interaction between chlorzoxazone and midazolam microdoses. Conclusion The chlorzoxazone microdose did not interact with the CYP3A marker substrate midazolam, enabling the simultaneous administration in a phenotyping cocktail. This microdose assay is now ready to be further validated and tested as a phenotyping procedure assessing the impact of induction and inhibition of CYP2E1 on chlorzoxazone microdose pharmacokinetics.

Aims We assessed the potential mutual interaction of oral macitentan (cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 substrate) at steady-state with single-dose oral rivaroxaban (CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein substrate) and evaluated the effect of the CYP3A and P-glycoprotein inducer St John's wort (SJW) on the pharmacokinetics of these drugs in healthy volunteers. Methods Twelve healthy volunteers completed this open-label, monocentre, two-period, one-sequence phase I clinical trial. The pharmacokinetics of macitentan (10 mg) was assessed on study days 3 (single dose), 15 (steady-state), 16 (impact of rivaroxaban) and 29 (after induction by oral SJW), and of rivaroxaban on days 2 (single dose), 16 (impact of macitentan at steady-state) and 29 (after induction by SJW). Concurrently, we quantified changes of CYP3A activity using oral microdoses of midazolam (30 μg). Results Rivaroxaban and macitentan did not significantly change the pharmacokinetics of each other. After induction with SJW, CYP3A activity increased by 272% and geometric mean ratios of macitentan AUC decreased by 48% and of Cmax by 45%. Concurrently, also geometric mean ratios of rivaroxaban AUC and Cmax decreased by 25%. Conclusions There is no evidence for a relevant pharmacokinetic interaction between macitentan and rivaroxaban suggesting that these two drugs can be combined without dose adjustment. SJW strongly increased CYP3A activity and substantially reduced rivaroxaban and macitentan exposure while estimated net endothelin antagonism only decreased by 20%, which is considered clinically irrelevant. The combination of SJW with rivaroxaban should be avoided.

AIMS To test the in vivo activity of Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2E1 in obese children vs. nonobese children, aged 11-18 years. Secondly, whether the activity of CYP2E1 in these patients is associated with NALFD, diabetes or hyperlipidaemia. METHODS Seventy children were divided into groups by body mass index (BMI) standard deviation score (SDS). All children received 250 mg oral chlorzoxazone (CLZ) as probe for CYP2E1 activity. Thirteen blood samples and 20-h urine samples were collected per participant. RESULTS Obese children had an increased oral clearance and distribution of CLZ, indicating increased CYP2E1 activity, similar to obese adults. The mean AUC0-∞ value of CLZ was decreased by 46% in obese children compared to nonobese children. The F was was increased twofold in obese children compared to nonobese children, P

Aims The pharmacokinetics of voriconazole show a nonlinear dose-exposure relationship caused by inhibition of its own CYP3A-dependent metabolism. Because the magnitude of autoinhibition also depends on voriconazole concentrations, infusion rate might modulate voriconazole exposure. The impact of four different infusion rates on voriconazole pharmacokinetics was investigated. Methods Twelve healthy participants received 100 mg voriconazole intravenous over 4 h, 400 mg over 6 h, 4 h, and 2 h in a crossover design. Oral midazolam (3 μg) was given at the end of infusion. Blood and urine samples were collected up to 48 h. Voriconazole and its N-oxide metabolite were quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. Midazolam estimated metabolic clearance (eCLmet) was calculated using a limited sampling strategy. Voriconazole-N-oxide inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoforms 2C19 and 3A4 were assessed with the P450-Glo luminescence assay. Results Area under the concentration-time curve for 400 mg intravenous voriconazole was 16% (90% confidence interval: 12-20%) lower when administered over 6 h compared to 2 h infusion. Dose-corrected area under the concentration-time curve for 100 mg over 4 h was 34% lower compared to 400 mg over 4 h. Midazolam eCLmet was 516 ml min-1 (420-640) following 100 mg 4 h-1 voriconazole, 152 ml min-1 (139-166) for 400 mg 6 h-1 , 192 ml min-1 (167-220) for 400 mg 4 h-1 , and 202 ml min-1 (189-217) for 400 mg 2 h-1 . Concentration giving 50% CYP inhibition of voriconazole N-oxide was 146 ± 23 μmol l-1 for CYP3A4, and 40.2 ± 4.2 μmol l-1 for CYP2C19. Conclusions Voriconazole pharmacokinetics is modulated by infusion rate, an autoinhibitory contribution voriconazole metabolism by CYP3A and 2C19 and to a lesser extent its main N-oxide metabolite for CYP2C19. To avoid reduced exposure, the infusion rate should be 2 h.

AIMS: We assessed the potential mutual interaction of oral macitentan (cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 substrate) at steady‐state with single‐dose oral rivaroxaban (CYP3A4 and P‐glycoprotein substrate) and evaluated the effect of the CYP3A and P‐glycoprotein inducer St John's wort (SJW) on the pharmacokinetics of these drugs in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers completed this open‐label, monocentre, two‐period, one‐sequence phase I clinical trial. The pharmacokinetics of macitentan (10 mg) was assessed on study days 3 (single dose), 15 (steady‐state), 16 (impact of rivaroxaban) and 29 (after induction by oral SJW), and of rivaroxaban on days 2 (single dose), 16 (impact of macitentan at steady‐state) and 29 (after induction by SJW). Concurrently, we quantified changes of CYP3A activity using oral microdoses of midazolam (30 μg). RESULTS: Rivaroxaban and macitentan did not significantly change the pharmacokinetics of each other. After induction with SJW, CYP3A activity increased by 272% and geometric mean ratios of macitentan AUC decreased by 48% and of C(max) by 45%. Concurrently, also geometric mean ratios of rivaroxaban AUC and C(max) decreased by 25%. CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence for a relevant pharmacokinetic interaction between macitentan and rivaroxaban suggesting that these two drugs can be combined without dose adjustment. SJW strongly increased CYP3A activity and substantially reduced rivaroxaban and macitentan exposure while estimated net endothelin antagonism only decreased by 20%, which is considered clinically irrelevant. The combination of SJW with rivaroxaban should be avoided.

Aim We aimed to establish a method to assess systemic and pre-systemic cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A activity using ineffective microgram doses of midazolam. Methods In an open, one sequence, crossover study, 16 healthy participants received intravenous and oral midazolam at microgram (0.001 mg intravenous and 0.003 mg oral) and regular milligram (1 mg intravenous and 3 mg oral) doses to assess the linearity of plasma and urine pharmacokinetics. Results Dose-normalized AUC and Cmax were 37.1 ng ml−1 h [95% CI 35.5, 40.6] and 39.1 ng ml−1 [95% CI 30.4, 50.2] for the microdose and 39.0 ng ml−1 h [95% CI 36.1, 42.1] and 37.1 ng ml−1 [95% CI 26.9, 51.3] for the milligram dose. CLmet was 253 ml min−1 [95% CI 201, 318] vs. 278 ml min−1 [95% CI 248, 311] for intravenous doses and 1880 ml min−1 [95% CI 1590, 2230] vs. 2050 ml min−1 [95% CI 1720, 2450] for oral doses. Oral bioavailability of a midazolam microdose was 23.4% [95% CI 20.0, 27.3] vs. 20.9% [95% CI 17.1, 25.5] after the regular dose. Hepatic and gut extraction ratios for microgram doses were 0.44 [95% CI 0.39, 0.49] and 0.53 [95% CI 0.45, 0.63] and compared well with those for milligram doses (0.43 [95% CI 0.37, 0.49] and 0.61 [95% CI 0.53, 0.70]). Conclusion The pharmacokinetics of an intravenous midazolam microdose is linear to the applied regular doses and can be used to assess safely systemic CYP3A activity and, in combination with oral microdoses, pre-systemic CYP3A activity.

Aims Erythromycin is a macrolide antibiotic, which is frequently used as a topical formulation for the treatment of acne. It is also known as an inhibitor of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzyme 3A4. In this study, the systemic availability of topical erythromycin, hence the influence on the activity of CYP3A, is evaluated in comparison to orally administered erythromycin.

Aims The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1 inhibitor clarithromycin on the pharmacokinetics of bosentan. We also aimed to evaluate the impact of CYP2C9 and SLCO1B1 (encoding for OATP1B1) genotypes and their combination. Methods We assessed the effect of the OATP and CYP3A inhibitor clarithromycin on bosentan pharmacokinetics at steady state and concurrently quantified changes of CYP3A activity using midazolam as a probe drug. Sixteen healthy volunteers received therapeutic doses of bosentan (125 mg twice daily) for 14 days and clarithromycin (500 mg twice daily) concomitantly for the last 4 days, and bosentan pharmacokinetics was assessed on days 1, 10 and 14. Results Clarithromycin significantly increased bosentan area under the plasma concentration–time curve of the dosing interval 3.7-fold and peak concentration 3.8-fold in all participants irrespective of the genotype. Clarithromycin also reduced CYP3A activity (midazolam clearance) in all participants; however, these changes were not correlated to the changes of bosentan clearance. Conclusions Clarithromycin substantially increases the exposure to bosentan, suggesting that dose reductions may be necessary.

The pharmacokinetics of voriconazole show a nonlinear dose-exposure relationship caused by inhibition of its own CYP3A-dependent metabolism. Because the magnitude of autoinhibition also depends on voriconazole concentrations, infusion rate might modulate voriconazole exposure. The impact of four different infusion rates on voriconazole pharmacokinetics was investigated.Twelve healthy participants received 100 mg voriconazole intravenous over 4 h, 400 mg over 6 h, 4 h, and 2 h in a crossover design. Oral midazolam (3 μg) was given at the end of infusion. Blood and urine samples were collected up to 48 h. Voriconazole and its N-oxide metabolite were quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. Midazolam estimated metabolic clearance (eCLmet) was calculated using a limited sampling strategy. Voriconazole-N-oxide inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoforms 2C19 and 3A4 were assessed with the P450-Glo luminescence assay.Area under the concentration-time curve for 400 mg intravenous voriconazole was 16% (90% confidence interval: 12-20%) lower when administered over 6 h compared to 2 h infusion. Dose-corrected area under the concentration-time curve for 100 mg over 4 h was 34% lower compared to 400 mg over 4 h. Midazolam eCLmet was 516 ml minVoriconazole pharmacokinetics is modulated by infusion rate, an autoinhibitory contribution voriconazole metabolism by CYP3A and 2C19 and to a lesser extent its main N-oxide metabolite for CYP2C19. To avoid reduced exposure, the infusion rate should be 2 h.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT • The analgesic activity of tilidine is mediated by its active metabolite, nortilidine, which easily penetrates the blood–brain barrier and binds to the µ-opioid receptor as a potent agonist. • Tilidine undergoes an extensive first-pass metabolism, which has been suggested to be mediated by CYP3A4 and CYP2C19; furthermore, strong inhibition of CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 by voriconazole increased exposure of nortilidine, probably by inhibition of further metabolism. • The novel CYP2C19 gene variant CYP2C19*17 causes ultrarapid drug metabolism, in contrast to the *2 and *3 variants, which result in impaired drug metabolism. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS • Using a panel study with CYP2C19 ultrarapid and poor metabolizers, a major contribution of polymorphic CYP2C19 on tilidine metabolic elimination can be excluded. • The potent CYP3A4 inhibitor ritonavir alters the sequential metabolism of tilidine, substantially reducing the partial metabolic clearances of tilidine to nortilidine and nortilidine to bisnortilidine, which increases the nortilidine exposure twofold. • The lowest clearance in overall tilidine elimination is the N-demethylation of nortilidine to bisnortilidine. Inhibition of this step leads to accumulation of the active nortilidine. AIMS To investigate in vivo the effect of the CYP2C19 genotype on the pharmacokinetics of tilidine and the contribution of CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 to the formation of nortilidine using potent CYP3A4 inhibition by ritonavir. METHODS Fourteen healthy volunteers (seven CYP2C19 poor and seven ultrarapid metabolizers) received ritonavir orally (300 mg twice daily) for 3 days or placebo, together with a single oral dose of tilidine and naloxone (100 mg and 4 mg, respectively). Blood samples and urine were collected for 72 h. Noncompartmental analysis was performed to determine pharmacokinetic parameters of tilidine, nortilidine, bisnortilidine and ritonavir. RESULTS Tilidine exposure increased sevenfold and terminal elimination half-life fivefold during ritonavir treatment, but no significant differences were observed between the CYP2C19 genotypes. During ritonavir treatment, nortilidine area under the concentration–time curve was on average doubled, with no differences between CYP2C19 poor metabolizers [2242 h ng ml−1 (95% confidence interval 1811–2674) vs. 996 h ng ml−1 (95% confidence interval 872–1119)] and ultrarapid metabolizers [2074 h ng ml−1 (95% confidence interval 1353–2795) vs. 1059 h ng ml−1 (95% confidence interval 789–1330)]. The plasma concentration–time curve of the secondary metabolite, bisnortilidine, showed a threefold increase of time to reach maximal observed plasma concentration; however, area under the concentration–time curve was not altered by ritonavir. CONCLUSIONS The sequential metabolism of tilidine is inhibited by the potent CYP3A4 inhibitor, ritonavir, independent of the CYP2C19 genotype, with a twofold increase in the exposure of the active nortilidine.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT • Nausea and vomiting are the most distressing side-effects of a high dose melphalan regimen. • Aprepitant in addition to an antiemetic standard regimen has been reported to improve significantly both acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS • Anti-emetic regimens including aprepitant have no clinically relevant effect on the pharmacokinetics of the anticancer agent melphalan when administered 1 h before high dose melphalan infusion. AIMS The objective of this investigation was to assess the effect of aprepitant on the pharmacokinetics of high-dose melphalan used as conditioning therapy before blood stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma. METHODS Aprepitant (125 mg) or placebo was administered 1 h before melphalan therapy (1 h infusion of 100 mg m−2). Eleven plasma samples were obtained over 8 h and melphalan was quantified using an LC/MS/MS method. Standard pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated and nonparametric testing was applied to assess the differences between aprepitant and placebo treatment. RESULTS Twenty patients received placebo and 10 patients aprepitant treatment. There were no differences observed for Cmax at the end of melphalan infusion (placebo 3431 ± 608 ng ml−1vs. aprepitant 3269 ± 660 ng ml−1). In addition, AUC and terminal elimination half-life were not changed by aprepitant. Total clearance of melphalan was 304 ± 58 ml min−1 m−2 (placebo) which was not influenced by aprepitant (288 ± 78 ml min−1 m−2). CONCLUSIONS The administration of the NK1 receptor antagonist aprepitant 1 h before a high-dose chemotherapy does not influence the exposure and the elimination of melphalan. Therefore, oral administration of 125 mg aprepitant 1 h before melphalan infusion does not alter the disposition of intravenously administered melphalan.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT • Pharmacokinetic variability of voriconazole is largely caused by CYP3A4- and CYP2C19-mediated metabolism. • Oral bioavailability of voriconazole has been claimed to be almost 100%, thus facilitating a change from intravenous to oral application without dose adjustment. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS • For the first time voriconazole exposure after intravenous and oral administration in relation to CYP2C19 activity is reported. • In addition, the predominant metabolic pathway is the hydroxylation that seems to be influenced by the CYP2C19 genotype. • Enterohepatic circulation of both hydroxylated metabolites must be anticipated. AIMS The aim was to determine the pharmacokinetics of voriconazole after a single oral dose in comparison with intravenous (i.v.) administration in healthy individuals stratified according to the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 genotype. In addition, the possible metabolic pathways and their modulation according to CYP2C19 genotype were investigated after oral and i.v. administration of voriconazole. METHODS In a single-centre, open-label, two-period crossover study 20 participants received single doses of 400 mg voriconazole orally and 400 mg voriconazole intravenously in randomized order. Blood and urine samples were collected up to 96 h post dose and the voriconazole and three major metabolites were quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectroscopy. RESULTS Absolute oral bioavailability of voriconazole was 82.6% (74.1, 91.0). It ranged from 94.4% (78.8, 109.9) in CYP2C19 poor metabolizers to 75.2% (62.9, 87.4) in extensive metabolizers. In contrast to voriconazole and its N-oxide, the plasma concentrations of both hydroxylated metabolites showed a large second peak after 24 h. Independent of the route of administration, voriconazole partial metabolic hydroxylation after i.v. administration was eightfold higher compared with N-oxidation [48.8 ml min−1 (30.5, 67.1) vs. 6.1 ml min−1 (4.1, 8.0)]. The formation of the metabolites was related to CYP2C19 activity. CONCLUSIONS Independent of the route of administration, voriconazole exposure was three times higher in CYP2C19 poor metabolizers compared with extensive metabolizers. Voriconazole has a high bioavailability with no large differences between the CYP2C19 genotypes. The hydroxylation pathway of voriconazole elimination exceeded the N-oxidation, both influenced by the CYP2C19 genotype.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THE SUBJECT • Tilidine, a World Health Organization level II analgesic, is a high extraction drug subject to pronounced first-pass metabolism, resulting in a low absolute bioavailability. • The analgesic activity of tilidine is almost exclusively exerted through its metabolite nortilidine, which easily penetrates the blood–brain barrier and binds to the µ-opioid receptor as a potent agonist. • In vitro, tilidine has been shown to be metabolized to nortilidine by N-demethylation via CYP3A4 and CYP2C19; furthermore, strong CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 inhibitors inhibited the formation of nortilidine, suggesting that these inhibitors will lead to a reduction of tilidine efficiency in vivo. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS • Co-administration of tilidine and the potent CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 inhibitor voriconazole resulted in a major pharmacokinetic interaction that was partly associated with changes in the analgesic effect. • Voriconazole inhibits both metabolic steps in the sequential metabolism of tilidine resulting in an increased exposure of the active nortilidine. • The incidence of adverse reactions was also significantly increased. AIMS To investigate in vivo the influence of the potent CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 inhibitor voriconazole on the pharmacokinetics and analgesic effects of tilidine. METHODS Sixteen healthy volunteers received voriconazole (400 mg) or placebo together with a single oral dose of tilidine (100 mg). Blood samples and urine were collected for 24 h and experimental pain was determined by using the cold pressor test. Noncompartimental analysis was performed to determine pharmacokinetic parameters of tilidine, nortilidine and voriconazole, whereas pharmacodynamic parameters were analysed by nonparametric repeated measures anova (Friedman). RESULTS Voriconazole caused a 20-fold increase in exposition of tilidine in serum [AUC 1250.8 h*ng ml−1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1076.8, 1424.9 vs. 61 h*ng ml−1, 95% CI 42.6, 80.9; P < 0.0001], whereas the AUC of nortilidine also increased 2.5-fold. After voriconazole much lower serum concentrations of bisnortilidine were observed. The onset of analgesic activity occurred later with voriconazole, which is in agreement with the prolonged tmax of nortilidine (0.78 h, 95% CI 0.63, 0.93 vs. 2.5 h, 95% CI 1.85, 3.18; P < 0.0001) due to the additional inhibition of nortilidine metabolism to bisnortilidine. After voriconazole the AUC under the pain withdrawal–time curve was reduced compared with placebo (149 s h−1, 95% CI 112, 185 vs. 175 s h−1, 95% CI 138, 213; P < 0.016), mainly due to the shorter withdrawal time 0.75 h after tilidine administration. CONCLUSIONS Voriconazole significantly inhibited the sequential metabolism of tilidine with increased exposure of the active nortilidine. Furthermore, the incidence of adverse events was almost doubled after voriconazole and tilidine.

Aims To investigate the pharmacokinetics and the pharmacodynamic effects in dorsal hand veins of the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist SLV317. Methods In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study 19 healthy men received a single oral dose of SLV317 or placebo. Blood samples were collected for analysis of SLV317 plasma concentrations and the inhibition of the venodilator response to substance P was evaluated using the hand vein compliance method. Results Administration of 250 mg SLV317 as an oral solution was well tolerated and resulted in mean peak plasma concentrations (± SEM) of 77 ± 9 ng ml−1 within 47 ± 3 min; the mean half-life was 9.9 ± 1.6 h. In hand veins preconstricted with phenylephrine, local infusion of substance P resulted in a mean venodilation of 56 ± 8% and 49 ± 6% (P = 0.91) before administration of SLV317 or placebo, respectively. SLV317 caused a substantial inhibition of substance P-induced venodilation, whereas placebo had no effect (P

Aims A clinically important interaction between the cardiac glycoside digoxin and the antibiotic clarithromycin has been suggested in earlier reports. The aim of this study was to investigate the extent of the interaction and the relative contribution of different mechanisms. Methods In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind cross-over design single oral doses of 0.75 mg digoxin with oral coadministration of placebo or 250 mg clarithromycin twice daily for 3 days were administered to 12 healthy men. Additionally, three of the subjects received single intravenous doses of 0.01 mg kg−1 digoxin with oral placebo or clarithromycin. Digoxin plasma and urine concentrations were determined by a highly sensitive radioimmunoassay. Results Oral coadministration of clarithromycin resulted in a 1.7-fold increase of the area under the digoxin plasma concentration–time curve [mean AUC(0,24) ± SD 23 ± 5.2 vs. 14 ± 2.9 µg L−1 h; 95% confidence interval (CI) on the difference 7.0, 12; P = 0.002] and in a reduction of the nonglomerular renal clearance of digoxin [mean ClRng(0, 24) ± SD 34 ± 39 vs. 57 ± 41 mL min−1; 95% CI on the difference 7.2, 45; P = 0.03]. The ratios of mean digoxin plasma concentrations with and without clarithromycin were highest during the absorption period of clarithromycin. After intravenous administration digoxin AUC(0,24) increased only 1.2-fold during coadministration of clarithromycin. Conclusions Increased oral bioavailability and reduced nonglomerular renal clearance of digoxin both contribute to the interaction between digoxin and clarithromycin, probably due to inhibition of intestinal and renal P-glycoprotein.

Aims Bioavailability of orally administered drugs depends on several factors including active excretion, e.g. by P-glycoprotein (PGP), and presystemic metabolism, e.g. by cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A), in both gastrointestinal tract and liver. Many drugs including saquinavir are substrates of both PGP and CYP3A. It was the aim of this study to test whether the extremely low bioavailability of saquinavir can be increased dose-dependently in vivo by cremophor EL, an ‘inactive’ pharmaceutic aid known to inhibit PGP in vitro. Methods In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, four phase cross-over design single doses of oral saquinavir (Invirase®, 600 mg, without food) were administered with increasing single doses of oral cremophor EL (up to 5000 mg) to eight healthy, male individuals. Saquinavir plasma concentrations were determined by LC/MS/MS up to 48 h after intake. Main outcome measures were area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC), peak concentration (Cmax), time to reach Cmax (tmax) and terminal elimination half-life (t½). Results Cremophor EL dose-dependently increased Cmax, AUC(0,4 h), and AUC(0,∞) of saquinavir. As compared with placebo, the increment observed after 5000 mg cremophor EL was 13-fold for both Cmax and AUC(0,4 h) and 5-fold for AUC(0,∞). The terminal half-life and the time to reach Cmax (tmax) were unchanged. Conclusions Cremophor EL increased the systemic availability of saquinavir without affecting its elimination suggesting that cremophor EL is not devoid of pharmacological action and acts as a modulator of the absorption process, probably by inhibiting intestinal PGP.

Erythromycin is a macrolide antibiotic, which is frequently used as a topical formulation for the treatment of acne. It is also known as an inhibitor of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzyme 3A4. In this study, the systemic availability of topical erythromycin, hence the influence on the activity of CYP3A, is evaluated in comparison to orally administered erythromycin.Sixteen healthy volunteers received consecutively topical (two applications of 800 mg) and oral erythromycin (two dose groups, 250 and 1000 mg, with n = 8) to assess erythromycin pharmacokinetics. A microdose of midazolam (3 μg orally) was used to determine the effect on CYP3A activity.After topical administration, erythromycin was detected in the plasma of every participant without causing a statistically significant alteration of CYP3A activity. After oral administration, the dose-normalized erythromycin exposure (AUC∞ ) was 1335 h ng ml(-1) after 250 mg and 3-fold higher after the 1000 mg dose (4051 h ng ml(-1); P0.01), suggesting nonlinear pharmacokinetics of erythromycin. Both oral doses inhibited CYP3A activity; midazolam clearance was decreased to 61% (250 mg) and 21% (1000 mg). The relationship between erythromycin exposure and CYP3A activity (Hill equation) revealed a 50% reduction of CYP3A activity by an erythromycin AUC∞ of 2106 h ng ml(-1).Topical erythromycin did not cause clinically relevant CYP3A alterations, although low systemic availability of erythromycin was observed. This supports the assumption that treatment with topical erythromycin is not critical in terms of CYP3A inhibition. Furthermore, substantial nonlinearity of erythromycin pharmacokinetics after two different oral doses was observed, possibly due to autoinhibition.

Aims It is not clear whether the analgesic effect following dihydrocodeine (DHC) administration is due to either DHC itself or its metabolite, dihydromorphine (DHM). We examined the relative contribution of DHC and DHM to analgesia following DHC administration in a group of healthy volunteers using a PK-PD link modelling approach. Methods A single oral dose of DHC (90 mg) was administered to 10 healthy volunteers in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. A computerized cold pressor test (CPT) was used to measure analgesia. On each study day, the volunteers performed the CPT before study medication and at 1.25, 2.75, 4.25 and 5.75 h postdose. Blood samples were taken at 0.25 h (predose) and then at half hourly intervals for 5.75 h postdose. PK-PD link modelling was used to describe the relationships between DHC, DHM and analgesic effect. Results Mean pain AUCs following DHC administration were significantly different to those following placebo administration (P = 0.001). Mean pain AUC changes were 91 score. s−1 for DHC and −17 score. s−1 for placebo (95% CI = ± 36.5 for both treatments). The assumption of a simple linear relationship between DHC concentration and effect provided a significantly better fit than the model containing DHM as the active moiety (AIC = 4.431 vs 4.668, respectively). The more complex models did not improve the likelihood of model fits significantly. Conclusions The findings suggest that the analgesic effect following DHC ingestion is mainly attributed to the parent drug rather than its DHM metabolite. It can thus be inferred that polymorphic differences in DHC metabolism to DHM have little or no effect on the analgesic affect.

Aims Using a stable isotope technique we investigated the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of gallopamil after administration of 50 mg pseudoracemic gallopamil every 12 h for 7 doses (72 h). Methods Six male healthy volunteers were studied. After the seventh dose the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were assessed. Serum levels of gallopamil were measured by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Effects of gallopamil were measured by ECG recording. Results The apparent oral clearances (R: 4.8 l min−1 (95% CI: 2.9–6.8); S: 5.5 l min−1 (95% CI: 2.5–8.5)) and half-lives (R: 6.2 h; S: 7.2 h) of R- and S-gallopamil were similar (P >0.05). The serum protein binding (fu R: 0.035 (95% CI: 0.026–0.045); S: 0.051 (95% CI: 0.033–0.069)) and the renal elimination (% of dose R: 0.49%; S: 0.71%) were enantioselective. Gallopamil had a potent effect on the PR interval (% prolongation 35.7% (95% CI: 14.0–57.3)). No changes in other electrocardiographic or cardiovascular parameters were observed. Conclusions The pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of the racemic drug gallopamil are not stereoselective at steady-state and are therefore not substantially altered compared with the single dose administration of gallopamil.

Aims The pharmacokinetics of dihydrocodeine (DHC) and its active metabolite dihydromorphine (DHM) were assessed after a single oral dose of DHC and after increasing doses of DHC at steady-state. Methods Twelve healthy male volunteers (18–45 years, CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers (EMs), MR

Aims Using a stable isotope technique which allows simultaneous and differential measuring of orally and intravenously administered drugs we compared the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of unlabelled modified release verapamil p.o. (steady state) and deuterated verapamil i.v. (single dose) following morning and evening administration. Methods Twelve female and 12 male healthy volunteers were studied in a randomized, crossover design. During the last day of each treatment period (day 6 and day 10) pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PR interval) of verapamil were assessed; 1 h before ingestion of a new R/S-verapamil 240 mg modified release formulation (08.00 h vs 20.00 h) a single dose of 10 mg d7-R/S-verapamil was administered intravenously. Serum levels of unlabelled and labelled R/S-verapamil were measured by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. In selected samples of serum which were chosen at tmin,po and tmax,po the enantiomers were separated by chiral high-performance liquid chromatography in order to calculate R- to S-verapamil serum concentration ratios. Results We observed no significant differences in pharmacokinetics (AUCpo, Cmax, tmax, CLo, F and R/S enantiomer ratio) between morning and evening treatment with modified release verapamil and there was no influence of time of dosing on mean prolongation of PR interval. AUCiv, CL, Vss and d7-R/d7-S enantiomer ratio following verapamil i.v. did not show circadian variation. t1/2 was slightly but statistically significantly increased after the morning infusion. PR-prolongation was significantly greater after verapamil i.v. in the morning than in the evening. The 90% confidence intervals of the differences between morning and evening administration in AUCpo, Cmax and AUCiv were within the equivalence range of 0.8–1.25. Conclusions Time of dosing has no significant influence on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of this new modified release formulation of verapamil. Circadian variation in presystemic metabolism of verapamil was not observed.

The objective of this investigation was to assess the effect of aprepitant on the pharmacokinetics of high-dose melphalan used as conditioning therapy before blood stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma.Aprepitant (125 mg) or placebo was administered 1 h before melphalan therapy (1 h infusion of 100 mg m⁻²). Eleven plasma samples were obtained over 8 h and melphalan was quantified using an LC/MS/MS method. Standard pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated and nonparametric testing was applied to assess the differences between aprepitant and placebo treatment.Twenty patients received placebo and 10 patients aprepitant treatment. There were no differences observed for C(max) at the end of melphalan infusion (placebo 3431 ± 608 ng ml⁻¹ vs. aprepitant 3269 ± 660 ng ml⁻¹). In addition, AUC and terminal elimination half-life were not changed by aprepitant. Total clearance of melphalan was 304 ± 58 ml min⁻¹ m⁻² (placebo) which was not influenced by aprepitant (288 ± 78 ml min⁻¹ m⁻²).The administration of the NK₁ receptor antagonist aprepitant 1 h before a high-dose chemotherapy does not influence the exposure and the elimination of melphalan. Therefore, oral administration of 125 mg aprepitant 1 h before melphalan infusion does not alter the disposition of intravenously administered melphalan.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT • Therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolate mofetil is a promising tool for reducing acute rejection episodes after renal transplantation. • Limited sampling algorithms of mycophenolic acid in mycophenolate mofetil-treated renal transplant patients have been established. • Recently published study results indicate that the intensity of early drug exposure might determine the risk of acute rejection episodes. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS • This study provides pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data of mycophenolic acid in enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium-treated renal transplant patients. • Limited sampling algorithms are evaluated and a practical sampling strategy with five sampling time points within the first 4 h after oral drug intake is provided in renal transplant patients with combined immunosuppression consisting of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium and ciclosporin A. • The association between pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters and the risk of adverse events are evaluated. • Both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters contribute to optimized individual immunosuppression. AIMS Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) monitoring strategies and clinical outcome were evaluated in enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS)-treated renal allograft recipients. METHODS PK [mycophenolic acid (MPA)] and PD [inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) activity] data were analysed in 66 EC-MPS and ciclosporin A (CsA)-treated renal allograft recipients. Adverse events were considered in a follow-up period of 12 weeks. RESULTS Analyses confirmed a limited sampling strategy (LSS) consisting of PK and PD data at predose, 1, 2, 3 and 4 h after oral intake as an appropriate sampling method (MPA r2= 0.812; IMPDH r2= 0.833). MPA AUC0–12 of patients with early biopsy-proven acute rejection was significantly lower compared with patients without a rejection (median MPA AUC0–12 28 µg*h ml−1 (7–45) vs. 40 µg*h ml−1 (16–130), P < 0.01), MPA AUC0–12 of patients with recurrent infections was significantly higher compared with patients without infections (median MPA AUC0–12 65 µg*h ml−1 (range 37–130) vs. 37 µg*h ml−1 (range 7–120), P < 0.005). Low 12-h IMPDH enzyme activity curve (AEC0–12) was associated with an increased frequency of gastrointestinal side-effects (median IMPDH AEC0–12 43 nmol*h mg−1 protein h−1[range 12–67) vs. 75 nmol*h mg−1 protein h−1 (range 15–371), P < 0.01]. CONCLUSIONS Despite highly variable absorption data, an appropriate LSS might be estimated by MPA AUC0–4 and IMPDH AEC0–4 in renal transplant patients treated with EC-MPS and CsA. Regarding adverse events, the suggested MPA-target AUC0–12 from 30 to 60 µg*h ml−1 seems to be appropriate in renal allograft recipients.

1. The pharmacokinetics, protein binding, bioavailability and metabolism of (+)-R- and (-)-S-nitrendipine were studied in six healthy subjects following random oral administration of 20 mg (+)-R-, 20 mg (-)-S- and 20 mg R,S-nitrendipine (pseudoracemic mixture of 10 mg [13C4)-(+)-R- and 10 mg (-)-S-enantiomer). 2. After administration of the enantiomers pronounced differences in AUC (R: 29.9 +/- 20.1; S: 123.8 +/- 63.7 ng ml-1 h; P less than 0.05), bioavailability (R: 10.7 +/- 7.4%; S: 44.6 +/- 23.1%; P less than 0.05) and Cmax (R: 14.4 +/- 7.7; S: 72.5 +/- 40.5 ng ml-1; P less than 0.05) were observed between R- and S-nitrendipine. When racemic nitrendipine was given bioavailability and dose normalized AUC and Cmax values of the S-enantiomer were not different from the values after S-nitrendipine-administration. In contrast, bioavailability (R: 10.7% R,S: 22.1%) and dose normalized AUC (R: 15.0; R,S: 29.5 ng ml-1 h and Cmax (R: 7.2; R,S: 16.8 ng ml-1) of R-nitrendipine were doubled following R,S- as compared with R-nitrendipine administration. t1/2 (R: 9.8; S: 9.1 h) and tmax were not different between the enantiomers nor were the values different after administration of the enantiomers or racemate. The fraction unbound in serum of R-nitrendipine was 0.0098 +/- 0.0032 (s.d.) and that of S-nitrendipine was 0.0083 +/- 0.0015 (s.d.). 3. The AUC values of the major pyridine metabolite M1 were similar after administration of R- and S-nitrendipine (S: 114.7 +/- 48.5; R: 71.7 +/- 29.9 ng ml-1 h).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

1. The pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, metabolism and antihypertensive effects of nitrendipine have been studied in 12 patients with impaired renal function and moderate to severe hypertension. The drug was administered simultaneously by the i.v. [13C4] and oral (commercial tablet 20 mg) routes. 2. No differences in the pharmacokinetic parameters were observed between the two routes of administration. The systemic clearance after i.v. administration in patients with renal impairment (18.2 +/- 6.1 ml min-1 kg-1) was similar to that observed in healthy volunteers. Despite complete absorption of drug from the tablet the bioavailability of the parent compound was 21.2 +/- 12.5%. Cumulative urinary excretion of nitrendipine metabolites was correlated with the creatinine clearance (r = 0.946). 3. Significant reductions in mean arterial blood pressure (mean: 23.6%) at the end of the nitrendipine infusion and after oral administration of 20 mg (mean: 17.5%) were observed. The blood pressure lowering effect of nitrendipine could be correlated within individuals with serum nitrendipine concentrations using a log linear model. 4. Following 4 weeks of therapy an average dose of 77 mg nitrendipine day-1 was required to achieve a systolic blood pressure below 160 mm Hg or a diastolic blood pressure below 90 mm Hg. The reduction in blood pressure during multiple dosing was related to the nitrendipine steady-state concentration. There was a significant relationship between the nitrendipine bioavailability and the dose required for sufficient blood pressure control. 5. No accumulation of nitrendipine caused by impaired renal function was observed during multiple dosing. Thus, no reduction of the nitrendipine dose in patients with renal impairment is necessary.

To investigate the pharmacokinetics and the pharmacodynamic effects in dorsal hand veins of the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist SLV317.In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study 19 healthy men received a single oral dose of SLV317 or placebo. Blood samples were collected for analysis of SLV317 plasma concentrations and the inhibition of the venodilator response to substance P was evaluated using the hand vein compliance method.Administration of 250 mg SLV317 as an oral solution was well tolerated and resulted in mean peak plasma concentrations (+/- SEM) of 77 +/- 9 ng ml(-1) within 47 +/- 3 min; the mean half-life was 9.9 +/- 1.6 h. In hand veins preconstricted with phenylephrine, local infusion of substance P resulted in a mean venodilation of 56 +/- 8% and 49 +/- 6% (P = 0.91) before administration of SLV317 or placebo, respectively. SLV317 caused a substantial inhibition of substance P-induced venodilation, whereas placebo had no effect (P0.001). The maximum antagonizing effect of SLV317 averaged 95 +/- 8% and was observed after 1.47 +/- 00.24 h. Correspondingly, the mean area under the effect curve after administration of SLV317 [278 +/- 67% h(-1); 95% confidence interval (CI) 198, 358] was significantly higher compared with placebo (49 +/- 12% h(-1); 95% CI -24, 122; P0.001).This study demonstrates that the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist SLV317 is an orally active and highly effective antagonist of substance P-induced effects in humans.

A clinically important interaction between the cardiac glycoside digoxin and the antibiotic clarithromycin has been suggested in earlier reports. The aim of this study was to investigate the extent of the interaction and the relative contribution of different mechanisms.In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind cross-over design single oral doses of 0.75 mg digoxin with oral coadministration of placebo or 250 mg clarithromycin twice daily for 3 days were administered to 12 healthy men. Additionally, three of the subjects received single intravenous doses of 0.01 mg x kg(-1) digoxin with oral placebo or clarithromycin. Digoxin plasma and urine concentrations were determined by a highly sensitive radioimmunoassay.Oral coadministration of clarithromycin resulted in a 1.7-fold increase of the area under the digoxin plasma concentration-time curve [mean AUC(0,24) +/- SD 23 +/- 5.2 vs. 14 +/- 2.9 microg x L(-1) x h; 95% confidence interval (CI) on the difference 7.0, 12; P = 0.002] and in a reduction of the nonglomerular renal clearance of digoxin [mean ClRng(0, 24) +/- SD 34 +/- 39 vs. 57 +/- 41 mL min-1; 95% CI on the difference 7.2, 45; P = 0.03]. The ratios of mean digoxin plasma concentrations with and without clarithromycin were highest during the absorption period of clarithromycin. After intravenous administration digoxin AUC(0,24) increased only 1.2-fold during coadministration of clarithromycin.Increased oral bioavailability and reduced nonglomerular renal clearance of digoxin both contribute to the interaction between digoxin and clarithromycin, probably due to inhibition of intestinal and renal P-glycoprotein.

Aims Concentrations in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are a useful approximation to the effect site for drugs like morphine. However, CSF samples, are available only in rare circumstances. If they can be obtained they may provide important insights into the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of opioids. Methods Nine neurological and neurosurgical patients (age 19–69 years) received 0.5 mg kg−1 morphine sulphate pentahydrate as an intravenous infusion over 30 min. Plasma and CSF were collected for up to 48 h. Concentration time-course and interindividual variability of morphine (M), morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6 glucuronide (M6G) were analysed using population pharmacokinetic modelling. Results While morphine was rapidly cleared from plasma (total clearance = 1838 ml min−1 (95% CI 1668, 2001 ml min−1)) the glucuronide metabolites were eliminated more slowly (clearance M3G = 44.5 ml min−1 (35.1, 53.9 ml min−1), clearance M6G = 42.1 ml min−1 (36.4, 47.7 ml min−1)) and their clearance could be described as a function of creatinine clearance. The central volumes of distribution were estimated to be 12.7 l (11.1, 14.3 l) for morphine. Transfer from the central compartment into the CSF was also rapid for M and considerably slower for both glucuronide metabolites. Maximum concentrations were achieved after 102 min (M), 417 min (M3G) and 443 min (M6G). A P-glycoprotein exon 26 polymorphism previously found to be linked with transport activity could be involved in CSF accessibility, since the homozygous mutant genotype was associated (P

Bioavailability of orally administered drugs depends on several factors including active excretion, e.g. by P-glycoprotein (PGP), and presystemic metabolism, e.g. by cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A), in both gastrointestinal tract and liver. Many drugs including saquinavir are substrates of both PGP and CYP3A. It was the aim of this study to test whether the extremely low bioavailability of saquinavir can be increased dose-dependently in vivo by cremophor EL, an 'inactive' pharmaceutic aid known to inhibit PGP in vitro.In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, four phase cross-over design single doses of oral saquinavir (Invirase, 600 mg, without food) were administered with increasing single doses of oral cremophor EL (up to 5000 mg) to eight healthy, male individuals. Saquinavir plasma concentrations were determined by LC/MS/MS up to 48 h after intake. Main outcome measures were area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC), peak concentration (Cmax), time to reach Cmax (tmax) and terminal elimination half-life (t(1/2)).Cremophor EL dose-dependently increased Cmax, AUC(0,4 h), and AUC(0,infinity) of saquinavir. As compared with placebo, the increment observed after 5000 mg cremophor EL was 13-fold for both Cmax and AUC(0,4 h) and 5-fold for AUC(0,infinity). The terminal half-life and the time to reach Cmax (tmax) were unchanged.Cremophor EL increased the systemic availability of saquinavir without affecting its elimination suggesting that cremophor EL is not devoid of pharmacological action and acts as a modulator of the absorption process, probably by inhibiting intestinal PGP.

1. The enzyme kinetics of dextromethorphan O-demethylation in liver microsomes from three extensive metabolisers (EM) with respect to CYP2D6 indicated high (Km1 2.2-9.4 microM) and low (Km2 55.5-307.3 microM) affinity sites whereas microsomes from two poor metabolisers (PM) indicated a single site (Km 560 and 157 microM). Similar differences were shown for 3-methoxymorphinan O-demethylation to 3-hydroxymorphinan (Km 6.9-9.6 microM in EM subjects; Km 307 and 213 microM in PM subjects). 2. Dextromethorphan O-demethylation was inhibited competitively by quinidine (Ki 0.1 microM), rac-perhexiline (Ki 0.4 microM), dextropropoxyphene (Ki 6 microM), rac-methadone (Ki 8 microM), and 3-methoxymorphinan (Ki 15 microM). These compounds were also potent inhibitors of 3-methoxymorphinan O-demethylation with IC50 values ranging from 0.02-12 microM. Anti-LKM1 serum inhibited both dextromethorphan and 3-methoxymorphinan O-demethylations in a titre-dependent manner. 3. The Michaelis-Menten constant for dextromethorphan N-demethylation to 3-methoxymorphinan (Km 632-977 microM) and dextrorphan N-demethylation to 3-hydroxymorphinan (Km 1571-4286 microM) did not differ between EM and PM microsomes. These N-demethylation reactions were not inhibited by quinidine and rac-methadone or LKM1 antibodies. 4. Dextromethorphan and 3-methoxymorphinan are metabolised by the same P450 isoform, CYP2D6, whereas the N-demethylation reactions are not carried out by CYP2D6.

1. The disposition of the enantiomers of the antiarrhythmic drug flecainide has been studied in five extensive (EM) and five poor (PM) metabolisers of sparteine/debrisoquine after administration of 50 mg of racemic flecainide acetate under conditions of high urinary flow rate and acidic urinary pH. 2. In the EM subjects there were no significant differences in the oral clearance, half-life or urinary excretion of (+)-S- and (-)-R-flecainide. 3. In the PM subjects differences in the pharmacokinetics of S- and R-flecainide were observed. The oral clearance of R-flecainide (467 +/- 109 ml min-1) was less (P less than 0.03) than that of the S-enantiomer (620 +/- 172 ml min-1). The half-life of R-flecainide (12.9 h) was longer (P less than 0.03) than that of S-flecainide (9.8 h). The renal clearance of the two enantiomers was, however, comparable and similar to that observed in the EM subjects. The urinary recovery of R-flecainide (15.6 +/- 3.7 mg) was greater (P less than 0.03) than that of the S-enantiomer (12.0 +/- 3.7 mg). The enantioselective disposition observed in PMs is therefore due to greater impairment in the metabolism of R- than S-flecainide. 4. The urinary recoveries of two major metabolites of flecainide, meta-O-dealkylated flecainide (MODF) and the meta-O-dealkylated lactam of flecainide (MODLF) were lower (P less than 0.05) in PMs, 12.0% +/- 3.1% and 8.2% +/- 3.2% of the dose administered, respectively, than in EMs of 17.7% +/- 3.3% and 16.5% +/- 3.3%, respectively. 5. One PM subject had a greatly diminished flecainide metabolic capacity and a rare genotype, as assigned by Xbal RFLP analysis.